Freedom of Choice - Bodily Autonomy - My Body My Choice - Less Government Intrusion - Works in the energy industry
Australia
Joined September 2020
- Tweets22.1K
- Following1.1K
- Followers879
- Likes26.2K
Kev retweeted
The COVID lockdowns were the darkest period in recent British history. A mass cover Up - they lied and they will pay for it. The UK, USA, Canada, Australia all have guilty individuals and institutions ianbrighthope.substack.com/p…
Transcription of the speech by Rupert Lowe MP.
The COVID lockdowns were the darkest period in recent British history.
The COVID lockdowns were the darkest period in recent British history, bar none. Our freedoms were stripped away in ways most of us never imagined possible.
And alongside all of that came extraordinary pressure on millions of people to take the COVID vaccine.
Pressure from politicians, employers, media, institutions, everything everywhere. For some, refusing meant losing their livelihood. They did it anyway. We were told to trust the science. But the science is not a commandment. It’s a process of questioning, testing, and challenging of evidence. And when a government asks millions of healthy people to undergo an unproven medical intervention with unwanted consequences, scrutiny should increase.
Co posed very different risks to different people. An elderly vulnerable person faced a very different calculation from a healthy 25year-old. In fact, they could not have been more different. The 25year-old was at no risk whatsoever. They were more likely to drown to death and have serious issues with COVID. Yet so much of the messaging treated vaccination as though it were the same decision for everyone. Why? Why were people asking questions treated with such hostility? And why were people who refused a medical invention intervention made to feel like social paras?
I’m particularly concerned about children. For the overwhelming majority, the risk of severe CO illness was non-existent. It was a cold. There was no threat at all. And let’s remember that the roll out to teenagers was forced through against the advice of JCVI who originally declined to recommend a mass roll out for younger teens. The facts are quite clear. We do know that cases of myocarditis and pericarditis occurred following COVID vaccinations particularly amongst adolescent and young adult males.
Millions of healthy young men and women should never have been forced to take that vaccination and those responsible for that decision must be held accountable. informed consent is the only way.
Then there was Nadim Zahari, the Conservative government’s vaccines minister at the time, now speaking for Reform UK. He stated that children 12 to 15 could receive the COVID vaccine even where their parents objected. A 12-year-old could take this vaccination against their parents’ wishes. Think about that, 12 years old.
And then came vaccine passports, again forced through by reform Zahari. I found the entire concept morally repugnant. It was criminal. The idea that the state could make access to ordinary parts of life dependent on disclosing your medical status. That is not how a free country should operate.
I did not take the COVID vaccine. I didn’t want it. I didn’t need it and I didn’t take it. That decision cost me money. It affected my travel. I lost friends. It made my life considerably more difficult. But I don’t regret it for one moment.
But this cannot end with another speech about how badly things were handled. We all know that this there must be accountability.
By law, this inquiry cannot decide whether anyone is liable for what went wrong. What response that responsibility now rests with government regulators and where necessary the courts. The inquiry itself recognized the heavy cost of lockdowns even as even if it criticized how decisions were made. That is exactly why there must be a full honest reckoning of their true costs and benefits and of the treatment of the care home residents.
Questions about pandemic censorship and conflicts of interest demand answers to. Who decided which questions the public was allowed to ask? Who profited from the answers?
The these are questions any healthy democracy should ask. The government has accepted that the reform is needed, but it has offered no timetable and no detail. Those who have been injured by these vaccines cannot be left waiting any longer. The scheme needs an overhaul. Nobody can be above the law.
My Opinion
Stop Congratulating Yourselves. Answer to the People Who Were Harmed.
I am sick of hearing declarations of success delivered while injured people are still fighting to be heard and those killed have no voice at all.
The parliamentary testimony reproduced here describes families seeking answers, serious allegations about regulatory failures, and a compensation scheme whose administrative costs reportedly dwarf the payments reaching claimants. Against that background, the familiar declaration that “the vaccine programme was a success” is a complete lie and an insult to those still waiting for recognition and help.
My objection is to the use of that declaration as an escape from accountability.
