Born in Ukraine, brought up in Russia.

Nuneaton
Joined August 2020
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
Маск получил два урока очевидного (для любого с мозгами). 1. Если ты коммерческая компания, то твоя стоимость зависит от контракта с потребителями твоих услуг. Стоимость твоей компании зависит от желания потребителей покупать твои услуги. Как только ты начинаешь вмешиваться в функционирование уже проданных услуг - рынок закатывает тебя в бетон. Вроде же очевидно, но наркоман решил, что раз у него есть триллион - он всесилен. А оказалось, что триллион зависит от рынка. Ой. После отторможения старлинка для Украины Индия, ЕС, Китай, Япония и Канада объявили о планах создать альтернативные сети, а компания Маска возможно потеряла потенциальные контракты в Италии и Индии. Да, альтернативы скайлинкам будут не сейчас. Но наркоман, вообразивший себя властелином мира, дал миру понять, что ему нельзя доверять и надо делать своё. А чем больше будет альтернатив, тем ниже будет стоимость империи Маска. Это как с Ормузом. Чем дольше Иран держит его в заложниках, тем быстрее будут отрабатываться альтернативные пути доставки, и тем меньше Тегеран будет иметь влияния на экономику. Всё. 2. Второй урок очевидного - оранжевое тебе сольёт, сынок. Всегда. Оранжевое слило, что инициатором слоудауна был Маск, приказав тому восстановить скорости. Видимо, от партии прилетело так, что дошло даже до тыквы. Увы. Казалось бы, триллион, умный человек, имей софт пауэр и наслаждайся. А оказалось, что Маск подобен путину: вообразив себя властелином мира, тот влез в Украину в 2014 году и слил в унитаз весь grand standing россии, который далибог у той был до начала украинского вторжения. А теперь не то что всю Украину - дай бог взять Малую Токмачку
81
291
7
1,821
51,807
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
America lost the capacity to tell good from evil. Brilliant speech 👇👇👇👏👏👏👏
48
568
16
1,655
21,199
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
When you hear Trump's team brag about how much they have given to Ukraine, here are the actual numbers.
330
3,008
177
6,293
297,894
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
Die Behauptung, Russland sei mit Minsk II betrogen worden, gehört zu den beliebtesten prorussischen Propagandamärchen. 1. Russland hat das Abkommen selbst unterzeichnet, wurde darin aber nicht als Kriegspartei benannt, obwohl es genau das war. So hat der Westen Moskaus erlaubt, lediglich als Vermittler aufzutreten. 2. Russland und die von ihm unterstützten Kräfte haben den Waffenstillstand bereits am ersten Tag seines Inkrafttretens gebrochen, indem sie die Offensive auf Debalzewe fortsetzten. 3. Minsk II verlangte ausdrücklich den Abzug aller ausländischen bewaffneten Truppen und ihrer Ausrüstung. Russland hat das aktiv unterlaufen. 4. Die Behauptung, Minsk II habe lediglich dazu gedient, die Ukraine „aufzurüsten“, ist geradezu grotesk angesichts der deutschen Weigerung, dem Land Waffen zu liefern. Man setzte auf Diplomatie und wollte eine weitere Eskalation mit Russland vermeiden. Auch andere westliche Staaten leisteten nur sehr geringe militärische Unterstützung. 5. Russland hat Minsk II am Ende selbst torpediert: Mit der Anerkennung der sogenannten Volksrepubliken im Februar 2022 zerstörte Putin das zentrale Ziel des Abkommens, diese Gebiete als Teil der Ukraine zu erhalten. Ausgerechnet Moskau inszeniert sich als betrogene Vertragspartei. Dass die Ukraine die gewonnene Zeit nutzte, um stärker zu werden, ist kein Beleg für einen „Betrug“. Minsk II verpflichtete sie weder zur Wehrlosigkeit noch zum Verzicht auf westliche Waffen.
Russlands Sicherheitsinteressen wurden mit Füßen getreten. Minsk 2 wurde von der UKR nicht umgesetzt. Russland wird sich nicht mehr hinter die Fichte führen lassen. Trotzdem sind Gespräche über Frieden immer das Richtige.
