Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff) header
Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff) profile picture

managing director Tellurium Q Ltd

Joined December 2021
Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)Photo by Geoff Merrigan (@MerriganGeoff)
This is why the issue is far from over:
🚨 BOMBSHELL FROM JAPAN — THEY CAN’T HIDE THIS ANYMORE Professor Robert Clancy just dropped the receipts: A massive Japanese study tracking 20 MILLION people found that ALL excess deaths were in the vaccinated group. The unvaccinated group? ZERO excess deaths. And here’s the killer detail: mortality surges exactly 3 months after every booster — with peak deaths hitting around 100 days post-vaccination. The pattern is undeniable. In my opinion, they can no longer suppress the information on the COVID vaccine. The data is out. The cover-up is crumbling. The world needs to see this.
1
1
More and more is coming out about that time. There needs to be full transparency and independent investigation….. and people need to be held accountable.
“The World Health Organization” now states on its website: “COVID-19 vaccination can cause multiple sclerosis due to cross-reactive CD4+ T cells that recognize the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and myelin peptides.” In other words, your own immune system destroys the nerve pathways and then attacks your brain and spinal cord. This data was available during the lockdowns but was labeled as a “conspiracy theory” and censored by social media.
1
6
Geoff Merrigan retweeted
Robert Reich in 2025: Trump is a fascist dictator for even suggesting that a company be taken over by the government and for telling a CEO what to do. Robert Reich in 2026: SpaceX and Starlink must be taken over by the government. Small man, giant fraud.
1,697
7,716
615
29,586
463,872
Geoff Merrigan retweeted
Correct. Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be. Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them. Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week. Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact. Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia. SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR. That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell. End of story.
STARLINK WORKS THE SAME WAY ITS ALWAYS WORKED. ITS NOT A WEAPONS SYSTEM, NO MATTER HOW MUCH UKRAINE WANTS IT TO BE.
11,243
32,734
3,515
192,933
11,778,340
He has a point, a very Musk thing to do:
I don't know if you realize what just happened. Elon Musk is completely bypassing the State. For 100 years, we've been told the problem is capital. That it must be captured, taxed, redistributed. With an army of intermediaries standing between those who create wealth and the people: ministries, agencies, commissions, bureaucrats. Musk is doing the opposite. He's taking his capital and giving it directly to the people. One SpaceX share to every kid in America. Not a handout. Not a subsidy. A piece of the machine that's taking humanity to Mars. And he says it himself: this is the first of many. Mises understood this back in 1944: the bureaucrat creates nothing. He administers what others created, following rules that have no connection to the value produced. The day value flows directly from the one who creates it to the one who receives it, the bureaucrat has no function left. That's what's being born right now. A new liberal world order, where the very concept of the State will make less and less sense. The world we're entering is a world of abundance. AI, robots, energy, space. And that abundance won't come through the State, for one simple reason: we have a century of proof that it doesn't work. Redistribution was version 1.0. Direct distribution of capital is 2.0. While France is still debating how to tax builders even more, America is handing stock to its kids. Pick your side.
2
16
A hard lesson:
You may need to hear this. Today's lesson about life.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The video is AI-generated scripted content from TikTok account @emotionalgravitychannel (labeled as such), not a real story or personal lesson. tiktok.com/@emotionalgrav… tiktok.com/@emotionalgrav… cnn.com/2026/06/04/bus…
2
9
Pretty much:
Wenn man die Präsentation des neuen Tesla Roadster sieht, liegt der Gedanke nahe: Das ist doch nur eine große Show, um den Aktienkurs zu treiben und Anleger anzulocken - viel Spektakel, wenig echter Nutzen und kaum echte Innovation. Dieser Eindruck trügt! Viele machen hier denselben Fehler: Sie gehen stillschweigend davon aus, dass Musk wie ein gewöhnlicher Mensch denkt und handelt - also vor allem nach Geld, Status, Macht oder kurzfristigem Gewinn strebt. Genau deshalb schätzen sie seine Motive so falsch ein. Sein Lebensprojekt ist aber nicht, möglichst reich oder mächtig zu werden. Es ist, die Menschheit multiplanetar zu machen - oder ganz konkret: eine selbsttragende Zivilisation auf dem Mars aufzubauen. Er nennt das seit Jahren „Lebensversicherung für das Bewusstsein“ bzw. für die Menschheit insgesamt. Denn auf einem einzigen Planeten ist alles extrem fragil. Asteroid, Superkatastrophe oder irgendwann einfach die sich ausdehnende Sonne - irgendwann ist Schluss. Eine zweite, unabhängige Basis erhöht die Überlebenschance von Zivilisation und Bewusstsein dramatisch. Das hat er schon vor 15-20 Jahren gesagt und wiederholt es bis heute unverändert. Genau deshalb hat er SpaceX gegründet: um die Kosten pro Tonne zum Mars um Größenordnungen zu senken, damit es überhaupt machbar wird. Tesla, Starlink, die Batterie- und Energiesysteme, xAI, Optimus, Boring Company und selbst die Technik des Roadsters (die Kaltgas-Thruster, die COPVs und die Schubvektorsteuerung, die direkt aus der SpaceX-Welt kommen) sind keine isolierten Produkte. Sie sind die notwendigen Bausteine: - Nachhaltige Energie und Batterien braucht man sowohl auf der Erde als auch auf dem Mars. -Globale Kommunikation (Starlink) ist die Grundlage für alles, was vernetzt und autonom funktionieren muss - und lässt sich auf Mars-Kommunikation übertragen. - KI und Robotik (xAI, Optimus) sind entscheidend, um in einer extrem feindlichen Umgebung überhaupt bauen, reparieren und leben zu können. - Tunnelbau und Infrastruktur-Technologien helfen bei Habitaten, die geschützt sein müssen. Und der Roadster ist eben nicht nur ein Halo-Car. Er ist eine öffentliche Demonstration und Weiterentwicklung von Antriebstechnik, die aus der Raketenwelt kommt - und damit ein weiteres Stück Technologie, das „Mars-ready“ gemacht und durch den Markt finanziert und skaliert wird. Musk hat mehrfach gesagt, dass er Vermögen im Wesentlichen nur sammelt, um genau dieses Ziel zu finanzieren. Die Unternehmen funktionieren über Markt, Wettbewerb und Investoren, weil das der effektivste Weg ist, die benötigten Technologien zu entwickeln, die es vorher schlicht nicht gab. Ohne die Nachfrage nach Elektroautos, Internet, Raketenstarts usw. hätte man nie das Kapital und die Iterationen gehabt, um die Kosten so stark zu senken und die Systeme so robust zu machen. Das heißt nicht, dass er keine Fehler macht, keine Show-Elemente nutzt oder nicht auch egoistisch oder chaotisch sein kann. Es heißt nur, dass seine zentrale Antriebskraft nicht der Aktienkurs ist, sondern das langfristige Ziel, die Menschheit vor dem Aussterben als Ein-Planet-Spezies zu bewahren und sie weiter ins Universum zu tragen. Das ist das, was ihn seit der Gründung von SpaceX und dem Einstieg bei Tesla antreibt - und warum die einzelnen Projekte so eng miteinander verzahnt sind. Genau deshalb bewundere ich ihn. Er denkt und handelt in Dimensionen, die weit über das hinausgehen, was gewöhnliche Menschen sich vorstellen oder anstreben - größer, langfristiger und in diesem Sinne selbstloser, weil es um die Spezies Mensch als Ganzes geht. Durch genau diese Haltung hat er bereits so viel erreicht (wiederverwendbare Raketen, den Massenmarkt für Elektroautos, globales Satelliteninternet und die konkrete technische Grundlage für eine multiplanetare Zukunft), dass ich überzeugt bin: Hier handelt es sich wohl um das größte Genie, das je gelebt hat. Ich bin froh, in derselben Zeitlinie wie er leben zu dürfen.
2
30
Geoff Merrigan retweeted
USA vs. Europe
596
3,016
369
19,473
2,652,716
Geoff Merrigan retweeted
An infuriated Dr John Campbell says the latest cancer study is remarkable and shows we could be curing the world of cancer with ivermectin/ mebendazole. He breaks it down: • 197 patients took 25mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole daily for 90 days: • 84% had a positive response • only 15.6% had cancer progression • the combination appears to be effective against a very wide range of cancers. ‘It just drives you mad really these studies are crying out to be done.
711
20
1,476
29,405
If the numbers are even broadly correct you have to ask, why?
Fuel Prices: 2008 vs 2026. So tell me — is this really all down to Trump and global oil prices, or are fuel companies and the UK Government taking us for a ride too? 🤔 👇👇
1
43
Listening to Daniel makes me want to start something else: youtu.be/fymfTFftN-g?is=Um9v… He acknowledges the role of luck and also what we do to increase that.
1
58
Pleased to oblige this request from a very happy new owner of Ultra Black II speaker cables (can’t wait until they hear the interconnects and power cables): “I wanted to check if it’s possible to change the name of “Ultra Black” cables to “Ultra Awesome” please ? I couldn’t resist passing on my heartfelt appreciation to you and your team I have never listened to Leonard Cohen and Floyd this much before !” Nitin Chanduka, Singapore Read more: telluriumq.com/products/spea…
15
Great Review on the new Silver III cables, thank you HiFi+ : “Silver III represents both a significant leap forward in performance over Silver II and lends itself to more upmarket equipment partnerships. So, significant in fact that Tellurium Q decided a matching set of interconnects were in order. Having checked several of the latest generation of Tellurium Q cables against their predecessors, this seems to be a common theme; the cables are improving across the board, and they are also allowing more high-end performance. But perhaps more importantly, they do this beyond the direct comparison with TQ’s existing cable range. Tellurium Q Silver III is one of those easy recommendations. At its price, it’s hard to beat for overall value. It takes what made Silver II so popular and adds so much more.” Alan Sircom, HiFi + magazine telluriumq.com/products/spea…
1
31
Thank you to Mr Lassen and his comments on the new Silver III speaker cable. Full comments on the Tellurium Q webpage. My conclusion is: The Tellurium Q Silver III represents a major upgrade over the Silver II in this system. Improvements are not subtle but immediately apparent, with significantly increased openness, articulation, separation and musical engagement. The upgrade encourages longer listening sessions and renewed enjoyment of familiar recordings. The Silver III´s make a greater emotional connection to the music. Period.” © Independent HiFi reviewer and Sound Engineer Kurt Lassen 2026 Denmark
15
The right of Argentina today, the left of New Zealand of 1980’s surprisingly similar play book and very similar outcomes. Who could have guessed but what will the incoming PM do?
