RVB retweeted
Because these people are Communists.
Communists use elections to end elections. Communists use rights to end rights. Communists use freedom to end freedom.
RVB retweeted
Climate activists have just blown the lid off exposing their fraud.
I am told that the 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 in global mean surface [air] temperature (GMST) is computable without having an accurate or precise dataset of absolute temperature measurements. The trend that arises doesn't matter because the biases allegedly “cancel out.”
In any other scientific discipline apart from “climate science,” a scientist publishing using a compromised dataset that is used to guide policymaking would in fact have their research grant funds terminated, and perhaps their career too. Research misconduct.
It is imperative that in any scientific research used for informed policymaking, that the data is both accurate and precise. The instrumental GMST record is, well, neither, particularly prior to 1950. There are a lot of inhomogeneities in the spatial distribution of Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) stations and varying station period of records (PORs), changes to their locations, and urban heat island (UHI) effects. If the data is contaminated with UHI, and perhaps, let's say the average latitude of GHCN stations has shifted southward, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cannot be pinpointed as the culprit for a trend. Hence, the claim that a trend from poor data sampling is just as meaningful really holds no water.
Data “homogenization” is a commonly used form of quality control. Of course, corrections to data would require error bars be inserted, but that's not often plotted on GMST data. Homogenization to GMST data would, in theory, result in “warming” the past or “cooling” the present to rid of, say, UHI effects. But, this is exactly opposite of what is done. A case-by-case examination of individual GHCN stations shows that routinely, the past is adjusted downward, which inflates the warming trend. Below, I attached a GIF comparison of the measured vs adjusted temperature at Guira, Venezuela plotted by Tony Heller (@TonyCLimate).
While government scientists paint with a broad brush saying that adjustments to temperature data are for quality control purposes to account for potential [and documented] issues that I raised above, they have yet to explain why adjustments were made to specific, individual stations, and why a specific, X, amount of adjustments were made. A thorough case-by-case basis would be required, but none of the bureaucrats seem interested in offering up an explanation.
It should be very suspicious that adjustments almost always result in more “warming.”
RVB retweeted
"Study Reveals Bill Gates’ Fake Meat Causes ‘Turbo Cancers’ in Humans"
'Bill Gates’ lab-grown meat causes cancer in humans who consume it, according to a disturbing new study.'
"Synthetic meat has been heavily promoted by Bill Gates and the globalist elites at the WEF as the solution to so-called climate change. However, this fake food has now been shown to cause cancer via the immortalized cell lines used to manufacture it.
“Normal meat cells don’t just keep dividing forever. To get the cell cultures to grow at rates big enough to power a business, several companies … are quietly using what are called immortalized cells, something most people have never eaten intentionally,” Fassler wrote.
While immortalized cell lines “are a staple of medical research,” Fassler noted that these are technically pre-cancerous and can be fully cancerous at times.
“The problem is that the materials used to make the product – ‘immortalized cell lines’ – replicate forever, just like cancer. Which means, in effect, that they are cancer. Industry types are ‘confident’ that eating such products poses no risk. But it’s not difficult to see, even if the products are ‘proven’ safe, how people might be put off by the thought that they’re eating a glorified tumor.”
According to REN, the dangers of fake meat made using immortalized cell lines come from the fact that long-term safety data for its consumption are not yet available.
You shouldn’t be surprised. After all, it’s not the first time Gates has attempted to push an experimental product on the masses in order to generate enormous profits for himself and catastrophic results for the rest of humanity." Dmitry Baxter
RVB retweeted
Why Climate Scientists were Totally Duped into Believing Rising CO2 will Harm Coral and Mollusks.
Coral build reefs by producing limestone, or calcium carbonate. The great diversity of shell building mollusks, like clams and oysters, also build their shells out of calcium carbonate. So, scientists assumed that these organisms just pulled carbonate ions from the surrounding sea water and joined it with abundant calcium ions to make reefs and shells, a process referred to as “calcification”. Many scientists then expressed their heart-felt concerns that more CO2 will reduce the ocean’s carbonate ions and thus stress coral reef building and mollusk shell building.
