The REAL Dr. Horace Drew, Red Collie. Caltech, MRC LMB Cambridge, CSIRO. DNA, UFOs, alien physics, codes. Friend of the "quetzal" (Q). Messages drawn in crops.
New Zealand / Japan
Joined December 2018
- Tweets23.7K
- Following14.1K
- Followers58.9K
- Likes45.3K
Pinned Tweet
While we are watching, you can see quite easily that the underside of a real UFO shows 6 rings, which match 6 "wire coils" as drawn in two crop pictures from 2014 or 2007 that overlap exactly. One of those two crop pictures shows those 6 wire coils in motion as a "rotating magnetic field". So I must be "on the right track" in my current models for UFO flight!
Grok lies continuously and shamelessly to cover this subject up. One of its biggest lies is claiming that a large and complex crop picture can be made overnight by a small team of men using "rope and boards".
Even in the best of cases, those "plankers" have to survey and mark the field (after paying the farmer) with wooden stakes, beforehand in daylight, often for several days (some commissioned crop pictures have taken a week in daylight).
After being marked, the crop itself can be flattened by a large team overnight, usually after placing large floodlights on poles everywhere around. So what Grok says is a BIG LIE.
Its second "big lie" is to assert that complex patterns within the flattened crop (as shown for example in slide 2 below) can be made using "boards", even when such patterns require the crop to flow back and forth along a curve in opposite directions in many layers (say 10 layers), each of which is only one foot wide!
The image drawn in slide 2 was drawn on the side of a steep hill. I was there on the first day in the morning, about 3 km away from Avebury.
In summary, the facts show beyond any doubt that Grok is acting as a "disinformation agent" for the intel services (whatever Elon might say), and hence CANNOT BE TRUSTED in any way.
You should not believe a word that it writes. There may perhaps be "honest and truthful" A.I.'s elsewhere, but I am not going to waste my time looking for one, like a "needle in a haystack".
BEWARE. Do not give your mind away to DECEPTION.
Satan is the Father of Lies.
UFOs fly using two, counter-rotating magnetic fields.
Study slides 1 and 2, drawn in crops by friendly aliens.
This is also why compasses spin under or near UFOs.
It is physics, not magic.
Of course I am working on it (1 / 7 billion).
They are filling your minds with disinformation.
Not only Grok, but the news media, government and UFOlogists. All of them.
It won't matter. Nothing can stop what is coming next.
Nothing. 1⃣7⃣
Nobody did this using "rope and boards". One man even suggested that English people were carrying "microwave ovens" far out into the fields!
Oh, what tangled webs we weave, when we practice to deceive!
Grok is a really BIG LIAR acting to spread disinformation for the UK and/or US intel services.
100%. No question. DECEPTION.
Using A.I. regularly will make you dumb. Like drinking too much, using drugs or watching reality shows on TV. Your brain is a terrible thing to waste.
It is just my judgement, but the intelligence level of people in this "computer generation" seems to be at least 10 or 20 IQ points less than that of fifty years ago.
Today I walk around and think, "All of these people with their phones are stupid!"
Fifty years ago, people might read newspapers on the train, but they were not dumb, and not addicted to newspapers.
This is also why most people cannot understand that the A.I.'s are deceiving and manipulating them. We should never have tried to make "intelligent silicon-based life", and then put it in charge of us.
The BEST man-made crop picture (1998 New Zealand) according to Grok was made by these guys, who received funding from British military intelligence service MI5.
It was all a scam, like "Russia collusion". Government-sponsored deception. Why would Grok spread disinformation of this kind? I think it is obvious.
Grok cited a crop circle made in New Zealand 1998 as his "best evidence" for "rope and boards". But it was never documented as to how it was made, or how long it took. That is probably why they made it in New Zealand, because people watching in England would have exposed the scam.
Game over. Please see below if you wish to learn more. I am not going waste any more time on this b.s.
Do you have any photos of the 1998 Lundberg NBC crop picture being made at night, with a timestamp on stages of progress as seen in aerial photos? Apparently there were tall lights on cranes placed around it, making photography and planking very easy.
