Pinned Tweet
Retail is dead? No. It’s only dead in downtown SF where CAR FREE is. Serramonte & Stones are packed. As locals, it’s sad that we can’t shop locally bc of crazy SF policies that’r anti-car anti-families anti-biz & pro criminals, closed/slowed street gangs, bike/transit/walkSF nuts
Bumbling Bay retweeted
He’s a spoiled little man who doesn’t scare a fly! We are not moved nor afraid!
Wicked evil @Scott_Wiener type morphing our communities without our consent, just like what they are doing with the @openthegreathwy.
Hayes Street’s future didn’t start with a closure permit.
The Market & Octavia Area Plan considered local commerce, walking, transit, loading and neighborhood circulation together.
How does today’s closure fit that vision?
Revisit the starting point: hvsafe.com/mos1
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Hayes Street’s future didn’t start with a closure permit.
The Market & Octavia Area Plan considered local commerce, walking, transit, loading and neighborhood circulation together.
How does today’s closure fit that vision?
Revisit the starting point: hvsafe.com/mos1
What’s up with Anthropic and closing Great Highway permanently? This connection together with @Scott_Wiener is very strange. AI against blue collars for sure. But why specifically Great Highway?!
Bumbling Bay retweeted
This is the people working "behind the scenes" with Stand with Joel. These are the same people behind the No on G campaign.
Notice any familiar names connected to PR agencies and active on Nextdoor? Some still are moderators. Many are affiliated with political connections and Bike Coalition. A few on Bike Advisory Committee.
1/2 🧵
Bumbling Bay retweeted
So No On G is now resorting to lawfare, trying to invalidate the proposition by appealing the slapdown they got in August. Sign of desperation? So it seems.
What a pathetic maneuver. If lawfare isn't for you, Yes On G sends the message loud and clear.
With just 5 days left before the November election, the Great Highway Compromise faces another legal challenge from Lucas Lux. As a Google lawyer, he knows very well how expensive these lawsuits are.
Lucas Lux's nonprofit, Friends of Sunset Dunes, has submitted a notice of appeal today challenging the court ruling that allowed Great Highway Compromise, Prop G, onto the ballot.
San Francisco voters deserve to decide with a vote, but Lucas Lux doesn't like that ordinary people have a say this November.
Lucas Lux is still trying to keep the Great Highway Compromise off the November ballot.
Why now? Likely because Lucas Lux has more than $500,000 left to burn in the next 5 days.
YES on G volunteers are still knocking on doors citywide, speaking with neighbors, and putting up signs. Every legal battle adds another burden to an effort sustained by ordinary people giving what they can.
I'm voting YES on G to allow the public with weekday access for everyone while preserving car-free recreation on weekends and holidays. That's a fair share.
Working families and commuters deserve reliable transportation, and San Francisco deserves a Great Highway we can share. 2-mile asphalt is not the entire 50-acre park. Share and Compromise.
Vote YES on G.
What's a compromise? greathighwayforeveryone.com/
Need a window sign? docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
Follow the money. campaign.sfethics.org/electi…
Bumbling Bay retweeted
WHY are @SFMTA_Muni and @RecParkSF LYING so much about the impacts of traffic from closing the Great Highway?
YES on G.
Bumbling Bay retweeted
🍌🍌🍌San Francisco is the odd one out.
While LA, Sacramento & San Diego require public hearings, formal findings & time limits for temporary street closures...
...at the direction of our Supervisor, SF earmarked $410,000 from a restricted Prop I fund to study making the Hayes Street closure permanent.
Full read: hvsafe.com/cvca
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Prop G campaign funding update 👇
• YES on G: $149,291.82 in contributions and $69,022.82 in reported spending.
• No on G: $1,610,469.50 in contributions and $1,103,191.71 in reported spending.
The No on G donor list includes:
👉Jeremy Stoppelman at $750,000.
👉Laura Yakovenko at $250,000.
👉Emmett Shear at $75,000.
Follow the money.
campaign.sfethics.org/electi…
Bumbling Bay retweeted
If you were to look at a map of San Francisco, it’s easy to see that cutting off the only western traffic corridor that allows commuters to avoid Golden Gate Park would increase congestion.
Instead of spreading out traffic evenly the permanent closure of the Great Highway has created concentrated bottlenecks in other parks that have roads such as Golden Gate Park, the Presidio, and many across the city. A weekday compromise could help elevate congestion and increase overall walkability in one of the most park friendly cities in the US.
Scott Wiener also passed SB 922 which allowed the road to park conversion work on the GH to move forward without a full Environmental Impact Report.
When you add that to the fact that the closure increased traffic in Golden Gate Park it makes you wonder how much the environment plays a role in the closure.
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Wednesday 10/21 6pm
What would normally be utilized by Sunset commuters is denied to allow 8 privileged people to walk on asphalt. I guess they are too good to walk on the sand or existing path. @SelenaC10705 @LarryQ6
Bumbling Bay retweeted
Scott Wiener also passed SB 922 which allowed the road to park conversion work on the GH to move forward without a full Environmental Impact Report.
When you add that to the fact that the closure increased traffic in Golden Gate Park it makes you wonder how much the environment plays a role in the closure.
Bumbling Bay retweeted
We can deal with this on weekends, but can we share access on weekdays? Keep San Francisco moving on weekdays, let people get to work and kids go to school.
Vote YES on G. Share and compromise.
And this 👇 multi-year project. sfpuc.gov/irving-street-and-…
The Wiener needs a defeat just like Joel Engardio for the permanent closure of the Great Highway. These are anti-humanity evils.
