Tom Foale retweeted
Why do we view time spent doing nothing as wasted, rather than essential for human reflection and mental health?
Tom Foale retweeted
BREAKING🚨: Google’s quantum chip solved in five minutes a problem that would take 10 septillion years.
Physicists say it “proved” we live in a multiverse!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Google's Willow chip (2024) ran a non-practical random circuit sampling benchmark in ~5 min vs. 10^25 years classically. Hartmut Neven (not physicists) said it "lends credence" to multiverse per Deutsch; experts reject as proof.
blog.google/innovation-and…
bigthink.com/starts-with-a-…
iflscience.com/google-suggest…
Tom Foale retweeted
🚨: Scientists reveal our universe has a secret mirror twin, running backward in time.
If this is real, there could be a mirror version of us, where if we could somehow look across, we’d see effects arrive before their causes.
Tom Foale retweeted
🚨: A Particle Collider just showed that matter can emerge from 'nothing' inside a Quantum Vacuum.
Tom Foale retweeted
An 11-year-old chess prodigy has become the youngest woman grandmaster of all time, after a strong performance at the 46th Chess Olympiad. cnn.it/4hQZouF
Tom Foale retweeted
An electron in an atom is not a miniature planet following a definite orbit. It is described by a wavefunction, and squeezing that wavefunction into an ever-smaller region requires increasingly large momentum components and therefore greater kinetic energy.
The attractive Coulomb energy favors smaller distances, while quantum confinement resists unlimited compression. Their competition produces a lowest-energy state at a finite size. In hydrogen, this scale is the Bohr radius, about 5.29 × 10⁻¹¹ m.
Tom Foale retweeted
√(ℏG/c³) is only 1.616 × 10⁻³⁵ metres long.
That single combination of the quantum of action, Newton’s constant and the speed of light is the Planck length: the scale at which the continuum of spacetime is thought to dissolve.
The same three constants produce a time √(ℏG/c⁵) = 5.391 × 10⁻⁴⁴ s, an energy √(ℏc⁵/G) = 1.221 × 10¹⁹ GeV, and a density c⁵/(ℏG²) so vast that general relativity and quantum theory can no longer be applied separately.
Planck wrote the formulae in 1899, looking for units that would outlast every human convention; they have become the natural boundary of known physics.
Tom Foale retweeted
We assume that objects are more fundamental than the relationships between those objects.
However, philosopher George Webster argues that quantum mechanics upends this common-sense picture.
In the quantum world, relations like symmetry are more real than the particles themselves. But neither our everyday language, nor the language of logic favored by philosophers, can make sense of this.
Webster suggests that we turn to the weird and wonderful language of Gilles Deleuze to truly comprehend the quantum picture of reality.
Tap here to read now. bit.ly/4ukmQ6J
Tom Foale retweeted
A basic accounting rule in physics says whenever a particle collision creates a baryon—something like a proton or neutron that consists of three particles called quarks—it must simultaneously create a similar antibaryon.
Such “baryon number conservation” implies the amount of nuclear matter in the universe is fixed. However, physicists have never determined where within a baryon the conserved number resides.
For decades, the textbook answer has been simple. Each quark carries a baryon number of 1/3 and each antiquark carries a baryon number of –1/3. Because a collision can only ever make quark-antiquark pairs, the total baryon number cannot change.
However, a recently published study suggests the baryon number is not carried by the quarks, but instead resides in an agglomeration of particles called gluons that bind the quarks together and is called a baryon junction.
Learn more: scim.ag/3UyAU0c
Tom Foale retweeted
Naegleria fowleri is a harmless pond-dweller—unless it ends up in the nose of a human swimmer. Once inside, the amoeba can crawl along nerve fibers in the nasal cavity and through little openings in the skull until it reaches the brain. Once there, it can cause an infection that is almost universally fatal, earning it the frightening moniker the “brain-eating amoeba.”
Exactly why N. fowleri, which normally feeds on bacteria, exhibits this behavior has long been unclear. But a recent study suggests a possible reason: The parasite loves to seek out tight spaces.
This “claustrophilic” behavior may help it find its prey—and explain why it occasionally ends up deep in the human brain.
Learn more: scim.ag/4bXCOgP
Tom Foale retweeted
Over decades, lunar orbiters have amassed evidence that the Moon’s polar craters hold stores of water, locked up as ice. But no mission has directly sampled these frozen deposits to determine how much ice is there, how it is distributed, or how it got there in the first place.
China will soon launch Chang’e-7, a robotic mission designed to address those questions by sending a thruster-powered “hopping” probe into a crater near the lunar south pole, among the coldest, darkest places in the Solar System.
Learn more: scim.ag/4x9Q7Da
Tom Foale retweeted
From the island’s coasts to its sloping mountain ranges, Puerto Rico’s tropical forests teem with biodiversity.
But these forests are even more diverse than they appear at first glance: When it comes to how they use water, trees in Puerto Rico are surprisingly individualistic.
A recently published study reveals that in these forests, two trees belonging to the same species can vary wildly in how they transport, manage, and store water, depending on how dry it is in their specific habitats.
The findings suggest Puerto Rico’s tropical forests may be more resilient to drought than once thought and point toward better ways to model forests’ responses to future climate change.
Learn more: scim.ag/4xBhwh7
Tom Foale retweeted
A basic accounting rule in physics says whenever a particle collision creates a baryon—something like a proton or neutron that consists of three particles called quarks—it must simultaneously create a similar antibaryon.
Such “baryon number conservation” implies the amount of nuclear matter in the universe is fixed. However, physicists have never determined where within a baryon the conserved number resides.
For decades, the textbook answer has been simple. Each quark carries a baryon number of 1/3 and each antiquark carries a baryon number of –1/3. Because a collision can only ever make quark-antiquark pairs, the total baryon number cannot change.
However, a recently published study suggests the baryon number is not carried by the quarks, but instead resides in an agglomeration of particles called gluons that bind the quarks together and is called a baryon junction.
Learn more: scim.ag/4hxQTFl




























