플로리다 주지사 드산티스 FSD 지오펜스 확장에 대해 "플로리다 탬파와 마이애미는 해변도 포함해야해!"

ARK’s Brett Winton on the podcast 1. Over the weekend, SpaceX executives followed Tesla’s X account. That looks like a sign that something is happening internally. 2. SpaceX is cash-flow constrained. It could raise more money in the stock market, but the investment opportunities in front of SpaceX offer some of the highest expected returns on invested capital(ROIC) of any company I’ve ever looked at. 3. Tesla, on the other hand, is about to enter the phase where its robotaxi network starts generating huge amounts of cash. And I don’t think Optimus is cash-constrained. The issue is execution. There are still challenges to solve on both the mechanical and software sides. 4. So if SpaceX could use Tesla’s free cash flow to launch AI satellites, the results could be enormous. Every business of a future-oriented company would come together under one roof: SpaceX, superintelligence, and Tesla. In short, SpaceX has huge long-term opportunities, but it needs Tesla’s cash flow to get there. The ones who really need this merger right now aren’t Tesla. They’re SpaceX and Elon. If they really want to do it, they need to bring an exchange ratio generous enough to pass the shareholder vote on the first try. Some influencers keep pushing the merger as if it’s the only option, without even mentioning a premium. All that does is hype up retail investors and weaken Tesla shareholders’ negotiating leverage. That’s irresponsible, and it deserves to be called out.