PIXELFLIP

I wanted to explain a little more why I think the name "Super Intelligence" is a bad replacement for AI because I mentioned earlier there are numerous reasons and its certainly worth sharing. 1. As I mentioned in my original post, I do not like the name "Super Intelligence" because it doesn't remind people that its "Artificial" or "Machine" Intelligence. This is not a good idea and is incredibly dangerous as it will result in people over relying on AI at times when they need to be extremely critical. 2. This is going to mislead an entire generation into calling something "Super Intelligence" when we have no measure for what Super Intelligence even is, which is quite dangerous. How do you know something is provably smarter than any humans let alone all humans, especially if it fails on basic logical tests? 3. This rebranding is like if tobacco companies were to rename a cigarette to a candy cane, and is now a thing for AI because frontier companies have been compromised by their poor decision making in hiring psychologists and philosophy majors to align models. 4. We do not fully understand the impact that AI use has on the human brain, for us to race to rename something which we don't even know how it impacts us or what potential harms there are for some populations say for example autists, some of whom are actually building these models. What if they are falling victim to their own work? A Zero Day Vulnerability in their hardware because their brain perceives the Hidden Markov Layers in Language Model Responses differently. We need research on this urgently before we continue to take advice from the people who are telling us AI is going to End the World but before it does it will cure cancer. And the logic of it all just doesn't add up, science is being given a back seat to folklore in blog posts. Right inline with the objectives of Effective Altruism, and the like's of Eli "I don't know if a baby is a person until its 4 years old" Yudkowsky. Also inline with those who want to hijack science for a world where claimed discoveries no longer need to be provable, no longer require scientific rigor, or validation of claims through observation. 5. Even with the rebranding, it doesn't fix the broken ecosystem of people who are delusional about this subject, and the actual naming itself is only going to induce additional delusion on this subject. Sam Altman said recently we should all be willing to accept that some bad things are going to happen for us to see the benefits of AI. This is absolute bonkers level of stupid. We have laws, if you break the law, you should be charged and tried. Our DOJ needs to do a better job here because we cannot have people operating above the law and claiming we just need to get used to it. Regardless if a company serves the US Government, if they, their founders, or employees break a law they should be subject to charges like the rest of us. Society need not assume harms, not democratically accepted, because the greed of the black suits in Silicon Valley. I said this for a few years now, Silicon Valley is the largest domestic threat to US National Security.