New Zealand, 1984. A country where the government fixed the price of your bread, subsidized your sheep, and set the interest rate on your mortgage by decree. Prime Minister Robert Muldoon had spent nine years running the place like a Soviet planning ministry with a Commonwealth accent. He froze wages and prices in 1982. He ran budget deficits north of 9 percent of GDP. Foreign debt ballooned. When farmers overproduced lamb nobody wanted, the state bought it anyway and let it rot in freezers. You cannot invent a better parody of central planning. Then the money ran out, as it always does. The 1984 currency crisis forced Muldoon from office, and the incoming Labour finance minister Roger Douglas did something no textbook predicted from a supposed left-wing party. He deregulated. Fast. Douglas floated the New Zealand dollar in March 1985. He abolished agricultural subsidies outright, which the farming lobby swore would end civilization. It did not. New Zealand farmers, stripped of their handouts, became among the most efficient on earth precisely because they now faced real prices and real losses. Subsidies breed dependence. Remove them and you remove the excuse for stagnation. He slashed the top income tax rate from 66 percent to 33 percent. He removed import licensing and tariffs that had protected lazy domestic manufacturers for decades. He gave the Reserve Bank a single mandate, price stability, through the 1989 Reserve Bank Act, and told it to stop monetizing the deficits of politicians. The state sold Telecom, the railways, and the airline. Departments that had employed thousands to shuffle paper simply vanished. The results embarrassed every planner who predicted collapse. Inflation, which hit 15 percent in the early 1980s, fell to low single digits. The economy that had grown slower than nearly every OECD peer began compounding. New Zealand climbed to the top of international rankings for economic freedom and ease of doing business, where it still sits, although it appears they have forgotten their past. The lesson costs you nothing to learn and everything to ignore. Prosperity comes from prices telling the truth and from letting people keep what they earn. Muldoon fixed prices. Douglas freed them. One left a basket case. The other created a country that worked.
1
49
Seems the current inequality narrative does not survive contact with facts. So why is it being pushed so hard right now?
Everyone assumes Britain is a country of hoarded wealth. The data says otherwise — UK wealth concentration (59) is lower than Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, France, and the US. A wealth tax is a solution looking for a problem we don't have.
2
22
Geoff Merrigan retweeted
The world is improving – not just for the rich, but also especially for the world’s poor. Read my peer-reviewed article: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
25
217
18
917
54,844
Atlas Shrugged made simple: 1. Society runs on a small number of highly capable producers – industrialists, inventors, engineers – whose work everyone depends on but takes for granted. 2. The system starts rewarding need over achievement: the more capable you are, the more you’re expected to sacrifice for those who aren’t. 3. Success gets treated like a debt – taxed, regulated, resented – until the most capable start asking why they bother trying at all. 4. One by one, led by a man named John Galt, they simply withdraw – walking away rather than keep propping up a system that punishes them for producing. 5. Without them, the whole structure collapses, revealing that the “automatic” prosperity everyone assumed was actually being generated by specific, irreplaceable people. 6. Atlas is the Titan from Greek myth, condemned to carry the sky on his shoulders forever – Rand’s stand-in for the producer class, holding up civilization while getting blamed for it. 7. “Shrugged” is the whole argument in one word: Atlas doesn’t fight, doesn’t protest – he just quietly sets the weight down. Nobody realized the sky was being held up by anyone in particular, until the day it isn’t. You don’t want us? We just go…🤷🏻‍♂️
The Road to Serfdom made simple: 1. Plan the whole economy: someone must decide what gets made and who gets what, since people don’t naturally agree on one set of priorities. 2. These decisions are too big and detailed for normal democratic debate, so power shifts to a smaller group who can just act – technocrats. 3. Fixed laws everyone can rely on get replaced by case-by-case rulings, because a plan needs flexibility, not predictability. 4. Dissent becomes a problem to manage, not an opinion to vote on – the plan can’t work if people are free to ignore it. 5. Enforcing all that selects for people most willing to be ruthless – Hayek’s “worst get on top” – i.e. negative moral selection. 6. Since economics touches everything (your job, home, speech), controlling the economy ends up controlling your whole life. That’s the "serfdom."
484
3,400
302
16,674
2,586,487