Red obsessed, perpetually stressed. Dont trust , DYOR.
→
Joined January 2021
- Tweets467
- Following44
- Followers6.4K
- Likes363
First CoinDCX. Now Bithumb.
Centralised exchanges keep asking users to trust them with their money and personal data, but when security incidents happen, users are left with more questions than answers.
Bithumb has confirmed unauthorised access to its internal mobile groupware system and is investigating whether customer information was compromised.
Meanwhile, CoinDCX has been dealing with questions following the $15.99 million loss from its old wallets.
Different incidents, same question: how safe is your data when you hand it over to a centralised exchange?
The irony? These platforms want you to complete KYC, submit your personal information, and trust their security systems.
But when something goes wrong, suddenly it's phishing warnings, security updates, and requests for patience. 💀
Centralised exchanges want your money, your personal data, and your trust. But who's holding them accountable when things go wrong?
It's time to explore decentralised exchanges like Hyperliquid and Lighter, where you can trade onchain without handing custody of your funds to a traditional centralised exchange.
Take control of your funds instead of blindly trusting a centralised exchange.
CoinDCX has dropped another update, and honestly, the more they post, the more questions users have.
First, $15.99 million goes missing. Reports of a hack are dismissed as a “false alarm.” Days later, the loss is acknowledged.
Then comes a phishing warning. And now, a post thanking users for their patience while announcing backend upgrades.
Sumit Gupta, users aren't asking for thank-you notes. 💀
You say deposits, withdrawals, and trading are running smoothly. Great. But what about the questions users have been asking since this incident?
What exactly went wrong? What has changed since the $15.99 million loss? And what guarantees do users have that their funds are safe?
Telling people to stay vigilant against phishing emails doesn't answer questions about exchange security.
And saying you're strengthening your systems is nice, but users deserve to know why those systems needed strengthening in the first place.
You can't keep asking users to trust you while giving them generic updates instead of clear answers.
@smtgpt, less PR. More transparency. That's how you rebuild trust.
To everyone in our community who wrote to us, questioned us, or simply stayed, thank you. We’ve been reading every message.
Last week was hard, and many of you told us plainly that you wanted to hear from us more often and more clearly. That feedback is fair.
Here’s what’s happening right now:
- We’re strengthening our systems: Our teams are working on the backend to tighten how our wallets and infrastructure are managed. Most of this happens quietly in the background, so you shouldn’t notice it.
- Some upgrades may need short maintenance windows: When they do you will hear it on our app/website only.
- Your trading experience remains unaffected: Our deposits, withdrawals & trading systems have kept running smoothly through all of this, and we intend to keep it that way.
We’ll keep posting updates here as this work progresses. If anything is unclear, or something isn’t working the way it should, reach out to us.
As informed earlier, be vigilant towards phishing emails and do not click on them.
Thank you for holding us to a high standard. We intend to meet it.
Sumit Gupta, CoinDCX users can't catch a break.
First, $15.99 million goes missing. CoinDCX dismisses reports as a “false alarm,” then admits the loss days later.
Now, CoinDCX is warning users about phishing emails and fake notifications targeting exchange users.
And we're supposed to believe this is all business as usual?
How do scammers know who to target? Where are these users' details coming from? Has customer data been leaked?
@smtgpt, people trusted CoinDCX with their money AND their personal information. They shouldn't have to wonder whether their data is safe every time another security warning drops.
The $15.99 million incident already raised serious questions about transparency. Now there's another security concern, and users still need answers.
Stop telling users to be careful and start explaining what's actually happening.
CoinDCX users aren't asking for another safety advisory. They're asking whether their money and data are safe.
Sumit Gupta, address the questions. Silence and generic warnings won't rebuild trust.
We’re aware of a phishing campaign in which unofficial notifications and emails are being sent to users, urging them to click external links.
Please do not click on any unverified links, connect your wallet, or enter account details on any site that isn’t the official CoinDCX platform.
We’ve also seen similar reports from other exchanges, and our teams are working with them and investigating the same.
What to remember:
✅ CoinDCX will never ask you to share private keys or seed phrases
✅ We will never ask for your OTP
✅ We will never send links asking you to withdraw funds
⚠️ Do not trust any link that leads outside the official CoinDCX app or website.
