Fearless Truth inadvertantly admits creatio ex nihilo is illogical. P1. Creation did not exist eternally; it was non-existence and then it was existence. This is definitionally a change. P2. Change is defined as potentiality to actuality; if there is a change, there is a potential that was actualized. P3. It is impossible for potential to exist in absolute metaphysical nothingness. P4. Before creation, only God existed; nothing else existed outside of God. C. The potential must have existed in in the only thing that existed: God. _____________ But Classical Theists like Nick reject this; potentiality CANNOT exist within God. This would break the whole system. He claims creation was merely conceptual, but that the concept itself was never actualized, and so reality's potential could not have been in the concept. So the potential must exist outside of God. ...But potential can't exist in nothingness (by definition). This creates a contradiction. And "Fearless Truth" admits this: "There's no such thing", "It's illogical". He recognizes the contradiction but fails to recognize the implications. You cannot create from nothing because you cannot actualize something that does not exist.