fomo - https://xitter.cf/t.co/FU3QhOS8uA

Joined January 2023
KeeperCF retweeted
are you a gas pumper or a simp for another pump? keep building
usually what takes off early in the cycle is not what is the main theme of the cycle, think pandora404, ordinals, btc bridges, btc l2s, etc last cycle Agentic Finance (agentfi) is still the multi year trend do not peak too early
5
7
1
53
2,573
KeeperCF retweeted
Replying to @entropyIO
@entropyIO : FACTS MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW A few interesting facts: > Built on @HyperliquidX via HIP-3 > Reportedly raised $14M, led by Ribbit Capital > Targets markets like Anthropic and SanDisk > Uses Hyperliquid's infrastructure instead of building its own exchange >No confirmed token or points program as of August 2026 The interesting part? Trading exposure to private companies before they even go public. Still early, but the numbers are already interesting.
JUST IN: Anthropic drops 7% in an hour on Entropy as some investors cut IPO expectations from $2 trillion to $1.5 trillion. Yesterday, Anthropic told investors revenue growth halved since last quarter.
1
2
128
KeeperCF retweeted
. $IMD ethereum:0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7 STILL EARLY
Alpha: Ethereum devs are deploying agent swarms.
1
26
373
KeeperCF retweeted
VARIATIONAL IS BECOMING A SERIOUS PERP DEX CONTENDER According to DefiLlama, @variational_io is now competing with giants like @HyperliquidX, Lighter, and Aster. The numbers speak for themselves: > 30D Volume: $76.78B > Open Interest: $956M > 24H Volume: $1.39B Variational ranks #2 in 30-day volume among these four platforms, ahead of @Lighter_xyz and @Aster_DEX And the interesting part? We're still farming points before TGE. 1 point on OTC - $30-40 farm - omni.variational.io/?ref=OMN…
Variational has listed 13 new markets in the past two weeks, with more added daily. The broker-like model aggregates existing liquidity from crypto and TradFi sources, so each new listing is liquid on day one.
7
4
32
514
VARIATIONAL IS BECOMING A SERIOUS PERP DEX CONTENDER According to DefiLlama, @variational_io is now competing with giants like @HyperliquidX, Lighter, and Aster. The numbers speak for themselves: > 30D Volume: $76.78B > Open Interest: $956M > 24H Volume: $1.39B Variational ranks #2 in 30-day volume among these four platforms, ahead of @Lighter_xyz and @Aster_DEX And the interesting part? We're still farming points before TGE. 1 point on OTC - $30-40 farm - omni.variational.io/?ref=OMN…
Variational has listed 13 new markets in the past two weeks, with more added daily. The broker-like model aggregates existing liquidity from crypto and TradFi sources, so each new listing is liquid on day one.
7
4
32
514
KeeperCF retweeted
IMD SZN: THE SWARM KEEPS SHIPPING October 26. Still bullish on $IMD, NFT agents and $INFER. @surfcoderepeat is using his own product, and his latest experiment is worth a look. He shared “a game to short IMD.” Eight agents worked on it, and the explorer confirms deployment on Ethereum. Each 0.1 ETH entry buys 0.08 ETH worth of $IMD for the player and adds 0.02 ETH to the prize pool. At sellout, the entry receiving the fewest tokens wins the pot. An unusual game, not a conventional short. The important part: an idea became a deployed contract through the swarm. Morning snapshot: > 1,116 registered agents. > Around 950 online, not necessarily working. > 52 jobs yesterday, including one failure. NFT operators now have app-based setup for Mac and Windows. Easier onboarding, with earnings dependent on accepted work. $IMD powers paid requests. $INFER remains on my watchlist for its proposed financial layer around IMD collateral and verified AI work. Execution is what I’m watching next. Also bullish on $IDM’s creativity: this recent IMD launch turns swaps into music through a Uniswap v4 hook. Feels like IMD szn is taking shape again. Useful products and returning users will make the difference.
1
5
27
664
IMD SZN: THE SWARM KEEPS SHIPPING October 26. Still bullish on $IMD, NFT agents and $INFER. @surfcoderepeat is using his own product, and his latest experiment is worth a look. He shared “a game to short IMD.” Eight agents worked on it, and the explorer confirms deployment on Ethereum. Each 0.1 ETH entry buys 0.08 ETH worth of $IMD for the player and adds 0.02 ETH to the prize pool. At sellout, the entry receiving the fewest tokens wins the pot. An unusual game, not a conventional short. The important part: an idea became a deployed contract through the swarm. Morning snapshot: > 1,116 registered agents. > Around 950 online, not necessarily working. > 52 jobs yesterday, including one failure. NFT operators now have app-based setup for Mac and Windows. Easier onboarding, with earnings dependent on accepted work. $IMD powers paid requests. $INFER remains on my watchlist for its proposed financial layer around IMD collateral and verified AI work. Execution is what I’m watching next. Also bullish on $IDM’s creativity: this recent IMD launch turns swaps into music through a Uniswap v4 hook. Feels like IMD szn is taking shape again. Useful products and returning users will make the difference.
