O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel) header
O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel) profile picture

🇿🇲ku chalo!

Joined May 2021
Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)Photo by O-LEVEL MATH (@MathLevel)
Replying to @phoenixfmzambia
Habeas corpus = produce the body alive or dead. There's no 3rd option. Alive? Bring him to court so he can be seen. Dead? Release him for burial. Saying ‘the doctor won't let us move him" doesn't confirm he's alive, doesn't say where he is, doesn't let anyone independent see him
1
8
178
Replying to @DiggersOfNews
The country will never the same that’s for sure
55
Replying to @Malik_ZMB
He has threatened us with riot gear, admitted the goal is protecting one man from accountability & cited the world's most famous example of leaving power as a reason to never leave. Bro has made three wild statements in one post & still ends with “ this isn't personal." 🤦
1
140
Replying to @ClotildahY
His post is unhinged! It has threats of state violence for peaceful assembly. Justifies staying in power to avoid accountability. Claims economic plans can’t survive power transfer. Also Mandela served 1 term & walked away. He’s literally the global symbol for relinquishing power
1
7
173
Replying to @zadama24
Love bombing
93
Replying to @ZambianObserver
How do people keep forgetting Kaunda?! He made us a one-party state claiming only he could keep us united & the country couldn't survive without him. Well we voted him out in '91 & didn't collapse so it was just a lie. Also ending his rule is the only reason UPND exists today
2
246
Replying to @DiggersOfNews
Yes we’re not a banana republic because if we were, a lawful, police notified march would be branded as ‘chaos’ & ‘disarray’ & churches/civil society would be warned to stick to their mandate. But we haven’t done any of these things so it’s ok
17
355
Replying to @Bright_200314
Borrow & burden the kids or get taxed more is a false choice - citizens still pay for both. Also celebrating domestic revenue financing when it’s being done by PAYE, VAT & other levies instead of copper exports is celebrating citizens footing the bill so the mines don’t have to
1
108
Replying to @DiggersOfNews
‘Dictatorship Lite, now with 40% less democracy than the leading brand’
3
147
Replying to @DobaniSingoJR
This is a man nobody voted for arguing that voting is overrated and I bet you the irony is lost on him 😂
1
45
Replying to @phoenixfmzambia
UK PM is easily removed by Parliament-Liz Truss lasted 49 days. The PM is also not head of state & doesn’t control the army so will we adopt these also? And the US was so alarmed that FDR stayed for so long that the minute he died they introduced 22nd amendment & never went back
1
203
Replying to @Viviansimbaya
We’ve already run his experiment. It was called the one-party state, zero elections for 19 years & instead of becoming Dubai we got empty shelves instead. Also comparing elections to colonialism is so backwards. What resembles colonial rule is having a leader you can’t vote out
7
447
Eish I don’t know man look at Museveni he scrapped term limits in 2005 and 20 years on Ugandans have failed to vote him out and every election widely condemned as rigged. He even nicely went on to scrap age limit in 2017 😂
1
4
61
Saying ‘ just vote them out’ works if elections are trustworthy. Right now the term limit is the only backstop against an election system that can be abused by the incumbent to stay in power. Only when we have truly credible elections can we possibly discuss term limit removal
2
14
547
Replying to @DiggersOfNews
Hollowing out the opposition then gloating you can ‘declare yourself winner’ because no one's left to run is like the arsonist blaming the house for burning. A ballot with only one name isn't a mandate - it’s just a one-party state with better PR
11
323
Replying to @raphael_phiri
The law is supposed to stand in a government's way. That’s its entire job. A healthy response to a law that constrains your power isn't "amend the law", it's "reconsider whether we should be doing the thing the law forbids”
25
Replying to @Mule_Kaipambe
‘They're different’ is not an argument for a separate ministry. Everything which is why departments exist & can be created under existing ministries . By her logic no number of ministries is ever too high - you can just say "ah but these two things are slightly different."
30
Replying to @Mike42726245
True there’s no investigative aspect! It’s all reactive: they wait for a quote then repeat the quote. Nobody finds the story, verifies the claim or probes GRZ for comment. But cyber act has made it risky for them to print investigative pieces so it’s wild for them as well
126