153
253
13
1,213
23,251
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
I will be speaking with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his team this week to discuss Starshield, sanctions, and other matters pertaining to the defense of our strong ally, Ukraine. I will be assuring President Zelenskyy that anyone who attempts to limit the use of Starshield for Ukraine will be fully investigated and will be held fully accountable, to include public congressional oversight hearings, and immediate harsh and punitive budget cuts to any responsible agency or agency head. Congress will unequivocally reaffirm that Ukraine is an indispensable ally to the United States, that Russia is a self-declared enemy of the United States, and that the United States will 100% support and defend the people of Ukraine in their fight for their own freedom against this brutal, illegal, and unprovoked Russian invasion. The United States must provide any and all defensive equipment that Ukraine needs to defend itself. The United States must not import a single drop of Russian oil. Sanctions against the Russian regime must be harsher and stronger than they’ve ever been before. Each and every one of these items will be brought to the House Floor—and each and every one of these items will pass on the House Floor by an overwhelming margin. This is, after all, what Ronald Reagan would do. And this is what we will do now. Ukraine can, and will, defeat Russia. #PeaceThroughStrength
7,315
4,299
617
23,330
1,201,281
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
RBC-Ukraine today shared a comment from a Ukrainian government official who said that the Americans want Ukraine's Defense Forces to withdraw from Donbas, effectively handing it over to Russia. Back in 2025, Putin demanded that Trump make Ukraine surrender Donbas to Russia, threatening to take it by force otherwise. Trump, apparently, was quite willing to believe Putin, since Russia had continued to advance in Ukraine, albeit slowly, even when American military assistance was still actively flowing. Trump figured that if he cut off aid and restricted arms supplies (and sales), Putin would surely manage to finish conquering Donbas within a year or so. More than a year has passed, and Putin has not only failed to take Donbas but has actually lost ground in certain areas. His offensive has effectively stalled along several key axes, while Ukraine has even carried out an offensive operation called Vivaldi. The operation not only allowed Ukraine to recapture territory and push Russian forces back, but it took place precisely where the Russians had been concentrating their efforts to complete the conquest of Donbas. It's easy to imagine the scene: Trump wakes up and receives his daily intelligence briefings, as every leader does. He asks, "So, how are the Russians doing? Have they captured Donbas yet?" And his aides and generals reply, "Actually, it's the other way around. The Ukrainians have pushed the Russians back." The US administration apparently believes (wrongly, but that's what it believes, yes) that Putin will agree to freeze the war if he gets Donbas. And this isn't speculation pulled out of thin air. It's literally what Rubio himself was saying even before Trump's latest policy shift: the Russians want Donbas, the Ukrainians aren't prepared to surrender it without a fight, and so, supposedly, we have a strategic deadlock. Trump decided to break this strategic deadlock by openly siding with Putin, who promised more than a year ago that he would finish taking Donbas but still can't get the job done. This has turned out to be a remarkably stupid decision, because Putin's continued failure to conquer Donbas now leaves the US administration looking like fools and carrying the stigma of betrayal. And that's not an exaggeration — even several members of the Republican Party have already described Trump's actions as a betrayal. The Republican Party, for crying out loud. As for Donbas, Kyiv understands perfectly well that Putin's ambitions don't end there. Let me remind you that Russia also officially claims the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions as its own. And more broadly, Moscow is unwilling to accept an independent Ukraine. It wants a Ukraine subordinated to Russia, in whatever form, but subordinated nonetheless. And yes, future historians will undoubtedly examine all the stupidity, shortsightedness, and pettiness of the current American administration in painstaking detail — because there's simply no other way to describe it.
