Professor, now Writer/Producer. As the Jewish People go, so goes Civilization. I proved Reuters is a propaganda mill (link ↙️).
Joined June 2024
- Tweets13.2K
- Following1.7K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes54.9K
Pinned Tweet
How to build a global Islamist-dominated media empire (Reuters) seeking the destruction of the only Jewish State and the United States of America:
1) Promote to the position of Senior Foreign Policy and White House correspondent, a Turkish Islamist-supporting woman named after Muhammad’s six-year-old bride (Humeyra Pamuk).
2) Retain as your lead writer in the Middle East, a British Muslim convert and proven liar (Tom Perry).
3) Publish glowing eulogies for Hamas mass murderers written by your Global Foreign Policy Editor (Samia Nakhoul).
4) Hire as your Deputy Gulf (Qatar) Bureau Chief, a former professor who developed the Anti-American, Antisemitic curriculum at Northwestern University’s Qatar-based journalism school (Andrew Mills).
5) Appoint a Palestinian as Bureau Chief in Israel’s Capital (Rami Ayyub).
6) Feature a Palestinian correspondent who hails from a clan that tried and failed to eradicate Israel in the 1948 War (Ali Sawafta).
7) Permit another Palestinian correspondent covering the Gaza War to publish Israeli troop movements relayed via social media (Nidal al-Mughrabi).
8) Staff your Jerusalem Bureau with radical-Left token Israeli Jews who hate their country (Maayan Lubell, Allyn Fisher-Ilan).
9) Assign a Washington-based reporter to cover riots, harassment and violence targeting Jewish students at scores of universities across the U.S. and blame it on "Israel's war in Gaza" (Kanishka Singh).
10) Refuse to report in your financial statements, the specific countries in the Middle East in which you generate revenue and income.
@thomsonreuters
@Reuters
Reuters' Palestinian correspondent Nidal al-Mughrabi:
"Israel killed people".
Ahmed Bracha, a Hamas Nukhba terrorist who took part in the October 7 raid on Kibbutz Nir Oz, was among 3 Nukhba operatives killed in Gaza strikes last week, the IDF announced. Bracha helped abduct civilians, including the late Alexander Danzig, and later helped hold hostages, including Nimrod Cohen.
In an effort to pressure the Israeli government to succumb to a Palestinian State or otherwise drive Netanyahu from power, Reuters has done everything possible in its coverage over the years to discredit and undermine Netanyahu. And their far-Left correspondents, like Maayan Lubell, had been predicting and pushing hard for a Netanyahu election loss.
For Reuters perennial 'Jewish' malcontent, Maayan Lubell: take two and call us in the morning.
Last week, election polls from Israel’s left leaning Channels 12 and 13 projected Netanyahu’s Likud party winning just 19 and 18 seats.
Tonight, exit polls put Likud at 24 to 30 seats.
As I pointed out earlier today, election polls are unreliable, especially when the results reflect the pollster’s political bias
Last we left former BBC Arabic and current Reuters propagandist Olivia Le Poidevin, she was blaming the U.S. for malnutrition in Yemen, relying on scientific fraud to claim there was famine in Gaza, parroting fake Hamas-issued casualty figures, and generally making an ass of herself on the front page of Reuters website.
Today, Le Poidevin is back, peddling the United Nation's latest canard that Israel not only committed "genocide" in Gaza during the war, but yes, you guessed it, Israel is now committing... Double Genocide:
"It said Israeli authorities had kept committing 'genocidal acts with the genocidal intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the Palestinians in Gaza', and that the situation had also continued to deteriorate in the occupied West Bank."
We look forward to Le Poidevin's column scheduled to appear on Reuters website next week where she will undoubtedly claim Israel is committing the dreaded Triple Genocide.
In the post below, Grok pulls down Le Poidevin's pants for a thorough spanking on her liberal use of propaganda, fallacies, and ethical violations of Reuters not-so-sacred handbook of journalism.
"The article in question (Geneva dateline, Oct. 26, 2026; reporting by Olivia Le Poidevin, writing by Kirsti Knolle) covers a UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry report alleging Israel continued “genocidal acts with the genocidal intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the Palestinians in Gaza” after the October 2025 US-brokered ceasefire, plus related West Bank claims."