Indeed, the increasing absorption of human produced carbon dioxide by the oceans can very slightly lower pH, or in other words, more CO2 increases the oceans’ concentration of H+ ions. It is also unassailable science that when CO2 enters the water, it interacts with water molecules to produce both H+ ions and bicarbonate ions. However, those H+ ions can then interact with carbonate ions and convert them to also form bicarbonate ions and reduce the pool of available carbonate ions. So, NOAA and hundreds of internet websites falsely told the world that “Ocean acidification slows the rate at which coral reefs generate calcium carbonate, thus slowing the growth of coral skeletons.”
However, climate scientists were apparently very ignorant regards the physiology of reef building and shell making. In order for charged ions to pass through an organism’s lipid membranes and enter its calcification chambers, a specialized channel or transporter is required. But for over a decade now, the search for carbonate transporters has failed to find any such transporters in any of these organisms. However, abundant bicarbonate transporters have been readily found and deemed important for making reefs and shells. (graphic B.)
From an evolutionary perspective, using the more abundant bi-carbonate ions is most logical. The higher amounts of carbon dioxide when mollusks and coral first evolved, would argue against using scarcer carbonate ions and using abundant bi-carbonate ions. And all those organisms already had the ability to absorb bicarbonate ions and transform it internally into carbonate ions for shell making and reef building by simply pumping out H+ ions.
When CO2 enters the oceans, over 90% of it converts to bicarbonate ions whether the oceans’ pH is acidic at pH 6 or basic at pH 9. In contrast, carbonate ions virtually do not exist when ocean pH approaches pH 6. (Graphic A.)
We can only hope that NOAA and those alarmist websites will soon admit that improved science has revealed the error of their ways, so they will now come clean and tell the public that CO2 has not threatened reef builders and shell builders. In fact, they should report that more CO2 generates more bicarbonate ions which are the real building blocks of shells and reefs.
RVB retweeted
A former airline captain named Philip Marshall wrote a book on 9/11 which highlighted various inconsistencies in the official story. Weeks after the book was released, Philip was found dead with 2 gunshot wounds, along with his 2 teenage kids and dog in his California home. According to a former NSA officer Wayne Madsen, this was "100% certain" a black ops hit, and the alleged murder-suicide is transparently absurd.
RVB retweeted
FREEMAN DYSON Emeritus Professor, Princeton Institute for Advanced Studies (2009)
THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING, THERE IS ONLY REGIONAL WARMING (AND IT'S A GOOD THING!):
"The change that’s now going on is very strongly concentrated in the Arctic. In fact in three respects, it’s not global, which I think is very important. First of all, it is mainly in the Arctic. Secondly, it’s mainly in the winter rather than summer. And thirdly, it’s mainly in the night rather than at the daytime. In all three respects, the warming is happening where it is cold, not where it is hot.
The people in Greenland love it. They tell you it’s made their lives a lot easier. They hope it continues. I am not saying none of these consequences are happening. I am just questioning whether they are harmful.
There’s a lot made out of the people who died in heat waves. And there is no doubt that we have heat waves and people die. What they don’t say is actually five times as many people die of cold in winters as die of heat in summer. And it is also true that more of the warming happens in winter than in summer. So, if anything, it’s heavily favorable as far as that goes. It certainly saves more lives in winter than it costs in summer.
So that kind of argument is never made. And I see a systematic bias in the way things are reported. Anything that looks bad is reported, and anything that looks good is not reported.
A lot of these things are not anything to do with human activities. Take the shrinking of glaciers, which certainly has been going on for 300 years and has been well documented. So it certainly wasn’t due to human activities, most of the time. There’s been a very strong warming, in fact, ever since the Little Ice Age, which was most intense in the 17th century. That certainly was not due to human activity.
And the most serious of almost all the problems is the rising sea level. But there again, we have no evidence that this is due to climate change. A good deal of evidence says it’s not. I mean, we know that that’s been going on for 12,000 years, and there’s very doubtful arguments as to what’s been happening in the last 50 years and (whether) human activities have been important. It’s not clear whether it’s been accelerating or not. But certainly, most of it is not due to human activities. So it would be a shame if we’ve made huge efforts to stop global warming and the sea continued to rise. That would be a tragedy. Sea level is a real problem, but we should be attacking it directly and not attacking the wrong problem."