Stop asking the injured to take comfort in a BS ‘success story.’
Give them answers, care and justice.
Ian Brighthope
Kev retweeted
the rba is raising fucking interest rates as we approach the ai singularity.
bunch of kunst
today they raised their cash rate to 4.85%. rate settings at two decimal points of absurdity.
they cite the middle east oil shock and, astonishingly, the inflationary effects of ai investment.
yep. ai. the same technology that might be about to make vast quantities of human labour economically redundant.
and they're worried about the price of computers. i'm worried about the price of human beings.
think about the sequence. first comes the extraordinary spending on data centres. shortages of chips. rising electricity demand. inflation.
but what happens when the machines start doing the work?
what happens to wages when employers discover they need fewer people? what happens to consumption when the mortgage is still there but the salary isn't?
that's the deflationary carnage i'm trying to imagine.
and the grey suits in australia are staring at today's inflation print and raising the price of time.
to be fair, they've got an argument. domestic capacity is tighter than they thought and inflation expectations have risen. i understand that.
but house prices are already falling. unemployment is rising. three of the nine board members wanted to hold.
and now they're tightening into what could become the greatest labour-displacing technological revolution in human history.
perhaps ai delivers a productivity miracle without the unemployment catastrophe. i'd love that.
but imagine the alternative.
a country drowning in household debt discovers that the value of human labour is falling just as the central bank makes servicing that debt more expensive.
they're fighting the inflationary cost of building the machines.
i'm terrified of what happens when they switch them on.
🌴🏴☠️
🤖 Made with AI
Kev retweeted
How is @shellenberger doing better work on Australian affairs, than most Australian Journalists based in Australia?
Taxpayers gave mining titan Twiggy Forrest's Fortescu A$308M in energy subsidies in 2025 alone, plus A$99M for an H2 project he abandoned. In exchange, Forrest gave millions for propaganda to pass @AlboMP government's censorship bill. It's a transparent, sinister quid pro quo.
Kev retweeted
The CDC’s own contractor privately admitted that Covid shot injuries were “5-6 times” worse than their “worst-case scenario” in this bombshell internal document.
Then, they blatantly lied to the public about the data.
Bookmark this.
Del Bigtree just broke down the document he uncovered that the CDC never wanted you to see:
Jeffrey Tucker: “The contract for processing the VAERS data was given out to… General Dynamics Information System.”
The number of injury reports was so overwhelming that they wrote an “urgent memo” to the CDC in which they admitted:
“We are no longer in a position to process these.”
Del Bigtree: “The CDC had told them the worst case scenario will be this amount.”
Then, 20 people at the CDC signed a public report that said:
“Wow, this is so reassuring.”
Tucker: “That is a flat-out lie based on that chart that General Dynamics Information System sent to CDC.”
@jeffreytucker @delbigtree
Kev retweeted
Support for the most radical censorship bill in the West is 100% fake, paid for by the corrupt @AlboMP and his billionaire backer, Twiggy Forrest, who takes hundreds of millions a year of taxpayer money. They’re desperate to censor critics who correctly point out that their policies put the financial interests of China ahead of the security and prosperity of the Australian people.
Kev retweeted
Taxpayers gave mining titan Twiggy Forrest's Fortescu A$308M in energy subsidies in 2025 alone, plus A$99M for an H2 project he abandoned. In exchange, Forrest gave millions for propaganda to pass @AlboMP government's censorship bill. It's a transparent, sinister quid pro quo.
Kev retweeted
Australia bet big on hydrogen made from renewables and lost billions. Now, one of Australia's largest miners may soon cut production and jobs. The cause was a set of catastrophic decisions by Labor leaders and Fortescue's founder, Andrew "Twiggy" Forrest.
Kev retweeted
BREAKING: A major civil war has erupted inside the Albanese Government, with a leadership spill officially brewing within the Labor Party.
In a stunning and unprecedented move, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has gone into survival mode, publicly pointing the finger directly at his boss, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, as the primary reason Labor’s popularity has completely plummeted.
