International Security is a leading peer-reviewed journal of security affairs, global and broadly defined.

Cambridge, MA
Joined July 2013
International Security retweeted
Henry Farrell and Abe Newman discuss weaponized interdependence with Paul Krugman. paulkrugman.substack.com/p/h…
1
2
2
410
International Security retweeted
just after #9-11 I was asked by Cambridge Review of International Affairs to author an analysis of the W. administration's "war on terror" based on my just-published essay in @IntSecHarvard. the result was "belfercenter.org/publication…." sad to say it proved uncannily prescient
1
1
175
International Security retweeted
Among the important ideas put forward by @MearsheimerJ about international order: a tripolar great-power system, dominated by #US_China_rivalry; #Russia remains a weaker third pole; #India is the only plausible fourth entrant; #liberal_hegemony gives way to #balance_of_power politics; flashpoints in #East_Asia and the prospect of #nuclear escalation make the coming half-century far more dangerous than the last. He does not expect China to surpass the US, but argues that a powerful China gives Washington and Moscow strong incentives to cooperate, and sees economic, technological, and military power as crucial to the competition. direct.mit.edu/isec/article/…
23
1
88
7,798
Join us for a celebration of our 50th anniversary on Friday, September 4, 4-5:30 pm at the MIT Press booth in the Hynes Convention Center @APSAtweets @mitpress @IntSecHarvard @BelferCenter
Replying to @IntSecHarvard
International Security is celebrating its 50th birthday! This and future issues will include essays on how the world and the security studies field have evolved over the past five decades and what the future may hold.
4
1
6
1,754
International Security retweeted
The latest issue of @IntSecHarvard features a paper by Eli Sanchez, former Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, “Seeing Through ‘Transparent Oceans’: Emerging Technology, Submarine Vulnerability, and the Future of MAD”. 🔖Bookmark now, 📖read later.
1
2
484
International Security retweeted
Summer 2026 issue preview @IntSecHarvard! 50th anniversary essays | @stephenWalt @MearsheimerJ Lars-Erik Cederman et al.| nationalist geopolitics E. Sanchez @MIT_SSP | emerging tech & transparent oceans @RushDoshi @AGhiselliChina @SiuHeiWong2 @ZenobiaChan et al. debate China
3
30
6
94
19,745
International Security retweeted
“The paradox is plain: Trump is exceptionally dedicated to coercion as a core foreign policy tool yet is one of its least effective practitioners,” write @reidpauly and Matthew Cebul. foreignaffairs.com/united-st…
2
11
4
37
21,559
International Security retweeted
When Trump “uses bellicose threats as a first resort,” he risks exposing the limits of U.S. military force—and emboldening adversaries to resist, write @reidpauly and Matthew Cebul. “Effective coercion requires more than heavy-handed threats.” foreignaffairs.com/united-st…
7
14
5,430
International Security retweeted
The list of countries threatened with U.S. military intervention is growing ·     Venezuela 🇻🇪 ·     Iran 🇮🇷 ·     Cuba 🇨🇺 ·     Greenland 🇬🇱 ·     Canada 🇨🇦                                   …just this year! Do they all want "Liberation"? No, I argue in @ForeignAffairs
2
14
24
2,054
International Security retweeted
Spring 2026 issue preview @IntSecHarvard! @eunajo_ @jessicacweiss | ideology Rosato | security dilemma @Fiona_Cunning @kbruusgaard | great powers' nuclear first-use options @the_nuclearyogi @rohan_mukh | India’s nuclear restraint Davis & Gholz | blockade against Taiwan's ports
4
51
6
204
20,903
International Security retweeted
Excited to finally be able to share my new article "Deception and Detection" in @IntSecHarvard In a nutshell, I argue that cyber defense has more to gain from AI automation than the offense. Here is the link to the full article : direct.mit.edu/isec/article/…
29
2
98
8,362
International Security retweeted
American Presidents invariably claim that the use of U.S. military force abroad benefits the local population. U.S. Presidents often explicitly or implicitly claim that "the intervened population" therefore welcomes U.S. military intervention - a powerful moral claim.
1
5
1
10
3,377
"Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz tops the list of global energy security nightmares," wrote Caitlin Talmadge in 2008 in @IntSecHarvard. The aftermath of limited strikes on Iran would be complicated and costly. Free to read for 90 days: direct.mit.edu/isec/article/…
13
2
40
7,270
International Security retweeted
As Ron Krebs demonstrates, aspiring populist demagogues love dead soldiers but hate serving officers. The former can’t answer back when their memory’s exploited, but the latter are the greatest potential obstacle to demagogic authority - hence efforts to cow and politicise.
Update: in just over year Hegseth has now fired the CJCS, CNO, CGC, Air Force CoS and Vice CoS, Army CoS and Vice CoS, Head NSA, Head DIA, and IG.
1
9
25
3,801
International Security retweeted
Winter 2026 issue preview @IntSecHarvard! Krebs | why populists love dead soldiers @JaninaDill, Myers, Schubiger | local consent for military interventions @LenMaschmeyer | AI and cyberattacks @joelfbrenner | AI and strategic surprise @John_Severini, Biddle | naval warfare
1
38
4
141
13,271