Joined June 2023
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @FM_Szijjarto
I think it all started with “fuck Ukraine, Russians are going to take it within days, we want to stay with the winner.” Sometimes being an unprincipled smart ass does not pay off.
38
256
1
6,745
67,099
1/ Where do U.S.-Russia-Ukraine negotiations go from here? Despite a flurry of summits and calls in mid-August, a breakthrough remains unlikely. The positions of Moscow, Kyiv, and Washington remain fundamentally incompatible. 🧵linkedin.com/posts/reaktion-…
1
1
82
Ungeheuerlich. Damit will man die 🇺🇦 der Vernichtungsabsicht Russlands ausliefern & uns mit! Wann wird begriffen, daß RUS nicht verhandeln& keinen Frieden will. RUS muss mil &pol unter Druck geraten: mit mehr mil. Unterstützung für🇺🇦 + stärkeren Sanktionen stern.de/politik/deutschland…
688
1,096
71
4,775
97,174
6/ The EU is at a crossroads: it must now take responsibility for its security, ensure deterrence against Russia, and make support for Ukraine a cornerstone of its defense strategy.
22
5/ But how will the #Kremlin react? A European peacekeeping force in Ukraine runs counter to #Putin’s war objectives. Meanwhile, analysts warn that Russia may turn its sights to the Baltics after a ceasefire in Ukraine.
1
33
4/ The evolving U.S. stance on #NATO under #Trump—particularly his warnings about potentially withholding Article 5 protections—has reshaped Europe's security strategy. The EU may no longer rely solely on #Washington for its defence.
1
16
3/ For the first time since WWII, #Germany has lifted restrictions on its defence budget, moving toward rearmament. Meanwhile, EC President @vonderleyen's proposal to raise €800B for EU #rearmament signals a shift from rhetoric to action.
1
9
2/ As transatlantic relations face ongoing turbulence, the #EU is advancing its independent defence policy. This shift fuels hopes for a more self-reliant Europe—one that not only backs #Ukraine but also increases its own military spending.
1
21
1/ President Zelensky has announced that a meeting of military representatives from countries willing to deploy peacekeeping troops in Ukraine will take place on Friday, April 4. This follows several meetings of the “coalition of the willing,” the most recent in Paris last week.
1
52
7/ As pressure mounts on both Moscow and Kyiv, it remains to be seen if Trump’s “carrot and stick” approach delivers a ceasefire or just more chaos.
18
6/ Zelensky’s past attempts to convince Trump with Oval Office photo evidence have had little effect. But perhaps the Pastor’s word will be more persuasive in shifting Trump’s stance.
1
21
5/ A notable twist: Trump’s Pastor Mark Burns recently visited #Kyiv and liberated Ukrainian territories. Given how personal relationships shape Trump’s administration, this trip might influence #Washington’s perception of Russia’s war crimes.
1
19
4/ This dual-pressure strategy—threatening #Putin with sanctions while warning Zelensky—suggests a broader attempt to force negotiations. The White House wants to avoid appearing pro-Russia while still nudging Ukraine toward a deal.
1
12
3/ On the other hand, Trump is also pressuring #Zelensky, warning that rejecting the revised Mineral Deal would lead to “big problems.” Given the terms of the agreement, it’s unclear what could be worse than signing it—perhaps just a rhetorical balancing act.
1
21
2/ In a major escalation, Trump announced his readiness to impose secondary sanctions on countries buying #Russianoil. This would target key Russian partners like #China, #India, and #Turkey, hitting #Moscow economically and politically by straining its ties with these nations.
1
29
1/ As the 100th day of the 47th U.S. President approaches, the unreality of his goal of quickly ending the war in #Ukraine becomes apparent. #Trump’s struggle to bring Putin to the table with real conditions for a ceasefire is intensifying.
1
49
Trump’s stance on Ukraine echoes Kremlin propaganda, mislabels Zelensky, and ignores Russia’s role as the aggressor. Appeasement isn’t peace––it’s an invitation to more war. Ukraine needs support, not sacrifice, as I argue in this piece for @NewEastEurope neweasterneurope.eu/2025/03/…
9
1
2
48
7/ The key question now: Will the White House take this initiative seriously or see it for what it is—an attempt to undermine Ukrainian sovereignty and prolong the war on Russia’s terms?
8