Michael Griffith retweeted
America was founded on Christian principles, and no amount of rewriting history will ever erase that.
We are a CHRISTIAN NATION.
Michael Griffith retweeted
Patrick Colbeck is one of the leading authorities on stolen elections. He has been investigating this for many years. A man of real integrity & courage.
WOW! While I was focused upon getting an audit of MI underway, I just had a chance to review what is reported to have happened in the TX General Election.
DYK
1) The top 9 Republican statewide vote-getters were down-ballot candidates for land commissioner, agriculture commissioner and judges?
2) Suspended Democrat Felon won House District 93
In the immortal words of Vizzini - the self-proclaimed genius in the Princess Bride...."INCONCEIVABLE"
@elonmusk @RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell @TrueTheVote
Michael Griffith retweeted
I’m asking states with Republican legislatures to pass a law that will open the non-juror records to public inspection
& list the reasons for disqualification.
The law should also clarify that public inspection includes receiving a digital file.
If non-citizens are receiving jury summons, Americans have the right to know.
Michael Griffith retweeted
🚨 ELECTIONS MATTER: Houston Mayor John Whitmire just ordered his police NOT to cooperate with ICE on nonviolent offenses.
His reasoning: "I also do this knowing that elections matter."
So it's politics, not public safety.
Meanwhile, a convicted child molester from Venezuela who's here illegally could soon walk free in Seattle because the city won't work with ICE.
He came in under Biden in 2023.
Sanctuary policies protect predators. Period.
Michael Griffith retweeted
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
Michael Griffith retweeted
🚨 MR. VETO: President Trump just sent Democrats a ONE-WORD message about their new majority.
They won Congress. He still holds the pen.
Abolish ICE? VETO.
Medicare for All? VETO.
Democrats don't have the votes to override him, and they know it.
Bring it.
Michael Griffith retweeted
🚨 ICE isn’t slowing down after Tuesday, NBC reports.
Maintaining the current pace would mean roughly 50,000 arrests a month.
An election doesn’t repeal immigration law.
Keep enforcing it, follow due process, and don’t let political pressure decide who gets a pass.
Michael Griffith retweeted
Not in a million years will I ever never ever believe that Americans voted for this. IT JUST DID NOT HAPPEN!
Michael Griffith retweeted
Democrats cheat, it’s what they do, it’s who they are.
Michael Griffith retweeted
In case you don’t know, this is impossible. Another Biden “81 million votes.”
The Democrats got 20 milliom new votes.
That’s a 40% increase from out of nowbere.
This is 10 million more than in 2018. When Trump was also on the ballot.
Republicans actually marginally increased turnout from 2022 and 2018.
Republican voters rarely flipped this election, according to NBC News exit polls (~1%).
So these are just new Dem voters “mad about Trump” that are 20% more than his last midterm.
And some Dem candidates apparently outperformed Kamala Harris, including Texas governor-elect Gina Hinojosa.
Hinojosa was actually trailing Abbott in the aggregate polling before the election.
How very odd.
Michael Griffith retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Michael Griffith retweeted
🚨 YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP: Democrat Congresswoman-elect LaKesha Womack heads to court Tuesday on a FELONY charge over a rental car.
Court records allege she never returned a $20,000 Toyota Corolla to Budget in 2019.
She beat Rep. Tim Moore in North Carolina's 14th by about two points.
Her response is to call it "a political attack disguised as a legal issue."
This is who Democrats are sending to Washington.
Michael Griffith retweeted
No way in hell.
Iowa did not vote for communism because of gas prices (that were the same or less than under previous admin) or a war to end a nuclear threat (w/ no boots on the ground).
I know Iowa.
Iowa raised me.
Iowa educated me.
The math isn’t mathing here.
Let’s audit this election to make sure the results are honest before we hand over the Hawkeye state and America to Communists.
Do not certify until you VERIFY the vote.
ALL 99 Iowa counties shifted blue?
Even Lee County, that was just promised the world's largest steel mill by Republicans?
Even these counties, with active Republicans up to the 70th percentile?
All leaned blue you say. Huh.
#Iowa
Michael Griffith retweeted
🚨 THE 15% BAND ISN’T A COINCIDENCE. IT’S A FORMULA.
For every 1,000 Trump votes in 2024… only ~850 stayed Republican in 2026. The other 150 landed on the Democrat side.
Same ratio. Every state. Senate and Governor. Red states, blue states — didn’t matter.
R² = 0.88. Drop any state and the multiplier barely moves.
That’s not a “swing.” That’s an algorithm.
Paper ballots. Hand counts. Poll books vs. votes cast. NOW.
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH
“We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue”
Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
Michael Griffith retweeted
Disarmament is how tyranny gets started—not how safety gets finished.
Noah Webster wrote it while the Constitution was still being debated:
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States."
— Noah Webster, An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (1787)
An unarmed people don't get to argue. They get ruled.
