International Security retweeted
See the open access @IntSecHarvard article “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion” doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
International Security retweeted
Henry Farrell and Abe Newman discuss weaponized interdependence with Paul Krugman.
paulkrugman.substack.com/p/h…
International Security retweeted
just after #9-11 I was asked by Cambridge Review of International Affairs to author an analysis of the W. administration's "war on terror" based on my just-published essay in @IntSecHarvard. the result was "belfercenter.org/publication…." sad to say it proved uncannily prescient
International Security retweeted
Among the important ideas put forward by @MearsheimerJ about international order: a tripolar great-power system, dominated by #US_China_rivalry; #Russia remains a weaker third pole; #India is the only plausible fourth entrant; #liberal_hegemony gives way to #balance_of_power politics; flashpoints in #East_Asia and the prospect of #nuclear escalation make the coming half-century far more dangerous than the last. He does not expect China to surpass the US, but argues that a powerful China gives Washington and Moscow strong incentives to cooperate, and sees economic, technological, and military power as crucial to the competition.
direct.mit.edu/isec/article/…
International Security retweeted
Join us for a celebration of our 50th anniversary on Friday, September 4, 4-5:30 pm at the MIT Press booth in the Hynes Convention Center @APSAtweets @mitpress @IntSecHarvard @BelferCenter
Replying to @IntSecHarvard
International Security is celebrating its 50th birthday! This and future issues will include essays on how the world and the security studies field have evolved over the past five decades and what the future may hold.
International Security retweeted
A review of John Mearsheimer's new article in @IntSecHarvard on anarchy. @BelferCenter @mitpress indiasworld.in/the-iron-cage…
International Security retweeted
A new piece in @lawfare from @KBruusgaard and Fiona Cunningham on nuclear strategy from their @IntSecHarvard article. @mitpress @BelferCenter @Pearson_ink lawfaremedia.org/article/the…
The latest issue of @IntSecHarvard features a paper by Eli Sanchez, former Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, “Seeing Through ‘Transparent Oceans’: Emerging Technology, Submarine Vulnerability, and the Future of MAD”.
🔖Bookmark now, 📖read later.
Replying to @IntSecHarvard
“Seeing Through 'Transparent Oceans': Emerging Technology, Submarine Vulnerability, and the Future of MAD,” by Eli Sanchez @MIT_SSP
doi.org/10.1162/ISEC.a.417
International Security retweeted
Summer 2026 issue preview @IntSecHarvard!
50th anniversary essays | @stephenWalt
@MearsheimerJ
Lars-Erik Cederman et al.| nationalist geopolitics
E. Sanchez @MIT_SSP | emerging tech & transparent oceans
@RushDoshi @AGhiselliChina @SiuHeiWong2 @ZenobiaChan et al. debate China
International Security retweeted
“The paradox is plain: Trump is exceptionally dedicated to coercion as a core foreign policy tool yet is one of its least effective practitioners,” write @reidpauly and Matthew Cebul.
foreignaffairs.com/united-st…
International Security retweeted
When Trump “uses bellicose threats as a first resort,” he risks exposing the limits of U.S. military force—and emboldening adversaries to resist, write @reidpauly and Matthew Cebul. “Effective coercion requires more than heavy-handed threats.”
foreignaffairs.com/united-st…
International Security retweeted
The list of countries threatened with U.S. military intervention is growing
· Venezuela 🇻🇪
· Iran 🇮🇷
· Cuba 🇨🇺
· Greenland 🇬🇱
· Canada 🇨🇦
…just this year!
Do they all want "Liberation"? No, I argue in @ForeignAffairs
International Security retweeted
Spring 2026 issue preview @IntSecHarvard!
@eunajo_ @jessicacweiss | ideology
Rosato | security dilemma
@Fiona_Cunning @kbruusgaard | great powers' nuclear first-use options
@the_nuclearyogi @rohan_mukh | India’s nuclear restraint
Davis & Gholz | blockade against Taiwan's ports
International Security retweeted
Replying to @IntSecHarvard
From International Security: "Why Populists Love Dead Soldiers and Hate Live Officers: Right-wing populist leaders love soldiers (especially fallen ones) and the trappings of military life. But their love affair with the military rarely endures." international-security.simpl…
International Security retweeted
The Battle of Savo Island wasn't lost because of inferior technology. It was lost because no one knew how to use the technology they had. warontherocks.com/2026/04/th…
International Security retweeted
Excited to finally be able to share my new article "Deception and Detection" in @IntSecHarvard
In a nutshell, I argue that cyber defense has more to gain from AI automation than the offense.
Here is the link to the full article :
direct.mit.edu/isec/article/…
International Security retweeted
American Presidents invariably claim that the use of U.S. military force abroad benefits the local population. U.S. Presidents often explicitly or implicitly claim that "the intervened population" therefore welcomes U.S. military intervention - a powerful moral claim.
Replying to @IntSecHarvard
3) “A Matter of Principle: How Local Consent Affects U.S. Support for Military Interventions,” by @JaninaDill, Emily Myers, and Livia I. Schubiger
doi.org/10.1162/ISEC.a.400
International Security retweeted
"Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz tops the list of global energy security nightmares," wrote Caitlin Talmadge in 2008 in @IntSecHarvard. The aftermath of limited strikes on Iran would be complicated and costly.
Free to read for 90 days:
direct.mit.edu/isec/article/…
International Security retweeted
As Ron Krebs demonstrates, aspiring populist demagogues love dead soldiers but hate serving officers. The former can’t answer back when their memory’s exploited, but the latter are the greatest potential obstacle to demagogic authority - hence efforts to cow and politicise.
International Security retweeted
Winter 2026 issue preview @IntSecHarvard!
Krebs | why populists love dead soldiers
@JaninaDill, Myers, Schubiger | local consent for military interventions
@LenMaschmeyer | AI and cyberattacks
@joelfbrenner | AI and strategic surprise
@John_Severini, Biddle | naval warfare




















