Like in good suspense stories, I could not stop reading this fascinating article @nytimes @CadeMetz telling the winding paths of an intellectual community of free thinkers in the Silicon Valley, led by a pseudonymous protected and mysterious psychiatrist nytimes.com/2021/02/13/techn…

Quantum world @GoogleAI @IBMResearch @meetIQM will have plenty of opportunities to explore in software applications & architecture designs with Latin American talent, boosting business with local visionaries @A_Aspuru_Guzik @aperdomoortiz @pnussen @cientificospe @CientificoenEsp

Exactly, it is not adding qubits to square lattices & nearest-neighbor coupling. There, a smart classical mapping may create eternal draw. Quantum computers may turn useful now if we go beyond digital mapping of problems on qubits & use creative architecture geometries/topologies

I disagree with the "overlooked" statement, it is valid only for unimaginative NISQ architectures. If we accept "useless" quantum supremacy as valid in Classical vs. Quantum debate, almost any quantum experiment outperforms classical computers since long. Examples abound in labs.

This is core to co-design principles. A co-design classical computer beats co-design quantum computer, until the latter makes a leap forward and so on. Evidently, Co-Design Quantum Computers will have last word. Let us keep working together for it @meetIQM @GoogleAI @IBMResearch

Metaphysics on Physics & Business (1) There is no cosmological curse on humans calling a problem Useless, 100 qubits suffice, or Useful, millions of qubits needed. (2) Remove spell: go beyond digital mapping of problems on qubits & square lattices with nearest-neighbor couplings.

In QUEBS 2010 @Harvard @A_Aspuru_Guzik, I claimed in a panel that existence of a quantum model matching observed biological effects is not a proof of quantumness. It is mandatory to prove no classical model suffice. This paper makes quantumness unnecessary arxiv.org/abs/2103.02604

Deep topic in quantum models & analog quantum simulations. Are chaos & physical properties (Schrödinger, Heisenberg, interaction) representation dependent? See arxiv.org/abs/2103.02714 work of the great @ihdeutsch If so, what about digital and digital-analog quantum simulations?

We open theater curtains: tensor network model, from Beijing, in classical computers overcome Google's quantum supremacy claim arxiv.org/abs/2103.03074 It looks like a credible result up to verification. Welcome healthy discussions and competition @GoogleAI @IBMResearch @meetIQM

Thanks @AndreMKonig @denruf Tommaso Demarie. You squeeze intellectual sins & moderate provocations with humor & talent. I will miss you, keep in touch @GoogleAI @IBMResearch @meetIQM @anthonyannun @jaygambetta @cientificospe @CientificoenEsp @upvehu @Ikerbasque @QUTIS3 @artist_qu