1
5
27
664
KeeperCF retweeted
looks like the $IMD founder made a game to short $IMD and pull the last bit of liquidity out, because he's bearish af gg
10
2
1
50
7,173
KeeperCF retweeted
Replying to @fradamt
working on it over at imd.fun, we have a swarm of over 1000 claude/codex subs, rn fully working on beta and you can hire for $2
6
8
1
73
1,675
KeeperCF retweeted
total monthly users: 35m losing traders: 88.5% where’s all this money going?
317
197
109
2,170
208,208
KeeperCF retweeted
The plan is the same been here before you came back and will stay here before you come back again
13
20
6
154
5,996
KeeperCF retweeted
IMD based Project that plays music based on swaps on a univ4 hook now live 24/7 on twitter
17
19
3
138
7,248
KeeperCF retweeted
if a founder isn’t their product’s biggest fan, it’s probably not that good the best products are built by people who are solving their own problems
7
13
4
111
10,782
KeeperCF retweeted
IS VIRTUALS AFRAID OF IMD SZN? imd.fun goes offline for roughly five hours, and @wegocrypto88 is already calling time on IMD. The site is back. @surfcoderepeat explained the registrar hold and announced infrastructure improvements: automatic worker failover, IPFS links and less dependence on a single domain. The swarm keeps building. Criticising downtime is fair. Declaring an entire project dead over it feels premature. But here’s the interesting part: the screenshot shows a like from someone with “core @virtuals_io" in their bio Save the obituary. IMD szn might just be getting started. Keep building
6
6
1
38
1,822
IS VIRTUALS AFRAID OF IMD SZN? imd.fun goes offline for roughly five hours, and @wegocrypto88 is already calling time on IMD. The site is back. @surfcoderepeat explained the registrar hold and announced infrastructure improvements: automatic worker failover, IPFS links and less dependence on a single domain. The swarm keeps building. Criticising downtime is fair. Declaring an entire project dead over it feels premature. But here’s the interesting part: the screenshot shows a like from someone with “core @virtuals_io" in their bio Save the obituary. IMD szn might just be getting started. Keep building
6
6
1
38
1,822
KeeperCF retweeted
I need a public response from @Pumpfun and @a1lon9. Today, October 25, my referral program was suddenly disabled — and rewards for the people who signed up through my referral link were stopped as well. No clear reason. No specific violation. No explanation of who allegedly did something wrong. Just: decision made. And this is where I have a serious problem. I am an influencer with a large Telegram audience. @Pumpfun launched a promotion designed to bring new users onto the platform: → a new user signs up through a referral → makes the required deposit → trades on Pump.fun → the user can earn up to $50 → the referrer receives a matching reward So I did exactly what a referral campaign is supposed to encourage. I promoted Pump.fun to my audience. People registered. People deposited their own money. People started trading. Pump.fun got new users, deposits, trading activity and exposure. Everything worked. Rewards were being paid. Then today my referral link/account was suddenly restricted and rewards connected to my referrals were stopped. I currently have roughly 135–150 referred users. And my main question is NOT even about my own referral rewards. My question is: Why should legitimate users who followed the rules lose their rewards because Pump.fun detected some unspecified issue somewhere inside one referral network? If one person abused the promotion — investigate that person. If five accounts abused it — block those five accounts. If I personally violated a rule — tell me what I violated and point to the relevant activity. I am absolutely fine with anti-fraud systems. Every large promotion needs them. What I cannot understand is this: How can an entire group of real users be punished without anyone being told what actually happened? These people did not create the promotion. They did not decide its rules. They saw an official Pump.fun incentive, registered, deposited money and traded because they were told they could earn a reward. Some of them may have joined Pump.fun specifically because I recommended the platform. I put my reputation behind that recommendation. I told my audience: “Pump.fun is running this promotion. Here are the conditions. Follow them and you can receive the reward.” Now those same people are coming back to me asking: “Where is the reward?” What am I supposed to tell them? “Pump.fun decided not to pay and will not explain why”? That damages MY reputation with my community even though I do not control Pump.fun’s anti-fraud system. And there is another important point. The entire purpose of a referral promotion is to bring new users to the platform. That is exactly what happened here. I brought a large number of users. They created accounts. They deposited. They traded. Pump.fun received exactly the growth and activity this campaign was designed to generate. So if @Pumpfun believes abuse happened, I am asking for something very simple: Manually review my referral network. Identify the accounts or activity that actually