RVB retweeted
TWO LEADING PRINCETON, MIT SCIENTISTS SAY EPA CLIMATE REGULATIONS BASED ON A ‘HOAX’:
"William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations aren’t based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong.
“The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen wrote. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule.
“All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data. The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”
Climate models such as the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times. To illustrate his point, he presented the EPA with a table showing the difference between those models’ predictions and the observed data."
RVB retweeted
The shattering of the climate hoax's "hockey stick":
Wharton statistician Dr. Abraham Wyner testified under oath today in @MichaelEMann v. Free Speech that Mann's "hockey stick" graphs were produced by "manipulating" data in a "misleading" manner.
Below are the hockey stick graphs from MBH 1998 (Nature), MBH 1999 (Geophysical Research Letters) and the IPCC Third Assessment Report.
They all helped build the climate hoax into what it is today. Now it is all on trial -- and under oath.
Dr. Wynder's blockbuster testimony for the defense continues tomorrow at 9:30 ET. Watch live at: dccourts.webex.com/wbxmjs/jo…
RVB retweeted
Very sad, a HS student was brainwashed to slam her own parents, just like Red Guard (I was a member) did during Mao's Cultural Revolution. Thank God, I did not publicly criticize my mom, but I did privately at home.
Warning: We are in the middle of American Cultural Revolution.
This is so sad… student at @LexRich5Schools slams her Conservative Christian parents at board meeting.
She warns against “book banning” and bashes Trump. She says she was inspired & influenced by her teachers.
Schools are indoctrinating students and turning kids against their parents.
RVB retweeted
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:
"I can very confidently assert, there is NO climate emergency."
“As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril. … atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.
The policies government have been implementing are total unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism.
Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system.
Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle.
I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency."
See slides from his talk on the thread below:
RVB retweeted
NEW: UFC champ Sean Strickland tells Canadian journalist to go "f**k" himself after the journalist tried asking a 'gotcha' question about the LGBT community.
🔥🔥🔥
"You're a weak f**king man. You're the f**king problem. You elected Justin Trudeau."
"The fact that you have no f**king backbone. [Trudeau] shut down your f**king country and seized bank accounts. You asked me some stupid shit like that. Go f**k yourself."
Video: @MMAJunkie
RVB retweeted
June 2022
JIM JORDAN: “When the government told us that the vaccinated couldn’t transmit it, was that a lie or was that a guess?”
DEBORAH BIRX: “I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way”
The govt promoted its fantasies as facts.
RVB retweeted
“I’ve never seen a vaccine like this,” testified pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan.
The shot Pfizer and Moderna offered us made the COVID situation worse.
According to a Cleveland Clinic study, the people who had the most shots had the greatest chance of contracting COVID.
“The lowest risk for getting COVID is if you’ve had zero vaccines. As you add vaccines, your risk of getting COVID goes up. I’ve never seen a vaccine like this. That’s not the basis of vaccines.”
RVB retweeted
INCREDIBLE
Tractors stretching as far as the eye can see.
German farmers are not giving up.
SHARE if you support the farmers
🚜🇩🇪🚜🇩🇪🚜🇩🇪
RVB retweeted
Super 40 second video illustrating nicely the absurdity of masks for virus transmission - blue masks don't even stop stray hairs blowing out around the edges, and don't start me on viruses!
RVB retweeted
"The whole problem of this global warming is a complete nothing," Dr. Willie Soon told Tucker Carlson.
He says he's 90% sure the sun, not carbon dioxide, is causing climate change and that the climate czars are so out of their minds that they are misleading the public.
"I really find that the whole problem of this global warming is a complete nothing, which means we should do nothing about it. Just go on and live life and adapt to it."
This message will never make the TV news. You should probably share it for others to see.
RVB retweeted
When Rebel journalist @TheMenzoid tried to interview Trudeau’s finance minister on a street, an officer physically blocks him & accuses him of assault. Menzies has done great surprise interviews including on Jessica Yaniv & the teacher w/prosthetic breasts.




























