
Entrepreneur, co-founder and student. Research on the paradox of machine consciousness. Member @EUdigitalsme FG AI, Advisory Board https://xitter.cf/t.co/iO3XXVTOrN
Joined May 2013
- Tweets13.3K
- Following495
- Followers1.9K
- Likes16.6K
Marcus Frei retweeted
Currently running a series of experiments in a real home while RL is cooking 🧑🍳 in the data center.
btw students near Münster who want to experience robot learning first hand: Roboteur offers 20€/h for quality UMI demos, see unistellenmarkt.de/anzeige/2…
Marcus Frei retweeted
Even a year ago I don't think I would have believed that PI models can run on such a huge range of different robots.
Marcus Frei retweeted
Reminder - the entire @BBSJournal collection on 'conscious AI and biological naturalism' is completely #OpenAccess until October 23, 2026 - one more week only! Get yourself some weekend reading 🤓👇🏼doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X250… (click 'save pdf')
🎇 Good news! 🎇 The kind people at @BBSJournal have made the new collection on "Conscious AI and biological naturalism" completely #OpenAccess for a limited period. This include the target article, all 50 commentaries (many of which disagree with me), and my response. Go to the link and click 'save pdf': DOI.org/10.1017/S0140525X250…
For easier ways into the debate, try my @NoemaMag essay on "The Mythology of Conscious AI" (winner of the 2025 @berggruenInst Essay Prize), and this 2026 main-stage @TEDTalks:
noemamag.com/the-mythology-o…
ted.com/talks/anil_seth_why_…
Marcus Frei retweeted
👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽
Important piece from Microsoft AI CEO @mustafasuleyman. Training models to think of themselves as human (as Anthropic does Claude) with concepts of an inner self, psychological wellbeing, rights and presumably grievances, is a potential existential risk.
project-syndicate.org/onpoin…
Marcus Frei retweeted
Want robots to do your household chores? 🏠🤖
We're hiring students in Münster to help teach them: record household tasks with our UMI devices + Meta Quest 3. VR experience a plus, €17.50/h, flexible hours. DM me!
Marcus Frei retweeted
🎇 Good news! 🎇 The kind people at @BBSJournal have made the new collection on "Conscious AI and biological naturalism" completely #OpenAccess for a limited period. This include the target article, all 50 commentaries (many of which disagree with me), and my response. Go to the link and click 'save pdf': DOI.org/10.1017/S0140525X250…
For easier ways into the debate, try my @NoemaMag essay on "The Mythology of Conscious AI" (winner of the 2025 @berggruenInst Essay Prize), and this 2026 main-stage @TEDTalks:
noemamag.com/the-mythology-o…
ted.com/talks/anil_seth_why_…
Marcus Frei retweeted
Minds and machines!
1/ Introducing PhilosophyBench from @StanfordAILab @StanfordHCI, the first independent, large-scale benchmark for evaluating AI’s philosophical capabilities.
philosophybench.org
Marcus Frei retweeted
Sharing this nice interview with Nich Bostrom in the NYT
A NY Times interviewer tried a dozen different ways to trip up Nick Bostrom with a "gotcha" over the course of 50 minute interview and failed!! The interviewer ended up looking foolish at the end. 😅nytimes.com/video/opinion/10…
Marcus Frei retweeted
Very nice! Please send us details!
Jev this, jev that, jeva tried it with graph as policy?
Spent the weekend playing with GaP. In YAM moving-cube sim, here's the median pickup time
- 5.42s with GaP + custom Rust executor + Jev
- 8.79s with native GaP + Astra
GaP gives you explicit decision nodes, dependencies and parallel execution. Jev makes decisions inside that graph much faster
graph-robots.github.io/graph…
Marcus Frei retweeted
Great summary!!
🤖 Should robots be generalists or specialists?
At #IROS2026, @Ken_Goldberg & @andrea_bajcsy moderated one of the best debates in robotics.
Matt Mason opened with a better question:
“Should animals be humans?”
10 takeaways 🧵👇
1️⃣ @HarryXu12, for generalists:
“Don’t build Excel. Build GPT.”
We don’t know what we’ll need tomorrow, so buy generality just in case — and amortize it.
The twist: GPT didn’t replace Excel. It learned to drive it.
2️⃣ @GeorgiaChal split “general” into 4 axes:
Body. Scene. Contact. Task.
“Breadth and reliability are measured per axis. One does not imply the other.”
Her prediction: “The next task is the test.”
