
Temple Beth Sholom (Topeka), Co-chair of Kansas Holocaust Commission. Published: Times of Israel, Kansas City Star, etc. Inquiries: [email protected]
Topeka, KS
Joined April 2022
- Tweets25.2K
- Following2.7K
- Followers10.4K
- Likes148K
Pinned Tweet
I was honored to sign this letter, and speak unambiguously to the world that IAGS’s resolution does not reflect reality. Israel is not committing genocide in Gaza.
The number of signatures on the letter debunking the IAGS statement claiming Israel is committing genocide now stands at 424. That’s four times the number of anonymous signatories with unknown credentials on the IAGS resolution.
Every one of these 424 have signed openly, under their real names. The list includes some true stars. Yet not a single major outlet outside Israel has reported it.
This silence is precisely why so many people who only skim mainstream headlines believe “pretty much everyone agrees” there is genocide in Gaza. The misleading of the public is staggering.
Huge thanks to @ElliotMalin for launching and seeing this through. We now know there is a strong scholarly and professional consensus that the genocide accusations against Israel don’t stand up to scrutiny.
Samuel Stern retweeted
Netanyahu’s mouthpieces are now pushing, with full power, for an alledged national unity government. But they conveniently leave out one crucial detail: **What they actually want is a government led by Netanyahu, again.**
We know how that story ends. Netanyahu will do to his new partners what he has done to virtually every centrist partner over the past two decades, whether Tzipi Livni, Benny Gantz, Moshe Kahlon, or Yair Lapid: use them, undermine them, make this *his government* and ultimately seek to destroy his partners politically.
The single greatest obstacle to a national unity government in Israel today is Netanyahu himself. Just read his speech today in the Knesset. Even his most devoted apologists could not explain the radical language he used with leaders of parties he now seeks "unity" with.
Having lost his parliamentary majority, Bibi still insists on remaining prime minister. After serving longer than any other prime minister in Israel’s history, he refuses to relinquish power or commit to a state commission of inquiry. There are 67 newly elected MKs in the 120 seat Knesset, all of whom agree that Netanyahu must go. Today, Netanyahu tried to argue that representatives of the Arab parties are all illegitimate.
What makes this sudden enthusiasm for national unity interesting is the hypocrisy.
These same mouthpieces had no interest in unity after the previous elections, when Netanyahu assembled the most far-right government in Israel’s history, inflicting huge damage on Israeli society, both domestically and internationally. Nor did they advocate unity during the recent election campaign. Netanyahu himself explicitly opposed it.
The only thing that changed is that he lost the elections.
Netanyahu could easily have campaigned on a national unity government. Instead, he explicitly ruled it out, choosing to cannibalize votes from the most extreme flank of the far right. And he succeeded in that.
His sudden call for unity is now effectively a demand that the Israeli majority surrender, accept him once again as prime minister, and embrace his narrative that the political representatives of 21% of the population are somehow terrorists in disguise.
A national unity government is entirely possible. All Netanyahu needs to do is relinquish his claim to the PM office and acknowledge that he lost the election.
Samuel Stern retweeted
To quote Ron Dermer, “I can deal with an anti-Israel president. What I cannot deal with is an anti-American one.”
Antizionism is the gateway drug to seeking america’s demise.
Samuel Stern retweeted
This is completely assbackwards.
Genuinely moderate candidates, like Kansas's Adam Hamilton and Iowa's Josh Turek, are the ones who succeeded in flipping red Senate seats blue.
So-called independent-minded working classoids concocted in a test tube by socialist consultants in New York City, like Nebraska’s Dan Osborn and Maine’s Graham Platner, fell flat.
Bernie Sanders-endorsed candidates were among the weakest performers in competitive Senate races this cycle.
And Bernie’s other strategy, running as a fake independent and counting on Democrats to clear the field for you, mostly flopped too.
Strategist @katz_morris on what Democrats should learn from their midterm success — and what the party must do next.
Samuel Stern retweeted
Something I find crazy is that what @JoelMartinRubin said is objectively true.
First, it’s not genocide in Gaza. It not being genocide also doesn’t make what is happening and has happened any better or somehow good. That’s just not how that works. The issue with the genocide accusation is that “genocide” is loosely thrown around without a substantive understanding of what the crime is and how it works.
Second, Joel is also right that this is just not *that* important of an issue to the American electorate. You don’t have to like that or agree with it, but it’s the truth. If only 4% of the electorate finds that to be a critical issue, then it’s not *that* important. Important to note that the electorate is also 3% Jewish (you can imagine how they fall on the issue).