Propaganda Devices
Atrocity propaganda (multiple instances): Headline and opening sentence present “genocide” as ongoing fact via the commission’s language. Emphasis on heavy munitions in populated areas, children/funerals, “exterminate and displace,” and death tolls frames Israeli actions as inherently atrocious without equivalent scrutiny of Hamas ceasefire compliance, military context, or human shielding. Image of distressed children at a funeral amplifies this. (Count: 5–6 distinct framing elements.)
Asymmetrical definition/loaded language: “Israel continued to commit genocide” and “genocidal acts with the genocidal intent” vs. Israeli dismissal as mere “misinformation campaign” or “scandalous.” “Israel’s assault on Gaza” and “intentional killing… strategy to exterminate” are presented with less hedging than the Israeli counter. (Count: 4.)
Card stacking/selective omission: Dominant focus on Palestinian child victims, post-truce Israeli territorial expansion, West Bank statistics, and commission claims. Minimal space for Israeli operational justifications, Hamas rocket/attack data during the period, or detailed rebuttals. Palestinian Authority criticisms appear only in the final sentence. Palestinian death figures given prominence with limited sourcing caveats. (Count: 4–5.)
Propaganda subtotal: ~13–15.
Logical Fallacies
Appeal to pity (core fallacy in the sample): Report scope and framing center on “violations against Palestinian children.” Image and funeral context of children evoke immediate emotional response. West Bank “intentional killing of Palestinian civilians” and displacement numbers (34,176 remaining displaced) heighten pity without proportional analysis of combatant status, threats, or comparative data. (Count: 4–5.)
Related emotional loading in phrases like “exterminate and displace” and the structure leading with genocide allegations. (Count: 2.)
Fallacies subtotal: ~6–7.
Reuters Handbook / Trust Principles Violations
Handbook/Trust Principles require integrity, independence, freedom from bias, accuracy, balance (“take no side, tell all sides”), social responsibility, and avoidance of unattributed opinion or one-sided storytelling.
Failure to strive for balance and freedom from bias: Article structure and headline lead with and center the commission’s contested “genocide” finding. Israeli response is brief and reactive. Context of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack is minimal relative to Palestinian casualty emphasis. No equivalent depth on Israeli security concerns or ceasefire implementation disputes. (Count: 5.)
Sourcing/attribution issues: Heavy reliance on the commission (whose prior genocide findings were rejected by Israel as scandalous) and “Palestinian authorities” for the 74,000 figure without noting the Hamas-run health ministry’s role or verification disputes common in such reporting. Commission claims of “genocidal intent” and “strategy to exterminate” are reported with limited independent caveats. (Count: 3.)
Social responsibility / impartiality: Framing risks presenting a highly contested legal/political determination (genocide post-ceasefire) in a manner that aligns with one side’s narrative. Brief PA criticism does not offset the overall tilt. (Count: 2–3.)
Handbook violations subtotal: ~10–11.
Totals:
🔴 Propaganda: 13–15 occurrences
🔴 Logical fallacies: 6–7 occurrences
🔴 Handbook violations: 10–11 occurrences
-----------------------------------------
🔴 Grand total: ~29–33 occurrences
In a story of less than 500 words, Le Poideven manages to peddle 29-33 examples of false claims, calumnies, one-sided contentions, unproven accusations, biased perspectives, hyperbole, loaded language, material omissions, sob stories, and dubious sourcing.
Reuters has been targeting the Jewish State with journalistic malpractice for decades. The question is, why? Who is incentivizing this garbage?
SCOOP
Pictured below: Reuters reports the Israeli government has begun building houses for Jewish settlers in the E1 corridor of the West Bank.
Congressman Chris Van Hollen has responded by submitting a bill calling for financial sanctions against the developers participating in construction.
Oops, sorry... those are homes built for Native-Americans on the Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota.
"Israel's democracy is under threat from ultra-nationalists and extremists."
But not apparently from Eisenkot's party, that will have to form a coalition with Arab parties which support Hamas and the liquidation of Israel.
