Danny (@DannyNLdn) profile picture

Social worker. Human being besides. AFC. Common sense. Occasionally bites at bait for fun. If I just laugh you’re beyond debate.

Joined October 2022
Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)Photo by Danny (@DannyNLdn)
Your demented Arsenal opinions make me do this
1
299
This is really poor by @FA. The governing body is supposed to protect players. It should be disputing this regulatory commission verdict by members drawn from the FA judicial panel. Max Dowman could have suffered a bad injury to his standing leg from a dangerous challenge which went unpunished. Arsenal 16-year-old shouldn’t have reacted but his frustration was understandable. Some other players might have rolled around and ensured a bad challenge was punished. Dowman didn’t. He doesn’t stay down. The FA should have shown some understanding towards Dowman. Instead, it has suspended him for three games. FA priorities all wrong: tolerating a poor challenge and some weak refereeing but punishing a kid who objected to a bad challenge that could have dealt him a serious injury. Protect players. #AFC
1,631
1,916
367
10,604
1,632,114
We’re governed by actual idiots
Labour economics hurt working Brits. As usual. Listen to this guy
18
Danny retweeted
I think it’s about more than the red. Arteta probably saw this as Max’s tournament - it was likely a big part of the club’s plan to develop him this season and I’d imagine Max had been told that.
1
8
631
So easily a pointless staggering of a young man’s career
Fundamentally illogical but these scenarios are always, always officiated in a fundamentally illogical way.
25
My attempt at discussing what has driven violent riots & wanton destruction in France (not without interruption). I was also reacting to unhelpfully labelling Kemi Badenoch's mention of challenges of migration y'day, as a Trump-like dog whistle #PoliticsLive
638
1,086
105
7,513
434,842
UAE bots are out in force, spreading their false narratives. The terrible financial state of English clubs is nothing to do with a “red cartel”. It’s because non-commercial clubs like Man City / Chelsea artificially inflated the market and the rules are too crap to address it.
66
180
9
1,472
41,020
Not massively enjoying my first outing as a Liverpool fan
19
43
2
1,396
24,556
Danny retweeted
𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗶𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝘁-𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗰𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻?
61
521
34
2,872
95,207
Silva, Tevez, Toure, Zaboleta, Otamendi, Aguero, Milner, Joe Hart, Nasri, Walker, Mahrez, Sagna, Adebayor, Clichy. All made TOTY during that period at least once. The last EIGHT were in TOTY for other clubs and then instantly bought by City. And then there’s the next 8 years.
Replying to @Londonblue_2
So, I asked Grok how many City players on average from 2008 to 2018 made Premier League Team of the season, and the answer is 1.3 and how many Players of the season in that time, and the answer is 1 - Vincent Kompany who cost 6 million in 2008. Merson is the worst pundit on TV
47
Arteta just bought a dog and hired a pickpocket
I watched the F1 film with Brad Pitt the other day, and there’s a moment where his character asks to add something to the car that isn’t really in the rules. The FIA punishes it, but the team can still race with the earlier car. It made me think. In F1, the best teams live at the edge of the regulations. Sometimes the FIA allows what they’ve found, and sometimes it says that goes too far. Occasionally the rules are rewritten afterwards. Now, City. I’m not defending them. A commission found they entered into sham agreements and broke the spending limits. A sham is an arrangement that isn’t what it claims to be, so that’s a different thing from using a gap nobody had spotted. City deny it and will appeal. But I find it useful to ask/reflect on how people inside the club see it. From their point of view, PERHAPS they believe they were doing what elite competitors do: looking at the rules, finding the limits, challenging interpretations and moving faster than the regulatory system. From the outside, you might look at that and say, “That’s cheating.” From inside the organisation, they might say, “We found something nobody had thought of.” If you believe you’ve found a way to bring money in, more or less within the rules (and the commission said it was not in the rules and it was cheating), you might tell yourself you’re just being a sharp competitor. We are all asking “did City cheat?”. But I find this question interesting too: “how did City come to believe they weren’t?” And understanding a mindset, or trying to, isn’t excusing it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Manchester City were found guilty of 114 out of 115 charges by an independent commission. The comparison made is not in the same ball park to the level of rule breaking Man City have committed. premierleague.com/en/news/472777…
13
Colour me shocked
116
936
68
14,185
416,384
Just thinking about the Palace game, lifting the trophy, and knowing, how winning it was done the right way.
18
221
4
3,263
53,192
Devastating
When Grok refuses to confirm your bias 😂
31
If you find comedy offensive, then DON'T FUCKING WATCH IT. But stop treating the rest of us like children who must be carefully protected from anything remotely controversial.
256
1,603
25
24,063
368,068
STOP INCORRECTLY TELLING ME WHAT A VOLLEY IS SUPPOSED TO BE.
20
Danny retweeted
Reminds me,
The officials ‘lost focus’ apparently but they ‘know the rules inside out’
13
1,073
25
6,906
245,940
Danny retweeted
Replying to @DavidD_73
Gabriel drags Ballard down in Sunderland’s penalty box and Arsenal get a penalty for it. What do you reckon the reaction is then? I think X goes fucking ballistic with brainwashed people saying how right they were about Arsenal cheating. I think you’d be one of them.
1
1
301
Danny retweeted
Arsenal have pushed the limits of physicality in set pieces. They do that on purpose and they escaped penalisation because they did it well (i.e. with mind paid to those limits). Watch your team. Watch everyone else. They do it too. A lot. We’re just better at it.
1
1
42
If McDonalds served you a carrot bag instead of a Big Mac, would you be happy if the other people on the restaurant called you insane for asking for the burger you ordered? 😂
Insane… If you dare go against them they’ll inconvenience you. After being favoured time and time again by the referees 1 slightly questionable decision and they lose their mind…
1
106
“Thinks he’s too good for a carrot this one - didn’t give a shit when I was eating carrots yesterday!”
21