People not liking the truth or law doesn’t magically change any of that. Also, the inability to have discourse is a major problem within our society today. It’s also important to point out that the accusation of genocide has the purpose of threatening Jews with harm, and that’s another major problem.
Either way, Joel is correct.
Samuel Stern retweeted
NORC exit poll of Michigan Jewish voters:
Rogers 52
El-Sayed 47
Consistent with the data from largely Jewish precincts in the state.
Samuel Stern retweeted
It’s time for American Jews to live without caveats.
My latest: commentary.org/seth-mandel/t…
Samuel Stern retweeted
So in fact only 47 pc of Jews voted for El Sayed, and that’s only after including people who aren’t actually Jews, but just “consider themselves Jewish in some way.”
And that was a massive 44 pc swing from the 2024 presidential vote among the same polling cohort.
Samuel Stern retweeted
We keep being told 'oh the DSA just wants healthcare and to help workers' and then the actual people in the org hold views like 'Oct. 7th was a cause for celebration.'
Really disturbed people and obviously, not at all people I want to be in a coalition with.
🚨 Philly DSA Accuses Politicians of Repression While Its Own Leadership Celebrates Purging Zionist Opposition
Philly DSA is defending Sunday's boycott of Jewish-owned businesses, accusing elected officials of attempting to suppress pro-Palestinian activism.
Listen to Philly DSA's James Ray describe how October 7 accelerated the push for hardline anti-Zionist red lines, first within the Philadelphia chapter and eventually at the national level.
Ray recalls being "hooting and hollering and celebrating" after October 7, while an Israeli-American member expressed concern for her family near Gaza. Following an ugly internal confrontation, Ray boasts that "we ended up basically holding our line and she left the chapter."
Her departure helped galvanize his faction, which organized activists behind the scenes to pass a hardline anti-Zionist resolution with roughly 83–84% support, having "just routed our opposition." Similar red lines were subsequently adopted nationally.
Just a friendly reminder that virtually any criticism of DSA will be met with cries of political repression, even as its own activists openly celebrate suppressing dissent within their ranks.
Samuel Stern retweeted
He spreads the genocide libel and then says the genocidal Iranian regime should be a “friend” of the United States. These are not our values as a country.
Samuel Stern retweeted
Hasan Piker is not an election analyst. He is a streamer with a long, public record of antisemitism and of justifying terrorism.
Yet NPR gave him four uninterrupted minutes on a national broadcast without asking a single question about the hate he has promoted to his audience.
Instead, he was met with softball questions and allowed to present his audience as though he were part of the mainstream Democratic coalition.
National news organizations should not be platforming people who espouse hate. At a minimum, if they choose to do so, they have an obligation to ask the hard questions.
ajc.org/news/hasan-piker-twi…
Samuel Stern retweeted
This doesn’t involve any bombs or anything to do with human rights. It’s just joint research and development projects.
It’s JStreet saying the Palestinians come before the US getting the advantage of Israeli technology.
JStreet is an anti Israel group that wants the U.S. weaker
Thank you @ChrisVanHollen for leading this letter demanding US-Israel military tech and intelligence-sharing provisions be removed from the NDAA. We were proud to support it.
No deepening of our military relationship with Israel unless they comply with the Gaza peace agreement, end settler violence and reverse their de facto annexation of the West Bank.
Samuel Stern retweeted
🔥Hot take: At least Mansour Abbas stood respectfully during the national anthem, rather than crossing his arms as though he desperately needed to use the restroom.
I would not expect Arab citizens of Israel to feel entirely comfortable singing haTiqva, given its explicitly Jewish national character.
Consider its opening words:
"כָּל עוֹד בַּלֵּבָב פְּנִימָה נֶפֶשׁ יְהוּדִי הוֹמִיָּה"
"As long as in the heart within,
The Jewish soul yearns"
Samuel Stern retweeted
Context: This new *Congressman-elect* (D-NJ) was a close associate, translator and defense witness for an infamous terrorist convicted of a sprawling jihadist conspiracy in the early 90s. He later went overseas and worked for an org that turned out to be an Al Qaeda front.
Insane exchange. Newly elected Democrat Adam Hamawy refuses to call Iran an adversary.
BROWN: Do you see Iran as the adversary?
HAMAWY: "We pushed them into a fight"
BROWN: But are they the adversary?
HAMAWY: "We should be making friends"
BROWN: They've been saying "death to America" for decades
HAMAWY: "We've been saying 'death to Iran'"
BROWN: They've killed a lot of Americans
HAMAWY: "And we've killed a lot of them"
BROWN: So you don't see Iran as an adversary?