24
257
7
1,240
98,075
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
In this powerful monologue, Joe Scarborough proves that Trump and his cronies acting as cheerleaders for putin are no different from the Nazi sympathisers of the 1930s. It’s a chilling, crystal-clear wake-up call about what happens when leaders trade American democracy for a dictator's favour. Joe Scarborough: “… just peeling what putin has had a collection of useful idiots across America do now for the past five years. I really I really don't say this often in American politics. but when you're defending vladimir putin, an ex KGB agent who is committing war crimes by the day, I'm not sure how you sleep at night. And this phenomenon though, has historical parallels. It was 89 years ago this month in October 1937, that the former king of England walked up the steps of Adolf Hitler's mountain retreat in Bavaria. The Duke of Windsor had given up the throne less than a year earlier, but he toured German factories, inspected the SS and was photographed greeting the Führer. Time Magazine reported that Hitler gave the Duke a Nazi salute as they parted and Edward returned that Nazi salute. Later he told friends that Britain shouldn't fight Hitler, the war should not start. Winston Churchill had to actually send him to the Bahamas to keep him away from his new friend in Berlin. But the Duke wasn't alone, just like Donald Trump isn't alone. Here at home, Charles Lindbergh, an American hero who accepted the medal of freedom from Hermann Goering in 1938, went on to lead America First. And in a 1941 speech in Des Moines, he blamed Jews and the British for pushing America toward war. Even FDR's US Ambassador to Britain, Joseph Kennedy, predicted democracy is finished in England. His appeasement and his lack of moral alarm cost Kennedy his job. In Britain, aristocrats like the Astors and Lord Halifax thought Hitler was a man they could do business with. Does that sound familiar? Sounded so respectable, trade, stability, money, peace in our time. History remembers them now as morally vacuous opportunists who looked at a tyrant who was devouring his neighbours, the only thing they saw, a business partner. The parallels with Trump are too on point. Now on Friday, Donald Trump got on the phone with vladimir putin who always plays him when they get on the phone and what happened? He lifted sanctions on the Russian diesel deal, he did it three weeks after Republicans had forced him to sign a Russia sanctions bill in honour of Lindsey Graham. The White House says his gift to putin will lower prices at the pump, but it won't. The first shipment is only about 2.2 million barrels and America burns through more than that every day. It's not going to lower gas prices in America. But it will help putin kill innocence in Ukraine, a country Trump has always hated. Trump's four billion dollar gift to the man he kowtows to every day will buy missiles, drones, and glide bombs that will keep terrorising and killing Ukrainians who are fighting for their country's freedom and their children's lives and yes, our freedom. A bipartisan group of senators including Susan Collins wrote in a statement Sunday that the United States should not provide putin with a financial lifeline while Russia continues to kill Ukrainian civilians. But Trump's aping of putin’s talking points, they just keep getting worse. With this weak president attacking Ukrainian freedom fighters and perversely calling for new leadership in Kyiv. We do need new leadership, Mr. President, but not in Ukraine. Donald, I've known you a long time and I know you don't read history, so let me tell you how this story ends. The Duke of Windsor ended up a footnote, a cautionary tale in a fancy suit forever assigned to the dustbin of British history. And your time to finally do the right thing in Ukraine, Mr. President, it's running out. Stop bowing down to putin. And start doing your job. 1/2
115
1,816
99
4,549
83,802
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
Hard-On for Putin, Tough on Ukraine Look at the graphic above and read down each column. On the left is how the Trump administration has treated Vladimir Putin, the man who launched the largest war in Europe since 1945. On the right is how it has treated Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the duly-elected leader of the democratic country Putin invaded. Hold the two side by side and the pattern is obvious. The aggressor gets stroked. The victim gets ultimatums and threats. This week highlights the pattern. Trump strokes villainy and abuses our allies. substack.com/@avindman/note/…
120
979
38
2,071
49,125
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
You’re fucking brainwashed!
89
152
17
545
27,828
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
If Russia stops bombing Ukraine then Ukraine will stop bombing Russia. If Ukraine stops bombing Russia, Russia will keep bombing Ukraine. Why can’t people see this? Russia is the problem.
265
750
13
7,872
67,250
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
Ахуєть......................
7
164
9
483
13,547
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
I don’t usually join panels, but given the news and my presence on the ground, I was asked to weigh in. Here’s my response to a panelist who appeared to be defending Vladimir Putin amid Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine: “Do you want to save Ukrainian civilian lives, or would you rather hinder and kneecap what’s supposed to be your ally in its fight for survival against Russia? That’s simply what it comes down to now.”
