If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever. George Orwell, 1984
Florida, USA
Joined November 2013
- Tweets6.7K
- Following2.4K
- Followers727
- Likes4.7K
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
I'm a Board Certified anesthesiologist and have been in practice for 24 years. I just learned that the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia where I trained has launched a program to increase flu vaccine uptake among children by vaccinating them while under anesthesia.
The program is called "Close your Eyes. We'll Immunize"
This is stunningly irresponsible. Here's why:
Anesthetists are extremely risk avoidant and endeavor to minimize patient exposure to anything which carries potential side effects. This is particularly true of pediatric patients who very often have never been exposed to anesthetic medications. We simply cannot know how an individual child will respond to these drugs for the first time.
Every single medication we administer during an operation can potentially trigger untoward or allergic responses. When this occurs our primary responsibility is to stabilize the patient. Our secondary responsibility is to identify the offending agent. There is absolutely no justification of introducing another agent, in this case a flu vaccine, which carries a risk of harm and contributes nothing to the success of the operation.
Some of the more common side effects of flu vaccines are fever (11-16%) and less commonly, a rash (1%). There is also an non-zero risk of severe allergic reactions and high-grade fevers which can develop over the course of minutes.
What if a child under anesthesia receives a vaccine and develops a rash and/or fever? Is it from the antibiotic that the surgeon requested? Is it from the narcotic? The anxiolytic? The barbiturate?
Anesthetic gases can also (rarely) trigger a life threatening response called Malignant Hyperthermia which commonly presents as a high fever. Without subsequent testing we cannot know which agent was responsible. Most commonly the testing is never done and the child’s record will forever reflect the possibility that some or all of the drugs which were used are responsible for their reaction. This makes future anesthetic care significantly more challenging and will require the use of alternatives which may not be necessary.
Advocating for a flu vaccine while a child is anesthetized reflects the pervasive yet inaccurate attitude among the medical establishment that vaccines are perfectly safe. I simply cannot believe that my mentors would have ever supported this initiative when I was a resident there. Close your eyes indeed.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
Port St. Lucie voted to remove Flock cameras from their county.
When they went to remove the cameras, they found 14 extra Flock cameras in their county.
They never authorized these cameras and don't know who installed them.
But if we had to guess, it would seem Flock itself put them up.
No one else could benefit, as the data these cameras collect only feed into the Flock network.
So we know with near-absolute certainty they put up the extra cameras; the next question is why.
If they only make money selling their subscription service, putting up free cameras makes no sense.
The only logical conclusion?
They make money selling the data.
So much money that it's worth putting up the cameras for free.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
The @FDA just approved an mRNA flu shot in which 23 subjects died in the mRNA arm, versus 9 in the traditional flu-shot arm. That product is now being tested in children.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
Now you can read what injection-injured people (and surviving relations) wrote in their V-safe entries. This is intensely powerful material. People not just statistics. 400 pages. Thank you @React19org for putting this together and trusting @brownstoneinst with the release. Please read and share. @SenRonJohnson brownstone.org/articles/crie…
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
For all the research I've done on Covid history, despite making it my life's work, I'm still at a loss in assigning direct culpability for what happened in hospitals all over the country. Who mapped this out, who gave the orders, who pushed this murderous program? teapawt.net/AaronSiriSG/status/210…
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
On the topic of splitting up the MMR vaccine into 3 separate vaccines, everyone should know that in 2012, two Merck virologists came forward and explained that around 2005 when Merck sought to change the label on its MMR vaccine and approval for ProQuad (a combination MMR and varicella vaccine), it “falsely certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it actually is.” (Complaint ¶ 1.)
As detailed in the whistleblower lawsuit, Merck obtained a license for its mumps vaccine in 1967. (Comp. ¶ 16.) In the late 1990s, to obtain approval for ProQuad and change the label on its MMR vaccine, Merck needed to reconfirm its claims of efficacy for its mumps vaccine made thirty years prior. (Comp.. ¶ 22.) Merck’s virologists working on testing the efficacy of the mumps vaccine revealed that after Merck could not demonstrate a 95% efficacy for its mumps vaccine, the results were simply fraudulently falsified to achieve this result. (Comp. ¶¶ 15-131.)
