
đ¤ Cofounder & CEO of @SuperpoweredSDK, cross-platform low latency audio SDK đ Acquired by @splice.
Austin, TX
Joined December 2009
- Tweets50.9K
- Following1.6K
- Followers12.1K
- Likes12.6K
Best Twitter/X post you will read all year. I am much too inarticulate to have written it myself but agree whole-heartedly.
Personally, I love the trivia and minutiae of all history but especially American history.
eg George Washington was a physical specimen -- one of the best horseman in the colonies and was known for his incredible strength, endurance and athletic ability.
In one famous anecdote, he threw an iron bar on his bowling green further than any of his guests --- without bothering to take off his coat.
I've been trying to write a post on why everyone should study early American history but I kept getting stuck, maybe because the premise is too presumptuous. So instead here's a post on why *I* am obsessed with it myself:
1/ it's a portal into many other histories. People naively think early America sits to the side, unconnected to anything else. It's the opposite! The founders (Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin) spent ten years (!!) in Paris working to secure French support against the English, so you get to learn all about France of Louis XVI. Franklin spent a decade in London so you learn about England of George III. Adams was raising funds for the revolution in the Netherlands so you get to learn about the Dutch. John Quincy (Adam's son and later the 6th president) was an ambassador to Russia and an eyewitness to Napoleon's invasion!
2/ it's a portal into the past. The founders were extremely well-read and steeped in the history of classic European civilization. You just cannot get them to shut up about Greece and Rome, so you absorb tons of info about those and go on the trail of Cicero, Thucydides, Tacitus, Plutarch, Homer, Horace, Terence, and so on. Jefferson was also obsessed with English civil war so you learn about Charles I, Cromwell, the English republic, and how it's all connected to American declaration of independence 120 years later
3/ the Enlightenment! America's independence happens during peak Enlightenment era and the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Everything is brimming with new ideas and boundless optimism. People believe in their bones that nature is knowable and there is no ceiling to progress. You meet all the characters and their ideas-- Adam Smith, David Hume, Thomas Paine, Edmund Burke (Franklin was friends with all of them). Electricity gets discovered, hot air balloons get invented, we start getting modern chemistry. Edward Gibbon writes his Decline and Fall and causes a furor by lampooning early Christian saints. Franklin even meets Voltaire!
4/ the Founders! JFK once joked at a dinner for Nobel Prize winners "this is the most extraordinary collection of talent that has ever been gathered at the White House, except when Thomas Jefferson dined alone." This is only a slight exaggeration. The founders were all *very* different, and all equally impressive in their own way. Between them they were educated, civic-minded, grounded in tradition but not bound by it, full of ideas but not ideological, entrepreneurial, tenacious, prudent, brave. You will not find a more remarkable cast in all of history! The more you get to know them the more you want to spend time with them, reach for their counsel, and appreciate how much of America's success (compared to e.g. French or Russian or Cuban or Iranian revolutions) is that America was founded by better men
5/ the correspondence! The founders were fantastic writers. Letters from John Adams, his wife Abigail, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Rush are some of my favorite writing, not just as historical documents, but in *any* genre. "Some people must have time to look around them, before, behind, on the right hand, and on the left, and then to think, and after all this to resolve. Others see at one intuitive glance into the past and the future, and judge with precision at once," writes John Adams. Is this not a marvelous passage?!
6/ you learn what to discount and what to keep in sight. Had you been scrolling X in ~1778 you'd see ~20% of ppl opposing independence, an even bigger "uncommitted middle", opposition repressed by patriots, prospering weapons suppliers, smallpox epidemics, backstabbing officers and politicians, devastating losses, a destitute army, desertions, hyperinflation, meddling foreign powers, mutinies, atrocity episodes on both sides. If you had let these events consume your attention, you would have misjudged the moment completely!
