Neal Geach (@Neal_Geach) profile picture

Assoc. Prof, PFHEA, Assoc Director @CLASS_UH Law Teacher of the Year Finalist 2020, & current judge Co-founded UH/Blackstone's National Criminal Advocacy Comp

High Wycombe, England
Joined February 2012
Photo by Neal Geach (@Neal_Geach)Photo by Neal Geach (@Neal_Geach)Photo by Neal Geach (@Neal_Geach)Photo by Neal Geach (@Neal_Geach)Photo by Neal Geach (@Neal_Geach)
Don’t lead. But do direct.
2
7
33
2,891
It’s Monday. It’s Episode 2. One hapless Silk. One man in glasses. One basic advocacy lesson. Keep it simple.
5
9
61
4,093
Join sessions designed to introduce you to Google Gemini. Sessions: In Person: Wednesday, 14 Oct 15.30 - 17.30 - de Havilland Online: Thursday, 5 Nov 10.00 - 12.00 Online: Wednesday, 18 Nov 14.00 – 16.00 Book your place: forms.cloud.microsoft/e/hjYy…
1
8
Advocacy, Illustrated Episode 1 Examination-in-chief: non-leading questions. One basic advocacy skill. One illustrated lesson. Every Monday.
4
6
2
56
3,555
Something new. Every Monday I will be posting comic strip me demonstrating an advocacy skill and comic strip me explaining it. All intended for those beginning their advocacy journey. Advocacy, Illustrated
15
15
1
108
7,312
Today, the National Junior Lawyers Division is publishing the findings of its survey of 476 past and current SQE candidates. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest independent surveys of the SQE cohort conducted to date. Some of the headline findings:
1
1
3
934
Ezra Klein: "Having AI summarize a book or paper for me is a disaster. It has no idea what I really wanted to know and wouldn't have made the connections I would've made. I'm interested in the thing I will see that other people wouldn't have seen, and I think AI typically sees what everybody else would see. I'm not saying that AI can't be useful, but I'm pretty against shortcuts. And obviously, you have to limit the amount of work you're doing. You can't read literally everything. But in some ways, I think it's more dangerous to think you've read something that you haven't than to not read it at all. I think the time you spend with things is pretty important." @ezraklein
From Ezra Klein, more true than ever. You would not believe how many shortcuts everyone else is taking. In many areas, you can get way ahead of everyone just by doing the work. More true than ever now, when more people are shirking and AI lets you do 10x if you try. 1/
99
590
136
4,656
2,056,349
1
18
676
Yes. Writing is not a second thing that happens after thinking. The act of writing is an act of thinking. Writing *is* thinking. Students, academics, and anyone else who outsources their writing to LLMs will find their screens full of words and their minds emptied of thought.
519
6,491
659
29,405
2,600,055
See also for writing law essays if you are a student
Please please do not rely on AI summaries of parliamentary procedure. It nearly always mashes together Commons and Lords rules and comes up with something that sounds good but is utter tosh.
4
6
56
3,595
Neal Geach retweeted
we're honestly so cooked. how is this not the headline and the only thing that matters. and instead everyone is desperate to pretend they're modern and forward thinking by insisting you use AI in every assignment
OpenAI, the company whose ChatGPT tool helped spark chatbot cheating, wants to embed A.I. in every facet of university life. Here's what the company told me about its plans to conquer campuses. nytimes.com/2025/06/07/techn…
32
1,209
38
6,461
313,976
Technology can lead us to forget what we're even capable of doing; make us believe that tasks and attributes once considered basic and ordinary are now beyond human capacity. Hence the danger in thoughtlessly yielding to its temptations.
3
6
3
23
8,439
ChatGPT didn't create a crisis in education-it simply revealed what was brewing for decades. Students need to see the purpose and value in what they do. That means we need to speak to students beyond AI about why learning matters.
1
2
6
180
Here’s the thing: The more you outsource your thinking to AI, the less well you’ll be able to think independent of it. This is true even of those who were educated before its invention. Students today, who did not have the mental training of an education, are outsourcing their thinking entirely to it and will never develop those skills. It’s not “oh no, these kids are being lazy and using technology to cheat;” it’s “these kids are never going to develop the ability to think well on any topic.” If you think this is just the latest iteration in a series of technological advances that complicates education, you’ve got it wrong. It is nothing less than the destruction of education itself.
12
19
5
158
5,284
Some news, team! 🎙️ I’m so excited to make my broadcasting debut for BBC Radio 4 next week. ‘You Do Not Have to Say Anything’ is a 10 episode behind-the-scenes peek at (and love letter to) the criminal justice system. Join me, Mon-Fri at 13:45 on BBC Radio 4 & BBC Sounds 🧡
34
79
27
555
108,304
📣We are now accepting entries to our 2025 essay competition! Open to those undertaking criminal pupillages, studying on the BPTC, and to BPTC grads awaiting / applying for pupillage. £2000 up for grabs! 📣Please RT. Further details on our website👇 thekalishertrust.org/2025/01…
3
2
966
For those interested, this toolkit provides numerous examples and strategies for mitigating the risk of generative AI related integrity concerns in higher education settings. 100% of the higher ed providers in Aus responded to the RFI and this is a culmination of their responses.
TEQSA has launched a new toolkit designed to support the #HigherEd sector in addressing the risk #GenAI poses to the integrity of awards. 👉teqsa.gov.au/guides-resource…
1
10
27
1,507
Just a reminder that the US Bill of Rights (1791) is also 94% AI generated. Show this to people who trust the reliability of AI detection tools.
10
134
15
549
28,967
This looks like the first #auslaw case in which a solicitor has been referred to the professional regulator for submitting AI generated written subs which contained "hallucinations" (aka authorities which do not actually exist): jade.io/article/1092470
2
27
1
40
5,259
Join us for an in-depth discussion on the role of computer-generated evidence in legal disputes. This talk will discuss the potential impact of computer bugs on the reliability of electronic evidence. 🗓️ 22 October, 6pm 📍In person and online 🎟️ Book: nrtm.pl/3N7gcxB
1
3
1
1
643