श्वेत मरुस्थल के बीच कृष्णवर्ण बादल हठी-सा💙 मायसेल्फ फ्राम भिलेज एरिया। #Team @humanaidint https://xitter.cf/t.co/vDZyIbQGG6
मैं हूँ ही नहीं इस दुनिया की
Joined September 2017
- Tweets234K
- Following634
- Followers13.4K
- Likes182K
Pinned Tweet
बीस की नहीं होती
वे लड़कियां जिनके पिता नहीं होते
वे एक शाम सोलह की होती है
बारहवीं का रिज़ल्ट उन्हें
तीस का बना देता है
बेतरतीब सी ज़िंदगी
उन्हें दोहरा चरित्र देती है
दिन भर खड़ूस मर्द बन
शाम को माँ की गोद में
सर रख पाँच साल की
बच्ची सी दुलराती हैं
पर
वो कभी बीस की नहीं होती
गरिमा तिवारी 🌱 retweeted
अगर आप ने बिना गालियां निकाले भारत में ड्राइविंग कर ली तो समझ लीजिए कि आप अपनी अंतरात्मा पर काबू पा चुके हैं और आप संत हो गए हैं. . . बाकी ये योगा, मैडिटेशन, भक्ति आदि मन के वहम हैं!
जहाँ दो महीने की गर्मी की छुट्टियों के दिन भी कम लगते थे, वहाँ दो दिन भी दो जनम जितने लंबे लगने लगे लेकिन 'जन्मभूमि' यदा-कदा याद कर ही लेती है।
यहाँ की माटी तो मेरी 'अपनी' है लेकिन समय निष्ठुर है।
गरिमा तिवारी 🌱 retweeted
ये है यशोदा लोधी जिन्हें सोशल मीडिया पर English with Dehati Madam के नाम से भी जाना जाता है।
आज ये लाखों लोगों को यूट्यूब के माध्यम से इंग्लिश पढ़ाती है।
पैदा होते ही वो अनाथ हो गई, जब एक साल की थी तो इन्हें सड़को पर छोड़ दिया गया था।
बड़ी हुई, शादी हुआ।
इनके पति मजदूरी का काम करते थे, जिन्हें ₹250 एक दिन के मिलते थे,और इसी मे गुजर बसर करना पड़ता था।
हताश-परेशान होकर इन्होंने एक स्मॉर्ट फोन खरीदा और उसपर इंग्लिश पढ़ना शुरू किया।
जो इन्होंने पढ़ा था, उसी को अपने यूट्यूब चैनल के द्वारा दूसरों को पढ़ाती।
एक महीने के अंदर ही इनका चैनल monetize हो गया। और आज बहुत अच्छा income कमा पाती है।
हाल ही इन्हें "power creator award" से सम्मानित किया गया है।
बदला दी रेवेन्ज
Sameet bhai no offence to you or anyone but didn't you also go through similar trouble when opposition was in power?Didn't they arrest you?Tab apke he sab dost yarr jo abhi IT cell ke hai they were crying about freedom of speech and wanted you to be released.Now you all are doing and endorsing same behaviour that too with people who are on your side.Then How is it okay now?
पहली बार हँस के टाल गईं थीं,दूसरी बार हमारे रिश्तेदार का बच्चा जब ऐसे ही सोफ़े पर, कालीन पर कूदा तो उनको गेट तक छोड़ने जाते समय मैंने हाथ जोड़कर बोला,"अगली बार आप बच्चे को मत लाना और लाना तो थोड़ा उठना बैठना सिखा के लाना।"
जाने क्यों वो अब हमारे घर नहीं आते।
Around two weeks ago, I bought a fabric sofa for my OPD consultation room after realizing that few patients bring multiple relatives, and chairs aren't enough.
On the very first day, a couple came in with a 5 or 6 year-old child. The wife was the patient, and while the husband was sitting on the sofa, he made the kid stand on it, with his shoes on. The child started jumping and walking around on the sofa.