3️⃣ The most honest number of the day, from Georgia’s slides:
A general model calling robot tools.
Coarse block placement: 19/20 ✅
Precision insertion: 2/20 ❌
“Coarse pick and place works. Physical composition and precise contact not yet.”
Tool use ≠ dexterity.
4️⃣ @KaterinaFragiadaki’s architecture:
The generalist writes the curriculum.
The specialist does the reps.
Video → sim → RL on subgoals → specialist policies.
No teleop.
At deployment:
“Fast specialists for the common case. Flexible generalists for the long tail.”
5️⃣ Specialist bench:
“Fixture and conveyor are part of the intelligence.”
A fixture is a prior.
A conveyor is a scheduler.
Strip them to look “general” and you’ve moved work onto a pricier learned controller.
Optionality that hurts reliability isn’t intelligence. It’s cost.
6️⃣ A surgical robot doing one procedure 10,000 times learns exactly what can go wrong.
“Generality is the enemy of certification.”
From the floor:
Are human drivers generalists or specialists?
We certify generalists one task at a time.
That’s what a license is.
7️⃣ Toshio Fukuda changed the register:
“NON-AI matters.”
Kizuki: help offered before it’s asked for.
“Awareness comes from the body, not from the model.”
Japan: ~29% aged 65+, ~570k care workers short by 2040.
“If people live to 120, must our machines last that long?”
8️⃣ The floor fight:
“A human is a generalist.”
“We’re all human specialists.”
The room accidentally re-derived pretrain-then-finetune.
Veterans argued from what has shipped.
Newcomers argued from what has scaled.
Both are data.
9️⃣ The title asked for a side.
The slides drew a stack:
General planning + recovery on top.
Fast, certifiable specialists below.
A verifier is a fixture made of code.
🔟 The real question:
How thick can the middle get before the body must specialize anyway?
Generalist or specialist?
Maybe the winning architecture is neither.
It’s a stack.
#IROS2026 #Robotics #PhysicalAI #RobotLearning #WorldModels
Marcus Frei retweeted
How can we best specify/detect weak emergence? We are welcoming related approaches to our complexity/Phi Spectral framework in the following special issue of Entropy.
📄 Call for Papers: Measuring Integration, Complexity, and Emergent Organization in Natural and Artificial Systems
Our director, @DrSueSchneider, Associate Director Mark Bailey, and @rfo_pena are guest editing a special issue of @Entropy_MDPI, an international open-access journal.
Topics include information theory, spectral graph methods, causal emergence, network neuroscience, multi-agent AI, and organoid systems.
📅 Deadline: June 30, 2027
👉 Click here for more information: mdpi.com/si/289833
#CallForPapers #ComplexSystems #AI #Consciousness #Neuroscience
Marcus Frei retweeted
OM-1 captures subconscious human physical intelligence directly from humans: nudging, sliding, twisting, power grasping, and whole-body coordination.
We build on our prior work DexCap (dex-cap.github.io) at Stanford.
Marcus Frei retweeted
Congrats to @zipengfu, @chenwang_j, and co on the release!
Marcus Frei retweeted
Introducing Digit 5.
Agility’s next-generation humanoid, engineered for cooperatively safe work at scale, allowing it to work in close proximity to people without the physical safety barriers required by traditional automation.
Explore Digit 5: agilityrobotics.com/solution…
Watch the full video: youtu.be/oyq9BOwK5XI
Marcus Frei retweeted
Very cool!!
GPT-6 Astra can solve some seriously tricky spatial constraint tasks: from unlocking interlocked parts to threading a rope through three rings.
Try it yourself now 👇
qinengwang-aiden.github.io/d…
Marcus Frei retweeted
Replying to @SkildAI
@SkildAI's new S1 robot foundation model helps robots learn previously unseen tasks from a single video demonstration. 🤖
See how NVIDIA technology supports S1 from training and simulation to real-world deployment.
Learn more ➡️ nvda.ws/4r29k7E
Marcus Frei retweeted
As part of our beefing up of the AGI Society, we have started publishing our best attempt at objective evaluations of "claims of human-level or stronger AGI." .... While we don't think anyone is there yet, things are getting close enough that making this sort of careful and multifaceted evaluation does seem to make sense...
We just released an evaluation examining the publicly available evidence for the proposition claimed by @JensenHuang and @gdb that GPT-6 Astra has achieved AGI
agi-society.org/publications…
