7/ you see the bones of the republic. Adams was an English traditionalist and viewed freedom of religion as freedom among christian denominations. His Massachusetts constitution required a christian test and established tax-supported churches. Jefferson was a reformer who reasoned everything out from the ground up. He applied freedom of religion to all religions and thought much of christian theology was superstitious gobbledygook. Knowing that we often keep circling the same tensions makes it easier to get your bearings in the present. E.g. you can view the upcoming Michigan senatorial race as revenge of the federalists or revenge of the jeffersonians, depending on how it goes
8/ the history is tangled. At Mt. Vernon about 500 feet down the hill from George & Martha Washington's magnificent house there is a wooded area with a mass burial site for the slaves. The graves are unmarked and no one knows exactly how many people are buried there. There are modern burial symbols; the curators did a good job balancing honoring the deceased and maintaining the original bare condition of the site. If you go on a good day there are many middle school group trips visiting. You see large groups of ~11yo kids at the site, mostly laughing, messing with each other, taking selfies (as 11yo kids do)
9/ perspective of the losers. How could Britain win almost every battle and still lose? What did that do to the empire, politically and psychologically? What were Howe and Clinton thinking?! How did the British political situation play out during the war? What was the thinking and ultimate fate of British loyalists? Should Britain's defeat have been obvious at the time? All this is fascinating and helpful to orient yourself in today's world. From the diary of a British officer: "nothing remains but to fight it out against a set of the most determined hypocrites and demagogues, compiled of the refuse of the colonies, that ever were permitted by Providence to be the scourge of a country."
10/ inspiration. From Jefferson's triumphant political return after humiliation as governor of Virginia and the deaths of his wife and four children, to Washington's superhuman tenacity at Valley Forge, it is difficult to find more inspiring stories in all of history. The Declaration of Independence was written for all humanity. Anyone who wishes can become its spiritual successor. It can be read on town squares of Philadelphia and on slaversâ plantation fields, as it once was, and on the streets of Tehran and Moscow, as it one day will be:
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
---
PS. the gateway drug is McCullough's John Adams, don't look at the reviews, don't research alternatives, just click buy and read the first page
PPS. buy a physical book and destroy the margins with your notes, don't dishonor this adventure with some pristine copy or a kindle
Patrick Vlaskovits retweeted
Kids make men more productive, because the amount of time "adults" expect you to waste with them is offensive. With kids, you avoid the peer pressure and other nonsense. "Let's check this new restaurant out." Hello? Are we 5? The addiction to novelty is a scourge.
Patrick Vlaskovits retweeted
You can tell which is your most important meeting of the week, because that's the meeting when your Mac will randomly choose to update its OS.
Follow me for more management tips.
Anyone have a response to this?
Scott is obv super-smart and successful -- but this post ironically undermines his entire point about stories.
:P
Humans can't not think in terms of stories -- and what Scott did was forcefully bind his team to >>HIS stories<< ie the right move.
Because he didn't want the wrong stories to infect his team. Again, right move -- but it was stories all the way down.
Realizing how incredibly autistic our early board meetings were for Spellbook:
1. I declared the meeting a âstory free zoneâ because I was worried that stories were too psychologically persuasive, and that they would pull us away from hard data-driven reality
2. Meetings would largely consist of scrolling through like 40 slides of charts sifting for signal. I called this âsoaking in the dataâ
3. In the search for PMF I wanted us to think like a hedge fund making many bets. While we knew the problem we were solving I didnât want our team to get too tied to any single narrative because I thought it would reduce agility.
4. I never allowed us to think about us as âa companyâ, but instead as a SWAT team searching for a company to build
5. This approach enabled us to launch over 100 different landing pages with different angles on the way to PMF
Honestly, I think itâs a really good approach pre-PMF. Too many companies get attached to a singular story too early and quit when it doesnât work out. Startups are 3D chess. There is always a move. Slack was a game company.
However, at Series B/Series C scale you really need stories to align both your team and customers, and you can think much more longterm after PMF.
But I still believe stories are a dangerous dark magic. You can craft an incredibly persuasive story for almost any position. Theyâre more of a marketing/comms tool than a reasoning/understanding reality tool.
Two offleash dogs with bad intentions started >>circling<< my oldest and me in the street. Owner casually standing by on his lawn pretending not to notice.
My kiddo looks up at me. ScaryCavemanPv spawns in, taps NormalHumanPv on the shoulder and says "I'll drive from here on out".
ScaryCavemanPv with murder in his eye, directs his energy directly at one of the dogs. Approaches dog forcefully.
Dogs are confused -- have never seen prey turn into predator -- stop growling and circling and start backing up.
Owner *now* suddenly engaged and worried about dogs' behavior as I about to commit a double-canicide runs over: "HEY MAN WHAT ARE YOU DOING?"
CavemanPv makes it clear that if he encounters the dogs again offleash in the street there will no more dogs.
Owner whining: "HEY MAN YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE LIKE THAT"
Zero self-awareness. Zero regret. Total victim.