HAMAWY: "I see that we are pushing Iran into a fight"
Samuel Stern retweeted
Mansour Abbas: "Netanyahu told me that he and Sinwar understand each other."
"Bibi told me that he and Sinwar understand each other. I didn't know there was a letter with a 'calculated risk.' He went to sleep and abandoned the security of Israeli citizens."
Samuel Stern retweeted
This should be a pretty easy move. In general, if Arab parties want to wield political power in the state of Israel they need to grow up and accept that Hamas and other terrorist groups that murder Israelis, including Israeli Arabs, are terrorists and their enemy too.
Samuel Stern retweeted
Being obsessed with Jews is often a sign of mental illness or of being a scammer, sometimes both.
Greenlight has won all litigation with James Fishback. @jamesfishback has been ordered to return every penny of salary and bonus that we ever paid him, to repay the money we lent him, to pay most of our legal fees, and to stop claiming titles, roles and responsibilities he never had. No, Fishback was not the “Head of Macro.” Rather, as the arbitrator found, he was a “faithless servant.”
That’s a fancy legal way of saying that Fishback was so disloyal during his employment that he was ordered to refund to us his entire compensation during his tenure at Greenlight.
Ordinarily, my style would be to let this decisive ruling speak for itself.
However, Fishback has made himself a public figure. He publicly requested appointments to be a governor of the Federal Reserve and a U.S. Senator. He unsuccessfully ran for Florida Governor and has hinted that he intends to run for President in the next election. I therefore feel a civic duty to share additional details and thoughts about Fishback’s character and why he should never be placed in a position of trust.
For more than three years, Fishback engaged in a scheme to harass Greenlight Capital and me. While he made a series of false allegations against us, I generally chose to remain silent and allow the legal process to run its course. It has now done so. The result of the final arbitration is that every single claim Fishback ever made about us was either withdrawn or was legally found to be untrue. The conclusion of the arbitration represents the end of all litigation between Greenlight and Fishback, with Greenlight winning a clean sweep and being awarded over $4 million of damages against Fishback due to his tortious actions, false statements and baseless allegations.
Fishback has accused us of lawfare. Let’s set the record straight: it can’t be lawfare when he started the litigation. We simply defended ourselves and made now proved counterclaims.
This all began with Fishback demanding a $5 million pay-off to spare us the reputational harm and legal costs of defending frivolous accusations of religious discrimination, age discrimination, a politically hostile work environment and defamation.
After filing his lawsuit, Fishback told Jack Farley on the Forward Guidance podcast that “discovery is going to be fun” and would vindicate his story. Farley asked how frequently Greenlight employees referred to him as ‘Head of Macro’ and what written evidence supported his claims. Fishback answered “Well, I don’t have access to my company email. If I did, we could produce them up the wazoo.”
Well, discovery came and went and not a single piece of evidence supported any of Fishback’s bogus claims. A company-wide email search revealed that the only additional Greenlight emails calling him “Head of Macro” were those where he gave the title to himself in his signature block while sending external emails where nobody from Greenlight was copied.
Instead, discovery uncovered some outrageous conduct by Fishback. For example, Fishback and his father concocted a scheme to use a fake reference check to create his fraudulent defamation claim against us.
In September of 2023, after his employment ended, Fishback texted his father a draft of a fake reference check email that included an inquiry as to Fishback’s duties as Greenlight’s “Head of Macro.” In the same chain, Fishback texted his father:
“We need them to DEFAME us. Which THEY WILL. That’s another $1 MM right there.”
Fishback persuaded a friend of a friend who worked at an investment firm to send us the fake reference check. When we responded that Fishback was not the Head of Macro, Fishback promptly sued us, claiming that our response caused the friend’s company to walk away from making a $5 million investment in Fishback’s start-up hedge fund.
The friend of the friend testified under oath that he sent the fake reference check as a favor and that his company was never considering investing with Fishback. The friend got fired.
It was all a sham to conjure a fake legal claim to extract money from us.
There’s more that came out in the litigation:
On his final day of employment, Fishback stole Greenlight’s most valuable property, its portfolio of investments, by emailing it to his personal email (in our industry this is a big deal).
An even bigger deal is that he and his father were secretly trading positions in Greenlight’s investment portfolio in their personal accounts.
Fishback admitted to violating his confidentiality obligations to Greenlight over 60 times, including by sending confidential investment information to third parties.
Fishback made numerous statements, including that he ran macro trading at Greenlight and that he was responsible for generating over $100 million of profits – none of which were true.
Fishback told various lies about why he left Greenlight, including that he left due to a hostile political environment.
