Founder of Sealing Technologies (acquired by Parsons 2023); Prior soldier; Cyber, Systems Engineering, & Business. Currently exploring AI & investment opps.

United States
Joined February 2022
Ed Sealing retweeted
RIP Bioware. You don't own the chuds. The chuds own YOU.
412
709
143
7,889
327,677
me when people ask about the current state of AI:
130
669
85
5,105
353,788
Opus is hilarious - “how Gemini made friends”
17
35
8
646
38,185
Ed Sealing retweeted
If you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin' One of the things this past decade has taught me is that pretty much all of the conspiracy theories have turned out to be true, and this isn't really that much of a conspiracy since the evidence is just sitting out in the open
This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works: 1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance. 2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely. According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits. The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024. Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025. And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well. What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)? 3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself. It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one. 4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
11
4
1
84
4,642
Ed Sealing retweeted
Attempting to revamp our current societal structure, based on speculation and fear can be FAR more dangerous than simply adapting to problems one at a time as they come up. The speculative fear-mongering being directed at law-makers and regulators should worry you more than AI.
1
1
57
Ed Sealing retweeted
Open-source. And open-source AI that I can run locally.
19
12
2
355
32,974
‼️ BREAKING: An active npm supply chain attack has compromised at least 868 packages carrying over 2 billion monthly installs with a credential-stealing worm. Shai-Hulud is back. It started with the compromise of the GitHub account of the maintainer behind keyv, a library with roughly 127 million weekly npm downloads. A preinstall hook fires on npm install and drops a stealer that sweeps npm, GitHub, AWS, Kubernetes and Vault secrets, and then spreads to more maintainers.
308
1,333
449
8,658
1,440,534
Ed Sealing retweeted
I do agree that it seems insane to spend the same amount of compute to generate a ` .` token as it does to give a 1-word answer to a complex problem. There is a massive inefficiency to auto-regessive transformers. At the same time, once the input tokens pass through the first attention block, they cease representing that single amount of information and, instead, become lanes on an information highway. Individual token vectors could plausibly hold the entire input worth of information inside a single vector. The more that are generated, the more "information" can fit on the highway. I'm looking forward to your JEPA research and what additional unlocks it will have for the field. But until then, transformer LLMs are currently the king arch and should be respected, rather than discarded and insulted. The last 3 paragraphs of "The Bitter Lesson" seem very applicable here. "...building in how we think we think does not work in the long run.". incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas…
1
1
124
Ed Sealing retweeted
Replying to @MiniMax_AI
About Licence: This regional carve-out stems from our ongoing generative video copyright litigation with major @Hollywood studios. We aim to deliver our AI tools globally to all users responsibly. US-based persons looking to deploy MiniMax-H3 may submit formal licensing requests. Licenses will be issued to applicants who commit to implementing robust compliance controls and guardrails fully aligned with US legal, compliance and regulatory requirements.
10
27
26
256
387,859
Ed Sealing retweeted
Replying to @tszzl
The state of my app when they pause AI.
1
3
218
For over two years, the largest open code dataset was The Stack v2… until today. 🥞 The Stack v3 is out: the largest open code dataset ever released: 114 TB, 770 languages, 224M repositories, ~5T tokens of deduplicated and filtered source code. Fully open, no restrictively licensed code included. The upgrade: - v2 (2024): 68 TB raw -> 2 TB / ~550B tokens, 618 languages filtered - v3 (2026): 114 TB raw -> 15.9 TB / ~5T tokens, 713 languages filtered C++ x15, TypeScript x7.5, Rust x7, Python x4.8. Even the COBOL corner of GitHub got a bigger slice. Part of that is two fresh years of open source. Part of it is a bug we found in v2's deduplication - story below. 👀 Things that make v3 different: 1. Contents inline. The #1 complaint about v2 was "cool dataset, where's the actual code?" v2 shipped file IDs from the Software Heritage graph, and fetching contents was a DIY treasure hunt. v3 is self-contained: sources embedded directly, one row = one repository. Download finishes -> you start training. 2. Fresh crawl. v2 was a 2023 snapshot of even older crawls. v3 is a direct re-crawl of GitHub at the latest commit, completed by August 2025: 224M repositories, 44B files. Forks were only included if they had 5+ stars. Two ways in: 🥞 stack-v3-train - near-deduplicated, quality-filtered, PII-redacted, contents inline. Point load_dataset at it and go. huggingface.co/datasets/Hugg… 🏗 stack-v3-full - the entire 114 TB corpus as an HF Storage Bucket: every duplicate kept with cluster IDs, stubs for excluded files. Roll your own dedup, filters, and mixes. huggingface.co/buckets/Huggi… The record isn't really ours to claim - it's millions of everyone's repositories, neatly stacked. Thanks to every developer who keeps their code public, the BigCode community, and friends who built the infrastructure that made this possible!
