WE DID IT! Service animals have now been formally recognized by the CDC BMBL clarification, and it is the first time this has been explicitly stated in alignment with biosafety guidance at the federal level.
URGENT UPDATE: Federal Clarification on Service Animal Access in Laboratories—Attention Safety and Compliance Personnel
Nearly 3 years ago, a scientist lost their career over one sentence. They contacted me for help.
They were highly qualified. They had an exemplary record.
They were also disabled and relied on a trained service dog for independence.
Then the newest edition of the CDC’s Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) was released.
One sentence changed everything:
“Animals and plants not associated with the work being performed are not permitted in the laboratory.”
That sentence—without context—was used to terminate them, and many others, as well as be used to deny students with disabilities utilizing a service dog for independnece access to labopratory experience.
Not because of risk.
Not because of performance.
Not because of science.
Because of interpretation.
I took this on directly.
I reached out to the authors and leadership behind the BMBL asking for one simple clarification:
That service animals may be an exception based on individualized risk assessment.
For months—nothing.
So I escalated.
I contacted Arizona Representative Juan Ciscomani and worked alongside his Legislative Director for over two and a half years.
We engaged direct conversations with the CDC.
We sent a letter signed by several others members of Congress and over a dozen biosafety organizations.
We engaged in NIH modernization discussions.
We spoke in open forums.
We pushed—consistently, persistently, and with evidence.
Today, there is a major step forward.
CDC has issued a formal clarification:
“Clarification on Service Animals in Laboratories: Compliance with Federal Laws and BMBL Guidance.”
And it says what should have always been clear:
• The BMBL does not override federal, state, or local law
• It cannot be used to deny reasonable accommodations
• It is guidance—not regulatory authority
• Risk assessment—not blanket exclusion—must drive decisions
Most importantly:
Service animals must be considered within the framework of lawful accommodation and individualized risk assessment.
This is more than a clarification. It is the first time this has been explicitly stated in alignment with biosafety guidance at the federal level. This is precedent setting.
It closes a policy gap that has harmed careers, limited access, and forced talented scientists out of the field.
To every Environmental Health & Safety office, compliance leader, biosafety professional, and institution: Please read this. Share this. Implement this.
Because inclusion and biosafety are not in conflict—they were just never clearly aligned. Until now.
I owe a great deal to Rep. Ciscomani and his Legislative Director for their trust, dedication, and commitment to making this possible!
Direct link:
lnkd.in/guhepBzG
#CDC #NIH #ServiceAnimal #ServiceDog #Accessible #Science #Inclusion #BMBL #RepresentativeCiscomani #INSISTENT