As explained by Merck’s virologists, Merck took blood samples pre-vaccinated with the mumps vaccine and then exposed them to the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 25-28.) When a test against a live strain of mumps would not yield a 95% efficacy, Merck tried to improperly obtain this rate using an attenuated strain of the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 29-30.) When this still would not achieve 95% efficacy, Merck tried different virus dilutions, different straining procedure, and even more liberal antibody counting techniques. (Comp. ¶¶ 31-32.) The Merck lab even improperly added animal antibodies to the blood samples and still could not achieve a 95% efficacy rate. (Comp. ¶¶ 33-39.)
When it was clear that even improper testing techniques could not produce the desired result, the test reports were simply falsified. (Comp. ¶¶ 40-51.) According to the Merck virologists, to document the desired efficacy rate, Merck destroyed result sheets and falsified various documents. (Id.) The Merck virologists claim this fraud was done with the direct authority and approval of Merck’s senior management. (Comp. ¶¶ 52-58.)
Now you know.
This may explain why outbreaks of mumps still regularly occur in highly vaccinated populations. See, e.g.:
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/m…(317 cases; 89% had received at least 2 MMR doses); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/m…(281 cases; high two-dose coverage among university-affiliated cases, with community spread); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/m…(301 student cases; all patients with complications had received at least 2 doses); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/m…(42 cases; all patients had ≥2 documented MMR doses; campus two-dose coverage exceeded 99%); cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtm…(29 cases; 76% had received the recommended 2 dose); cdc.gov/mumps/outbreaks/inde…(CDC: “experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people still get mumps…).
Complaint: icandecide.org/wp-content/up…
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
Lindsey Isaacs, a 23-year-old from Palm Coast, Florida, testified about being thrown into solitary confinement for more than three days after a Flock license-plate camera wrongly tied her Dodge Durango to a deadly I-4 crash.
Jail staff told her she had to stay isolated because of how serious the charges were. The cell door stayed locked for about 86 hours.
She said she was terrified she would spend the rest of her life in prison for a wreck she knew she hadn’t caused.
At her lowest point she didn’t want to live. She spent nearly two weeks in maximum-security jail before prosecutors dropped the charges.
Flock should be sued out of existence for this.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
Navy Veteran Flocked hundreds of times after filing a complaint against the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Department
-----
Napoleon Jones was illegally arrested by Deputy Shayhorn, and after spending 5 hours in jail, Jones was released without charges and filed a complaint against the department.
During litigation in his lawsuit, it was revealed that a lieutenant in the Waukesha Sheriff’s Department ordered hundreds of Flock searches of Jones’ vehicle, seemingly in retaliation for the filed complaint.
Jones filed a federal lawsuit on December 1, 2025, against Waukesha County, the Village of Lisbon, and Deputy Shayhorn. Jones’ lawsuit alleges violations of the 4th and 14th Amendments - unreasonable search and seizure, false arrest, lack of Probable Cause, and targeted retaliation and electronic tracking after filing a grievance.
Jones shared his story to the Milwaukee Fire & Police Commission (FPC) on Thursday, Sept 3rd, during their public comment on Flock cameras.
Many citizens have made it clear that they don’t want the MPD to use surveillance tools. Hundreds packed the room and the overflow room to deliver statements calling for a ban on all Flock cameras and an end to the surveillance state.
source: facebook.com/reel/1101613925…
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
Pssst... Did ya know that around '08 when more parents began choosing to separate their kids' MMR shots into 3 separate doses....
Merck pulled the separate shots off the market?
In other words: as more parents got educated about vaccine safety, Merck removed their ability to make this choice.
After about 40 years of the shots being available individually, just as vaccines became officially linked to brain damage (including autism) and to many other disorders via court cases, studies, and through whistleblowers... Merck removed the ability of parents to do the very thing that many experts said was safer.
The single shots are called “monovalent” as in measles-only, mumps-only, rubella-only.
Merck’s monovalent products were Attenuvax (measles), Mumpsvax (mumps), and Meruvax II (rubella).
Merck stopped making all three, citing manufacturing constraints and saying it would resume only if it wouldn't squeeze supply of the company's combo MMR shot.
Then, in October 2009, Merck announced it would not resume production of the monovalent shots, and formally discontinued them.
Merck claimed its decision was based on input from professionals, advisers, and customers. Merck said all of those people preferred the combo vax because it is one injection instead of three.
Merck maintained that, contrary to some experts, there is no medical reasons to give the shots separately.
President Trump has called for the MMR vaccine to be split into three separate single-dose vaccines administered at separate visits. Merck's response: it could take up to ten years.
