InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO) profile picture

Here to correct misinformation and disinformation. Not to collect followers.

Canada
Joined April 2014
Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)Photo by InterestingIMO (@InterestingIMO)
InterestingIMO retweeted
#BREAKING: This is real investigative journalism. Moose on the Loose is Canada’s very own @nickshirleyy. He is doing what the MSM will never do, exposing CORRUPTION and FRAUD. @dsimieritsch @ESLTeac16885695 @MarkJCarney @ANTlWEF @vonderleyen
57
931
16
2,865
21,890
InterestingIMO retweeted
Are these the European values we want to emulate?
🇩🇪 This is Berlin, Germany. Happening tonight. Totally nuts. Writer: Oliver
408
1,130
37
3,838
39,877
RECUSE yourself
Richard Wagner described the 2022 Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa as the "start of anarchy," where participants took residents "hostage" and acted with a "bad understanding" of Canadian law. A Supreme Court of Canada justice does not have the right to express negative public views about an active case they are hearing. Doing so violates core constitutional principles and ethical duties governing the Canadian judiciary. globalnews.ca/news/12113125/…
1
1
10
Emergencies Act appeal: Chief Justice Wagner must recuse himself
52
474
29
1,288
33,345
Richard Wagner’s past remarks raise serious questions about judicial impartiality and he MUST recuse himself from the Emergencies Act appeal.
Can Canadians expect an impartial hearing when the Chief Justice has already publicly condemned the Freedom Convoy? In this column, John Carpay argues that Justice Richard Wagner’s past remarks raise serious questions about judicial impartiality and why he should recuse himself from the Emergencies Act appeal. junonews.com/p/justice-wagne…
1
8
InterestingIMO retweeted
CARPAY: Chief Justice Wagner should recuse himself from the Emergencies Act appeal “Chief Justice Wagner should have no involvement in deciding this appeal because he has already expressed strong public opposition to Freedom Convoy.” junonews.com/p/justice-wagne…
105
769
30
2,339
18,199
Replying to @KirkLubimov
@ElectionsAB care to explain?
1
4
69
2,452
Another example of why Alberta needs to select its own judges. Currently, the majority were appointed by Justin Trudeau. This judicial appointment dates back to Jean Chretien.
The 3 monsters tortured this couple. Then they crushed her skull and slit her throat. (To spare the family, I will skip other details.) Then they wrapped her husband’s face in duct tape, slowly asphyxiating him while they laughed.If you like liberal judges, vote Liberal.
1
57
Don’t be dumb like @ToewsWenda. In Alberta, you must be a Canadian citizen to vote, but you don’t have to provide proof of citizenship. You declare eligibility.
1
192
InterestingIMO retweeted
Never again? Albertans should never again endure the devastation caused by policies like the National Energy Program. “Never again” requires more than trusting the government of the day. It requires lasting structural protection. That begins by voting Option 2 on October 19.
31
287
11
654
5,104
InterestingIMO retweeted
Should the Province of Alberta cease to be part of Canada and become an independent state? Important: please like and repost to reach a larger sample size after voting 🗳️
YesNo
70%Yes
30%No
10,600 votes • Final results
187
1,357
65
1,638
95,373
InterestingIMO retweeted
Alberta: 33,000 barrels of oil reserves per person. Norway: 1,230 barrels per person. Norway has turned its energy resources into extraordinary national wealth. Alberta has an even greater resource endowment per person. Imagine what we could accomplish. We can do better. Vote Option 2.
173
863
41
2,095
35,863
InterestingIMO retweeted
If Alberta were already independent, would you vote to join Canada? Send Ottawa $20–30 BILLION a year. Surrender control over our laws and future. Let them block our resource development. Would you vote for that deal?