624
1,249
85
7,040
394,986
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
To Donald J. Trump, 45th and 47th President of the United States From Viktor Yushchenko, 3rd President of Ukraine Mr. President, I write these words without diplomatic formulas or ceremonial language. I write simply, from one human being to another, and from one president to another—two men who understand that there are moments in history when decisions determine not only the fate of nations, but the fate of freedom itself. For Ukrainians, freedom is not an abstraction. It is not a slogan written into a political declaration. Freedom is in our blood. It comes to us through generations — from our Cossack forefathers, from ancestors who valued above all else their liberty, their dignity, and the land God gave them. We are a nation rooted in the soil. Our identity grew from love of our home, our field, our village, our city, our church, our family, and the sky above us. Ukrainians have never sought what belongs to another nation. But neither have we ever willingly surrendered what is ours. Mr. President, look at what is happening in Ukraine right now, at this very moment. Every day and night, our cities shudder under Russian ballistic missiles, Iranian Shahed drones, and aerial bombs. Russia strikes ordinary residential buildings in ancient Kyiv, sleeping neighborhoods in Zaporizhzhia, Odesa, Dnipro, Kharkiv, and towns across our country. Families are killed in their homes. Millions live under the threat of another siren, another explosion, another night wondering whether their children will still be alive in the morning. And when there is talk of “concessions” or deals with Putin, the Kremlin’s answer is more missiles, more drones, and more bloodshed. Ukrainian families pay the price. Behind every statistic is a human life. A mother buries her child. A child stands beside the grave of a father. A family returns to what was once its home and finds only broken concrete and photographs scattered through the ruins. This is not a distant “conflict.” This is the daily reality of millions of Ukrainians. And against this reality, Ukrainians hear calls that Ukraine should stop. That Ukraine should restrain its strikes against the infrastructure that finances and sustains Russia's war. That trade in Russian energy can somehow be separated from the missiles and drones Russia sends against Ukrainian families. It cannot. Money paid for Russian fuel is not an abstraction called “commerce” It finances an economy geared toward total war. Russia needs resources to wage this unjust war and Ukraine is fighting to deprive Russia of those resources. There is a profound moral difference between the aggressor and the nation defending itself. Mr. President, America knows this distinction better than most nations. It knows how dangerous it is to believe that trade can tame an aggressor or make the threat disappear. History taught us that lesson at a terrible price. Before the United States entered World War II, America traded extensively with Imperial Japan, including in strategically important materials. Washington hoped for years to avoid a wider war in the Pacific. Ultimately, economic pressure and diplomacy could not prevent catastrophe and on December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor was attacked. History may not repeat itself exactly, but it does raise the same questions again. What price do free nations pay when aggression is rewarded rather than stopped? Ukraine once placed extraordinary faith in the international order led by the United States. When the Soviet Union collapsed, Ukraine inherited one of the largest nuclear arsenals in the world. In negotiations with our allies, we agreed to give it up. We did so because we believed that a world governed by agreements was safer than a world governed by nuclear weapons. In 1994, the United States of America, along with its partners, signed the Budapest Memorandum, providing Ukraine with official assurances of security, sovereignty, and the inviolability of our borders. They pledged not to threaten or use force against Ukraine. America assumed a moral responsibility toward Ukraine. So how can anyone today, when a treacherous enemy has attacked us, forget America’s signature on this document? Ukraine kept its word. Russia broke its word. That history matters today. Because when a nation gives up the most powerful weapons on Earth in return for international commitments, and is later invaded by one of the very states that made those commitments, the consequences extend far beyond Ukraine. Every nation in the world is watching and asking whether agreements with great powers mean anything. They are asking whether giving up nuclear weapons makes a country safer—or more vulnerable. And they are watching America. Mr. President, our nations are connected by more than treaties and diplomacy. We have stood together many times before. One of the six Marines who raised the American flag at Iwo Jima was Sergeant Michael Strank, whose family came from Lemkivshchyna and who gave his life fighting for the United States. When American and Soviet forces met at the Elbe in April 1945, American Lieutenant William Robertson was