Papa Soma (@QuantPapa) header
Papa Soma (@QuantPapa) profile picture

Cult-ural Hunter and Collector. Novelty Observer and Commentator.

British Columbia
Joined December 2012
Photo by Papa Soma (@QuantPapa)Photo by Papa Soma (@QuantPapa)Photo by Papa Soma (@QuantPapa)Photo by Papa Soma (@QuantPapa)
Papa Soma retweeted
On the issue of democracy, I’m opposed. But if we insist on keeping the vote, we should at least stop pretending every ballot deserves the same weight. Here’s my proposal, which we can call "Weighted Suffrage." Every citizen starts with 100 points. Your ballot in a federal election counts as (points ÷ 100) of a vote. Points are adjusted as follows: Stake in the system: — Paying at the top federal income tax tier: +50 — Net contributor (federal taxes paid exceed means-tested benefits received): +25 — Net recipient (benefits received exceed taxes paid): −60 — Social Security & Medicare don’t count on either side. You were forced to pay in; drawing out isn’t dependency. Judgment: — Age 18–24: −25 — Age 40–64: +15 — Age 65+: +25 — Passing a civics exam (same one we give immigrants): +20 Conduct: — Each felony conviction: −40 — Each misdemeanor in the past 10 years: −10 Skin in the game: — Military or first-responder service: +15 — Parent or legal guardian of a minor: +10 per kid — Federal employee or contractor: −20. (You don’t get to vote for your own raise with a full-weight ballot.) The floor is zero, the cap is 200. Some sample scenarios: A 22-year-old on benefits w/ a felony: 100 − 60 − 25 − 40 = −25, rounded to zero. A 70-year-old veteran who worked 45 years: 100 + 25 + 25 + 15 = 165. A 45-year-old top-bracket taxpayer with two kids who passed the civics test: 185. Notice how nobody is barred from voting. Everyone keeps a path back to full weight: pay in, stay out of trouble, learn how the government works. The system stops pretending the view of a law-abiding, taxpaying community leader should be equally weighted against a fentanyl-addled repeat felon surviving on handouts. Done right, the system incentivizes not only better govt, but better behavior. Haters will call Weighted Suffrage “undemocratic.” Exactly. That’s the point. We already weight votes (Wyoming vs. California in the Senate, the Electoral College); we just do it by geography rather than by anything that correlates w/ good govt. Anything you'd you add?
405
89
36
1,600
124,411
3
5
1
60
939