Pinned Tweet
“It should be our highest ambition to make [ourselves], first of all a property-holding, industrious, intelligent, virtuous citizen, and a Republican or Democrat afterward.” -Booker T. Washington
We should give Andy Beshear his flowers, too.
.@DemGovs' big wins just expanded Democrats' map for 2028, putting states like Iowa, Ohio, and Texas in play.
We proved that Democrats can win anywhere – and we should be fighting everywhere. newsweek.com/excusive-andy-b…
Read the second sentence, and you'll know what this is all about.
Replying to @DougJBalloon
Rare L from the pitchbot. Jeffries and Schumer have fought against all of the most popular candidates in state and local elections. Schumer ignored Nixon and cost us Florida. He endorsed Steven in Michigan and she endorsed the Republican. His Mills pick didn’t cost us anything but it shows how bad he is at this.
His approval rate is 13%. Jeffies is loathed among the base. Voters picked populists running on progressive platforms. They don’t want Schumer and Jeffries.
The Wizard of Tuskegee retweeted
Congressional Democrats scored their greatest electoral triumph in over 50 years on Tuesday. Here’s why the only logical next step is for all of their leaders to step down.
The Wizard of Tuskegee retweeted
I hope you're all enjoying the break from attack ads and political mailers as much as I am!
The final ballots are still coming in, and we'll know more on Tuesday. But the data so far is clear – we have the clearest path to victory.
Replying to @BookersGhost
You don't think we could have won a senate seat and governorship with more investment? Fuck we won in Mississippi. Moron.
I wish Jeffries and Schumer would give folks exactly what they want. Stand down.
Give them Leader Sanders and Speaker AOC.
It's time to force these people to produce something and end the alternative reality that they'd be so much better at the job than anyone else.
The Wizard of Tuskegee retweeted
Y'all called Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris bad candidates for losing... so let's keep that same energy. She was a shitty candidate that lost to a shitty opponent.
Replying to @WonderKing82
I looked at her very closely in FL and she was a good candidate. But this is Florida and she is DSA. So she started out with two strikes against her.
Yeah, Colom has lost me now. 🤷🏼
Asked whether he would support Chuck Schumer as Senate Democratic leader if elected, Mississippi Democrat Scott Colom said: “I don’t like that our party is represented by two people that live in the same borough.”
Colom, who was referring to Brooklyn-based Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, is leading Republican incumbent Cindy Hyde-Smith by 49.1% to 48.8%, ~2,500 votes, with 98% of votes counted. The race has not yet been called.
The responses to this are why Democrats are going to continue to lose the business lobby.
Just total animosity toward free enterprise from the White, far left members.
NEW: Chuck Schumer is preparing to lead the Senate with a network of former aides lobbying for private equity—including two former policy chiefs and his top health adviser. Their clients include Blackstone, Apollo, and the industry’s top trade group. readsludge.com/2026/11/06/th…
So did Jamie Davis and Angie Nixon, slapdick.
We had to send massive amounts of money to defend that short piece of shit because he's a fucking nutjob.
The misinformation and disinformation on this app are insane.
I said earlier leftists didn't know who Scott Colom or Jamie Davis were until Wednesday and now they've made him their entire personality because they think they can use his face to attack the Party.
The Wizard of Tuskegee retweeted
It’s just flat out dishonest to act as if we could know those would be close races. None of you were on here taking about Louisiana.
But now you’re an expert on what was known before the election?
Just dishonest noise
Fake performative bs.
"We could have won Florida" is the new "Bernie got robbed," I see.
Just completely made up.
Replying to @PatrickSvitek
We GAVE the GOP a seat in Montana and FL. We should have a filibuster-proof majority.






