And who is quoting Rabbi Weinberg for Reuters? Well, it's their Jerusalem correspondent Maayan Lubell, who personally signed a petition urging Israeli soldiers to mutiny, rather than defend Jewish families from Palestinian terrorists.
Reuters: All propaganda, all the time.
New York rabbi Josh Weinberg is among overseas Israelis flying home to vote in Tuesday's parliamentary election. 'A lot is at stake,' he says, adding that Israel's democracy is under threat from 'ultra-nationalists and extremists' reut.rs/4zmiC1u
Reposting. Because Michigan must not elect an advocate for the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood.
Here are the Islamists at Reuters trying to throw Americans off the scent of Abdul El-Sayed as a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood:
"Rogers has alleged without evidence that El-Sayed has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the Arab world's oldest and most influential Islamist groups."
So, let's review. Shortly after the Freedom and Justice Party (Muslim Brotherhood) took power in Egypt following the revolution staged in 2011, their leader and new Egyptian president, Mohamed Morsi, expanded his executive powers, announced he was going to "purge" the Egyptian media and police, and suggested the government might kill Egypt's peace treaty with Israel.
An Arabic-language petition in support of the "revolutionary decisions taken by the president" was published on the Egyptian site Al-Ahram Gate and signed by 46 people described as leaders of the Egyptian community in the U.S. Abdul El-Sayed being one of them:
“We, leaders of the Egyptian community, support the revolutionary decisions taken by the president, and we call on him to purge the media and the police as quickly as possible.”
There are also verified posts by El-Sayed's half-sister about his mother being an activist for the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1970s.
Is El-Sayed a card-carrying member of the Muslim Brotherhood? We don't know for sure, at the moment. But his support for the Islamist group's political extremism is documented and not likely a hallmark the vast majority of Michiganders want to see in their Senator.
Unless you're an Islamist, or a Reuters correspondent. But I'm being redundant.
Here are the Islamists at Reuters trying to throw Americans off the scent of Abdul El-Sayed as a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood:
"Rogers has alleged without evidence that El-Sayed has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the Arab world's oldest and most influential Islamist groups."
So, let's review. Shortly after the Freedom and Justice Party (Muslim Brotherhood) took power in Egypt following the revolution staged in 2011, their leader and new Egyptian president, Mohamed Morsi, expanded his executive powers, announced he was going to "purge" the Egyptian media and police, and suggested the government might kill Egypt's peace treaty with Israel.
An Arabic-language petition in support of the "revolutionary decisions taken by the president" was published on the Egyptian site Al-Ahram Gate and signed by 46 people described as leaders of the Egyptian community in the U.S. Abdul El-Sayed being one of them:
“We, leaders of the Egyptian community, support the revolutionary decisions taken by the president, and we call on him to purge the media and the police as quickly as possible.”
There are also verified posts by El-Sayed's half-sister about his mother being an activist for the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1970s.
Is El-Sayed a card-carrying member of the Muslim Brotherhood? We don't know for sure, at the moment. But his support for the Islamist group's political extremism is documented and not likely a hallmark the vast majority of Michiganders want to see in their Senator.
Unless you're an Islamist, or a Reuters correspondent. But I'm being redundant.
Has this dude apologized yet?
Much has already been written in righteous response to Obama's ignorant and hateful diatribe in Belfast targeting the Jewish People of Israel. I add three observations to the factual record:
1) Under the Ottoman Empire, 90% of agricultural land in Palestine was classified as "Miri", State land not owned by any individual -- Jew, Gentile, or Muslim. Palestinian Arabs did not hold title. Much of it remains public land in Israel today. At the same time, hundreds of thousands of acres of agricultural land, desert and wasteland, malarial swamps, were sold at extortionate prices to Jews and Jewish land funds like the JNF. None of this land was "taken" from Palestinian Arabs.
2) When Obama kicked off his Middle East tour in Egypt in 2009, he similarly apologized for Israel's existence with reference solely to the Holocaust and the need for a Jewish refuge. Not a word, then or now, about 3,000 years of Jewish history, blood, toil, and nation-building in the land, nor Jewish indigenous rights as recognized in international law in the 1920s -- twenty years before the Holocaust.