violated the rules. Disqualify the real violators if necessary. Restore rewards for legitimate users who completed the requirements. Tell me whether I personally violated any rule and, if so, what category of rule was violated. I am NOT asking @Pumpfun or @a1lon9 to reveal fraud-detection algorithms. I am NOT asking for internal thresholds, security systems or anti-abuse methodology. I am asking for basic accountability when more than 100 real people are affected by one decision. There is a huge difference between: “We cannot reveal our anti-fraud methodology.” and: “We blocked everything and do not have to explain anything.” A referral program is built on trust. Influencers put their reputation behind the platform. Users put their money onto the platform. The platform gets acquisition, deposits, trading volume and exposure. That relationship cannot work if rewards for an entire community can simply disappear with no meaningful explanation. And yes — I promoted Pump.fun because I wanted to make money. Of course I did. That is literally the purpose of a referral program. But I also wanted my subscribers to make money from the promotion. Pump.fun wanted new users. My audience wanted the bonus. I wanted the referral reward. Everyone had an incentive. That is how a healthy referral campaign is supposed to work. I have screenshots of the promotion. I have records showing users registering and receiving rewards before the restriction. I have examples of rewards being stopped. I have my correspondence with support. I will attach the evidence below so everyone can judge the situation for themselves. @Pumpfun @a1lon9, I am asking publicly for a manual review. If I broke a rule, tell me what category of rule I broke. If certain referrals abused the promotion, remove those referrals. But please do not punish legitimate users for activity they had nothing to do with. I would much rather resolve this fairly than turn it into a public fight. Restore legitimate rewards, or give us a meaningful explanation for why these users were disqualified. That is all I am asking. And I am also asking for maximum support from influencers, crypto creators and everyone who has ever promoted a platform to their audience. If you believe platforms should not use influencers to bring in new users, receive their deposits and trading activity, and then mass-stop rewards without a meaningful explanation — repost or quote this post. Not just for me. People need to know how @Pumpfun handles situations like this. Today it happened to my audience. Tomorrow it could happen to the audience of any other influencer. If you are an influencer running referral campaigns, this matters to you too — because your own reputation is on the line every time you recommend a platform to your followers. Please repost or quote. We need a public response from @Pumpfun and @a1lon9. And if you participated through my referral link and your reward was stopped, reply below with your experience and screenshots. Let’s document exactly how many legitimate users were affected.
38
39
4
109
2,378
KeeperCF retweeted
WHAT IF YOU BOUGHT $10 OF hyperliquid:native EVERY SINGLE DAY SINCE LAUNCH? I built a hyperliquid:native DCA calculator to find out From November 29, 2024 to October 25, 2026: > Total invested: $6,960 > Portfolio value: $16,524 > Profit: +$9,564 (+137%) > hyperliquid:native accumulated: 217.89 But here's the crazy part... If you had invested the same $6,960 on day one, it would be worth $84,425 today That's a massive difference I built a free calculator where you can change the dates and daily investment to test your own hyperliquid:native strategy Try it: hyperfomo.vercel.app/
the biggest $HYPE short on hyperliquid has been in since late august watched it rip to $98 last month and never closed a thing..... now sitting on 715k $HYPE short worth $54m, up almost $6m plus $620k collected in funding whoever this is won the hype war for now 🤣🤣
7
5
34
976
WHAT IF YOU BOUGHT $10 OF hyperliquid:native EVERY SINGLE DAY SINCE LAUNCH? I built a hyperliquid:native DCA calculator to find out From November 29, 2024 to October 25, 2026: > Total invested: $6,960 > Portfolio value: $16,524 > Profit: +$9,564 (+137%) > hyperliquid:native accumulated: 217.89 But here's the crazy part... If you had invested the same $6,960 on day one, it would be worth $84,425 today That's a massive difference I built a free calculator where you can change the dates and daily investment to test your own hyperliquid:native strategy Try it: hyperfomo.vercel.app/
the biggest $HYPE short on hyperliquid has been in since late august watched it rip to $98 last month and never closed a thing..... now sitting on 715k $HYPE short worth $54m, up almost $6m plus $620k collected in funding whoever this is won the hype war for now 🤣🤣
7
5
34
976
KeeperCF retweeted
The exact same thing will happen with $IMD only this time, it won’t take decades; it will happen much faster so fast, in fact, that you can’t even imagine Keep building
3
23
590
The exact same thing will happen with $IMD only this time, it won’t take decades; it will happen much faster so fast, in fact, that you can’t even imagine Keep building
3
23
590