Ericson Silva retweeted
What Darwin didn't know. Michael Behe explains the difference between understanding how a cellular system works and explaining how it originated, and argues that much of the claimed evidence for Darwinian theory assumes the two are the same.
youtu.be/8vwWUmM5R08
Ericson Silva retweeted
Whenever you doubt your purpose, remember how incredible it is that you're here.
👀 Curious to learn more? Watch The Story of Everything streaming on Amazon now.
Ericson Silva retweeted
What's the universe's most complex code? 👀
🔬 Find out more in The Story of Everything streaming on Amazon.
This sounds far less likely than brains that evolved by chance being mistaken about how the universe was formed.
“The right light,” says Dr. McLatchie, would be like the thickness of “a few playing cards in a stack stretching beyond the galaxy of Andromeda.” scienceandculture.com/2026/1…
Poor Darwin. He wasn't aware of his own ignorance.
That mountain of "evidence" supporting a neo-Darwinian account of life? Look closer and you'll see a lot of lip service and assumption, says biochemist Michael Behe. Watch this clip from a recent interview. Link in comments. @DiscoveryCSC #Darwin
Ericson Silva retweeted
FACT: There is ZERO chance that Darwinian Evolution is true.
@DougAxe does not deny the existence of natural selection. Indeed, he argues that minor adaptations—such as virus mutations or dog breed variations—are well established. But can random mutation and selection explain the origin of complex, function biological systems when the odds of forming a single functional protein fold are a staggering 1 in 10⁷⁷?
Watch @AmThoughtLeader interview at link below 👇
Ericson Silva retweeted
Even the simplest cell carries an incredible amount of complex information.
🔬Discover more in the film, The Story of Everything, streaming now on Amazon!
Ericson Silva retweeted
Stephen Meyer joins @PiersUncensored to debate @Matt_Dillahunty. Meyer says "From the standpoint of my own field, the philosophy of science, the test of a good explanation is one that invokes an entity which has the causal power to produce the effect in question. Materialism or pure matter cannot explain the origin of matter." Watch at the link below.
Ericson Silva retweeted
True, our ID argument does depend in part upon critical assessments of the causal adequacy of materialistic explanations for the origin of DNA information.scienceandculture.com/2026/1…
Ericson Silva retweeted
The Story of Everything explores the incredible fine-tuning of the universe and the complexity of life. Stream on Amazon today! 🌅
Ericson Silva retweeted
"It opposes Stephen Meyer, whose article published on September 22 sets out a measured and convincing argument that atheism is increasingly losing ground as a major cultural force, and the guru of the so-called “New Atheists,” Richard Dawkins, who exercised his right of reply on October 2 (though in doing so, he chose not to address Meyer by name)." scienceandculture.com/2026/1…
Ericson Silva retweeted
When it comes to evaluating cosmological models for viability, says Dr. Bruce Gordon, the principle of sufficient reason is key: "to jump to brute factuality is a huge mistake." Link to full segment in comments! @DiscoveryCSC @StephenCMeyer
Ericson Silva retweeted
Public Misled on Origin of Life
Scientists have not created life in laboratories, despite public belief.
#ScienceFacts
Ericson Silva retweeted
FIVE SHORT VIDEOS with philosopher of science Stephen Meyer, on themes from his award winning book, Return of the God Hypothesis. See them all now at intelligentdesign.org/videos… @prageru
Those who ask who designed the designer cannot explain where their own intelligence came from, which renders their question rationally untenable.
To mark the 20th anniversary of the publication of @RichardDawkins The God Delusion, Stephen Meyer took to the pages of @Telegraph. His essay prompted 2,000+ reader responses. A recurrent challenge was the “Who designed the designer?” objection. Writing in the comments section, Dr. Meyer offered three separate replies. Read them all at the link below.
Ericson Silva retweeted
The deeper he explored science, the more questions emerged.
Could naturalism explain meaning, consciousness, or the origin of life? Why did the universe appear so finely tuned? And what if the story he had accepted about science and faith was itself incomplete? On @exskeptic physicist Brian Miller explains his journey from scientific materialist to intelligent design proponent.
Watch at link below
Ericson Silva retweeted
To speak of a “paradigm shift” on Junk DNA is another way of saying that the debate is over and ID won.scienceandculture.com/2026/0…