In a classic example of “You can’t fire me, I quit,” Fishback resigned right after my assistant scheduled a meeting with him so I could fire him for not doing his job.
As for the political environment at Greenlight, Fishback has repeatedly claimed that I am “a Soros aligned hedge fund billionaire.” That’s simply not so. Politically, I am just left of center. I have made large philanthropic contributions to causes supporting bi-partisanship, bridging differences and pluralism. I support centrist Democrat politicians. Some on the far-left have even tried to fight my efforts to have a more civil culture by labeling me a far-right conservative. That isn’t true either.
At Greenlight, we discuss politics so infrequently that I was unaware of Fishback’s views during his tenure. And it surprised me when he quoted scripture in his resignation email. His politics have since been made clear to all. We have no view on the sincerity of his religious beliefs but suffice it to say that we’ve been witness to him breaking those Commandments regarding stealing and lying.
Fishback campaigned for Florida Governor on an extreme “tough on crime” platform. He threatened homeless people with 15 years in jail for being homeless; he threatened teenagers participating in riots with 5 years in jail, including prosecuting minors as adults; he promised criminal prosecutions of homeowners’ associations; and planned for mass deportations of non-citizens. He even said a black man “should be lynched” for confronting him.
And yet, Fishback is a man who believes the laws don’t apply to him. Rules are for other people.
During his campaign, Fishback was challenged for living outside of Florida. His testimony that he lived in Florida was certainly news to us. When Fishback worked for Greenlight, he provided his address as being in Washington, D.C. He had us withhold D.C. resident taxes from his payroll. When he visited our New York office, he frequently submitted expense reimbursements for Amtrak trips between D.C. and New York.
Before this final arbitration, we had already won verdicts against Fishback to repay the loans that we generously lent to him on favorable terms for what he claimed at the time to be a family emergency (though that’s not what he told Jack Farley).
Even with valid court orders of U.S. Federal District Court Judges ordering him to repay us and surrender property to satisfy the judgements, Fishback simply thumbs his nose at the rule of law. He decides on his own that the Judge was a Democrat, or was appointed by a Democrat, or was otherwise politically motivated, rendering the rulings (in his mind) invalid. Fishback was ordered to repay his debt to us: He ignored it. Fishback was ordered to turn over shares in a company and 43 luxury items he owns to us: He ignored it. A company owned by Fishback was ordered to produce documents in discovery: He ignored it. And that is just a partial list.
We have little doubt that he will try to ignore the arbitration ruling against him from the arbitration he commenced. Ignoring court orders is a very dangerous way for anyone to behave. But those that do, especially in such a self-serving fashion, should not be put in a position of public trust or have influence in the enforcement of laws against others.
It doesn’t matter that I’m a Democrat. What does matter is that we gave a seemingly intelligent college drop-out a chance to achieve what he once said was his dream job. And once he was provided with that opportunity, instead of applying any semblance of a work ethic, he chose to be a “faithless servant”.
We have a theory as to why Fishback wishes to continue his political ambitions. We believe that by continuing to seek office, he will find donors to his campaign, PAC and charitable endeavors, and he will use those funds to stay in hotels, rent cars, travel and dine out – all without ever acquiring an asset in his own name that can be used to repay his legitimate creditors, like us. It’s the perfect way for Fishback to continue to grift and continue to avoid paying his debts.
It won’t work. James, you owe us over $4 million and interest is ticking.
And, when we do collect it, I will in turn donate it to a combination of the National Immigration Forum, The Center for Reproductive Rights, The Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, and The Florida Chapter of the ADL. The best way to fight your hate is to support those you hate.
Samuel Stern retweeted
BROWN: They've been saying "death to America" for decades
HAMAWY: "We've been saying 'death to Iran'"
That is a complete and total lie
Insane exchange. Newly elected Democrat Adam Hamawy refuses to call Iran an adversary.
BROWN: Do you see Iran as the adversary?
HAMAWY: "We pushed them into a fight"
BROWN: But are they the adversary?
HAMAWY: "We should be making friends"
BROWN: They've been saying "death to America" for decades
HAMAWY: "We've been saying 'death to Iran'"
BROWN: They've killed a lot of Americans
HAMAWY: "And we've killed a lot of them"
BROWN: So you don't see Iran as an adversary?
HAMAWY: "I see that we are pushing Iran into a fight"
Samuel Stern retweeted
I really do wonder why the audience of Pod Save America hates the Jewish state so much.
It’s almost like they’ve been radicalized…
