Make no mistake, the lines have been drawn, the factions are fracturing, and a leadership spill is coming.
Here is exactly how the civil war is playing out:
Jim Chalmers openly name checked Anthony Albanese and other senior ministers, declaring that everyone is responsible for their own “parts of the shop”
Translation?
He is refusing to take the sole fall for Labor’s catastrophic economic failures and tanking poll numbers.
In what is being viewed as direct code for internal warfare, Chalmers’ comments firmly dump the blame for Labor's cascading crises onto his colleagues:
He ripped into Finance Minister Katy Gallagher for the ballooning public service.
Had a dig at Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke for national security and immigration failures.
Blamed Foreign Minister Penny Wong for diplomatic blunders.
And then stunningly, Anthony Albanese for the absolute disaster of the lot.
With yet another interest rate hike tipped for Melbourne Cup Day, Chalmers is desperately trying to shield himself from the impending fallout of a faltering economy and soaring inflation.
And typically, as the domestic front burns, Albanese is preparing to jet off to Antigua and Barbuda, leaving behind an increasingly toxic, agitated cabinet and a deputy chair relationship that is completely fractured.
The defensive posture from Chalmers proves he knows the ship is sinking.
The blame game has begun, trust is entirely gone, and a challenge for the lodge is now inevitable.
Kev retweeted
Though biologically illiterate to vaccinate against any coronavirus, at least Sweden has put mRNA injections in the garbage can, where they belong.
Sweden is officially ditching mRNA vaccines, and they are not hiding their reasons for doing so.
artsencollectief.nl/zweden-k…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Misleading. Image text is from a Dutch group (Artsen Collectief), not a Swedish source. Sweden’s regions chose Sanofi’s Nuvaxovid as sole supplier for the 2027/2028 campaign only.
There has been no mRNA ban; Public Health Agency says 2026/2027 mainly uses mRNA Comirnaty.
nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artsen_Co…
adda.se/upphandling-oc…
folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publikationer-…
lakemedelsvarlden.se/myndighetsrad-…
Kev retweeted
‼️🚨One if not the most important video in the history of the 20 century!
🚨How the City of London is not part of the UK.
🚨For those who have not seen this before it’s important you watch and listen. The City of London, Washington DC and the Vatican City all have special status. This gives special rights and protections to those in these areas.
🚨The speaker is smartest and most lucid professor on banking Professor Richard Werner.
👏👏👏👏👏👏
Kev retweeted
In England, vaccine uptake landed around 70 percent, meaning 30 percent never took a single dose. Denmark came in the same. So did Finland. Africa was even lower. America lands in that same range, roughly 30 percent who never vaccinated.
That number is worth sitting with. Under the largest coordinated propaganda campaign I’ve ever seen, every government on earth, the WHO, the WEF, the UN, all working in lockstep with a twenty four hour news cycle, 30 percent of humanity still said no. Different countries, different media systems, and the number held steady everywhere.
We didn’t even know there were this many of us. People were too afraid to talk about it at work. When employers mandated vaccination to return, I told people to start talking to their coworkers. If the numbers held true in their own workplace, 30 percent of the room could have walked out together.
Thirty percent changes governments. This is an international movement, and we have to keep speaking up loudly, or we lose both free speech and the most powerful chance for change we’ve had in a generation.
Kev retweeted
This woman does not qualify for any decent position in society.
An Open Letter to the University of Sydney @Sydney_Uni @mscott
Regarding the appointment of Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice
Dear Professor Scott,
I read with absolute disgust that the University of Sydney has appointed Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice, where she will apparently be sharing her wisdom on empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust.
You cannot be serious.
You are quoted as saying:
"Dame Jacinda led New Zealand through events of profound consequence and her leadership demonstrated that empathy and resolve do not compete with one another; each can strengthen the other."
Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre. The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic.
My name is Alia Bland. I am a co-founder of Voices for Freedom, an organisation established in New Zealand in 2020. For years, we stood alongside tens of thousands of ordinary Kiwis whose lives were torn apart by the policies of Ardern's government.
While the international media fawned over her kindness and compassion, we were dealing with the wreckage.