3) Obama is an extremely well-educated and articulate former American president. His use of the adolescent gutter term "taken off" to describe how Israel came to hold the land was not only false, but deliberately crude and intended to evoke Antisemitic tropes at a time when Jews are being hunted and murdered for their religious and national identity.
Obama's speech betrayed what many of us long suspected: he is a flag bearer for those seeking to once again marginalize and dispossess the oldest extant indigenous People in the Middle East.
If, on the other hand, and as many Jews referred to him while in office, Obama is truly a "mensch", he should do the right thing: issue a correction, retract his provably false claims, and apologize.
Phil Gordon once worked for Bill Clinton, a classically liberal president who did everything in his power to forge a Palestinian State (see below) with an Israel willing to make extraordinary concessions, e.g., cede its indigenous heartland and 3,000-year-old capital, in exchange for the promise of peace.
Clinton was a liberal but also a realist, able to learn from experience. He blamed Yasser Arafat for the failure of negotiations and understood that Hamas, elected by the Palestinians in 2006, wanted only to murder Jews.
Clinton also came to understand that once forfeit, a Palestinian State would no longer be possible to achieve.
Gordon, on the other hand, is that particular brand of idiot, so absorbed in his own fantasies of power and process, he believes a Democrat administration, with him in it of course, can coerce a reality which ignores history and dismisses the intrinsic Palestinian ambition to eliminate Israel.
Or maybe he just doesn't worry much about body counts of Israelis and Palestinians.
Former Biden officials, hopeful for a comeback to the White House in 2028, are declaring that there is no difference between Netanyahu and other Israelis, or their different voters. All Israelis are immoral and America should force morality on them.
The puzzling part is that these same officials said we should leave Saddam, Assad, Islamic Iran alone, Houthis, Hamas, Hezbollah alone, even lift sanctions because they hurt people only and never the regimes. Only Israel should be compelled.
And they don’t see the antisemitism behind it.
The morality lesson in the op-ed:
“They are expressions of opposition to Israeli actions that Americans increasingly see not just in geopolitical but also moral terms.”
1. Israel is the farthest thing from an "apartheid" State. 20% of the population is Arab; they enjoy full rights and have a standard of living higher than that seen in most Arab countries. Nearly all of the 22 Arab States are institutionally racist and de facto apartheid States.
2. Jews have every right in international law to live in Judea & Samaria ("West Bank"), see San Remo Resolution (1920), Palestine Mandate (1922), American-British Palestine Mandate Convention (1924), Articles 75-80 of the UN Charter (1945), UNSCR 242 (1967), Oslo Accords (1993).
3. Thousands of Palestinian Arabs are employed by Israeli companies operating in both Israel and J&S. They directly suffer from boycotts.
4. By virtue of their decision to boycott Israeli products and not Chinese, Russian, Turkish, or Iranian products, these creeps are demonstrating they are racist, ignorant hypocrites.
"How did a photographer from Agence France-Presse (AFP), one of the world’s largest news agencies, capture a gunman in the middle of a terrorist attack near Judea Junction?"
The same way Palestinian photographers working for Reuters, the largest news agency in the world, were among the first to cross the Gaza border when Hamas invaded on October 7th.
They knew, in advance.
xitter.cf/PropagandaBuff/status/…
🚨 COINCIDENCE? How did a photographer from Agence France-Presse (AFP), one of the world’s largest news agencies, capture a gunman in the middle of a terrorist attack near Judea Junction?
According to Israeli reports, the IDF is investigating whether the photographer had advance knowledge of the attack.
Was it extraordinary timing, or did someone know what was coming?
-@ynetnews
HIS, PHD retweeted
CBC deliberately inverted the story
They opened with: “Israel has closed off the West Bank after Israeli soldiers shot and killed two Palestinians near Hebron.”
The actual sequence—that two armed men from Hebron drove up, got out of the car, and opened fire on the checkpoint, triggering a 20-minute gun battle in which the attackers were killed—was buried nearly two and a half minutes in. Only then did viewers learn about the large quantity of weapons and ammunition, Israeli officials saying the pair were planning a major attack on civilians, and Hamas praising the “high-impact operation” while calling for more violence.
