Dharmocracy

In the context of Modi’s hand (raucous democracy, hostile neighbors, foreign interference via NGOs, traitorous opposition, malcontent veto, etc…), one can understand this sentiment. Though Modi will have to do a few more concrete moves on the economic front + wait for time to shine his legacy for common comparisons with Deng. I think one facet driving this notion tho is an upsurge of the dissatisfaction of specifically Indian democracy in recent years. This isn’t regarding retarded notions like vote chori either. Rather it is simply a recognizing of the inherent Tamas in the hearts of the Indian electorate. The raving bands of caste lunatics constantly seeking a carve out & chimping out over any loose comment about their community. Clearly foreign funded NGOs agitating protests for any random road, metro, factory, energy plant, military infrastructure, etc… A malcontent population that cares not if growth has been 12% or -2%; instead, simply single-mindedly focused on removing a party out of power for religious or parochial convictions. A seeping magma-like corruption oozing across so many facets of life, burning India’s citizens & cooling into stalagmites of unaccountability. All this with the Eye of Sauron (the Internet), constantly gazing for a misstep to rile up this blackness in the hearts of Le Janta to return India to factory settings. However, this being all true, there is another side of this as well. Modi is also a fruition of Indian democracy. That a poor tea seller could become the PM of a billion strong country, arguably (not for long) its greatest & one that pulled much of the country from the 19th to 21st century, is a notch in the belt for Bharat’s Ganarajya. Of course, one can say this is a natural positive outburst after decades negative rule, and perhaps we will see this unfortunate process again, but for now, Modi has become an emblem of Indian democracy.