Sad how sports betting has fully pwned pro sports with Gronk casually breaking down the parlay pre-game.
The betting is the product. NBD.
:/
FWIW when it comes to trimming fat on briskets, Franklin does not do anything unique or more extreme at all.
PS I hate BBQ nerds.
There is a queue at six in the morning outside a barbecue restaurant in Austin, Texas, that runs for five hours, and the people in it are waiting for a brisket with the fat left on, cooked for eighteen hours over oak by a man who has said the fat is the whole point.
Aaron Franklin opened in a trailer in 2009 and has been named the best barbecue in America by everyone who hands out that title. The food is Texas, which means beef, and the beef is the brisket: the whole chest muscle of a steer, twelve to fifteen pounds, with a cap of white fat an inch thick across the top, which most of the country would trim off and throw away. Franklin trims it to a quarter inch and leaves it, and as the brisket sits in the smoke the fat renders down through the meat for most of a day, until the lean is soaked and the cap is a soft dark bark. He has written that the fat is what carries the smoke and the salt, and that a lean brisket is a waste of a cow.
He went on television in a cap and a T-shirt and taught the technique to a nation that had been told for forty years to buy the lean cut, and the nation drove to Austin. People fly in. They bring chairs. They sell out by one in the afternoon, every day, and he has never once sold a turkey breast as a substitute.
The thing on the chopping block, sliced thick, glistening, with the fat the colour of amber and the crust black, is the oldest food in Texas: a cheap tough cut of the animal, made glorious by heat and time and nothing else. There is white bread on the side and a pickle, and that is the meal.
The leaflet says to trim the visible fat. Five hundred people a day stand in the Texas sun for the man who ignores it.
Patrick Vlaskovits retweeted
Growing older is grappling with the realization that my schizophrenic relative with paranoid delusions has a higher hit rate than the people who dismiss him.
WTF, $3000 Samsung TV has an always-on mic, automatic content recognition, geo tracking, network mapping, and ships your data to Samsung + 400 partners.
Bro Rooted a brand-new 2025 Samsung TV after noticing absurdly targeted ads.
Firmware was locked down, so zero-days it was.
Got a root shell.
then found: always-on voice service, ACR, geo, full telemetry pipeline, and four separate DRM systems.
This isnât a bug, Itâs the product bro.
For 3,000 years people have loved the same few building styles.
Architects treat this as a problem to be solved, so they invent some shitty new style every generation, and then loathe the actual users for not appreciating it.
I visited Wurster Hall at UC Berkeley today. It was designed by, and currently houses, the architecture faculty.
The UC Berkeley website notes that "Wurster is often voted Berkeley's ugliest building."
I visited because I was curious about whether it would in person seem as unattractive as it does in photos. And, in short: it does. It's gaunt, austere, and filmed in grime. On an elysian campus, it stands out for its bleak hostility. It reminds me of the German submarine base in Bordeaux.
The UC Berkeley page agrees that it was never designed to be attractive, quoting the curator of their design archives: âWurster and his handpicked architects didnât want anything romantic, or sentimental â they hated the idea of âmaking pretty buildings. They wanted a serious building.â
I guess we have to concede success relative to their stated goals, but it does make one wonder what it all says about architecture as a discipline.
Patrick Vlaskovits retweeted
The architecture school is always the ugliest building on any American campus since it was built according the lights of whatever trendy architectural fad.
Well known empirical fact.
I visited Wurster Hall at UC Berkeley today. It was designed by, and currently houses, the architecture faculty.
The UC Berkeley website notes that "Wurster is often voted Berkeley's ugliest building."
I visited because I was curious about whether it would in person seem as unattractive as it does in photos. And, in short: it does. It's gaunt, austere, and filmed in grime. On an elysian campus, it stands out for its bleak hostility. It reminds me of the German submarine base in Bordeaux.
The UC Berkeley page agrees that it was never designed to be attractive, quoting the curator of their design archives: âWurster and his handpicked architects didnât want anything romantic, or sentimental â they hated the idea of âmaking pretty buildings. They wanted a serious building.â
I guess we have to concede success relative to their stated goals, but it does make one wonder what it all says about architecture as a discipline.
The number of legit good ideas I had -- that I examined -- seemed too good to be true and obvious -- and then someone built a giant business around is insanely embarrassing.






























