Programmer, BJJ enthusiast (and still bad at it), father of 3, co-founder of @FabmanHQ, working on a compiler @Thekla_inc

Wien, Österreich
Joined November 2014
At this point ~everyone acknowledges that movies today have generally become a lot worse. Little-known fact: You can watch the old movies which are good instead of the new ones which are bad. I almost never watch new releases. The last movie I saw was made in 1961.
I skipped school to wait in line to buy tickets for the opening day midnight showing of _Phantom Menace_, there was a ton of hype (we also saw the 7 PM show later that same day, after the midnight open). My friends & I enjoyed the movie, especially the spectacular lightsaber duels, although we were a bit confused by the plot on the first viewing & reminded of how cheesy Lucas' dialogue is (the script in the original trilogy is even worse but it feels familiar). We also hated Jar-Jar Binks—everyone did. Kids were starting petitions online to have him die in the next movie. The midi-chlorians were super controversial as well because lots of people thought they 'demystified' the Force (I liked them because I thought they 're-mystified' the Jedi & Sith, revealing their teachings to be merely contingent, religious interpretations of naturalistic phenomena). But the biggest difference between the millennial experience of seeing _Phantom Menace_ in theaters & zoomers watching today is *context*. PM came out at the end / peak of a great period for Hollywood. Other very solid / good Hollywood movies that came out in 1999 that still hold up: Eyes Wide Shut Fight Club The Sixth Sense Magnolia Being John Malkovich Man on the Moon The Talented Mr. Ripley The Matrix Blair Witch Project October Sky The Mummy 8mm Cruel Intentions Lock, Stock, & Two Smoking Barrels 10 Things I Hate About You Tarzan American Beauty Three Kings That year was absolutely stacked with movies better than almost anything being released today. There was a specific combination of relatively high budget, emerging SFX technology, auteurism, & willingness to experiment (thank you Miramax) that was really quite special, & it's probably difficult for young people today to grasp how high the prevailing level of quality really was.
3
2
90
3,472
Raphael Luba retweeted
Replying to @LubaRaphael
Samsung alone is like 13% of South Korea’s GDP. This doesn’t sit right with me but that level of economic impact comes with real power. It’s also a family business… their chairman Lee Jae-yong served time for bribery and embezzlement but was pardoned after 18 months to help with economic recovery. This isn’t a one of thing either. Several top South Korean companies have been charged with bribery and embezzlement but deemed ”too important” for ordinary accountability.
2
1
5
410
The AI impact won't be felt immediately through layoffs (existing jobs are sticky), but through a collapse in hiring (jobs that don't yet exist have no stickiness).
The problem isn’t that AI is intelligent. It isn’t. The problem is that too many adults (but not all) are at once mechanistic, imitative, unimaginative, stupid, formulaic, influenceable, & gullible, arrogant beyond their skill set, & too expensive to maintain.
162
505
72
5,502
259,089
Raphael Luba retweeted
A somewhat common but strange response to the consumer request for AI disclosures on products is to suggest that if you did this, you should have to disclose all sorts of other things (how many people worked on the product, what other software you used, what hardware it was made on, etc.) I can understand that some people don't like the idea of having AI disclosures, so they immediately try to think of arguments against it. But respectfully, this one makes no sense. Product labeling requirements are driven by demand, either from consumers or from competitors. There is no significant cross-section of the public asking to know if a game was made on machines with AMD or Intel hardware. There is no significant cross-section of the industry demanding that their competitors list whether or not they used Adobe Premier. Product labeling is not about giving you a complete set of information about how a product was made. It's about giving the consumer information that a significant number of them might want to know before making a purchase. Which ones of these get codified can be driven by consumer demand, competitor demand, or - most commonly - a combination of the two. This is not weird. It's good, actually. And it's especially good if an industry takes proactive steps to voluntarily label their products accurately, because then they avoid the inevitable alternative, which is that the consumer demand for the missing labeling produces a political movement which ends with mandatory labeling designed by a political body.
86
113
7
1,452
70,319
I‘m really surprised that Samsung does not get litigated out of existence for this!But it confirms my opinion of them.
i own a relatively new (2025) samsung tv. i kept getting weirdly targeted ads. i tried reversing the firmware but it was aes encrypted and no keys unless tear it apart and do uart/jtag magic. zero days it is. root shell on new samsung TVs! discovered PRIVACY HORROR. write up?
6
2
55
1,450
Follow @mmjukic for loads of depressing truth bombs about the state of the world. Highly recommended—if you don’t have a predisposition for anxiety attacks.
Replying to @mmjukic
Except instead of "just" that, we are also burdening those declining workers with massive pension and entitlement burdens for non-workers, losing industry to China, making all basic inputs harder to acquire and more expensive, etc. The whole thing is a dumpster fire.