At the height of the COVID response, we were receiving upwards of 1,000 emails a day. Desperate people reaching out because they had lost their jobs, their incomes, their homes and, in many cases, their will to live.
People nearing retirement were forced to sell family homes they had spent decades paying off. Some are still living in caravans five years later.
Marriages collapsed. Families fractured. Lifelong friendships were destroyed. People who had served their communities for decades were suddenly treated like lepers because they declined a medical procedure.
Some of the people who came to us had spent their entire lives believing New Zealand was a decent, fair-minded country. Watching that belief crumble, and seeing what it did to them, was heartbreaking.
I cannot adequately describe the anguish in those emails. The desperation of parents wondering how they would feed and house their families. The humiliation of hardworking people being marched out of professions they loved. The despair of people who had done everything society asked of them, only to discover that their own government considered them disposable.
And presiding over it all was Jacinda Ardern, smiling for the cameras and telling the world how kind New Zealand was.
Kind? For whom?
Her government deliberately created a two-class society. Ardern herself acknowledged it publicly. New Zealanders were excluded from workplaces, businesses, events and ordinary social life. People were coerced into accepting a medical intervention under threat of losing their livelihoods.
And those who suffered adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines faced another nightmare. We fought for vaccine-injured New Zealanders whose lives had been devastated by serious physical harm, while many struggled to have their injuries acknowledged or receive adequate support.
The government's public assurances about vaccine safety deserve particular scrutiny. Officials knew about the myocarditis risk, including among young people. We have examined the records. Yet people raising legitimate questions about those risks were routinely dismissed and vilified.
The damage went far beyond lost incomes and broken relationships. An enormous number of New Zealanders lost faith in the very institutions they had trusted their entire lives. Government, health authorities, education, police and the media. That trust has not magically returned because Ardern has moved on to more prestigious surroundings.
While her government was busy marginalising people, we were building a nationwide support network to help them survive.
Voices for Freedom grew to more than 100,000 people on our mailing list, many representing entire families. More than 45,000 people signed up to our local groups across the country, which are still operational today in 2026. We established industry groups to help people fight for their careers, provided support through employment disputes and legal challenges, organised practical assistance and hand-delivered millions of flyers to households throughout New Zealand.
We did this while facing censorship, public vilification and government surveillance. Official records obtained since have confirmed that our activities and communications were being monitored and reported on.
Our volunteers gave everything they could to help people who had been abandoned by the institutions meant to protect them.
And now the University of Sydney wants to hold up the woman responsible for overseeing this period as a shining example of empathy and social cohesion?
It is sickening.
Professor Scott, did anyone at your university bother to speak with the people whose lives were destroyed under Ardern's leadership before celebrating her appointment?
Have you spoken to the former nurses, teachers and police officers who lost their careers? The families who lost their homes? The people still suffering from vaccine injuries? The parents whose children no longer speak to them?
Or did you simply swallow the carefully cultivated international image of Saint Jacinda, the compassionate leader who saved New Zealand?
I wonder whether you have considered why this internationally celebrated former prime minister now lives in Australia rather than the country she once led. The depth of hostility towards her among many New Zealanders should give you pause.
Because I can assure you, there is another side to that story. And there are hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who live with the consequences.
I have no objection to universities studying Ardern's leadership. In fact, I would encourage it. There is an enormous amount to learn from what happened in New Zealand between 2021 and 2023. Like, what not to do...
But presenting her as someone uniquely qualified to teach empathy, social cohesion and civic trust, without acknowledging the extraordinary human suffering that occurred under her leadership, is an insult to the people who paid the price.
We were there, Professor Scott. We saw what happened. We picked up the pieces. We are still picking them up.
Some of those people will never recover what they lost.
And the woman who presided over it all gets a professorship in empathy.
What an absolute disgrace.
Yours sincerely,
Alia Bland
Co-founder, Voices for Freedom
New Zealand
Kev retweeted
It’s laughable that Jacinda Ardern the tyrannical leader who enforced medical apartheid is now to teach empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust.
