'Perhaps the most influential climate science contrarian' (Nature). Trump EPA transition. Chairman, @HeartlandInst. Executive Director, @FreeEntProject.
Joined February 2009
- Tweets108K
- Following75
- Followers155K
- Likes1.6K
Pinned Tweet
13 million views. Even @ElonMusk commented.
Twitter tried to censor it but just wound up exposing (again) the lying nature of climate alarmism.
Added bonus: My explanation and warming prediction.
junkscience.com/2023/01/mill…
How about doing these things first:
1. Stop Communist China from owning land near military bases.
2. End military reliance on equipment from Communist China.
3. End vital infrastructure dependence on Communist China.
There are probably many other things that make sense to do from a national security standpoint vs. ensuring military bases in the US are self-sufficient. In fact, relying on local infrastructure would ensure that the military remains interested in the safety and security of local communities.
How will the rest of us survive? Just askin'. It's nice that our self-minded political leaders and the spend-thrift military want to ensure their own survival but they're supposed to serve and protect us, not themselves. How about smart national security policies vs. doomsday bunkers and supply hoarding?
How will the rest of us survive? Just askin'. It's nice that our self-minded political leaders and the spend-thrift military want to ensure their own survival but they're supposed to serve and protect us, not themselves. How about smart national security policies vs. doomsday bunkers and supply hoarding?
FORTRESS: The Pentagon is preparing every major U.S. military base to survive 90 days without outside support — no civilian power grid, no global supply chains, no outside fuel or water.
The initiative, revealed in documents reviewed by Fox News Digital, envisions portable nuclear reactors, massive battery storage, and microgrids that can disconnect installations from civilian electricity entirely. Strategic reserves of munitions, fuel, critical minerals, and medical supplies would be stockpiled based on wartime consumption rates. Civilian factories are being pre-identified to shift to defense production during a crisis.
Pentagon chief spokesperson Sean Parnell put it bluntly: "Power is combat now. Without electricity, you lose communications, water, logistics, assembly lines and just basic military command structures."
Full story here foxnews.com/politics/inside-…
'Fighting Against Ohio': Recall that Comrade Obama illegally and unconstitutionally wrecked the coal industry in Ohio. Though none of his anti-coal rules survived court review, he forced much of the industry into bankruptcy, just like he promised he would do in 2008. Miners, their families, and their communities and many supporting businesses were wrecked. Obama laughed all the way to the bank.
reuters.com/legal/government…
If NYTimes @maxinejoselow is going to claim that permitted industrial emissions are "toxic," she ought to show us the receipts. Where are the bodies? She can't because there are none, because the emissions are safe. Reasonably regulated industrialization is good for public health because wealthier people are healthier people.
nytimes.com/2026/10/24/clima…
NYTimes blowhard @tomfriedman is still raving about climate:
"We’ve changed the climate. We are the first species to actually drive itself into a basically man-made climate era. No species has ever done that before. That is a godlike act."
Right Tom, the climate doesn't change on its own. This graph of the past 485 million years shows a 20°C+/36°F+ variation in global surface temperature was driven by SUVs, coal plants and cheeseburgers.🙄
BTW, there are more people living healthier. wealthier and freer lives than ever before, thanks to emissions. The Earth itself is carrying more life than at any time in the past 20,000 years.
We have real problems, but emissions are not one of them.
nytimes.com/2026/10/25/opini…
Nope, a new study does not "demolish long-running assumptions about the safety of plastic":
1. There is no credible body of research that shows microplastics have caused any harm.
2. Since we've been using plastics, people have only gotten wealthier and healthier. That is the sole public health impact of plastic.
3. These researchers claim that their experiment showed that water degraded tiny particles of styrofoam over the course of 10 days. Even accepting the result at face value, I doubt the relevance of this study since the body is way more different and complex than a test tube containing water and other unknown lab conditions. Moreover, the body excretes ingested plastic as a matter of course.
4. Bottom line: There is no there there in the study results since ingestion of plastics is not linked with any harm.
washingtonpost.com/climate-e…
If solar is so cheap and makes so much sense, why doesn't every house in this Arizona suburb have roof-top panels? Are they just stupid?
PFAS are inert and harmless to the environment and humans. PFAS concentrations in the environment and consumer products are measured in "parts per trillion"—nothing is toxic at that level, let alone PFAS that are engineered to be non-reactive. Not to pile on, but the entire endocrine disrupter scare is also a hoax. Maybe @SenBooker should schedule sometime with me to be schooled on some toxicology reality.
New research found that 80% of national and 90% of New Jersey samples of water from lakes and streams had PFAS contamination. PFAS is linked to cancer, hormone disruption, developmental issues, and more. Meanwhile, Trump’s EPA is trying to weaken PFAS limits in drinking water.
environmentamerica.org/newje…
Don't forget: The UN admitted this week that Trump policy—i.e., end the climate hoax— would only hypothetically cause 0.1°C of warming by 2100. That is not even measurable.
