GUCCI GIFT
@MariahCarey marks the start of the festive season in a new video directed by Harmony Korine.
Music: 'All I Want For Christmas Is You' Performed by Mariah Carey and Written by Mariah Carey, Walter N Afanasieff
Discover more on.gucci.com/GucciGift26_
#MariahCarey #GucciGift
Natalie Portman es mucho más que una actriz de Hollywood.
A los 12-13 años debutó en Léon: El Profesional (1994) y se convirtió en una de las caras más reconocibles del cine.
Podría haberse quedado en los focos, las alfombras rojas y los cheques de estudio.
En cambio, eligió el camino más difícil.
Mientras filmaba las precuelas de Star Wars como Padmé Amidala, se fue a Harvard.
Se graduó en Psicología en 2003. No pausó la carrera del todo, pero sí redujo el ritmo a propósito.
Años después protagonizó Cisne Negro, se llevó el Óscar a Mejor Actriz y demostró que la educación no la frenó: la potenció.
Para entonces ya tenía fama, dinero y prestigio.
La mayoría en su posición se habría quedado ahí.
Ella empezó a pensar en propiedad.
Invirtió en empresas de comida plant-based y sostenibilidad (Oatly, La Vie, startups de proteínas alternativas y agricultura vertical como Bowery).
Una de las apuestas más conocidas del sector, Impossible Foods, llegó a valorarse en miles de millones y puso la Impossible Whopper en Burger King.
El mensaje era claro: el capital bien colocado sigue trabajando cuando tú no estás delante de una cámara.
Pero su movimiento más audaz fue aún mayor, en 2020 co-fundó Angel City FC, el equipo de fútbol femenino de Los Ángeles de la NWSL.
No solo invirtió: ayudó a construir el club desde cero junto a otras ejecutivas.
El equipo se convirtió en uno de los más valiosos de la liga y en 2024 se vendió una participación de control que valoró el club en 250 millones de dólares.
Hoy sigue vinculada como cofundadora.
Además creó su productora MountainA y mantiene uno de los contratos de embajadora más sólidos de Hollywood con Dior.
La lección que ella misma ha demostrado es simple y brutal:La fama genera atención.
Los premios generan prestigio.
La propiedad genera riqueza que sigue funcionando aunque dejes de trabajar.
Mientras muchos perseguían el próximo papel o el próximo titular, Natalie Portman construía activos. Actriz, estudiante de Harvard, inversionista y cofundadora de un equipo de fútbol profesional. Pocas trayectorias combinan talento artístico con esa claridad estratégica.
¿Crees que más gente del entretenimiento debería copiar este modelo, o es un caso excepcional?
Chloe✤ retweeted
Steve Jobs died of cancer in 2011.
His son Reed is now running a VC firm with one goal: to make cancer non-lethal in his lifetime.
It's called Yosemite, and it's not a normal fund:
• Oncology only, which is ~40% of biotech
• Grants university labs no-strings-attached money to de-risk early ideas
• Builds about a third of its companies itself, with academics at places like Yale, Berkeley and Stanford
• Fund 1 backed 20 companies. Fund 2 is oversubscribed, above its $350M target, with AbbVie and Amgen as partners
Asked what his father would tell him today:
"Stay on the path… This is a long-term play that is going to take my whole life."
And the hardest part, in his words:
"I'm an impatient guy… But the discipline is knowing that that is what this really takes."
Patience isn't a personality trait. It's a decision you keep making.
Chloe✤ retweeted
When Iron Man randomly started singing with Sting
Sting approved “Every Breath You Take” because he wanted to hear Robert sing it.
Chloe✤ retweeted
Listening to Bach’s Air on the G String feels like letting your mind slowly settle, your worries gently fade, and everything fall into harmony with the music’s peaceful flow.
Chloe✤ retweeted
A lot of upper middle/upper class women feel this way. The myth of the “wealthy man” marrying a submissive “trad wife” just isn’t what functionally happens. Most men in that position do want to partner who’s an intellectual/social equal so she often is also highly educated and would be bored by the monotony of 24/7 childcare. Many women who could stay home but don’t tell me it makes them better moms to have something of their own and they feel more committed/present in the evening hours having had the working day. I’m giving no firm opinion on this of my own, just noticing and naming it, but the online right seems to increasingly be disconnected from this affluent suburban group of people. Many of them do vote Republican too but they don’t want to “retvn” they want their daughters to go to elite schools as much as their sons and they want to live their lives the way this post describes.
