All-in $TSLA OG since 2019. Subscribers unlock DM access + short and long-term Tesla takes and archived posts.

NFA
Joined August 2013
$TSLA cheat sheet >20x trailing 12-month revenue = overpriced 13-20x = expensive 8-12x = fair priced 5-7x= cheap <5x = bargain basement prices
38
58
21
663
423,218
Selling most of your $TSLA to buy $SPCX before a merger? You might regret it. My best guess? This gets presented as a 50/50 valuation ratio. Equal market caps, both companies walking in on equal footing. At today's prices that's $1.48T vs $1.91T. TSLA gets marked up ~30% to meet SPCX. SPCX gets no premium. The swap only wins if there's no deal or TSLA gets a worse ratio. Holding 99% TSLA - no risk, no reward 🔥🚀
10
1
81
4,804
Tesla's 10-Q says 'disinterested directors' will decide a multi-trillion dollar deal. Funny choice of words 🤣🤣 Legally it means no stake in $SPCX so the people setting the price answer to $TSLA holders, not Elon. That's the part that matters.
SpaceX's new Q3 10-Q puts the Tesla combination in writing for the first time. Its board formed a special committee "to evaluate a potential combination," and any deal would need approval from that committee, the SpaceX board and its controlling shareholder. Tesla's 10-Q frames it differently: a committee of disinterested directors exploring "deepening Tesla's relationship with SpaceX," with a business combination as one possible path and any necessary shareholder approval at the end. Neither company has reached a decision, and both say there is no assurance a transaction happens. Side-by-side of the exact filing language below. d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.ne…
2
19
1,455
Just laid out the ideal $TSLA 🤝 $SPCX scenario for subs. Some of my best posts live behind the lock and stay there 🔒👀
You're unable to view this Tweet because it's only available to the Subscribers of the account owner.
2
340
The wild thing I think many are missing? $SPCX holders won't need to vote on a merger with $TSLA Wait what? Yup. SpaceX's 10-Q says it needs approval by its "controlling shareholder." That's Elon. Which is why TSLA holders are the ones who need convincing 👇
$TSLA 🤝 $SPCX Elon is walking a tightrope right now, and it's not a knock on him. It's just incentives. SpaceX holders aren't the hurdle. He has voting control there. Tesla holders are. A merger needs 50% of ALL outstanding shares. So SpaceX has to look like the crown jewel. But oversell Tesla and the price goes up. Undersell it and the vote gets harder. That's why today we heard "not a certainty" and "no guarantee." Nobody follows incentives better than Elon. Watch the messaging 👀
6
1
66
3,472
Christopher Dungeon retweeted
Tesla shareholders might get the convincing deal they’re looking for in a Tesla-SpaceX merger 🧐 Compare the 10-Q language: 🚕 Tesla: "any necessary shareholder approval" 
🛰️ SpaceX: "further approval by…our controlling shareholder" Musk's super-voting shares make him SpaceX's controlling shareholder. So if a deal clears both special committees, Tesla holders are the ones who need convincing, after years of a flat stock price Could that mean a sweeter deal to get Tesla shareholders to say yes? 🤔
17
6
2
104
7,388
$TSLA 🤝 $SPCX The biggest funds own way more TSLA than SPCX. The chart shows share count. A TSLA share is worth ~2.6x an SPCX share, so in dollar terms: - State Street: ~28x more TSLA - Vanguard: ~18x - Geode: ~13x - BlackRock: ~11x Fidelity is the exception at ~3x more SPCX. These are the votes that decide a merger and they'll want a fair premium Since August, TSLA has traded roughly 25-35% below SPCX in market cap. A ~30% premium closes that gap almost exactly. My guess? That's not a coincidence.
