The dead cat continues to bounce.
What is Bitcoin, 17 years later?
It’s not great for transactions or smart contracts; the user experience is still intimidating for most, and it’s no longer capturing the public’s imagination.
If it comes up at the dinner party, it's followed by a hearty “remember that!”
It’s a boring store of value, trusted as that—which is its biggest value.
It's boring.
Folks expect bitcoin to be stable and that it’s no longer a way to get rich quick.
Institutions embracing and accumulating it took $btc from punk rock to Muzak.
Advocates went from pirates to suits in orange ties, awkwardly sharing cringe memes — just like the cool kids do!
If Bitcoin were going to reach mass adoption and an important use case, it does better than anyone else, it would have by now.
Bitcoin feels like the CD in the age of Spotify, the DVD in the age of Netflix — a bridge technology that folks who invested in “their collection” keep saying is the better experience.
Perhaps bitcoin is vinyl, cool memories and fun to drag out and put on display, but a technology that served us to get to where we are now.
Anmol Singh retweeted
I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies, which are not money, and whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air. Unregulated Crypto Assets can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drug trade and other illegal activity....
Anmol Singh retweeted
Will history repeat itself for Michael Saylor and Micro Strategy just with bigger numbers this time ? Let’s explore this and the parallels between what the Hunt brothers did in the past with Silver
The Hunt brothers’ silver saga and Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin strategy share striking parallels, and history has shown us that speculative markets don’t always end well for the ambitious. Here’s why caution is warranted:
1.Excessive Leverage: The Hunt brothers heavily relied on borrowed funds to accumulate silver, controlling one-third of the world’s non-government silver supply. Similarly, Saylor’s MicroStrategy has leveraged substantial debt to acquire Bitcoin, betting on its appreciation.
2.Market Manipulation Accusations: Just as the Hunts faced backlash for hoarding silver and driving up prices, creating market chaos, Saylor’s Bitcoin acquisition strategy influences Bitcoin’s scarcity perception and prices, raising concerns about sustainability.
3.Regulatory Oversight: The Hunt brothers’ downfall was accelerated by regulatory changes, like COMEX’s margin restrictions, forcing liquidation and a crash. Saylor risks similar regulatory scrutiny as governments tighten crypto regulations.
4.Price Volatility: When the price of silver plummeted, the Hunts faced devastating margin calls, eventually declaring bankruptcy. Bitcoin’s notorious volatility makes MicroStrategy’s position precarious—extreme price swings could mirror the Hunts’ financial unraveling.
5.Public Perception and Market Sentiment: The Hunt brothers were publicly condemned for creating artificial price spikes, much like skepticism surrounding Saylor’s relentless Bitcoin purchases.
Saylor’s bold Bitcoin bet evokes memories of past speculative collapses, like the Hunt brothers and the silver crash of 1980, warning us that history has a way of repeating itself in financial markets. As with “Silver Thursday,” the question is not if markets correct but when—and who will bear the fallout.
As always, regulators often arrive post-collapse, too late to prevent harm. Let’s remain vigilant and skeptical in speculative frenzies, especially when leverage and public narratives mask inherent risks.
Attached images for reference into the Hunt Brothers if you’re not familiar.
#Bitcoin $MSTR
Anmol Singh retweeted
Michael Saylor’s strategy with Bitcoin and MicroStrategy is bold, but it’s also incredibly risky. I understand the reasoning behind it, but it has all the signs of a strategy that could unravel disastrously. As the saying goes, “irrational exuberance” always meets a “reversion to the mean.” It’s not a question of if—it’s a question of when. This could go on for years, but I don’t see it ending well in the long term.
Here’s why: the strategy revolves around selling $MSTR shares to buy #Bitcoin which in turn pushes the price of Bitcoin higher. The rising Bitcoin price then boosts MicroStrategy’s stock, allowing them to sell more shares, buy more Bitcoin, and repeat the cycle. It’s a loop that creates artificial momentum. But eventually, this cycle hits a wall. At some point, the dilution becomes significant, and control of the company could fall into the hands of a majority shareholder who might have very different priorities. They could effectively dictate what happens to #MicroStrategy and the Bitcoin it holds.
The other issue is leverage. This strategy ties the fate of a publicly traded company to the volatile swings of a single asset class. Bitcoin’s price history shows extreme highs and deep crashes, and a sharp downturn could leave MicroStrategy and its shareholders in a precarious position.
I could be wrong—this might play out differently than expected. But from where I stand, it looks like a house of cards built on momentum and speculation. It’s a high-risk bet with the potential for catastrophic consequences down the line. Time will tell, but history hasn’t been kind to strategies that rely on perpetual market euphoria.
Anmol Singh retweeted
Most traders think they need a better setup. That’s usually not the real problem.
The real problem is what happens after you’re in the trade.
The hesitation.
The second guessing.
The emotional exits.
The random management.
That’s why I’m doing this live interview with Chester Gould, the creator of TraderFlow. I want to pull back the curtain on what actually helps traders become more consistent once the trade is on.
We’re going to talk about structure, automation, backtesting, journaling, and how to stop managing trades by feel.
In other words… how to trade more like a bionic trader. If you’ve ever felt like you know what to do, but still don’t execute the way you want to in real time, you’ll want to catch this. Register and learn more here: livetraders.com/trader-flow-…
Anmol Singh retweeted
You need to be at the next one.
