
Eating vegan food somewhere ; Promoting health food magic; Mediocre basketball player once upon a time; #designnerd
Los Angeles, CA
Joined September 2012
- Tweets11K
- Following5K
- Followers602
- Likes48.3K
Connor Garrity πͺπ± retweeted
Tearing down all the data centers and replacing them with Criterion Closets.
Connor Garrity πͺπ± retweeted
We need antitrust immunity! We need copyright immunity! We need to IPO to make our risk systemic!
The law canβt apply to us or weβll bring down the economy with us!
Anthropic's S1 reveals that the company considers copyright law a massive risk.
It says: "If we cannot rely on the fair use doctrine to access copyrighted work for training our models, we may be required to pay significant fees to obtain a license to such training data or our ability to further develop our models [...] and distribute models trained on such data at issue could be adversely affected."
Adverse rulings "could require us to retrain affected models from scratch at substantial cost."
It notes that the copyright questions around AI training have not been resolved in the US, and that other countries don't even have 'fair use'.
There is hope yet.
Not a good thing, for two companies with questionable ethics as well
Connor Garrity πͺπ± retweeted
Maybe working on your unconscious is helping people youβve never met
Wrote a few months ago how desperate they are for better quality data, and more discerning customers. Currently, majority of DD Grocery customers make under 75k.
Link-
connorgarrity.substack.com/pβ¦
Exclusive: DoorDash is in advanced talks to buy food-delivery rival Instacart on.wsj.com/4eAGdmT
Relevant to SV and the need for AI, so they can feel cool and relevant and rich, even if everything goes to slop
Many not so great people can be very nice, but are incredibly insecure and their dark energy roots not from a place of malice, but from needing to do literally anything out into the world to minimize their insecurities, no matter the cost to others.
The consensus take is that Elizabeth Holmes is indeed a master manipulator, but the more interesting thing the movie explores is that people who do bad things rarely view themselves as bad people. Rather, they operate under layers of cognitive dissonance, self-deception, and rationalization
This disconnect is the central plot point and it drives Nathan and the rest of the crew insane because of how unshakable and earnest the belief in their mission are
Connor Garrity πͺπ± retweeted
I now see the danger in βhumanizingβ AI with human names and human qualities. Millions of people do not have the cognitive sophistication to handle this and millions will have deep AI psychosis in five years. I believe AI should be presented in a sterile UI as much as possible
We believe voice is the most natural way to interact with intelligence, so we created Dessa, the most authentic full-duplex speech model ever built. Talking with it feels like talking with a personβ¦full of emotion, nuance, pauses, and a natural cadence.
block.xyz/dessa
Curious why besides Barcode which went bankrupt, none of these hydration or energy drinks have any luck getting high profile nba players and other visible, prominent athletes on board.
Side note, love Leisure project, but the name is literally lesiure not athletics for a reason
2011, all of 15 years ago, first college basketball game, remember how cool was that I could see score of game on my nokia phone's roaming internet.
Seeing score on sportscenter bottomline felt like the pinnacle akin to internet fame. Now bottomline/SC is paid no mind.
Coop like organizations for basic food & needs will make a major comeback
.@jayleno says the middle of the consumer market is disappearing, from cars to hotels to restaurants.
"The middle is dead."
"I see Porsche moving upscale and they want to be like Ferrari."
"Everything is that way now. With hotels, you're either at the Motel 6 or the Four Seasons."
"Restaurants are either fast food or top end restaurant."
"We have no middle class anymore."
Connor Garrity πͺπ± retweeted
Someone could probably write a book (if they havenβt already) about the cycle of technology productizing the removal of friction in the name of convenience only for us to discover that the friction was a load-bearing part of the social compact.
Someone told me he thinks dating apps are bad because they let you access connection without having any motion in your life. Normally meeting people requires going out into the world, entering new scenes and navigating unfamiliar situations. You have to be living a life that brings you into contact with other people. Dating apps let you order connection without doing any of that work
Connor Garrity πͺπ± retweeted
Palantir's merch feels like the endpoint in streetwear's evolution, which started with young kids in urban areas βΒ mostly ethnic minorities from low-income families βΒ creating their own style from the ground up. Over time, that aesthetic was co-opted by luxury brands seeking "authenticity." And now, by a surveillance company seeking cultural capital.
Streetwear used to be an aesthetic defined by the ground-up by people were disempowered in political and economic life, but engaged in actual street culture. Now it's an aesthetic dictated from the top down by giant corporations with no conenction to such cultures. And used by political and economic elites who want to appear as outsiders.
This is also why big food platforms Doordash, Uber, etc. actually are kind of screwed eventually imo as have zero trust with local partners, drivers hate them, and consumers are meh
i strongly donβt subscribe to the idea that personal ai agents will monetize through ads.
the entire value of a personal agent comes from the user trusting that it is acting in their best interest.
that trust starts to break the second recommendations are influenced by whichever advertiser pays the most for placement.
a much more likely model is that agents monetize through the transactions they drive.
i predict that eventually a massive commerce network gets built that aggregates merchants and funnels agentic spend through one layer.
that network negotiates discounted pricing and merchant-funded rewards, then distributes those economics back to the agents driving the transaction.
consumers get better deals and agents get paid without needing to charge users a monthly subscription.
we already see versions of this model today:
card networks like Visa created an economic layer where banks earn revenue every time a consumer makes a purchase and a transaction flows through their network (known as interchange).
a similar layer will eventually be built specifically for agentic commerce.
if personal agents end up influencing trillions of dollars in consumer spend, the company that becomes the default transaction network will become insanely valuable.
every agent plugs into it, merchants compete for access to demand, and the network that sit in the middle takes a cut of the economics.




