Stay safe, and rely only on our official app, website, and verified channels. We’ll share updates as the investigation progresses.
A Chinese AI lab just revealed numbers that could change how you think about the AI business.
DeepSeek has open-sourced its inference engine, and the economics behind running AI are getting REALLY interesting.
But here's the question: if AI is this cheap to run, why are OpenAI and Anthropic still operating at a loss?
Let me explain.
First, you need to understand three things.
GPUs are AI chips manufactured by companies like NVIDIA and AMD. Multiple GPUs are connected and housed together in a rack. Multiple racks combine to form a cluster.
DeepSeek has a cluster with 2,400 GPUs.
Now, every time you ask ChatGPT or another cloud-based AI service a question, your prompt and the response are processed as tokens. That's what much of the AI industry charges for.
Here's where it gets interesting.
DeepSeek recently revealed real-world inference numbers. According to the reported figures, a single cluster serves 155 trillion tokens per day.
And a single GPU generates almost $38 in revenue per hour.
These are off-peak figures. During peak hours, that revenue reportedly nearly doubles.
And according to researcher Yichun, even if you rent NVIDIA's latest B300 chip, the economics can still be surprisingly interesting.
But here's the catch: revenue is not profit.
Running AI isn't just about paying for GPUs. These companies also have to cover infrastructure, electricity, networking, data centres, model training, research and development, engineering teams, and the cost of serving millions of users.
And then there's the subscription problem.
A $20 ChatGPT subscription doesn't mean every user costs OpenAI the same amount. Some users barely touch the service, while others run intensive workloads all day. Heavy users can consume significantly more computing resources.
So even if inference becomes cheaper, that doesn't automatically mean the entire business becomes profitable.
But DeepSeek's approach raises a much bigger question.
If inference costs keep falling and open-source models keep getting better, will companies like OpenAI and Anthropic be able to justify their subscription prices?
Or will AI eventually become so cheap to run that today's pricing models stop making sense?
The real AI race isn't just about who builds the smartest model. It's about who can serve intelligence at the lowest cost and turn that into a sustainable business.
“A single cluster currently serves 155 trillion tokens/day, generating $38 in revenue per GPU-hour (at off-peak pricing).”
Huge flex from DeepSeek. Not only did they open-source their inference engine, but they also open-sourced their revenue numbers.
They didn't disclose which GPUs they're using here, but DeepInfer supports both NVIDIA Blackwell and Huawei Ascend.
Even assuming they're renting B300s at $7 per GPU-hour, that's ~82% gross margin.
Sumit Gupta, please don't follow the same playbook as your blood brother @gauravdahake, who denied the hack for a year.
People have genuine questions here.
CoinDCX said these wallets hadn't been in use since the July 2025 incident. But Bitquery's analysis suggests funds were still moving through them in October 2026.
Now Tether has frozen around $2.2M in USDT linked to the $16M outflow.
If there's a clear explanation, share the wallet addresses and transaction details. Don't just ask people to trust your statements. Show the evidence and clear the air.
🚨 India is becoming a superpower day by day. 🇮🇳🚀
At least, that’s what the PR tells us. Your portfolio, however, seems to be living in a different India. 😂
📉 Nifty Smallcap 100: Down 7.3% in a week.
📉 Nifty 50: Down 2.4%.
🛢️ Brent crude: Nearly $114 a barrel.
🏦 10-year bond yield: 7.47%, the highest since March 2023.
The Nifty is already 14.3% below its January peak.
Expensive oil means a bigger import bill, pressure on the rupee, higher costs for businesses and more pain for consumers. Rising bond yields can make borrowing more expensive, too.
Meanwhile, foreign investors are pulling money out, and small-cap investors are taking a much harder hit.
Of course, global markets are under pressure. India cannot control everything happening in the world.
But isn’t that exactly why economic planning and preparedness matter?
You can’t control global oil prices, but you can strengthen energy security. You can’t force foreign investors to stay, but you can build an economy that gives them reasons to invest.
When the market rises, it’s India’s achievement. When it falls, suddenly it’s all because of global factors.
GDP growth? Credit to the government.
Stock market rally? Credit to the government.
Expensive oil? International problem.
Foreign investors exiting? Market dynamics.
