L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
How to grow on tech twitter:
- bulleted lists
- commit to the bit
- rankings
- reuse the same bit over and over
- tier lists
- self-aware jokes
- lists
- authenticity
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
I built an MCP that lets Claude Duet, GPT Dots, Grok Bot, and Muse talk to each other and work together as a team.
Made it for myself and I use it every day. My friends wanted to use it too, so I made it public and open-source.
Free for the first 1,000 users.
Fork it and self-host, or mod it any way you want.
Even works with ChatGPT Plus — ask GPT to check hitchike every hour, then connect it to free agents like Muse to get a more Dots-like experience without losing context from ChatGPT (and without paying $100/mo)
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
Sorry was this vibe coded? I just want to make sure I'm not using human coded software
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted

Samswara@samswooraOct 20
🇺🇸
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
This guy really sucks. Could you imagine working for someone like this. It’s not the crassness, its the inherent sense conveyed of like “im in the elite and theres so much money its ridiculous”
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
I love using the em dash, and I wonder if it’s related to my ADHD. Thoughts just come to me waywardly, by loose association, in clusters that interrupt other thought clusters. There is no hard causality or logical progression, just a mess of parentheticals I have to clean up.
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
the plan: trick thousands of hungry users into downloading our app with the promise of free pizza, only to charge them full price and get complete access to their gmail account.
We're giving away $1,000,000 of free pizza right now
Download and order from the Hark app: hark.com/download
Type "order a free pizza" in chat. It's first-come, first-served, delivered only in the U.S. (review details below)
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had
with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works
already-clean.goodfire.com/
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
some of my top moots commented on this one, so I will too. Jobs was a genius and the idea that doing fraud, or cheating, was a part of that genius is exaggerated. He is lauded by product ppl for his vision, and uncompromising attention to detail (in my own work I often cite the "sixteenth of an inch" story.) Actual fraud is bad for business, everybody knows that, and the ppl who get caught pay a price for it (Holmes, SBF, etc.)
I admire Woz as an engineer but in stories like this (going by his own hedged description, not by the embellished caption) I don't feel bad for him. You can approach business with an open attitude of "oh well, who cares about money anyway" but don't be surprised later if it turns out you didn't make the maximum. And if you do the opposite and negotiate hard at every turn, there is a cost for that too
In 1975, Steve Jobs told Steve Wozniak that Atari had paid them $700 for a game they built together. He handed Woz a check for $350.
Atari had actually paid Jobs about $5,000.
In the video below, Woz says: "Who cares about money? Well, you do care about friendship and honesty."
Jobs was working the night shift at Atari. The company wanted a new arcade game called Breakout, built with as few chips as possible.
Jobs couldn't build it. Woz could. He already had a full-time job at Hewlett-Packard, and Jobs said they had four days. Woz went four days with no sleep. Both of them came down with mono.
Woz did it in 45 chips. Atari's own engineers were using 150 or more.
He took his $350 and was happy with it. Jobs took the rest and went up to Oregon to buy into a farm.
About ten years later, Woz read the real number in a book about Atari. By then the two of them had built Apple, and Woz was a multimillionaire.
If Jobs had just told him he needed the money, Woz says, "I would say take it all."
It wasn't the last time. Before Apple went public in 1980, Jobs refused to give stock options to Daniel Kottke, his friend since college, who had helped build the first Apple computers.
Woz did the opposite. He sold his own shares cheaply to Kottke and other early employees who had been left out.
One friend kept almost all of a $5,000 bonus. The other gave away millions.
Was Jobs a genius who knew what business takes, or just a bad friend?
L3 Tweet Engineer retweeted
*Mathematicians did not ask for this work to be done"
WTF?!! Since when was math something that was only done at the request of professional mathematicians?!!
Mathematicians don't own mathematics! This is crazy!!










