BBC, CNN, The Washington Post, and The Times of Israel all led with the attack itself. CBC chose not to.
This is not neutral sequencing. Leading with the Israeli response while delaying the fact that the dead men initiated a terrorist attack is a classic framing choice that makes the aggressors look like victims—days before Israel’s election @brodiefenlon
Palestinian reporters and otherwise Islamist writers and editors working for Reuters and trained in the far-Left media giant's unscrupulous propaganda methods cram so many insidious rhetorical devices into a single article, engage in so many ethical violations of Reuters own journalism handbook in an effort to dupe readers, I am now employing Grok to identify and tally all of them.
Here's Grok summarizing Reuters' artful deceptions in just a single story on the upcoming Israeli elections, edited by their Jerusalem Bureau Chief, Palestinian Rami Ayyub and British Muslim convert Tom Perry:
Propaganda techniques (≈14–16 instances):
Card stacking / omissions (multiple clustered instances): Emphasis on Palestinian living conditions in Gaza (“mainly in tents or damaged buildings”), “rapid expansion” of settlements, settler attacks, and government “turned a blind eye,” while omitting or minimizing Oct. 7 atrocities and remaining hostages in detail, historical Palestinian rejection of prior offers, security rationales for Israeli control and presence in disputed territory, comparative Israeli civilian impacts, or fuller context on why both candidates prioritize security control. The lead frames policies that “have hampered a decades-old peace process” without equivalent Palestinian agency or rejectionism.
Asymmetrical definition / loaded language (≈6–8): Repeated “occupied West Bank,” “occupied Palestinian land,” “territory Israel captured in a 1967 war,” and “a practice nearly all countries consider illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this.” These present a contested legal/political status (Israel rejects the applicability of certain occupation-law transfer prohibitions and views the territory as disputed) in near-consensus framing. Additional loaded phrasing includes “hampered,” “rapid expansion,” and “repudiates the ‘two-state solution.’”
Assertion / innuendo (≈3–4): “policies that have hampered a decades-old peace process”; “In a sign of how far Israeli politics has shifted to the right”; presentation of critics’ “blind eye” claim without balanced counter-context.
Pity / atrocity-adjacent framing (≈2–3): Gaza population description and settler-violence emphasis evoke suffering without parallel scale or context for the other side.
Logical fallacies (≈5 instances):
Appeal to pity (≈2–3): Gaza tent/damaged-building description and implications of settlement/settler impacts.
Appeal to authority (≈1–2): “Nearly all countries consider illegal under international law” as near-definitive, with Israel’s dispute secondary.
Causal / post-hoc elements (≈1): Attribution of peace-process stagnation primarily to Israeli policies.
Reuters Handbook / Trust Principles violations (≈9–11 instances):
Always strive for balance and freedom from bias; take no side / tell all sides (overarching and multiple specific): Title, lead, and structure center Israeli policies as the variable affecting Palestinians rather than mutual dynamics; selective emphasis on Palestinian grievances and international consensus language over equivalent security, historical, or rejectionist context. Both candidates’ shared opposition to a Palestinian state is framed as a rightward repudiation of generations of negotiations.
Loaded expressions (≈4–5): “Occupied,” “hampered,” “rapid expansion,” “blind eye,” “repudiates.”
Guard against putting opinion in a news story (≈2): Judgmental framing such as “how far Israeli politics has shifted to the right” and “effectively repudiates.”
Social responsibility / completeness of facts (≈1–2): Incomplete picture via the omissions noted above.
Allegations not portrayed as fact: International-law consensus language is strong relative to the acknowledged Israeli dispute.
Totals: Approximately 28–32 discrete reporting/ethical failures across the categories (propaganda ≈14–16, fallacies ≈5, Handbook ≈9–11).
Reuters: All propaganda, all the time.
Since the October 2025 truce in Gaza, at least $800 million to $1.2+ billion has been officially paid out to the Palestinians by European and Canadian governments. This doesn't include money funneled to Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups by NGOs and fake charities.