Replying to @ladyloodeeloo
My husband makes 500k-750k. We own our house outright. We have no debt. My kids college funds are done. I still work. I have never had any desire not to, though I have worked from home for the entirety of my kids lives.
I don’t like early childcare. It’s very tedious, isolating, frustrating, boring. I simply have no desire to do it for more than 6 hours a day. After every weekend, I am glad Monday is coming because I don’t have to mind small kids for the entire day.
I would quit my job to homeschool my children age 5+, but I do not want to deal with them all day every day when they are 4 and under.
Chloe✤ retweeted
A ‘hello world’ milestone for Project Suncatcher 🚀
After launching our prototype satellite a few weeks ago, we’ve now successfully sent a command up to orbit, booted up the TPU, ran the prompt, and received our first complete response back on earth - a haiku!
Chloe✤ retweeted
I joined @GoogleDeepMind to develop a research program on the economics of AGI. Today, together with Andrew Koh (@andrewjkoh) and Shane Legg (@ShaneLegg), we are incredibly excited to release The Economics of Intelligence, the first in a series of projects from our group on how AGI will change the economy.
How do capability improvements transform the economy, and when? In this project, we define thresholds of economic capabilities, e.g., minimal AGI, based on how they transform the economy. We then track how the economy–market structure, employment, and wages–changes during the transition across capability regimes.
We have seen exponential increases in what AI agents can do but the broader economy seems almost remarkably unchanged. Part of the reason is that the solo AI agent is the wrong economic object; economic transformation is an equilibrium outcome where organizations compete. Looking at how intelligence functions within organizations, transformation will depend on when two key capability thresholds are crossed: competence (gains on individual skills, e.g., coding, math) and coordination (gains on ability of agents to cooperate and work together).
We show that what economic transformation looks like depends on whether AI becomes supercompetent, supercooperative, or both—the regime of artificial superintelligence (ASI). Tracking this transition shows why the real visible transformation may come from improvements in coordination—a capability most benchmarks don’t yet track. Past a certain threshold, AI capabilities can break the Coasian ceiling on firm size and lead to an economy that looks drastically different than the one we see today.
Two main takeaways:
1. To understand the path of transformation, we should be tracking agentic coordination more closely.
2. The impact of AI will likely show up in wages before market structure or employment.
We are really excited about this paper. Excited to hear people’s thoughts.
Link: institute.deepmind.com/essay…
Chloe✤ retweeted
🇯🇵 Cate Blanchett at the 36th Prince Takamatsu Memorial World Culture Press conference in Tokyo, as this year's Praemium Imperiale laureate by the Japan Art Association for her work in the Theatre/Film category | 27 October 2026 @JAPAN_Forward_
#CateBlanchett #PraemiumImperiale
Chloe✤ retweeted
🗓️ November 19, 2026 will mark the first public event of Cate Blanchett's tenure as Cameron Mackintosh Visiting Professor at Oxford University where she'll join Jude Kelly, CBE, for a conversation on creativity, risk, and the role of disruption in the artistic process.
Chloe✤ retweeted
This is f*cking insane. Nobel Prize winner and DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis:
"One person who really understands AI will outperform an entire startup team
In 5 years, the people who build with AI will run whole companies with a tenth of the headcount"
In this 1-hour talk, Hassabis explains who survives the next 5 years and who doesn't
Prompts → Agents → Workflows → Automated Departments
Understanding AI doesn't mean typing better questions into a chatbot
It means chaining agents into workflows that run entire departments on their own
95% of people still use AI like a calculator, the 5% who treat it like infrastructure will run everything
Worth more than any $2,000 AI course
Watch it today, then save the full harness engineering guide below before everyone catches up ↓
Chloe✤ retweeted
Your brain cannot do three things at once. Switching back and forth between your work, your texts, and your open tabs leaves your mind half-interested in everything. Pick one single target. Give it your full attention. A focused mind is dangerous, whereas a scattered mind gets nothing done.





