I couldn't stop looking. There was literally mud on the child's shoes, and it was really bothering me. I wanted to tell the parents to remove the shoes, but couldn't bring myself to say anything, knowing they might take offense instead of realizing their mistake. I let it go with a sigh.
A few days later, the exact same thing happened: different couple, different child, but the same behavior. It makes me wonder why some modern parents aren't teaching their children basic hygiene and etiquette, especially nowadays, when parents are generally more educated and aware.
गरिमा तिवारी 🌱 retweeted
Why youth is angry, idealistic, anti-establishment by nature and how communists exploit those traits:
कुछ रहस्य हमेशा रहस्य ही रह जाते हैं।
A premier investigation agency concluded in a formal closure report that there was no sufficient evidence against the parents—only for the judge to convert that very closure report into a charge sheet and sentence them to life imprisonment.
The reason might surprise you.
On the morning of May 16, 2008, flat L-32 in Jalvayu Vihar, Noida, became the center of modern India’s most scrutinized double-murder mystery.
Fourteen-year-old Aarushi Talwar was discovered in her bed with her throat slit with surgical precision and a blunt trauma injury to her forehead.
The primary suspect appeared obvious: the family’s 45-year-old domestic helper, Hemraj Banjade, was missing.
Noida Police publicly named Hemraj as the killer and dispatched teams to his ancestral village in Nepal.
Then came the first shocking blunder:
The next morning, a retired police officer visiting the crime scene noticed blood drops leading up the stairs to the locked terrace roof.
When police forced open the terrace door, they found Hemraj’s decomposing corpse lying in a pool of blood, concealed beneath an air-cooler panel. He had been murdered on the exact same night with the exact same modus operandi.
The discovery exposed catastrophic investigative negligence:
The initial crime scene had been trampled by dozens of neighbors, relatives, and media camera crews before forensic dusting was complete.
Noida Police, led by Inspector General Gurdarshan Singh, staged a press conference alleging an "honor killing" by Aarushi’s father, Dr. Rajesh Talwar, based on sensationalized theories that lacked forensic backing.
Public outcry forced the Uttar Pradesh government to transfer the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
What followed was an unprecedented feud within the CBI itself:
CBI Team 1 (Led by Arun Kumar): After narco-analysis tests, brain mapping, and polygraph examinations, this team zeroed in on three domestic aides, Krishna, Rajkumar, and Vijay Mandal. They suspected a drunken brawl and attempted assault. A purple pillowcase recovered from Krishna’s room reportedly tested positive for Hemraj’s DNA.
The Fatal Typographical Error: When a new CBI team took over under A.G.L. Kaul, the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD) in Hyderabad declared the report a "typographical error," claiming the labels of the pillowcases from Hemraj's room and Krishna's room had been accidentally swapped.
CBI Team 2 (Led by A.G.L. Kaul): This team pivoted entirely back to the parents, Dr. Rajesh and Dr. Nupur Talwar, arguing that with no signs of forced entry, the "last seen" theory under Section 106 of the Evidence Act placed the burden of proof on them.
In late 2010, the CBI filed a closure report stating that while they suspected Rajesh Talwar, the evidentiary chain was incomplete to frame formal charges.
In a rare legal turn, the special CBI magistrate in Ghaziabad rejected the closure, took cognizance of the facts within it as circumstantial evidence, and put the parents on trial. In November 2013, the court convicted both parents, sentencing them to life imprisonment in Dasna Jail.
Four years later, the legal narrative collapsed completely:
In October 2017, the Allahabad High Court acquitted Rajesh and Nupur Talwar, delivering a stinging indictment of the trial court’s reliance on conjecture over forensic facts:
The High Court ruled that the prosecution had failed to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, noting that suspicion, no matter how grave, cannot substitute for legal proof.
Critical forensic gaps, contaminated evidence, altered witness statements, and contradictory DNA files meant the chain of circumstances was thoroughly broken.
After nearly a decade of tabloid character assassination, two contrasting CBI conclusions, and four years behind bars, the Talwars walked out of prison.