Keep in mind, the above figure is CASH; it doesn't include indirect payments for humanitarian supplies, e.g., food aid, shelter materials, medicines, fuel, etc., which are tallied separately.
Here are the biggest donors:
European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid department (ECHO): ~$178 million
Sweden: ~$90 million
Canada: ~$84.5 million
Netherlands: ~$64 million
Germany: ~$43 million
United Kingdom: ~$36 million
Italy: ~$28 million
Switzerland: ~$27 million
Norway: ~$25 million
France: ~$25 million
Belgium: ~$16 million
OCHA’s Financial Tracking Service (FTS) totals for the full-year 2025 include:
ECHO ~$272 million, Sweden ~$80 million, Germany ~$65 million, Canada ~$63 million, Netherlands ~$64 million, UK ~$52 million, Norway ~$62 million.
And this is where it's going ⬇️
Report: Israeli intelligence shared with the US that terror group Hamas has no plans to disarm, has rebuilt its tunnel system, restored its pre-October 7, 2023, force levels of 30,000 to 40,000 terrorists, and has reimposed full governance over Gaza.
And now Hamas has made its intentions explicit.
Last week, Hamas officials met with the UN humanitarian coordinator in Gaza - and used the meeting to deliver a direct threat to Israel: they are prepared to carry out another October 7, 2023-style attack, inside Israel, in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, and abroad, wherever an opportunity arises. Israeli officials described the warning as “unusually explicit and severe.”
While the world pressures Israel to make concessions - Hamas is rebuilding, rearming, and promising to do it again.
Because Reuters correspondents are too busy writing dailies about "Jewish settlers" eating Palestinian olives to report on Palestinians murdering Jews.
BBC, The New York Times, The Guardian and Al Jazeera report on Israeli “settler violence” on the daily.
This morning, 2 Palestinian terrorists armed with hundreds of rounds of ammunition attempted to carry out a MASS casualty attack against Israelis near Hebron.
5 Israelis were wounded, including 2 critically. Both terrorists were eliminated by Israeli security forces.
Yet hours after the attack, I could find ZERO coverage from any of these 5 major outlets.
Why is that?
In his daily propaganda report on Gaza, Reuters Palestinian correspondent Nidal al-Mughrabi no longer bothers to differentiate between combatant and civilian casualties. When terrorists are killed, they're just "people".
Here's another "people" recently eliminated.
Reuters is already preparing the ground for riots in the U.S., a la France.
If Democrats lose the Midterm elections, they will claim Russian collusion and Reuters will seek to justify violent street protests by DSA supporters and Islamists.
Of course, if Democrats win the Midterms, Reuters will insist there is absolutely no evidence of voter fraud, notwithstanding the tens of thousands of non-citizens registered to vote.
See how that works?
David Horovitz and his audience of far-Left radicals in Israel and the US have been largely responsible for weakening Israel and tying Netanyahu's hands as to how he deals with the genocidal maniacs, otherwise known as the "Palestinians".
For example, Hamas knew exactly where to find and kill their Jewish victims on October 7th because they had maps and intelligence provided by Gazans working in southern Israel.
It was Israeli progressives who had pushed for more Palestinian work permits and the previous Lapid-Bennett government accommodated, increasing the number of permits from 5,000 to 20,000 in just two years. Lapid ironically argued that more permits would help Gazans “live a different life”.
So, it's rich for Horovitz to persecute Netanyahu over October 7th and blame Likud policies for decades of Palestinian terror, which truly took off following the political Left's dangerous folly at Oslo in 1993.
Here is deranged Editor of the Times of Palestine -- er, Times of Israel, David Horovitz, bitching that Likud may once again be elected to lead the nation.
62 years after the Soviet fabrication of a 'Palestinian' national identity intended solely to destroy the Jewish State; over a century of the most savage, sadistic Palestinian Arab violence targeting the Jewish People; a dozen offers of peace and land roundly rejected by the Palestinians,
Horovitz is still seeking an Israeli prime minister that will agree to create a Palestinian terror State in Israel's heartland.
Proving beyond a shadow of a doubt, the Left is literally unable to learn anything from history or human experience.
