These people are completely incapable of taking accountability or self reflection.
The replies to this post are a snapshot of what most hard-working Indo-Canadians now face in Canada.
And this did not appear from nowhere. Politicians & influencers have spent years turning India the villain, & Indo-Canadians into the face of every Canadian failure, from housing & jobs to crime. @X then rewards the pile-on.
When every problem becomes 'India' & every Indo-Canadian becomes suspect, then it's no longer an immigration debate. Its anti-Indian hate, normalized for clicks & votes.
@CdnHumanRights @Safety
Matt retweeted
The DairyQueen in my town, the last White owned goyslop place around, just got bought by indians. It was 100% White kids working there and it's now half pajeetas overnight.
The humiliation of being colonized by the grossest race of people on the planet is almost unbearable.
Matt retweeted
What’s actually going on in Ukraine is that there is a massive incentive difference between the elites and the people.
The former have grown very rich off the hundreds of billions flowing to Ukraine, while the latter’s children are conscripted to die in trenches.
I swear people who make these posts are farming for engagement.
It guarantees hundreds of replies calling OP retard.
It's funny to me that people get so upset over the word "retard".
Nobody is talking about people with downs, and besides, we screen for and abort babies with downs.
...yet people like this never object to that.
Ecole poly technique happened because of a lack of immigration control.
Violence against women and girls are up because of a lack of immigration controls.
But this person wants gun control?
🤔
"statistically rare shootings"
Why not spell it out?
MASS SHOOTINGS
Tell us #CCFR: How many mass shootings are required before one can justify gun control?
(Also: Most crime guns are domestically sourced.
ctvnews.ca/canada/article/mo…)
Matt retweeted
This is the most evil and least civilized thing anyone could ever possibly say or believe. This is why liberals are less than human and must be denied any form of human rights.
Let's say there is a lion and a hyena.
Let's say the lion spends a huge amount of energy hunting a gazelle. It searches for days. It chases the gazelle repeatedly. There is a violent struggle. The lion wins.
Let's say the hyena and 20 of its "student" buddies move in to take the kill away after the lion spent all of its energy and risked injury to feed itself and its cubs.
What would the lion do?
It would fight the hyenas. It would not care if the hyenas were "permanently scarred."
Liberals (soulless, empty bodies controlled by demons) will tell you that it is wrong for the lion to hurt the hyenas, who are just hungry and "want a better life."
Liberals would also pay somebody to shoot the lion dead for defending its kill.
This is the key to understanding why Liberals are unhuman, anti-human, less than human, whatever you want to call it. Not people.
The lion does the work and gets the reward. The hyenas come to steal the reward without doing the work. The lion fights back to defend what it did for itself.
The liberal shoots the lion.
White countries created the first world. We made everything worth having. We are the lion.
The third world are hyenas. They are moving in to take it from us because they cannot have it for themselves otherwise.
When white people fight back, liberals pay the police to shoot us. But they would never allow the police to shoot the hyenas from far off countries that are not worth living in.
The liberal will always kill whoever did the good thing and give rewards to whoever did the bad thing.
Liberals are not just less than human, they are the exact opposite of what a good person is.
They hate work. They love theft.
They hate beauty. They love decay.
They hate health. They love disease.
They hate honor. They love deceit.
They hate the superior. They love the inferior.
A liberal is nothing but an empty shell filled with the perfect inversion of a person.
Everything that you want, liberals want to take away. Everything that you hate, liberals want to force on you.
There is no reason to tolerate these people as equals or to allow them to have freedom. It's time for them to be made silent.
He may have a Star wars name and disagree with you on everything you and your ancestors held dear,
but dammit! He's just as American as you!
I am a second-generation American. I was BORN in the United States. I was raised here. This is the only country I have ever called home.
I grew up believing in mostly conservative principles. Individual liberty, meritocracy, personal responsibility, and the American Dream. I believed these were values worth defending.
But somewhere along the way, something went terribly wrong.
I watched fellow Americans being told they didn't belong because of the immutable characteristics like ancestry. I watched patriotism become a test of ethnicity. I watched people who spent their entire lives loving this country being treated like outsiders in their own homeland.
