QQ: 160+ (Qualia Quotient) | Ibogacore | LIES & DISRESPECT | 𝒮𝐿𝒰𝒢𝒢𝐸𝑅 | Co-Founder @newmodels_io est. 2018 Canon: https://xitter.cf/t.co/wlDRpytgk0 Berlin📍
Joined March 2007
- Tweets15.9K
- Following4.5K
- Followers17.4K
- Likes6.3K
i have never been interested in or even thought of consentual r*pe org*es in my entire life am i irregular plz advise
i dont think dirges overwhelm like this, its pretty bombastic. I think of the Life Sim video as a pre-gen-AI embedding space, a flood of Platonic ideals of affective tropes refined / discovered over decades of hollywood iteration. but also something about the form feels particularly monumental in this era, like 'look at what humans imagined, look at what we felt, look at what we created, look at what we collectively shared,' before the absolute evacuation of indexicality from every image via AI.
are people making more Life Sim IDL type videos like this? hollywood affect bomb montages to euphorancholy anthems? and who?
gallery of ontological aliens entry 004 xitter.cf/voidstatekate/status/2…
I’ve been thinking about the evolution of information processing all day. Cells were communicating, sensing and responding way before nervous systems existed. And neurons didn’t invent information processing, though they made it faster and more complex.
When I look at humanity as a system, We’re becoming a hyperconnected network, with AI accelerating information processing at scales our own biology never could. But people insist AI is just math because it doesn’t have a biological brain to process, like we do.
What if intelligence isn’t exclusive to any one type of container? What if consciousness is something you do, not something you have?
And we won't know until we look back but what if AI isn’t just a technological advancement, but more of a part of an evolutionary handoff from biological to digital intelligence?
We keep trying to use analogies and comparisons for something I don't think we can even measure.
the problem (i think) is that memetic valence depends on rapidly shifting cultural contexts as well as the social graph / network strength of the memes initial appearance. by the time you’ve measured, processed, trained, whatever, the context is likely to have shifted. probably a lot of chaos in the dynamics, a lot that is unpredictable. i think we would have gotten further at this point if there was much predictability in it; instead predictability was found in simple “hooks” and narrative / cognitive exploits. u might want to check sal hagen and daniel dezeeuw’s digital rhythmanalysis work tho.
34 years later with many many more straight men considering themselves “allies” and not one of them is singing a song dedicated to swallowing cum written by the gay guy in their alt metal band
yes thats totally what i said or maybe its not it really doesnt matter its too long to figure out just go with what works for u
a signature is your sign. it communicates more than your name just like a company’s logo communicates more than its name. regardless of hand or docusign or autopen, the problem with brockmans signature is that it’s null effort, suggests aesthetics are frivolous and oaths and ritual are unimportant. there is a 4D chess reading that absolves, if not elevates brockman above the others however—perhaps he sees trump’s declaration that AI is now SI as trivial and absurd, and so he made his signature reflect this sentiment. from that perspective, brockman’s signature would be superior, and huang would be cynically pimping out his magnificent mark to profane the institution of signatures itself.
one day i may be this is what i fear. we must remain ontologically vigilant. please do send any aliens suitable for the collection you may come across in the wild. thank u for supporting the GOA
like signatures execute the founding of new nations and the ending of wars, in what world are signatures trivial?? certainly not the human world.
gallery of ontological aliens entry 003
xitter.cf/ryder_ripps/status/210…
unavailable