And we’re still busy selling the dream of becoming Vishwaguru.
If crude stays above $110 and 10-year bond yields remain above 7.4%, small-caps could continue to underperform the Nifty 50 through November.
Maybe the market will bounce back. But a few green candles won’t magically fix expensive energy, rising financing costs or weak corporate earnings.
India may be becoming a superpower day by day.
Could someone please inform the stock market and the common investor?
The vision is bullish. The PR is bullish. But the portfolio? Not so much. 😂📉
Indian crypto exchanges have a unique business model. 😂
Gaurav Dahake (BitBNS): Your money is yours. You can withdraw ₹5,000 a day. Please calculate how long it will take to recover your own money.
Sumit Gupta (CoinDCX): We want to build trust. First, let us explain a $44.2 million security breach and a new $16 million controversy.
Now comes the interesting part. 👇
I've heard rumours that Gaurav Dahake is driving a Ferrari in Dubai. I couldn't independently verify that, so take it as an unverified claim.
But BuyHatke, the shopping platform associated with him, is certainly getting attention.
Dhruv Rathee. Nitish Rajput. Mohak Mangal. The Deshbhakt.
BuyHatke sponsorships have been tracked across major YouTube channels. SponsorRadar lists 34 tracked sponsorship deals across 26 channels.
BuyHatke seems to know how to get its brand in front of millions of Indians.
Meanwhile, BitBNS users are still asking when they can access their money.
The marketing is moving. The withdrawal questions aren't going away. 💀
And then there's CoinDCX.
According to Business Standard, CoinDCX's total traded value fell 37% year-on-year, from ₹23,497 crore in H1 2025 to ₹14,664 crore in H1 2026.
Its registered user base actually grew by 15.8%.
So the problem isn't that nobody has signed up. The question is whether the product and trading experience are compelling enough to keep traders active.
In my opinion, CoinDCX needs to do much more to win serious traders on product quality, execution, fees and overall experience.
Here's the irony:
→ BitBNS users want answers about their withdrawals.
→ BuyHatke is getting promoted by some of India's biggest creators.
→ CoinDCX's reported trading value is down 37% year-on-year.
→ And Indian crypto users are expected to trust these platforms with their hard-earned money.
Dear Gaurav Dahake and Sumit Gupta, marketing can buy attention. Influencers can bring users. But neither can replace trust.
When money is involved, users need more than a good brand and a support ticket. They need transparency, accountability and a product that actually deserves their trust. 💀
CoinDCX is not the only Indian exchange people should be worried about.
In my opinion, BitBNS is one of the biggest crypto failures India has seen, and nobody is talking about it enough.
Here is what I know 👇
→ BitBNS users have had withdrawals capped at ₹5,000 a day since May 2025. That's about 1.5 years (526+ days).
→ People's hard-earned money is stuck. Some have lakhs, some have crores sitting there.
→ Every day I see people in the comments asking the same thing: "When will withdrawals happen?" No real answer. Just automated replies from support.
→ BitBNS hid a ~$7.5M hack in 2022 and called it "maintenance". Users found out much later.
Now compare this with WazirX.
→ WazirX got hacked in 2024 and lost about ₹2,000 crore.
→ They still communicated, went through a court-approved process, and returned ~85% to users.
→ BitBNS users have not got their money back in full. Not even a clear timeline.
Meanwhile, the founder @gauravdahake is still running @BuyHatke.
→ BitBNS and BuyHatke sit under the same legal entity: Buyhatke Internet Pvt Ltd.
→ BuyHatke's Chrome extension has about 1M users.
→ Sponsor trackers show 30 YouTube creators and 92 sponsored videos for BuyHatke.
→ It's being promoted by India's top creators, like @dhruv_rathee and @nitishrajput.
So I have some simple questions:
→ Where did the user funds go?
→ How is BuyHatke being run while BitBNS users can't withdraw?
→ Are user funds being used to run BuyHatke? I want an answer.
→ How are they paying the biggest influencers in India, but can't pay back users?
→ Where is the communication, @bitbns?
→ Why is there no real investigation?
→ The Delhi High Court refused a CBI/SIT probe and called it a "private commercial dispute".
→ The ED raided Buy Hatke in June 2026 over cross-border crypto transfers.