first embraced by a Ukrainian boy from the Cherkasy region — Oleksandr Silvashko. Ukrainian soldiers served alongside American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and, today, Ukraine continues to share its hard-won military experience with its American partners, including expertise in countering Iranian-designed drones. Ukrainians and Americans have shed blood together in defense of freedom against tyranny. Mr. President, above all, there is one thing I want you—and the world—to understand. Do not mistake the Ukrainian desire for peace for a willingness to surrender. The Ukrainian spirit cannot and will not be broken. No people wants peace more than a people whose children are being killed. But peace cannot come by asking the victim to pay the price for the aggressor’s crimes. We cannot agree to a peace that will later cause the deaths of many more of our children and grandchildren. We are a people with deep roots, bound to our land by love, labor, and the spirit of freedom. We will never yield our land willingly to anyone. This is our home, given to us by God. We were here, we are here, and we will always be here. We cannot be intimidated by missiles, and we cannot be forced to surrender. Ukrainian identity has been forged through centuries of attempts to erase it. The Russian empire tried to silence our language, destroy our culture, starve our people, imprison our leaders, and rewrite our history. And still Ukraine survived. We survived because our roots are deep, and because the blood of a free people flows in our veins. Russia can destroy our buildings. It can terrorize our cities. It can kill our people. But it cannot destroy who we are. It cannot compel Ukrainians to cease being Ukrainian. Mr. President, America’s greatness was not built by accommodating tyranny, but by understanding, at decisive moments of its history, that freedom must be defended before the price of defending it becomes immeasurably greater. Ukraine is defending that principle today with the lives of our people. Today, the free world faces questions larger than Ukraine itself: whether borders may be changed by force; whether agreements between nations still have meaning; whether aggression will be rewarded; and whether the free world will stand beside those who choose freedom. One does not negotiate with tyrants—one stops them. Mr. President, I believe America understands this. With faith in truth, freedom, and the honor of the free world, Viktor Yushchenko President of Ukraine 2005-2010
482
2,476
242
7,250
302,594
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
I've now analysed over 241 videos featuring key figures behind RUS 2014 annexation of Crimea and the war in Donbas. Not once is NATO enlargement mentioned. Instead, it's always the same rhetoric: "historical Russian lands", "one people", "Slavic blood", "Russian imperialism."
88
770
66
2,865
48,922
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
Räumen wir mit einem weiteren pro-russischen Narrativ auf, den angeblichen 14.000 Toten, die die Ukraine dort zwischen 2014-2022 getötet haben soll. Wie so oft, wenn gelogen wird gibt es ein Körnchen Wahrheit, nämlich die Zahl 14.000. Dies ist allerdings die GESAMTZAHL der in diesem Zeitraum getöteten, beider Seiten, militärisch wie zivil. Der UN-Bericht (Link im 1.Kommentar) bricht die Zahl weiter herunter. Ca. 3.400 zivile Opfer, ca. 4.400 auf Seiten der ukr. Sicherheitskräfte und ca. 6.500 bei "bewaffneten Gruppierungen" (d.h. russiche Armee ohne Hoheitsabzeichen). Das heißt, der größte Teil der im Donbas getöteten, ca. 75%, waren Mitglieder der Streitkräfte. Des Weiteren zeigt sich klar, dass nach den intensiven Kämpfen in 2014 die Zahl der zivilen Opfer ab 2017 von Jahr zu Jahr immer mehr abnahm, in 2021 waren es in Summe "nur" 25. Russische Terrorangriffe führen mittlerweile innerhalb von 24 Stunden zu solch einer Opferzahl. Bei den Toten die bei den Streitkräften zu verzeichnen sind wird die Gesamtzahl der Toten von 2014-2022 nun in weniger als 10 Tagen erreicht. Fazit: Die angeblich von der Ukraine "massakrierten" 14.000 Bewohner des Donbas hat es nie gegeben. Was es tatsächlich gab sind 14.000 Tote als Folge einer terroristischen Intervention auf ukrainischem Territorium, getragen von russischen Soldaten, Agenten, Panzern und Artillerie die sich das Hoheitsabzeichen entfernt haben.
377
705
101
3,668
146,331
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
Amazing speech! 👏👏👏
202
1,560
148
4,380
79,627
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
Маріуполь 2022 року. За тиждень до нападу.
18
134
6
488
29,258
Worth another repost.
🇷🇺🚫 Если бы Россия увидела то, что творит Россия в России, то Россия вторглась бы в Россию, чтобы спасти Россию от России Гениально 🧠
2
91
Olya Soshkina. 🇺🇦🌻 retweeted
I predicted a month ago that Trump was going to say exactly this. I said he was going to try and blame Ukraine for diesel prices and tell Zelenskyy to stop. And here it is.
Trump: "Zelenskyy has to do one thing -- he has to stop knocking out diesel fuel in Russia. He's causing a shortage of diesel fuel. This isn't done by the Middle East, this is done by what's happening with Russia and Ukraine."
227
2,566
45
9,364
236,324