There is no naturality to modern dating, and the lack of organic expression of unarmed combat exemplifies this. Hypergamy, as it were, isn’t even what any of this is—contrary to popular belief. It’s a display of women’s delusional and naive assumptions of hierarchy of value. Women’s attraction is based off PERCEPTION of value, not objective truth. Women would be more attracted now to a man who LOOKS like he can fight over a man who can but doesn’t seem it. Feminists say it’s “natural selection,” Dating coaches say it’s “survival of the fittest,” Theorists say it’s some “culling of the herd” by elitists. None of these apply to a feminized gynocentric society where everything is gay & retarded. The ONLY way women’s sexual attraction can truly be eugenic is if women depend on men. Similar to how women can only grasp politics when they have children, they cannot grasp male value until they need it. But the current political system shields them from this reality. There are no laws against trying to take from another man’s territory, but there are laws against a man protecting his territory now, thus the imbalance. “Getting mogged” back in the day meant a guy was too much on his Rico Suave shtick and the husband/bf of some chick he was trying to pull, took him outside and knocked his teeth out, and went on to smoke a Marlboro red and there was no “police report” bullshit or a chance of going viral and getting some civil suit. And this worked out because it would arouse the woman for her boyfriend anyway. No matter how much better looking you are, getting bitched by another man in a fight is one of the worst “aura killers” you could have happen. This homeostasis is gone, one half of masculine value is completely nerfed from being displayed. Building a society that rewards pretty boys and playboys exclusively, leaves us weak and distracted. Letting men knock some heads in these situations satiates women’s true hypergamy and lets us build.