lure

Dear Walmart Ethics and Compliance Team, I am writing to formally request the permanent removal of Pudgy Penguins products from Walmart.com and @Walmart stores due to serious concerns surrounding Luca Schnetzler, also known as Luca Netz, particularly his role in Abstract Chain, which has left hundreds of thousands of users financially harmed, as well as allegations concerning his previous projects and business practices. My concerns are based on my own experience with @AbstractChain, as well as the publicly available information and evidence outlined below. I actively participated in its ecosystem for nearly two years, accumulated millions of XP, and estimate that I spent approximately $30,000 across the ecosystem. I have also publicly documented my personal experience with Abstract Chain in the following post: teapawt.net/silentbuilder3/status/… Throughout this period, Luca Netz and the Abstract team made numerous statements and promises regarding XP, potential rewards, a future token, and the value users could receive for their participation. These promises encouraged users to continue investing their time, money, and effort into the ecosystem for nearly two years. However, Abstract Chain subsequently announced its wind down without delivering on the promises made to its community. Users who had dedicated substantial time, effort, and money to the ecosystem were left without the promised token rewards or meaningful compensation for their accumulated XP. In my view, this represents a serious failure to honor the expectations created by the project's own communications and has left many community members feeling betrayed and financially harmed. I want to emphasize that this is not simply a matter of an unsuccessful project. People spent nearly two years contributing to an ecosystem based on repeated statements and expectations that were never fulfilled. Their financial investments, time, and efforts were effectively left unrewarded. I also urge Walmart to review the following publicly available materials concerning Luca Netz and his previous activities: 1. @NFTherder's Research: "LUCA NETZ: FROM RUG PULLS TO RICHES" This investigation raises serious questions and allegations regarding @LucaNetz's previous NFT projects, claims associated with those projects, wallet transfers, and the source of funds reportedly used in connection with the Pudgy Penguins acquisition: teapawt.net/NFTshepard/status/1710… 2. @horlomite's X Post This post by Horlomite provides additional information and raises further questions concerning Luca Netz and his previous activities. I encourage Walmart to review it as part of its independent assessment: teapawt.net/horlomite/status/17104… 3. Marketing Course Training Footage Training footage reportedly associated with a marketing course sold by Luca Netz is featured in a video published on my own X account. The footage discusses marketing strategies involving charitable appeals, luxury positioning, and purchased social media engagement. I believe this material warrants further examination, and I encourage Walmart's Ethics and Compliance Team to review the video and independently assess its contents: teapawt.net/silentbuilder3/status/… 4. @Nexus_Epoch's Video Summarizing Evidence X user @Nexus_Epoch has prepared and published a video containing summaries of some of the evidence and allegations surrounding these matters. I strongly encourage Walmart's Ethics and Compliance Team to review this material: teapawt.net/Nexus_Epoch/status/211… I understand that allegations and publicly available materials should be independently evaluated and that they do not, by themselves, constitute legal findings. However, the volume and seriousness of these concerns deserve attention, particularly from a major retailer such as Walmart. I do not believe a company with Walmart's reputation should continue providing a retail platform for products associated with an individual facing such serious questions about his business practices and the treatment of his communities. I therefore urge Walmart to: 1. Conduct an independent review of the concerns and publicly available evidence regarding Luca Netz and his associated projects. 2. Reconsider its business relationship with Pudgy Penguins. 3. Permanently remove @pudgypenguins products from Walmart.com and its physical stores. Relevant Links: My Personal Experience with Abstract Chain: teapawt.net/silentbuilder3/status/… NFTherder's Research: "LUCA NETZ: FROM RUG PULLS TO RICHES": teapawt.net/NFTshepard/status/1710… Horlomite's X Post: teapawt.net/horlomite/status/17104… Marketing Course Training Footage, Video Published by Me: teapawt.net/silentbuilder3/status/… Nexus_Epoch's Video Summarizing Evidence: teapawt.net/Nexus_Epoch/status/211… Walmart's Pudgy Penguins Product Listings: walmart.com/browse/pudgy-pen… I respectfully request that Walmart take these concerns seriously, investigate the matter, and provide a written response confirming receipt of this complaint and explaining whether the company intends to take action regarding these products. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Do you genuinely expect people to continue believing these empty and exaggerated claims? The reality is entirely different. Soon, you may struggle to find even five to ten people who believe your baseless promises, let alone billions. How can you continue making such misleading and unrealistic statements after deceiving people? You should be held legally accountable for misleading, manipulating, and deceiving the public.