51
294
14
1,374
11,663
“We’re heading toward another failed government in Ottawa” Summary: Canada already has trade agreements with the EU, Britain and EFTA countries. So the Liberals’ talk of “turning to Europe” raises a basic question: what does that mean beyond the trade access Canada already has? EU membership would mean more than a trade deal. It would place some powers above national governments, which was a central reason Britain voted for Brexit. Europe is a poor model for Canada’s economic future. Its economy is stagnating, and its ability to fund the core functions of a modern state is declining. Carney’s European overtures risk provoking the United States, Canada’s far larger trading partner. Trump has threatened serious tariffs or restrictions if he views closer EU ties as hostile. The Liberals want to attract investment, but since 2015, $828 billion more in investment capital has left Canada than has entered. That outflow is weakening the dollar and contributing to industrial decline. Ottawa is projecting a $78.3-billion deficit for 2026–27. With Canadian families already paying a large share of their income in taxes, there is little room to solve the problem by raising taxes further. The Liberals’ immigration policy is adding to the strain. Replacing the points system with large numbers of people who lack needed skills or social compatibility increases reliance on taxpayer support. The Liberals are also increasing government control over information. Bill C-9 changes the Criminal Code’s hate-propaganda provisions, while Bill C-34 creates a Digital Safety Commission to regulate online content. This is a threat to freedom of expression and access to information. Canada’s decline began before Trump became U.S. president. Blaming him does not erase the damage caused by Liberal policies on trade, investment, spending, immigration and freedom of expression.
64
Vote for OPTION 2 gives Albertans a Voice, and results in Leverage with Ottawa.
Don't let the Canadian Government or the Media mislead you. A Vote for OPTION 2 does NOT mean Separation. A Vote for OPTION 2 gives Albertans a Voice, and results in Leverage with Ottawa. This October Vote Q-10 OPTION 2, a Referendum on a Referendum = Leverage.
2
3
80
“Carney handed the administrative levers of the Canadian state to an unaccountable foreign national drawn from his private network. Canada is no longer being governed; it is being operated.”
Wow. Who wrote this masterpiece? This is long and excellent. I’m only halfway through. “Nothing makes the corporate transition of the Prime Minister’s Office more undeniable than Carney’s appointment of Maia Johnson as the first-ever Chief Operating Officer of the PMO on July 14, 2026. An American political operative connected to Carney through GFANZ, Johnson is not a Canadian citizen. She was recently fined by Canada’s Ethics Commissioner for failing to file her mandatory disclosures within the legal 60-day window - a filing still listed as in progress. Traditional Prime Ministers hire a Chief of Staff to manage policy and public trust; a Chief Operating Officer is hired to run a corporation. By importing this executive design, Carney handed the administrative levers of the Canadian state to an unaccountable foreign national drawn from his private network. Canada is no longer being governed; it is being operated.”
4
56
Canada now
COLUMN: OECD downgrades Canada’s economic growth as Carney moves away from U.S. Canada also faces long-standing structural problems in its economy, including low productivity torontosun.com/opinion/colum…
13
Canada 2030:
Everything in this video is where Canada is already headed. The only question is whether Alberta goes with it. Vote Option 2.
17
Why would Trump use the military to annex Canada? All he would have to do is offer Alberta statehood, liberation from transfer payments, excessive regulation and carbon taxes, carte blanche to exploit its natural resources, a generous welcome bonus in the form of a $100,000 tax credit to every adult Albertan and replace their Canadian dollars with equal amounts of US currency. They would effectively be acquiring Alberta for the knock-down bargain price of roughly 1x annual GDP.
It is with great concern for some of my fellow countrymen, inching precariously toward the edge of utter lunacy, that I write this post. Prime Minister Mark Carney this week, in an interview with the New York Times, went on record saying it would be “irresponsible” not to plan for the possible contingency of a military invasion of Canada by the United States. Unfortunately, Mr. Carney didn’t misspeak or fall victim to a cherry-picked quote taken out of context. His concern was later reiterated by Defence Minister David McGuinty and Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Soloman. We all know that Donald Trump has a colourful history of spouting off some truly outrageous whoppers from time to time, but even he has never disseminated something as fatuous, dangerous or dishonest as this. And while he seldom backs down from his outrageous claims, whenever he pushes the envelope too far, at least his entourage goes on damage control to walk back some of his excesses – Carney’s guys are doubling down. Despite these idiotic statements, these are intelligent men. The odds that all three of them would simultaneously become afflicted by the same psychotic delusion is infinitesimally small. The only rational conclusion, therefore, is that they believe, or rather their polling data shows, that enough Canadians are so possessed by Trump Derangement that engaging in such asinine demagoguery is politically expedient. Sadly, they may be right. The vast coalition of useful idiots and true believers after effectively having their intelligences insulted by their dear leader, are coming out of the woodwork