Jim Galka (@JimGalka) header
Jim Galka (@JimGalka) profile picture
Colorado, USA
Joined November 2017
Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)Photo by Jim Galka (@JimGalka)
Greatfull for these gentleman... @aantonop @PeterMcCormack @saifedean. My family's financial future would not be where it is today without you... Thank you for all you've done for ₿. You have improved the lives of so many!
1
128
Up to #7 globally… taking out Meta, all of the above ground Silver, and Saudi Aramco just in the last 10 days!!! 🤯 Up next Amazon and Google.
1
72
SMH… so sad that 600k+ died as a result of the USA not holding to its word. End it @realDonaldTrump
36
Presented w/o comment:
14
76
10
220
14,010
Just going to leave this little gem 👇🏻 🤡🌏@profstonge
1
12
Jim Galka retweeted
BG2 Ep15. Deep Dive Nuclear from INSIDE Diablo Canyon 👊💥@altcap @bgurley (00:00) Intro (04:14) Maureen Zawalick | VP at Diablo Canyon (06:13) The Need for Diablo (10:07) The Importance of Nuclear Power (15:50) License Renewal and the Future of Diablo (18:39) Hope for Expanding Nuclear Power (25:22) Nuclear Waste (30:29) Cost Differential: US vs China (38:56) Factors Contributing to Cost Differential (45:07) Implications of China’s Nuclear Leadership (47:42) Nuclear Energy and AI Supremacy (50:58) The Innovation Gap and Gen 4 Reactors (57:27) Overcoming Challenges (01:03:45) A Call for Government Support
53
73
48
486
413,851
The last time the US yield curve uninverted with US debt/GDP at 123%, US deficit/GDP at 7%, US Net Int’l Investment Position at -80% of GDP, & Central Banks not having bought any USTs on net in 10 years was…👇 It is, by definition, “different this time” (at least for the US)…
41
152
14
927
138,416
A challenge with macroeconomic policies is that it’s hard or impossible to run tests with any sort of control group, or for a sufficient length of time. But since countries make different choices, a decent sample of test outcomes has developed over time.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
56
81
9
663
105,671
This is worth taking a minute to read.
People need to stop overreacting about Kamala’s plan to reduce food inflation, as if it would lead to communism, mass starvation, and the end of America. I worked in M&A in the food industry. Here’s a step-by-step summary of what would actually happen: 1. The government announces that grocery retailers aren’t allowed to raise prices. 2. Grocery stores, which operate on 1-2% net margins, can’t survive if their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food producers (Kraft Heinz, ConAgra, Tyson, Hormel, et. al.) also aren’t allowed to raise prices. 3. Not all grocery stores are created equal. Stores in lower-income areas make less money than those in higher-income areas, as the former disproportionately sell lower-margin prepackaged foods (“center of the store”) instead of higher-margin fresh products like meat (“perimeter of the store”). Because stores in lower-income areas aren’t able to cover overhead (remember, even if their wholesale costs are fixed, their labor, utilities, insurance, and other operating expenses aren’t fixed… yet), grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural areas and in low-income urban areas alike become worse. 4. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding. Their primary costs (ingredients, energy, and labor) aren’t fixed, and their shrinking gross profits leave less cash flow available to cover overhead, maintain facilities, and reinvest in additional production capacity. 5. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space, start to repurpose their stores (those they didn’t have to shut down, I should say) to sell more non-price-controlled items—everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel—and less price-controlled food products. Your local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart. 6. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chain start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can’t compete by offering stronger prices (remember, producers aren’t allowed to raise prices here, and, even if they could, grocery chains no longer have the gross profit to bear price increases), they compete on things like payment terms. 7. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely, or get sold to larger chains like Kroger. In addition to not being able to cover fixed costs, a major reason for this is because they can no longer reliably secure delivery of products, due to producers prioritizing sales to larger customers, which are able to leverage their stronger balance sheets to offer superior payment terms. 8. Smaller food producers—which typically sell via distributors, rather than directly to grocery chains—start to go out of business. Because these producers have an additional step their value chains, and because they have lower volumes over which to spread their fixed costs, their cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food producers. When grocery stores aren’t able to raise prices, cutting product costs becomes all the more important, and deprioritizing purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so. 9. As supply chains break down, lines start to form outside grocery stores every morning. Cities assign police officers to patrol store parking lots, and food producers draft contingency plans to assign armed escorts to delivery trucks. 10. The federal government announces a program to issue block grants for states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA also seizes closed-down production facilities. 11. The government announces that prices for all key food costs—corn, wheat, cattle, energy, etc.—are also now fixed, to stop “profiteers” from gouging the now-government-operated food industry. 12. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding. 13. Communism, mass starvation, and the end of America quickly ensue. Hey wait a second