People see the wins.
The big trades.
The profit screenshots.
The awards.
What they rarely see is everything behind it.
The conversations.
The questions.
The mistakes being broken down.
The uncomfortable truths traders have to face.
Months ago this event was just an idea.
A vision of bringing serious traders into the same room to sharpen their edge.
Because becoming a consistently profitable trader is not about one strategy.
It is about who you become in the process.
Anmol Singh retweeted
We will be live tonight at 8pm EST on Spaces. link below. will be recorded. We'll be discussing $TSLA, AI "slop", a tiny biotech ticker, $CLSK, photonics, other tickers, and more. We're the opening band 🎸for the SOTU tonight. @DeltaNinety
Anmol Singh retweeted
🎤 Panel Discussion Announced — #TPC2026 📷
Why Traders Know What to Do — But Still Don’t Do It Featuring:
• @Ahead_Coach
• Kiryl Linnik
• @prrobbins
• Sue o'Reilly
• @DeltaNinety
Real experience. Real psychology. Real trading challenges. 📷tpc.tradefulness.com
Anmol Singh retweeted
Price action is the market’s language. Indicators are just subtitles that lag the story.
Learn to read candlesticks before you listen to anything else.
Anmol Singh retweeted
Algorand is now more decentralized than ever before.
We're transitioning from a relay node network to a P2P network.
P2P is the most decentralized option, and so we've implemented it.
Sending decentralization, censorship resistance, and network resilience to the next level.
Anmol Singh retweeted
The U.S. Air Force’s Blockchain Stack —
Algorand x Constellation x DeRec**
(Two networks. Two missions. One emerging security ecosystem.)
The @usairforce isn’t “choosing” a single blockchain.
It’s building a multi-layered defense architecture, using different networks for different mission profiles.
The two most important?
➡️ Constellation Network (DAG)
➡️ Algorand
Both already appear in Air Force systems — just at different layers.
Let’s start with @Conste11ation (DAG).
Constellation works with the U.S. Air Force under an official SBIR Phase II contract, using its Hypergraph Transfer Protocol (HGTP) to secure mission data, validate telemetry, and protect the data fabric of modern defense systems.
Constellation doesn’t focus on token transactions.
It focuses on high-volume data integrity.
Constellation’s role inside the Air Force ecosystem:
• Objective: Create a trusted, tamper-proof way for the Air Force to exchange operational mission data with commercial partners.
• Technology: Constellation’s HGTP validates large, unstructured, high-throughput datasets — far beyond financial blockchains.
• Purpose: Provide end-to-end data security and real-time integrity for mission systems.
• Example: HGTP is integrated into platforms like Iron SPIDR, used by the Air Force and Space Force to authenticate telemetry, radar, and satellite data across distributed networks.
• Contract: All supported through a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase II contract, confirming HGTP as defense infrastructure.
DAG & Constellation Network
• Constellation Network: A data-focused blockchain + software company developing HGTP for military-grade data validation.
• DAG: The native token that secures the Hypergraph through validator rewards and economic alignment.
• Mission: Build infrastructure for a machine-speed world, not for traditional cryptocurrency payments.
Constellation = the data integrity layer.
Now we pivot to the second layer of the Air Force blockchain stack:
Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC)
— built on @AlgoFoundation
A newly published U.S. Air Force–funded patent (Nov 2025) describes a system where:
• MPC computations run over the Algorand blockchain
• messages are embedded inside Algorand transactions
• everything propagates via Algo’s fast gossip protocol
This is cryptographic infrastructure — not data transport.
Why Algorand?
Because MPC requires:
• deterministic finality
• structured transactions
• formal mathematical security
• predictable execution
• verifiable cryptography
Algorand is one of the few blockchains in the world that meets these requirements.
This is why the patent explicitly uses it.
Now the architecture becomes clear:
Constellation validates massive data streams.
Algorand executes secure cryptographic computation.
Both essential.
Zero overlap.
Two different layers of the same future military stack.
Constellation = secure data flow
Algorand = secure computation
Together, they form a defense-grade digital infrastructure, capable of supporting:
• autonomous systems
• intelligence pipelines
• battlefield telemetry
• secure multiparty computation
• resilient digital operations
This is military engineering.
And here’s the part almost nobody realizes:
Both Algorand and Constellation are members of the @DeRecAlliance —
a standards group building the next generation of digital trust, recovery, and interoperability.
These networks are not random choices.
They’re aligned under the same cryptographic ecosystem.
That means the Air Force isn’t just using two networks.
It’s tapping into a coordinated, multi-layer security architecture:
🔹 Constellation → scalable data integrity
🔹 Algorand → MPC + cryptographic execution
🔹 DeRec → unified trust & recovery standards
This is not coincidence — it’s design.
These networks quietly power government systems.
Constellation secures the data.
Algorand secures the computation.
DeRec unifies the trust layer.
Anmol Singh retweeted
Algorand and @Noah_HQ just announced a partnership to bring banking on-chain for users around the world.
At our Devcon event, CBO @mintwt sat down with Noah Founder and CEO, @shahramezani, for Season 3, Episode 8 of Verifiably Random.


