to express gratitude online for the Prime Minister’s caution in preparing for all, including the most remote, contingencies. Others are retreating slightly to hold the line at the fall-back position articulated by Minister McGuinty that, this kind of paranoid delusion is perfectly normal and, “all militaries in the world spend time analyzing risk scenarios.” I assure you, this is not normal. Back on planet Earth, the situation is tense and acrimonious (and there is plenty of blame to go around for that), but this is not the more than two centuries of peace along the 49th parallel that followed the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1815 drawing to an end. Trump has imposed tariffs on $20 billion (or 2% of the $400 billion per year) of Canadian exports to the US. In other words, amid this unnecessary, escalatory, and foolish trade dispute, the United States will still purchase 200% more Canadian goods and services this year than the rest of the world combined. This situation is like a restaurant’s picky regular customer complaining about an overcooked steak to a prideful chef who, fortified in his own mind by the knowledge he cooked the steak perfectly, refuses to comp the entree. This is not the start of World War III. We are so far removed from a military incursion at our southern border that we may as well be strategizing the response to the equally plausible threat of Santa Claus leading an invasion of elves from the north. If we woke up tomorrow in some parallel reality where the United States actually was contemplating a full-scale military campaign against Canada, with all due respect to our brave men and women in uniform, the only preparations to be made would be negotiating the terms of our unconditional surrender. Some brave and patriotic Canadians may refuse to submit and instead choose to conduct, as a matter of principle, a brutal and bloody guerilla warfare campaign against the strongest conventional and nuclear military force in the history of the world. Unfortunately, they would be in the precarious position of having to rely on our miserly European allies, or countries like Russia or China, whose recent actions have been significantly more hostile and provocative challenges to our sovereignty than the US tariffs, to supply us with weapons, and they would not remotely be adequate. It’s all so desperately preposterous. But for the sake of argument, let’s suppose that Donald Trump was indeed the terrifying bogeyman haunting the dreams of the most extreme and hopeless sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome and its frightful sister affliction, Andrew Coyneism, a rare and especially acute form of tweet-induced psychotic maladjustment. Even in this scenario, why would Trump use the military to annex Canada? All he would have to do is offer Alberta statehood, liberation from transfer payments, excessive regulation and carbon taxes, carte blanche to exploit its natural resources, a generous welcome bonus in the form of a $100,000 tax credit to every adult Albertan and replace their Canadian dollars with equal amounts of US currency. They would effectively be acquiring Alberta for the knock-down bargain price of roughly 1x annual GDP. Simultaneously, the US (including the newly acquired Alberta) would immediately cut off all trade with the rest of Canada. The net impact to Canada of this manoeuvre would be a cataclysmic economic collapse, while the newly composed United States would take a net GDP hit (loss of all trade with Canada, mostly offset by the acquisition of Alberta) of 0.8%. Next would come a full package of sanctions, a naval blockade, and when the rest of Canada became desperate enough, a Chinese belt-and-road style offtake of all of Canada’s resources at bargain prices, which by then, the Canadians would be desperate for. In the meantime, the US would revamp its immigration policy to recreate the brain-drain of the 1990s on steroids, welcoming the top 20% most productive Canadians to flee what had overnight become the third world. Harvard Alumnus Mark Carney might well be among those at the front of the line seeking this emigration opportunity, rejoining 91 percent of his own investments already located there. There would, no doubt, be a fearsome contingent of Canadians refusing to bend or break in the face of American tyranny, and elbows would be flying up to vertiginous heights with such vigour that the Canadian healthcare system would be overwhelmed by millions of spontaneous emergency room visits of patriotic patients with dislocated shoulders. I suspect many of you reading this are thinking to yourself that this is so completely far-fetched and absurd that, if serious, I must have lost my mind. Allow me to reassure you that while this is all bunk, it remains at least ten times more likely than the United States military executing a boots-on-the-ground invasion of Canada. Anyone who spends more than one second worrying about such an outcome should immediately proceed to the nearest sink to splash some cold water in their face and pull themselves together.
1
2
28
Cannot disagree
Fuck each and every Canadian who voted for a Liberal candidate in the last Federal election. Fuck each and every Canadian who cast a vote that helped a man become Prime Minister of Canada, who did not have Canada’s best interests at heart. Fuck each and every Canadian who chose to put into power a man and a party who seem focussed on destroying this country, and allowing us to be conquered. Fuck each and every Canadian who voted for a globalist who has demonstrated he doesn’t care at all about Canadians. Fuck each and every Canadian who elected a Party who has fucked us for 10 years, and a new leader who is finding brand new ways to fuck us. You were warned. You were told. You did it anyway. Fuck you.
17