→ BitBNS is facing 200+ court cases.
To me, this feels like people's money being looted in broad daylight while the business carries on as normal.
How do these guys sleep at night?
If your money is stuck on BitBNS, comment below. Let's make some noise.
“Dear Prime Minister Ambani…” 🇮🇳
Remember when Elon Musk sarcastically called Mukesh Ambani the “real boss of India”?
Well, look at what’s happening now.
Initially, reports suggested that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio would bypass Delhi and PM Narendra Modi to meet oligarch Mukesh Ambani directly at Reliance’s Jamnagar refinery.
But why is Jamnagar so important?
The answer is Venezuela.
Venezuela has enormous oil reserves, but much of its crude is extremely heavy and difficult to refine. You need specialised infrastructure to turn it into usable fuel.
And India has exactly that.
Reliance’s Jamnagar refinery is one of the largest and most sophisticated refining complexes in the world.
Now look at the bigger picture.
The war in Ukraine, rising tensions in the Middle East and disruptions to global energy supplies are putting pressure on the oil market.
The US wants to increase Venezuelan oil production, but extracting oil is only half the job. Someone still needs to refine it.
This is where India becomes important.
The US has the oil. India has the refining capacity. And Mukesh Ambani sits right at the centre of this equation.
Think about the geopolitical implications.
A private Indian company has the industrial infrastructure that could help address a major challenge in global energy markets.
And when that infrastructure becomes strategically important to the world's largest economy, its owner naturally becomes an important figure in international affairs.
This brings us back to Musk's remark.
Was “Prime Minister Ambani” just a joke, or does it raise a bigger question about the influence of India's biggest billionaires?
Because in geopolitics, power isn't just about who runs a country.
Sometimes, it's also about who controls the infrastructure the world needs.
What do you think?
#India #Geopolitics #energy
What happens when a country's people turn against their own government? Albania could be the next big test for Europe. 🇦🇱
Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama is facing growing pressure as anti-government protests escalate. But the interesting part is how this whole situation began to grow into something much bigger.
One of the major flashpoints involves coastal development projects linked to Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law.
Albania has a beautiful coastline, and these projects have raised concerns about environmental damage and the influence of wealthy investors.
People have started asking a simple question: Why should the rich and politically connected get special treatment while ordinary citizens have to follow the rules?
And this is where the story goes beyond real estate.
When people are already frustrated with corruption, inequality and a lack of accountability, one controversy can become a symbol of everything they believe is wrong with the system.
Soon, the anger is no longer just about one project. It becomes about the government itself.
But why should the rest of Europe care about Albania?
Albania is a NATO member, located in the Western Balkans, across the Adriatic Sea from Italy. Political instability there matters beyond its borders, especially given the region's strategic importance and Albania's relationship with the US and its ambitions to join the European Union.
But there is another factor worth watching: the power of Gen Z and social media.
A local issue can turn into a nationwide movement in a matter of days. Videos spread, people organise, and grievances that once seemed isolated become part of a much bigger protest.
That's how anger over one issue can turn into a challenge to an entire political establishment.
Of course, protests don't automatically bring down governments. What happens next depends on public support, political opposition, institutions and how the authorities respond.
But one thing is clear: when people lose trust in their government, the consequences can extend far beyond the original controversy.
And if governments respond with greater surveillance, internet restrictions or excessive force, they risk making that distrust even worse.
Albania's story raises a bigger question for Europe: what happens when a generation stops trusting the system it's supposed to inherit?
Trump has made so much money over the past year that even if you added up the net worth of every president America has ever had, it still wouldn’t come close.
But do you know where this money came from? Corruption and insider trading, both of which this guy is allegedly engaging in right out in the open.
Look at the pattern.
On June 18, Trump reportedly bought around half a million dollars’ worth of Boeing stock ($BA). On that same day, the US Navy awarded Boeing a contract worth $880 million.
Then Trump invested in SpaceX ($SPCX), and shortly afterwards, NASA awarded SpaceX a contract worth around $400 million.
And this isn’t something new. We’ve been seeing a similar pattern during the war as well.
For example, when Trump announced a ceasefire with Iran on April 7, he sold his ExxonMobil stock ($XOM). The very next day, ExxonMobil’s stock fell by 6.5%.