The single-dose measles vaccine already exists. The Serum Institute of India is the world's largest supplier of monovalent measles vaccine. Japan produces a single-dose mumps vaccine. Merck is not being asked to invent anything. It is being asked to stop bundling vaccines that already exist in separate form and submit them for FDA approval individually.
The ten-year timeline is a delay tactic designed to run out the clock on this administration. An antitrust lawsuit decided just a few years ago revealed that Merck had falsified efficacy data for its mumps vaccine in a study called Protocol 7007, adding animal antibodies to inflate apparent efficacy and defend its claimed 95% effectiveness rate.
The judge noted on the record that Merck had sought to extend its monopoly by misrepresenting facts on FDA-approved drug labeling. Separating the MMR would require Merck to submit each component to independent placebo-controlled safety and efficacy trials. That is what they are trying to avoid.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
If you think *that* post stirred up the vaccine industry shills, wait until you see how they respond to this:
The govt (DOJ)/vaccine industry's chief expert witness that specialized in denying the vaccine autism link *changed his mind* based on advancing scientific knowledge. He said vaccines can cause autism, after all, in exceptional cases, and that he personally treated some. This is like the robber's best friend admitting his friend pulled the job.
If Dr. Zimmerman had come down the other way, the vaccine industry and their propagandists would declare it "settled science."
But since he came down the "wrong way" on this key issue worth so much $$$$, the vaccine cultists have bent themselves into pretzels trying to minimize him, his findings, spin it. See how they reply to this post for entertaining pretzel-ing.
The fact is: if vaccines triggered autism in one child with mitochondrial disorder, it's silly to conclude that's the only child on the planet it could happen to. Quite the opposite. Now that a biological mechanism is identified, it implies more instances. Perhaps many more. (Scientists say today mitochondrial dysfunction is more common than we knew when Dr. Zimmerman labeled it as a factor in vaccine-induced-autism.)
Secondly, many other predispositions can cause autism when triggered by vaccines, but the medical health establishment has made no public investment in identifying them.
For example, vaccine court and the government have acknowledged kids born with tuberous sclerosis also had autism triggered by vaccination. The government has paid awards to some of those families for that reason.
Hannah was described as normal, happy and precocious in her first 18 months.
Then, in July 2000, she was vaccinated against nine diseases in one doctor's visit: measles, mumps, rubella, polio, varicella, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and Haemophilus influenzae.
Afterward, her health declined rapidly. She developed high fevers, stopped eating, didn't respond when spoken to, began showing signs of autism, and began having screaming fits.
In 2002, Hannah's parents filed an autism claim in federal vaccine court. Five years later, the government admitted vaccines caused her autism, settled quietly before it could become a landmark case, and had it sealed.
CDC officials continued to call the vaccine-autism link "debunked" and a "quack" theory.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
Let China win the race to put every citizen inside a digital panopticon.
America should be racing toward greater liberty, privacy, decentralization, and human flourishing, not building some red-white-and-blue version of Beijing’s surveillance state.
Reject this narrative.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
🔥This from Rand Paul's latest documents is a huge and shocking data point, worth further investigation.
It suggests that the CIA and Pfizer knew they were lying to the public on the very need for a Covid shot at all. By the time of release, according to their own math, shared only privately, we would already have achieved herd immunity.
On May 7, 2020, CIA Chief Operating Officer Andy Makridis led a briefing with Pfizer's Scott Gottlieb. The CIA summary of the meeting: "On 'herd immunity' Dr. Gottlieb...believes nationally, the seroprevalence is about 20-25% which is insufficient for herd immunity at the R₀ (BRR) value of 3."
Screenshot attached. In the same time frame, he was telling the public it was low around 8%. Even 3.5 months later, August 16, 2020, he was STILL claiming a low seroprevalence rate nationally. Screenshots attached.
What this means: both Gottlieb AND the CIA KNEW early on that endemicity would be obtained by the time of the shot release. They lied in public while telling the truth in private. paul.senate.gov/wp-content/u…
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
This Asian man got a loaner car from Lexus
The vehicle is equipped with new eye monitoring cameras to make sure you’re paying attention to the road. Only one problem
Because he’s Asian the Lexus registers his eyes as closed…. Many people believe this is racist
Apparently this is caused by a computer-vision threshold problem. The camera’s software measures how open the eye looks. They do this by meaning the height of the visible opening between the eyelids relative to the width. If that opening drops below a set value for too long, it flags “eyes closed.”