And perhaps the most heartbreaking part was the silence of people we once considered political allies.
Let me make something absolutely clear.
My American identity is NOT conditional on my skin color. My citizenship is NOT diminished by my surname. And my patriotism does NOT require validation from anyone.
I can disagree with you on immigration, economics, foreign policy, or virtually any political issue. That is democracy.
But I will NEVER entertain a debate about whether I belong in the country where I was born.
No political party is entitled to my unconditional loyalty. Especially not at the expense of my dignity.
I did not come to America. I was born in America.
And I refuse to spend the rest of my life proving that I belong in my own country.
I am an American. Not a guest. Not a foreigner. Not a second-class citizen.
An American. Full stop.
Send them back the same way.
This is how White slave traders transported Africans across the Atlantic.
They packed men, women and children into the holds of ships, chained them together and stacked them in suffocating spaces like worthless cargo.
Human beings were crammed together for weeks or months, surrounded by filth, disease, starvation and death.
Many were shackled so tightly they could barely move.
Others were thrown overboard when they died or became too sick to be considered profitable.
At least 2 million Africans died during the Middle Passage alone.
Think about that.
Millions of people never reached the other side of the Atlantic.
Their lives were stolen before they even arrived at the plantations where survivors would be forced to work.
And all of this was done for profit.
African men, women and children were reduced to commodities in one of history's largest forced migrations, their suffering turned into wealth for slave traders, merchants and plantation owners.
Slavery was not just exploitation.
It was the systematic dehumanization of an entire people for economic gain.
Slavery is one of humanity's greatest crimes.
Never let anyone romanticize it, minimize it or erase what was done to African people.
Matt retweeted
Settlement and immigration are distinct activities. The former involves carving civilization out of blank wilderness, the latter does not. That's the first lie they tell in order to flood the country with Indians.
The second lie is that Canadians "immigrated" at all. Where are *Canadians* from, exactly? You might say "France and Britain, mainly," but there are no Canadians in France or Britain.
Canadians experienced ethnogenesis in Canada. The French Canadians have been in Quebec for four centuries, and are entirely descended from a small group of settlers. That's only a bit less time than the Maori have been in New Zealand. Over those centuries they became a distinct people. The Quebecois are not "from" France, they're from Quebec.
Anglo-Canadians were more recently minted, arising as a distinct group over the last two centuries via the mixture of the English, Irish, and Scottish. My own ancestry includes contributions from all three of these. Am I English, Irish, or Scottish? No, I'm Canadian. In precisely the same fashion the English emerged in the first millennium AD from the mixture of Angles, Saxons, and Jutes with one another and with the native Britons.
Trace any group back far enough and you find that they're "from" somewhere else. "Native" Americans migrated from Siberia. Does this make them Siberian? No, because they experienced ethnogenesis in the Americas. It would be equally absurd to say that Siberians are akchually Africans, because the Australopithecines evolved in Africa. We can play this stupid game back to the dawn of time. "You see really your homeland is a muddy tidal pool 4 billion years ago, where the first biotic slime emerged." That's obviously stupid. You are not from a muddy tidal pool (though for Indians and degree of confusion on this point is understandable). You are from where the people you belong to, as they exist in your historical moment, came to be as they are now.
Obviously the same thing might apply at some point in the future to present day immigrants. You can already see this happening in Toronto, where Indians, Chinese, Caribbeans, and Arabs are gradually and with a great deal of friction merging into some new mystery meat urban ethnos that doesn't exist anywhere else, and may in several generations come to see itself as simply Torontonian. That hasn't happened yet. Most of them arrived a few years ago, have no deep roots in Canada, and are very obviously members of foreign ethne whose true homelands are in distant countries. In other words, they are immigrants. Whether it is desirable to nurture a new Frankensteinian ethnos from the odds and ends of the planet's genetic leftovers, an ethnos which is liable to turn on its creator as it matures, is another matter entirely, and that question is one that facile "nation of immigrants" rhetoric is intended to dodge.
3 million fewer foreigners is a small, barely noticeable improvement.
But it's still an improvement.
I bet you'd notice 97 million more.