30
94
22
524
105,724
This is what the average meeting at a Fortune 500 company sounds like.
180
768
116
9,797
913,262
Ed Sealing retweeted
It's easier to hit your target when flying low and under the radar. Ego is the enemy, my friend.
1
1
123
Ed Sealing retweeted
I've spent a lot of hours using AI for work. In fact, i'd wager i have as many hours and tokens logged as _anyone_ using AI in a professional capacity where the outcome was critical to doing my job or achieving a specific business objective. Over the last year or so, it became very clear that there were 2 major systematic risks to the way i had grown reliant on working: 1) git and github - git is poorly suited to ai work. when you spin up multiple agents at the same time, branches and worktrees become stale, after dozens of changes and PRs, reviews diverge causing constant conflicts, repos become large and unwieldy and adrift in drity state. On top of that, cloning giant repos and setting up dev envs every time i wanted to spin up an agent became cumbersome. sure you can use docker to help but its still stale and required packaging and cloning step(s). neither git or github was designed for my new ai centric, dozens to hundreds of agents working on large repos / monorepos simultaneously, workflows. managing state and envs and conflicts and iops became a full time job. 2) claude code and anthropic - i had grown reliant on a model and a powerful harness and on that model being trained to be an expert in that harness. I needed to be able to fine tune a model for my use cases but also have it be a master of the tools and flows of a specific harness. vertically integrating and fine tuning the model on the harness and tasks you want to accomplish is one of the most important aspects to actually being productive with these systems. When i took a step back to figure out how to aggressively de-risk but also how to actually be productive as a single dev managing tons of semi-supervised AI, i figured i needed to go back to the beginning. Lets try to take an example from Google who has similar issues with scale and tooling and setup (albeit with human developers at least when i was there) . If you wanted to build a system that was based on their best practices to manage all those moving parts and thousands of developers working in large monorepos, how would you do it? It wouldn't just be a simple git forge, git itself is a huge part of the problem. if you were starting from scratch, you'd want to make sure you designed the system from the ground up for ai agents and workflows for the new world. Well to start, you'd make shallow virtual checkouts and clones so you never had to pull the full repo to disk and your clones would be instant. then you'd use jj to keep track of your draft state with a real jj native persistence layer and backend. You'd use sapling to create commit stacks and you'd keep all of your workspaces automatically in sync with a cloud sync system. You'd optimize this system from the ground up to make ai agents and reviewers first class citizens , you'd reduce startup time to seconds and you'd have per file ACLs so you never had agents run wild. And if you were going to do all of that, you'd also want to vertically integrate EVERYTHING from the model to coding harness to scm to tools to remote cloud runtimes and platforms to optimize end to end for this new world and its new workflows. So thats what i built and i've been using it exclusively to build and run our research lab and company for the last 6 months or so. This was not only a great way to pressure test the models, tools and the workflows but it was also an interesting research project on its own. Could a single developer use AI to be productive enough to launch a real, high quality product that would normally take a team of hundreds of engineers to build, launch and operate? I suppose you will have to be the judge of how successful it ultimately was but the project as of today is ~25 million lines of code and dozens of services and automation. in my opinion it has been an overwhelming success and i cant imagine going back to working any other way. So, today I am starting the process of making the same tools i have been using internally for the last 6 months available to all of you. this will start with the code app that i released a few days ago and access to our inference engine to power that app. soon we will announce more tools and features including access to the ncode scm and ncode platform. there will be more formal announcements about these new platforms, tools and features over the coming days / weeks as we begin rolling out access. I hope y'all find them as useful as i have. code.noumena.com
53
58
12
983
149,248
1
7
645
Ed Sealing retweeted
Scientific research is fundamental to advancing civilization and helping people globally to solve the most critical problems, from medicine to materials, from brain science to physics, and much beyond. This is only possible when scientists have access to the best tools of the time to conduct scientific research, including having access to AI-based tools.
119
463
34
3,055
207,335
Ed Sealing retweeted
June 9th Researcher Reciprocity License "if you train on it, you let us generate - reverse terms of use void" Status quo 1. We teach frontier devs with ICLR/NeurIPS papers, OSS Github contributions 2. They use it to make frontier models 3. Then ban us from exploring our ideas We need a new license, original thinkers can't be an underclass to a tyrannical researcher fiefdom
mythos will be bad ON PURPOSE on ai "frontier llm research" tasks, this is very very sad for the research community also the fact that this is un purpose not visible to the user is crazy
30
100
11
951
112,091
never waste a good crisis
1,069
3,040
465
65,146
3,262,467
Ed Sealing retweeted
Anthropic PMs making notes and then conferring quietly together. Thank you for your feedback, we can ship all of this by the end of Q4
14
30
3
1,334
43,136
How many distros can you mention?
39
10
8
433
20,234