Many Asian faces have a naturally narrower eye opening even when the eyes are fully open so this registers as being closed to the software
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
The Florida Department of Transportation has just revoked all permits it has previously issued for license plate reading cameras, such as Flock, in the right of way of any state highway and will not issue new permits.
Agencies have 30 days to remove the cameras.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
I combed through hundreds of videos since the 1970s and put together this compilation
Either we give the politicians, bureaucrats, and the activist class trillions of dollars and shut down the economy tomorrow or we're all gonna die
50 years of climate grift
Enjoy
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
I wasn't familiar with any of these scandals that I ended up covering at CBS News until they assigned me to investigate some medical-related stories including the planned re-start of the smallpox vaccine after 9/11.
At the time, it wasn't controversial to explore medical risks. In fact, back then, it would have been odd and unjournalistic to turn a blind eye to it (like so many do now).
I never dreamed I would learn what I did about the medical establishment and federal agencies misleading us on so many levels in ways the injured and killed people.
And after many of us began heavily covering these issues, the industry/establishment successfully gained near total influence and control over the media and other forms of information dissemination.
Taken together, it's probably the biggest story of a career.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
The Left: Wanted lockdown mandates, contact tracing apps, and vaccine passports.
The Right: Wanted voter ID, REAL ID and license plate reader cameras on our streets.
Free Thinkers: Want government to stop tracking us, stop scanning us and leave us the hell alone.
Not_My_New_Normal retweeted
Look at the code WIRED pulled from Flock’s own servers. Flock built an AI tool called OS Investigate.🚨👀
It accesses "commercial databases that contain Social Security numbers, dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses, relatives and associates." It also accesses "police case files, 911 dispatch logs, and commercial identity records." The prompts can generate dossiers ("workups") on people based purely on driving patterns, without a crime, a plate, or a name. It Can identify drivers, track patterns, find "witnesses," generate suspicion based on behavior without a target. Code was found publicly on Flock's website. 🚨
Flock is performing automated, suspicionless background checks (pulling SSNs, DOBs, relatives) using commercial databases on citizens who have committed no crime, have no warrant, and are not named in any case file. The trigger is purely an AI algorithm flagging their driving pattern.
🚨
NO officer initiates the search for the suspect, Flock's AI essentially acting as the investigator, but doing so through commercial data brokers. Flock pulls consumer reports without a permissible purpose.
⚠️⚠️
Why did Flock build OS Investigate? Because selling LPR cameras is a hardware game with limits. Selling an "AI investigator" is a high-margin SaaS play. To justify the valuation ($1B+), they need to monopolize the investigative workflow. To do that, they fused LPR data (which they hold) with police records (CJI) and commercial data (SSNs). ⚠️
Why are they doing this? Because Flock’s hardware is a commodity. The cameras are just metal on a pole. The real valuation the nearly $1 billion in venture capital is in their proprietary datasets. To justify that valuation, they have to build a total surveillance map of America that links physical movement to full digital and financial identities. They cannot legally buy that data on the open market because of the FCRA. So they built an AI to force the police to pull it for them. Flock gets the fused data, the police get the dossier, and Flock gets to declare the new AI-generated identity maps as "Flock Property" under their contracts.
⚠️⚠️
Flock is using the police as a legal shield to run unauthorized mass identity resolution queries for their own proprietary training and profit. The "perpetual license" terms gives Flock ownership of these AI-generated dossiers. They are building a national private surveillance database of SSNs linked to movement patterns, bypassing the FCRA by routing the queries through police terminals.🚨
Now look at their new August 2026 "Trust" updates. They announced a reduction in data retention to 7 days, but they created an exception called "Evidence Mode" where searched data is preserved instead of aging out. 🚨
Here is the trap. If they actually deleted data in 7 days, their AI prompts which ask for people "arrested more than twice in two years" would not function.🚨
The AI needs a multi-year historical window to track patterns. "Evidence Mode" is the backdoor they built to force all searched data into permanent retention so their AI can keep running. The 7-day retention is theater for the city councils. The permanent retention is the actual product.🚨
And the Audit Assistance" they say is to catch police misuse? It is a complete deception. The audit logs track the police officer. But the AI generates the lead before the officer interacts with the system. The AI does the suspicionless searching in the backend. The officer just clicks the prewritten prompt. The audit log captures the officer clicking a button, but it does not capture the unauthorized API calls Flock’s AI is making to the commercial databases to pull the SSNs. They built the logging system to cover their own corporate trail.🚨
wired.com/story/flock-safety…
