Howard Clark

This man is a former advisor to Tony Blair whose government opened the door to the erasure of the female sex by passing the Gender Recogniton Act. It looks like they are trying to do the same to the English by proposing a law to allow people without English heritage to identity as English on the census, thus making data gathering much more difficult. We have been here before. The transgender assault on women's rights and it's mission to erase sex in law was proceeded by the cultural deconstruction of womanhood. What is a woman asked a panel of men, sitting besides party wig lesbians who insisted they were not only women, but female. The Prime Minister Kier Starmer argued that it was bigoted to say that only women had a cervixs and it was "something that shouldn't be said, it is not right." The social and cultural expression of femaleness - gender, was said to take precisence over the physical reality of sex. Now we are told that those who express the vague and ill defined concept of British values should be permitted to change their ethnic group in official data. While they have relented on that front and are insisting that women are female, Labour are working on legisaltion that could put people in jail for telling men in dressed that they're not actually women. What is not recognised in law cannot be defended in law. If anybody can be English, then what does it matter if white skinned Brits are replaced by brown skinned Brits? If you think it matters you are nothing but a racist seems to be the line pushed by both main political parties in the UK. But just as it wasn't bigoted or strange to insist that women are female, it's not racist to argue that the English, Welsh and Scottish are ethnic groups - ethnic groups indegenous to Great Britain.