The U.S was the world’s only major economy to see greenhouse gas emissions go up significantly last year. It happened as the Trump administration gutted pollution safeguards and forced dirty coal plants to stay running.
npr.org/2026/10/21/nx-s1-600…
"Clean energy projects" are expensive junk that only raise electricity costs, make us more dependent on Communist China, and harm the environment.
We can build large clean energy projects here at home, but we have to be able to do it faster.
ALT Cover image of a Vox article titled "How the biggest renewable energy project in US history finally got built." Below, it says "The SunZia wind farm is a marvel. Why did it take 20 years to build?" The background features stylized wind turbines with an abstract design in orange, black, blue, and white hues.
PFAS (so-called 'forever chemicals') in drinking water are measured in the parts per trillion. Not even botulinum toxin (the most toxic substance) would be toxic at that level in drinking water. But PFAS are engineered to be inert, in the first place. All the ongoing panic about PFAS has no basis in fact. EPA should have buried this scare long ago.
washingtonpost.com/climate-e…
Also: The US was able to prevail in WWII and become the lone global superpower by becoming the "Arsenal of Democracy." We could achieve that because there was no mindless EPA and no elitist NIMBY-ism to block it. We will not be able to maintain our superpower status or standard of living by becoming a giant national park. Permitted emissions from modern industrial facilities don't threaten local communities. This anti-industrial propaganda from the New York Times and others only helps Communist China, not any American.
Sorry NYTimes @EricLiptonNYT, there is no credible evidence that emissions of ethylene oxide cause cancer. The evidence for cancer is not close to compelling among heavily exposed 20th century workers. Local communities exposed to much lower facility emissions? Absolutely nothing. Keep in mind that 35-40% of people will be diagnosed with cancer over the course of their lifetime. That some people who live near industrial facilities get cancer is not indicative that their cancers were caused by the facility. This article is just more wreckless fearmongering.
nytimes.com/2026/10/24/clima…
Sorry NYTimes @EricLiptonNYT, there is no credible evidence that emissions of ethylene oxide cause cancer. The evidence for cancer is not close to compelling among heavily exposed 20th century workers. Local communities exposed to much lower facility emissions? Absolutely nothing. Keep in mind that 35-40% of people will be diagnosed with cancer over the course of their lifetime. That some people who live near industrial facilities get cancer is not indicative that their cancers were caused by the facility. This article is just more wreckless fearmongering.
nytimes.com/2026/10/24/clima…
I am all in favor of sending the federal government to the Moon, especially if it would take our $40.2 trillion debt with it. But Congress would then probably claim that the debt only weighs one-sixth of what it actually does, giving the welfare state a new lease on life.
apnews.com/article/nasa-arte…
It wouldn't be Halloween without party pooper greens:
"Every Halloween, costumes get their big moment. But every year, millions end up in a landfill after a single use, and many are made from synthetic plastics that don’t easily break down, contributing to environmental pollution."
Reality: Landfilling plastic is not an environmental problem—it's called waste management. That said, landfilling is a silly waste of land when the smart alternative is to burn trash for energy in modern incinerators. We used to burn trash before greens essentially ended incineration in favor of landfills. If you haven't yet figured this out: Greens are just crazy.
apnews.com/article/halloween…
'Net Zero' Update: "Oil production across the Western Hemisphere is projected to surge in the next decade as high prices justify investments in marginal projects. Chevron, for example, plans to put nearly $14 billion into Argentina over the next decade, tripling production there. Four out of five institutional investors say that disruptions in Middle Eastern markets have made them more likely to invest in Canada, according to a recent survey by ATB Cormark Capital Markets."
washingtonpost.com/opinions/…
Hail no! Should we go communist, hoping for smaller hail? Climate hoaxers have no idea how stupid they sound.
Yet another way climate change is costing Americans billions: "Hailstorms are becoming larger and more frequent, especially in the Great Plains. Their toll is soaring."
washingtonpost.com/nation/20…
Senator Outhouse💩needs to be emptied again. Just this week, the UN said that the effect of Trump's climate policies is worth an estimated-yet-hypothetical 0.1°C of warming over the next 74 years. More than merely trivial, it's not close to being measurable.
Steve Milloy retweeted
Tonight on @StacyOnTheRight 9pm-12am ET Fri 10/23
9:20pm @Michael_Mo14
10:05pm @JunkScience
11:05pm @kelsey_pritch
Tonight's Opening Verse: Galatians 6:2
Call In Now: 866-957-2874
sxm.app.link/Patriot sxm.app.link/StacyOnTheRight
#SOTR #RighteouslyAmerican