LUCA NETZ WAS TEACHING PEOPLE HOW TO MANIPULATE CUSTOMERS AND MAKE MONEY IN HIS $1,700 COURSE Footage from a training program previously sold for $1,700 by Luca Netz, the owner of Pudgy Penguins, reveals highly questionable marketing practices and raises serious concerns about the methods he was teaching. Throughout the course, Luca explains how ordinary products can be sold at inflated prices by exploiting human psychology, creating artificial perceptions of trust, and influencing consumers' purchasing decisions. 1. SELLING PRODUCTS UNDER THE PRETEXT OF SAVING KOALAS One of the strategies Luca discusses in his course involves purchasing bracelets and necklaces from Chinese suppliers at extremely low prices and reselling them for approximately five times their original cost. However, the most concerning aspect is not the profit margin itself, but the marketing strategy used to sell these products. The accessories were marketed as products that would help rescue and protect endangered koalas affected by wildfires in Australia. Customers were told that a portion of the profits from every purchase would be donated toward rescuing and protecting these animals. In other words, people's compassion for animals and their genuine desire to help were placed at the center of a commercial sales strategy. This raises several important questions. How much revenue did this campaign generate? How much of that money was actually donated? Which organizations received those donations, and where is the documentation proving that the donations took place? 2. CREATING AN ARTIFICIAL PERCEPTION OF LUXURY AROUND ORDINARY PRODUCTS In another section of the course, Luca explains how he made an ordinary product sourced from China appear significantly more valuable than it actually was. To accomplish this, he added expensive products from internationally recognized luxury brands to his website. He then marked those products as sold out, leaving only his own product available for purchase. This strategy was designed to make visitors believe they were shopping from a prestigious luxury brand. A product that was relatively inexpensive to source was presented alongside high end brands to artificially increase its perceived value. The objective was not simply to promote a product, but to deliberately influence how consumers perceived its worth. 3. CREATING FAKE TRUST THROUGH PURCHASED FOLLOWERS, LIKES, AND COMMENTS One of the most revealing parts of Luca's course involves his explanations of how to manufacture social media popularity. Luca discusses how his friends attempted similar sales strategies but failed to achieve the same results. When explaining why they were unsuccessful, he suggests that they had not put enough effort into developing their Instagram accounts, purchasing likes, and faking various aspects of their online presence. The course also demonstrates where students can purchase fake followers, likes, and comments. The purpose of these methods is to create an artificial impression of popularity and credibility among potential customers who encounter the brand for the first time. Consumers may naturally assume that a brand with thousands of followers and numerous positive comments is trustworthy. However, when those interactions are purchased rather than earned organically, the trust influencing their purchasing decisions is based on manufactured social proof rather than genuine customer experiences. 4. TEACHING THESE METHODS TO THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE Perhaps one of the most disturbing aspects of this situation is that Luca was not merely discussing these strategies in relation to his own businesses. He was teaching them to students as part of a $1,700 training program. The methods described in the course included exploiting people's desire to support charitable causes, manufacturing an artificial perception of luxury around ordinary products, and creating credibility through purchased social media engagement. Teaching these practices to a large audience raises concerns that extend far beyond a single brand or business. It potentially encourages the widespread use of deceptive marketing techniques that could influence purchasing decisions across numerous online stores. 5. THE LINE BETWEEN MARKETING AND DECEIVING CONSUMERS Purchasing inexpensive products from China and reselling them at a substantial profit is not inherently fraudulent. However, manufacturing popularity through purchased followers, creating artificial prestige around products, and leveraging people's compassion to drive sales raise serious ethical concerns. When charitable causes are involved, transparency becomes even more important. Customers deserve to know whether the donations promised to them were actually made and whether the charitable claims used to influence their purchasing decisions were legitimate. The methods described in Luca Netz's course provide a striking example of how consumer trust can be turned into a commercial tool. The fundamental question is simple: If a brand's credibility is built not on genuine customer satisfaction, but on purchased followers, fake engagement, manufactured luxury perceptions, and marketing strategies that exploit people's compassion, can we really call that successful entrepreneurship? The methods Luca discusses in his own training materials raise important questions about the marketing practices behind certain business success stories. They also serve as a reminder that what is presented as entrepreneurial success may sometimes deserve much closer scrutiny. So, let me ask you this: Do you still trust this guy? If your answer is yes, then it's time to take a hard look at yourself. Source: docs.google.com/document/d/1…