412
1,788
87
9,559
428,173
Rut row… @LukeGromen @PrestonPysh looks like the dreaded treasury dysfunction you both prophesied may be instigated by Japan sooner than later. Would love your thoughts on this…
"If the Treasury gets backed into this corner and is forced to pony up higher yields, then things will unravel fast. We’ll look back fondly at 8% mortgage rates and the limited bank failures of spring 2023, because things will be much worse than that..." (Article linked in reply)
1
24
My latest article examines why the vast majority of investments in the world are poor performers (bonds, stocks, and real estate), and what the handful of good performers tend to have in common. lynalden.com/most-investment…
134
466
82
2,849
637,030
the FBI calls crypto money so they can arrest you for money laundering the IRS calls it property so they can tax you on capital gains the SEC calls it a security so they can sue every exchange the CFTC calls it a commodity so you can’t use it as a currency
583
3,635
353
14,257
1,288,226
34
352
15
1,423
34,173
Serious Question @PrestonPysh @LukeGromen… not saying this is possible but if it were, how would Yellen and JPow engineer the dollar to fall in a meaningful way (say to 70-80)? What exactly would that look like? If this is the only survival path, what should they be doing?
1
12
The State of Our Union
2,602
13,172
3,301
49,718
12,162,325
Excited to see @DOE posting content like this 45 years' worth of spent nuclear fuel from an entire power plant is shown in this photo, and it’s barely visible. More people need to see this
132
1,108
82
7,032
356,987
Hi Lizzy, can I call you Lizzy? As a law professor, and a senator serving on the Banking Committee, one would hope you know how this works. While the SEC as a rulemaking organization may provide its guidance and interpretations of the law, it does not set or decide that law. The binding interpretation of law in this country is, and always shall be, with the judiciary. The SEC did not get “the law” wrong. Because the SEC was not the one who decide the law here. That was the DC circuit Court of Appeals, where a three-judge panel **unanimously** that the SEC’s denials of these ETFs was “arbitrarily and capriciously” a violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. You may not like the policy, or the asset and that’s fine. But no one “got the law wrong” here. You as a Senator, have the ability to change that law, and you have failed to do so, because a majority of elected officials have disagreed with your pro-banking, parental police state legislation of preventing the American people from choosing their own assets. You’re allowed to suggest the policy is wrong, or you think Bitcoin is risky, or, admit the truth and say you just don’t understand it all and it’s scary. But to have the audacity to suggest, that the DC Circuit Court of Appeals views matter less than your own when it comes down to what the law is, is an outrageous thing for a Senator to say. It’s nothing short of an insult to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, to have a Senator who has such little respect for the rule of law, and so little respect for her own constituents, that she feels the need to babysit their finances. I look forward to supporting your next primary opponent whom ever they may be.
The @SECgov is wrong on the law and wrong on the policy with respect to the Bitcoin ETF decision. If the SEC is going to let crypto burrow even deeper into our financial system, then it's more urgent than ever that crypto follow basic anti-money laundering rules.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
There are already robust laws to prevent crypto money laundering. US agencies such as FinCEN, SEC, CFTC enforce Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, sanctions adherence, and the txn monitoring. States like New York (BitLicense), also contribute to AML efforts. reuters.com/legal/transact… americanbar.org/groups/crimina… insights.pecb.com/cryptocurrency…
114
408
48
2,715
300,567
This guy did his homework… if you are wondering why the Israeli/Gaza broke out, this lays out the incentives @LukeGromen
Israel have now killed over 7,500 people, surpassing the slaughter of 2014 twofold. It's not just because Israel is racist. Israel and the United States want the giant amounts of gas in Gaza, and to create a rival to China's New Silk Road. If you do one thing, watch this video
28