Developing mass spectrometry and chemical biology tools to study dynamic protein interactions at @VanderbiltChem. This is a trainee run account.

Nashville, TN
Joined March 2019
Lastly, is MLEC important for SARS-CoV-2 replication? We use a replicon system to show that YES, it is! (7/7)
108
MLEC surveys our glycoproteins during production, checking for errors and capturing duds before they are sent out. Is this function of MLEC important for CoV replication? Yes! (6/7)
1
111
What part of CoV infection is MLEC used in? We measure different parts of viral replication and find that MLEC is important for viral protein production, particularly the nsps which are made early on. (5/7)
1
34
How does nsp2 interact with MLEC during infection? And does infection change what MLEC sees? We leverage proteomics and find 1) that nsp2 interacts with many of MLEC’s immediate neighbors (OST complex) and 2) infection dramatically alters MLEC’s interactome. (4/7)
1
1
33
Which of these interactors are actually important for CoV replication? We use a model CoV (MHV) to test what happens when we get rid of interactors one-by-one. One of the most exciting hits is Malectin (MLEC). (3/7)
1
24
CoVs use nonstructural proteins (nsps) to take over a host cell. What parts of a host cell do nsps interact with? We use proteomics to find host protein interactors of nsp2 and nsp4. Turns out nsps from several CoVs, like SARS-2, SARS-1, & MERS share several interactors (2/7)
1
59
Excited to share a preprint from @J_P_Davies PhD work! We find that CoVs, like SARS-CoV-2, use malectin (part of cells’ glycoprotein production assembly line) to make viral proteins and replicate. Malectin may be a prime pan-CoV antiviral target! 🧵(1/7) biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
2
1
6
539
Good morning Phoenix. Looking forward to attending #NACFC2023. If you’re around, come to the lunch roundtable on Proteomic-driven Advances in Studies of CF (RT29) where we’ll discuss the latest mass spec research on CF. @CF_Foundation
1
7
545
In sum, AM predicts CF accurately w/ a high false positive rate. AM correlated modestly w/ clinical outcomes, but well w/ CFTR function. It cannot distinguish pathophysiology. AM may prove useful for identifying CF causing variants in carriers, but caution must be taken. (7/7)
169
Finally, we were curious if AM could predict CFTR theratype - how CFTR variants respond to drug. This feat is technically outside AM's intended design, but is important in the CF field. We concluded, AM cannot predict CFTR theratype. (6/7)
1
191