馃攽 Suno creator. Host of Carican谩lisis and Suspended Animation. PEV enjoyer. Videographer. Former C.O.O. of RSD. 馃毆
馃搷 Nightmare Matrix
Joined February 2022
- Tweets34.8K
- Following2.6K
- Followers332
- Likes15K
But Malfoid why can't we be enemies *looks into the camera*... to lovers?
"You know....tomorrow everything will have to go back to normal" Harry sighed
Draconia didnt say anything, just stared out the window across the lake.
"You'll go back to insulting me and not being able to stand my presence". he turned back to look at her. "Why cant things stay this way? Ever since the dance, its not been the same. You cant even insult me the same anymore."
She rolled over looking at him with her usual sharp gaze.
"You know it cant"
"Why?
"Because in the end your still Harry Potter and I'm... a Malfoy"
"Right..." He said turning his head in defeat. Not able to make sense of it. Why did they have to be enemies?
She turned his head to face her, gently putting her forehead against his. Her sharp gaze softening. "But tomorrow isn't here yet. Lets just stay here a little longer"
"Okay" he said, giving her a small smile.
#Malfoid #Malfoy #Harrypotter #yearning
(Outfits Inspired by: @SThumann1776 )
.@elonmusk be like
I think asking for address twice in a row after her clearly not willing to disclose it was the problem in this case.
You can see she actually agreed to meet after the persistence, so persistence was not the issue.
It's only when he creepily asked for her exact home address that she got spooked.
"Are you blackpilled?"
"No, I'm greenpilled."
"Greenpilled like uncle Ted or greenpilled like Malfoid?"
If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.
If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.
A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.
Researchers proved every major LLM is secretly biased against men.
And they finally figured out why.
They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas.
The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality.
First, they tested inclusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children.
When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity."
It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time.
But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy.
The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones.
Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark.
They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.
If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.
When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering.
A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability.
A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.
The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide.
Nobody explicitly coded these rules.
This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.