1
20
1,175
Raphael Luba retweeted
The elephant in the room is that there is basically nothing you can do to stave off total economic depression if your workforce has below-replacement fertility and eventually fewer workers replace them in the workforce. Nothing! This is *before* pensions even come into play!
13
5
180
3,688
Raphael Luba retweeted
I'm a few hundred puzzles into Order of the Sinking Star, and it is, indeed, fantastic. Yes, it's a box pushing game, but it plans to be the LAST box pushing game. No meat will be left on the bones. The puzzles are really well put together. Compact. No extra elements. You are given a seemingly impossible situation and you have to explore the capabilities of the few parts you are given and figure out a new way to use them. Really ingenious stuff in here. Highly recommended. I've already gotten well over the $30 worth, and I have a LONG way to go.
22
11
2
409
10,675
Whenever you get a bout of imposter syndrome: remember that there are many people way more incompetent than you:
Replying to @astuyve
Oh god: The p384 private keys are randomly selected integers between 1 and 256, the private keys are effectively all-zeroes apart from the last byte
2
23
820
I looooved just toying with this level when I had to fix an issue with our fire particles a few months ago. I had so much fun just running back and forth and taking it all in.
Took me 1.5 hours, but I this is my favorite puzzle so far. I honestly can't even imagine what goes into designing something like this. Like, what is the process? Do you come up with the gimmick first? How you make it not obtuse? How do you place "WHOA" moments strategically???
3
128
3,469
I finished the @SinkingStarGame demo, and I only have a single critique, because it is absolutely bloody fantastic. There are far too many tutorials and spoilers. Of course, the game isn't done, so some of these may be made more implicit, or conveyed through gameplay rather than talking at the player eventually, but this stuff really has to go. It immediately and unavoidably robbed me of the chance to explore the world, and figure out how things work on my own.
13
35
1
1,282
49,507
Voting closes soon for the @GoldenJoysticks Awards! 🏆 Order of the Sinking Star is up for: ⭐ Best Indie Game 💻 PC Game of the Year If you've been loving the game, cast your vote for us here 👉 goldenjoysticks.com/ Thank you for all the support! 🙌
5
8
148
7,084
There is no such thing as the "tech industry". "Tech" is a euphemism that lets software and VC finance people assume the glamour and prestige earned by hardware people. Software companies are neat but they're not the same thing as factories.
14
20
7
188
15,950
Raphael Luba retweeted
lesss gooooooo This game is so good I can't man. It was worth the wait!
11
1
189
4,937
This is the most ambitious puzzle games ever built. It took 10 years to make. It's size is staggering and every puzzle is a gem that has been polished by some of the best designers alive. It's the Manhattan Project of block pushing games. store.steampowered.com/app/4…
3
10
2
333
5,932
I had the privilege of experiencing Matthew‘s prowess up close and it’s very humbling. He combines incredible attention to detail with non-stop drive and energy. I wish I was half as productive…
I came onto the project pretty late. But I have probably worked harder in the past year than I ever have. I hope people will enjoy the game. When you're as close to it as I am, it's hard to see anything but the flaws, but I do hope people will appreciate all that we managed to do
2
132
3,915
Raphael Luba retweeted
Order of the Sinking Star is out now! It’s been an incredible honour to compose the music for this massive and groundbreaking puzzle game. I’ve had the privilege of working closely with Martin Stig Andersen and Hans Christian Kock for almost six years. Thanks Thekla and Jon!
Order of the Sinking Star, the massive puzzle adventure from @Thekla_Inc and @Jonathan_Blow (director of Braid & The Witness) is OUT NOW on Steam, Nintendo Switch 2 and PlayStation 5! 🧩 Get it today: orderofthesinkingstar.com
21
24
3
592
27,422
Raphael Luba retweeted
Replying to @Jonathan_Blow
As fortold! @SinkingStarGame
1
22
739
Raphael Luba retweeted
After TEN LONG YEARS, Order of the Sinking Star is out Now! On Switch 2, PS5, and ... it's at the top of Popular New Releases on Steam, already! Thank you everyone for your support during this long, long, long, long, long development!
283
481
57
6,263
138,351
Periodic reminder that Wikipedia has a squillion times more money than they need to operate the actual website, and all marginal donations go to the fake paper-shuffling NGO that attached itself to the organization for the purpose of feeding on donations from rubes.
I have no interest in giving Wikipedia money to blow on fake jobs for ovecredentialed paper-pushers, but if the banner said “Jimmy Wales created Wikipedia and he’d like to buy a yacht” then I’d pull out my wallet immediately.
33
515
13
4,468
186,130