Having fled New Zealand where she is despised she has spent the last years trying to reinvent herself as a woman of kindness and compassion.
It’s never gonna happen.
The internet is forever and we have the receipts.
Kev retweeted
You distributed a dirt file on her. You spread hatred of your enemies on state funded media and social media. And now you’re blaming social media so you can censor it.
Huh. A "dirt sheet" sure looks a lot like "hate speech."
@AlboMP wouldn't want to have to censor that kind of thing now would he
Kev retweeted
Australians,
You are funding your own servitude.
More than half your wealth is stolen by the State.
The State then uses YOUR MONEY to control the media, restrict your speech, and build out an AI technocracy to monitor your every move (and hand out massive fines for non-compliance).
It's only going to get worse.
And you can't vote your way out of this.
There is no democratic solution - we're too far gone for that.
We imported too many new voters. And put too many citizens on the government payroll - there's no way they will vote against the gravy train, their own self-interest.
One Nation won't save you either. It's just another big State party leveraging discontent to gain power. If you think they'll destroy the surveillance state after you hand them the keys, you've got rocks in your head.
The way I see it, you only have 2 options.
The first is Revolution. But I don't see how you can do that. The State took your guns and everyone is too apathetic and scared anyway. They've done a good job of making sure Australians are timid and compliant. Good luck to anyone that tries.
The second option is Escape. That's what I chose. It's worked out well. Extremely well, in fact. I've disengaged from the perpetual doom that comes from being ruled over by slimy, serpentine communists. But even this isn't for everyone. There's not too many places to go, and Australia is so beautiful She deserves to be saved.
There's no easy solution.
So you're now stuck between a rock and a hard place. Under the crushing boot of authoritarianism that won't let up anytime soon.
Any anger that you feel is justified and good. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. You're allow to be angry. Channel it into something productive (that worked for me).
Kev retweeted
I note that a lot of people today are questioning Aboriginal history and culture.
So, here's some modern 'ancient' 'Truth-telling', some you may know, some not:
- Dot paintings were invented in 1971 by Geoffrey Bardon who then taught the style and technique to Aborigines.
- The Welcome to Country Ceremony was invented in 1976 by Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley to welcome Maori performers.
- There is no Aboriginal word or phrase for Welcome to Country, unlike the Maoris’ welcome/wardance, the ‘haka’. As such, it cannot have been invented prior to colonisation and the introduction of English. How, in ancient times, would they have asked “Who’s doing the Welcome to Country Ceremony?” if there were no words in Aboriginal languages for it?
- The Acknowledgement of Country was invented in the 1990s
- There is no film or video evidence of any of these ceremonies existing at important events such as Royal Tours, the 1956 Olympics, etc. prior to the 70s.
- The not mentioning the name of deceased Aboriginal people or showing an image or providing a warning in an article is also modern. As recently as 2011 when boxer Lionel Rose died, not even the ABC did this.
- ‘Walkabout’ is now considered an offensive term, since it implies someone is late or lazy, despite it being an integral part of initiation ceremonies.
- ‘The oldest living culture’ is not just factually incorrect, it defies logic. The branch of the tree cannot be older than the tree itself. Humans evolved in Africa. There are African tribes that live almost exactly as they did 100,000+ years ago, without welfare, 4WDs, mobile phones, etc. Aborigines are descended from these tribes as humans moved out of Africa and around the world. As such, Aboriginal culture cannot possibly be older than the cultures from which they are derived. (See: diagram)
- Aborigines were never categorized or classified in Australia under the Flora and Fauna Act, despite Linda Burney and many others claiming this. This has been fact-checked and verified by the ABC as a complete and utter myth.
- The term ‘First Nations’ has been culturally appropriated from North American natives.
- The term ‘totem’ is used now widely. Many Aboriginal people adopt or are given a totem. But if this is, as claimed, an ancient tradition, what are the Aboriginal words, in any of the many languages, for ‘totem’ or ‘totems? ‘Totem’ is word from the Ojibwa tribe of North American natives. It is not an ancient Aboriginal word. It, too, is appropriated or 'stolen', ironically.