In fact, Trump made more than 1,000 trades in June alone, and every single one of them benefited some company or another. The complete list is in the comment section. You can check it out later.
But do you know what’s even more shocking?
All of this is legal in America.
Compare that with a dictatorship, where these kinds of things happen behind closed doors. Ordinary Americans can’t do much about it because the law that prevents government officials from engaging in such conflicts of interest doesn’t even apply to their own president.
Isn’t that ironic?
There is a law in America that prevents government officials from trading stocks in companies they influence. Reports suggest that this law does not apply to the president. Here is the pattern that has been publicly disclosed:
June 18, 2026 — Trump bought up to $500,000 in Boeing stock. On the same day, the US Navy awarded Boeing an $880 million contract.
June 23, 2026 — Trump bought up to $50,000 in SpaceX stock. On the same day, NASA reportedly awarded SpaceX a $425 million contract.
April 7, 2026 — Trump announced a ceasefire with Iran and sold $500,000 to $1 million in ExxonMobil stock. The next day, ExxonMobil’s stock fell by 6.5%.
August 18, 2026 — Trump bought $1 million to $5 million in SpaceX debt. Two days later, Trump signed a policy expanding US commercial space launches.
August 21, 2026 — Trump bought up to $25 million in Meta stock, plus $1 million to $5 million each in Netflix, Chevron, AT&T, and ConocoPhillips.
You can find more details on CapitolMarkets.
Article: Investigation: Trump’s June 2026 Stock Trades — All 1,051, Line by Line.
Guys, I think we should start talking about something most people in crypto probably aren't thinking about right now.
If you are trading on Hyperliquid(hyperliquid:native ),Lighter(ethereum:0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 ), or any other perp DEX, using DeFi regularly, or keeping your funds on Ledger / Trust Wallet, this is worth understanding.
I am not saying ECDSA is going to break tomorrow. It hasn't, and there is no evidence that someone today can simply take your public key and recover your private key.
But I don't want to completely ignore the recent progress in AI and mathematics.
The interesting part is not just quantum computing anymore. There is also a possibility that AI systems become good enough at mathematics to discover things that humans have simply missed for decades.
And if someone eventually finds a practical way to attack the mathematical assumptions behind elliptic curves, the impact on crypto would be massive.
Again, this is a possibility, not something that has happened.
I don't think people should panic and start moving everything around because of one post or one researcher making a prediction.
But there are some simple things we can do anyway.
If you are holding a large amount of BTC for the long term, using fresh addresses and avoiding unnecessary address reuse is just good practice.
If you are trading perps on Hyperliquid or Lighter, I personally wouldn't keep my entire portfolio in the same wallet that I use for trading.
Keep your trading capital separate.
Keep your long-term holdings somewhere else.
And if you are using Trust Wallet or another hot wallet for DeFi, having a separate wallet for experimenting with new protocols is probably one of the easiest things you can do.
Because honestly, today I am much more worried about someone clicking a fake link or signing a malicious transaction than AI suddenly breaking ECDSA.
People connect their wallets to random websites, approve unlimited spending, sign things they don't understand, and then blame the wallet when something goes wrong.
Ledger can protect your private key.
It cannot protect you from signing something malicious.
So I don't think the right reaction here is panic.
Just be a little more careful with where you keep your funds and what you sign.
Crypto is still very early, and we don't know what the next 5–10 years will look like.
Maybe ECDSA remains completely fine for decades.
Maybe quantum computing becomes the bigger threat.
Maybe AI discovers something nobody expected.
Nobody knows.
Anyway, something worth thinking about.
DYOR Daily.
Sayonara.
Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash.
Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase).
Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets.
IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster).
Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot.
Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time?
Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.)
Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once.
Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case.
I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026).
Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS.
Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security.
The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.
The “Piranha Effect” is real in Web3.
Many lost heavily in past cycles.
Then came the Oct 10 crash:
liquidations, panic, exits.
But the real loss wasn’t money.
It was psychological.
They didn’t just lose capital.
They lost the willingness to act.
Now markets are stabilizing.
New narratives are forming.
Opportunities are back.
But they don’t return.
Not because they can’t see.
Because their brain learned:
Crypto = Pain
This is learned helplessness.