1
5
36
2,024
$TSLA 🤝 $SPCX We've seen this movie before: SolarCity, 2016 Then: - Elon on both sides of the deal - He recused himself - First offer: a 21-30% premium - 85%+ of shareholders other than Elon voted YES - Shareholders still sued for years. Elon won in Delaware's Supreme Court in 2023 Now: - Elon on both sides again - Recused again - Special committees of independent directors at both companies this time That last part is the lesson learned. Independent committees set the price, then holders vote. My take? It's slower but it's built to survive a lawsuit. And a 30% premium is right at the top of where SolarCity started.
10
1
2
169
19,711
Not here to say I told you so. $TSLA ran into earnings, then gave it back. Down ~2% today after dipping ~4% premarket. Calls bought for the pop got crushed while shares just rode it out. We all get ahead of ourselves thinking short-term gains never end. I've done it too.
Friendly reminder before tonight's $TSLA Q3 earnings... Don't get greedy with short-term options. We've run into this countless times. TSLA can 180 into a buy-the-rumor, sell-the-news reaction real fast. It's ok to take some off the table. Let shares do your heavy lifting 🍻
3
25
2,432
$TSLA got 7 price target raises this morning. Zero cuts. Zero downgrades. - Piper Sandler: $475 (Overweight) - Mizuho: $460 (Outperform) - Canaccord: $442 (Buy) - JPMorgan: $430 (Neutral) - UBS: $425 (Neutral) - Morgan Stanley: $410 (from $400) - CLSA: $400, upgraded from Underperform to Hold TD Cowen reiterated Buy at $460. Goldman stayed Neutral at $360. My take? Wall Street saw what it's buying: 75%+ FSD attach rate on new North American deliveries, positive free cash flow, and the biggest backlog in 4 years 🔥🚀
13
56
4
409
12,899
$TSLA's problem isn't demand. It's batteries. Straight from the Q3 deck: battery availability was "the limiting factor in increasing auto volumes." The receipts: - Delivered 486,532 but only produced 464,391. Cars sold faster than they could be built - Largest passenger vehicle backlog in 4 years - More than 75% of new North America buyers added FSD My take: deliveries down 2% YoY isn't a demand story. It's a supply story. And Q3 2025 was a tough compare. Buyers rushed in before the $7,500 federal EV tax credit expired on Sept 30, 2025, pulling demand forward into that quarter. Down just 2% against that, with no tax credit and limited batteries? That's strength 🔋🔥
2
8
1
64
3,341
Christopher Dungeon retweeted
The growth story continues... $TSLA @elonmusk
41
84
14
916
29,947
Whoa 🤯 Tesla app on iPhone Duo looks great.
15
1,692
Elon on merger talk during today's call? Said everything he needed to yesterday 🤐 Special committees are working on it. He's recused. $TSLA 🤝 $SPCX
4
54
3,157
Christopher Dungeon retweeted
436
913
141
6,894
763,857
$TSLA Q3 highlights worth knowing 👇 - Robotaxi unsupervised miles up 8x in the quarter to ~2M - Cybercab capacity in Texas: 125K+ a year - Optimus production started on Fremont's high-volume lines - Active FSD subs: 1.74M (+67% YoY) - 75%+ of new North America deliveries include FSD - FSD now approved in 9 EU countries - Auto margin ex-credits: 18.1% (vs 15.4% a year ago) - Free cash flow back positive: $1.53B - Cash: $45.4B - 10 millionth vehicle delivered - Largest order backlog in 4 years Operating income fell 56% as R&D jumped 69%. My take? That's the price of building AI, Optimus and Cybercab, not a demand problem 🔥🚀
41
2,005
I was way off 🤯 Now >75% in North America. $TSLA
55% of new $TSLA vehicle sales in the US for Q2 selected the FSD option at point of sale. This number will increase to 60-65% for Q3.
2
38
2,017
Active $TSLA FSD Subscriptions now 1.74M That's up 67% yoy 🔥 And 75%+ of new North America deliveries now include FSD 🤯🤯🤯
4
56
2,175
Was 1.48M at the end of Q2
6
597