- ‘Deadly’ is not an Aboriginal word. It was a popular term in the 60s: ‘deadly good’. It was often used to describe a bicycle: ‘a deadly treadly’.
- Uluru (Ayers Rock) is, according to the area’s most senior elder, Paddy Uluru, of no cultural significance and is not sacred. Only recently has this been claimed to stop people climbing it.
- The Lake Bolac ‘eel’ rock arrangement required a machine to move the rocks. Which is more likely: that Aborigines arranged the 100+kg rocks 1,500 years ago or it was created more recently in the 20th Century to promote the Annual Eel Festival?
- Neologisms: ‘On country’; ‘Blak’; ‘First Nations’, ‘Blakfullah’, ‘Blak’, ‘First People’, ‘Welcome to Country Ceremony’, ‘Smoking Ceremony’, ‘Rainbow Serpent’ and ‘Dreamtime’ – all English-language-derived, not Aboriginal, such as ‘gangurru’ (kangaroo).
- Things that have fallen out of fashion: ‘Pointing the bone’; curses; photography stealing the soul.
- In almost every instance, the occurrence of a ‘massacre’ was settlers’ retribution for Aborigines stealing sheep, killing workers and/or raping wives and daughters. The notion that settlers or troops went out riding to kill Aborigines for ‘sport’ is a myth.
- The notion of a government-mandated, sanctioned or planned ‘genocide’ isn’t supported and the scale of Aboriginal deaths is widely disputed. Estimates vary so wildly that they cannot be replied upon: from over 1,000,000 to around 200,000 to 100,000 to just 10,000.
- Rainbow Serpent is not translated from any Aboriginal language. Similarly, ‘Dreamtime’ is not translated from any Aboriginal language. (See: diags)
So, what hasn't been made up in the past 50 years?
You tell me.
Kev retweeted
The Jacques Baud Interviews: Condemned for Speaking the Objective Truth
On Saturday, October 24, I travelled to Brussels, Belgium. My mission: to interview Jacques Baud, the retired Swiss Colonel and veteran intelligence officer sanctioned by the European Union for telling the truth about the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
Jacques and I met in the home of one of his friends and close supporters, and over the course of several hours engaged in a wide ranging conversation about his life and work, and the consequences of being sanctioned by the European Union, accused of being a Russian propagandist.
The interview, recorded by my daughter, Victoria and edited by Alexandra Madornaya, will be released in two parts.
Part One will explore the life and times of Jacques Baud, tracing his work as a Swiss Strategic Intelligence Officer, United Nations Peacekeeper, and NATO Humanitarian specialist. This interview underpins the reality that Jacques Baud is the furthest thing from a Russian propagandist. Trained in the US and UK, Jacques is an intelligence professional whose objectivity and adherence to fact-based analysis is backed by a track record of proven performance at the highest levels of international policy making.
Part Two will dive into Jacques writing and podcasts done after retirement. It is work that had him targeted by the European Union for sanctions which, when taken at face value, were tantamount to a death sentence. In a recent review of his case by the European Union, Jacques’ sanctions were extended. The reason why? He was too neutral and too objective in his assessments, and as such his work would help Russia and hinder the European Union.
Condemned to die because he was too objective, and too neutral.
It is my honor and privilege to publish these interviews, and to further the work of Jacques Baud, a heroic man on the frontlines of the fight for free speech.
Kev retweeted
All of this work from just under a year ago is now peer reviewed and published.
A few Volunteers have done more QC on the shots that reached billions of arms than entire 20,000 person government agencies.
Nothing spells capture more than that fact alone.
How is this possible?
@DrJBhattacharya @MartyMakary @RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB
For Veterans Day we had a Vaccine injured Veteran come to our lab and sequence Pfizer lot LN2588 and GK0936.
@CharlesRixey has never prepped a vaccine or made a DNA sequencing library before. Yet ..
Kev retweeted
You know, take the week. Or the month. Scratch that. How about never going on social media again? While you’re at it you could stop trying to censor it. Doing both might help your mental health. I genuinely mean that