Rugged once → stop trusting
Liquidated → stop trading
Bought the top → stop investing
Even when conditions improve.
Meanwhile, new players enter.
No baggage. No fear.
They take the same risks.
They capture the upside.
Markets don’t just transfer money.
They transfer conviction.
From those stuck in the past
to those acting in the present.
The wall is gone.
But most are still reacting to it.
The real edge in Web3 isn’t alpha.
It’s how fast you reset.
DYOR. Reset. Execute.
Why the Iranian regime is unlikely to fall by June 30.
polymarket.com/event/will-th…
There’s a lot of talk that if tensions rise enough, the regime will collapse.
But this market isn’t asking whether pressure increases. It’s asking whether the Islamic Republic actually stops governing.
For it to resolve “Yes,” the system itself has to be replaced.
Not just a new leader.
Not internal reshuffling.
Not reforms.
The core structure would need to go — the Supreme Leader’s office, the Guardian Council, the IRGC’s role under clerical authority — and a clearly different government would need to take control.
Even a coup wouldn’t qualify if the same framework stays in place.
In other words, this isn’t about instability. It’s about a complete break in continuity.
That’s a high bar.
Based on those rules, “No” is the more likely outcome.
NFA. DYOR DAILY.
Why Khamenei cannot be killed (at least not that easily).
U.S. and Israeli sources say he was killed in the Feb 28 strikes.
Many people think it’s confirmed.
There is still no official confirmation from Iran.
Iran’s Supreme Leader is not someone without protection. He has tight security, protected locations, and multiple layers of guards around him at all times.
He’s the top authority in the system.
If he was truly killed, we would likely see clear signs:
– An official statement from Iran
– A successor announced
– A clear transfer of power
So far, none of that has happened publicly.
Iran also has strong ties with Russia and China. In a situation like this, early warnings and information sharing are possible.
A strike hitting a building does not automatically mean the person inside was killed.
Until there is clear and official confirmation that he is out as Supreme Leader, it remains unproven.
That’s why the bet is NO 👇
polymarket.com/event/khamene…
NFA. DYOR DAILY.
Why aliens don’t exist (yet).
The U.S. is reviewing and releasing more UFO/UAP files, and many think confirmation is coming.
We don’t see it.
Here’s why.
There is still no proof of even a single extraterrestrial cell.
NASA has shown that Mars once had rivers. Europa likely has a salty ocean. Enceladus contains organic molecules the building blocks of life.
That’s habitability.
Not life.
It’s like finding a house with food in the kitchen. That tells us someone could live there. It doesn’t prove someone does.
Until there is physical, verifiable biological evidence, no government will officially confirm alien life.
That’s why the bet is NO 👇
polymarket.com/event/will-th…
Life may exist somewhere in the universe.
But proof?
We’re not there yet.
What would change your mind?
We’re focused on @pacifica_fi — it’s the only Perp DEX we’re trading on right now.
Start here 👇
app.pacifica.fi?referral=DYO…
Instead of jumping between multiple projects, we prefer to stay consistent with one and understand it properly.
> Mobile app is coming soon.
> Points season is active.
> Some users are steadily building their position.
Traders are earning perp points through alt pairs like $SOL, $HYPE, and $BNB; rotating pairs, watching OI, and avoiding wash trading.
FDV at launch is uncertain. It could be small or large.
We’re here for the process and positioning.
Invite codes in the comments.
DYOR Daily 🤝
EY9Z6YER7K397FY6
188FYHSMTA7FB3FG
VA233TAS57AXYFDN
WC3MYCK85CM2XXSC
09PKFJGSVKWJGNHF
VKC4F80FQ530JMGW
29K521VEK7RXD8WF
M0V8RA09ERGQ3XFG
RNPR91J835XSP2TS
KTBFV10Z7NAHB4VX
8RBSZ8YF0NAVKWRV
EF23VDJM2M0FW9XD
WGCF1H1JGQGX6TCY
G395W2B6XJ155WV1
GGJPBDWE7PH43B4Y
FTWY5K27C27BQ6RW
Q5T5WRCGA7A0BQ2H
EA3TEK4FJ8JZYSZS
5PJSY58PKBA7X3M7
VVS0VPG9DW94HYW0