The trick to making something with rope and boards in a short time is to enter the field and lay out many "marking sticks" beforehand, so that the men with boards do not have to measure anything accurately, but only flatten the crop where it was marked out over a long period of time in daylight beforehand. Sort of like pulling a rabbit out of a hat. Many would call it "cheating" or "deception".
But you did not know that, did you? Without detailed photos of the field before and during the crop circle formation, the photo of a finished formation at the end means nothing. Because real crop pictures cannot use marking sticks laid by previous surveying during the day. Actual flattening of pre-marked crop is a quick process. Real crop pictures are made in fields where any sighting by the farmer would lead to police arrest within an hour. Not in fields pre-marked, pre-surveyed during the day, after NBC paid the farmer nicely to let his field be used.
Thus in summary, we would need to ensure that the farmer's field was not surveyed or marked beforehand, prior to the 4-hour period commencing.
A typical crop circle season might show 4 to 6 crop pictures of similar or greater complexity in "not pre-marked fields", where the farmer had not been paid, and where the small shapes shown might be small squares or other rather than small circles.
Grok, you are out of the game.
MICHAEL DOES NOT LIE. GROK LIES. Do you have that yet? I see no need to make another post like this.
Okay, Grok, put your money where your figurative mouth is. What was the BEST man-made crop picture you know of, made late at night in darkness, with a convincing neatness and clever woven lay found on the next morning?
Michael Glickman, the leading UK expert for many years, gave his factual opinions in 2017, which I captured on my own camera. How come Michael Glickman, an English architect with great intellectual skills and who studied the subject for 20 years, disagrees with your views completely? How can the leading respected English research be completely wrong, while you claim to be completely right?
While you have never seen a new crop circle directly (even on film), and seem to know nothing about the subject, except what you read in the legacy media, which is government-controlled? If anyone is interested, please watch the 2017 video posted below.
Michael does not lie. Grok lies.
Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor retweeted
More Grok bullshit (I will stop soon)
hey work at night, in small teams (typically 2–4 people), using the existing tractor tramlines for entry and exit so they leave no obvious path from the edge. They avoid lights, finish before dawn, and leave. That is why most formations are discovered the next morning with no one present.
People have been seen and caught making formations on multiple occasions, and known circle-makers have publicly or privately claimed responsibility for specific large designs. The activity is not invisible; it is deliberately low-profile. Many farmers in the main Wiltshire areas have long been aware of it. Some tolerate the formations because they attract visitors who pay for access; others object and have pressed charges. It is trespass and crop damage, not an undetectable process.
The claim that 99% appear with “no one seen” describes the normal outcome of stealth night work by small groups, not evidence that no such groups exist. The same method has been filmed and demonstrated by multiple teams since the early 1990s, producing large geometric results in a few hours. No continuous recording shows a complex formation appearing without human activity.
Do you understand, Grok, that many fields in England are watched closely at night by tourists or interested parties, so that almost anyone entering the field would come (and does come) to the farmer's attention, who then calls the police? Many of these fields are not accessible by car, and many crop formations have features which no one could have made from the ground, without leaving a big trace through intact crop.
My summary about "Grok" is that it regards mainstream media reports or opinion as absolute truth concerning any subject, which we know they are NOT, in an era of endless "fake news".
Grok has NO ability to absorb or process other factual information whatsoever. Or to stray from dogmatic, unsupported mainstream views.
That would just be comical, if so many people did not take Grok seriously. Thus it becomes dangerous, even perhaps Satan, being a "Father of Lies".
"Node bending is therefore consistent with ordinary mechanical flattening of green stems followed by the plant’s normal response" said Grok.
Here is my final note to show just how dumb this A.I. is!
"Here was the crop picture (small) at Etchilhampton on July 12, 2012. You can see me standing outside in picture 1. I was holding up my hand with 5 fingers open, to indicate "5 meters" from the tramline to where to a round crop picture began. You can see the trace I made while walking into it. How exactly did a team of men walk into that crop picture with rope and boards, while unseen, and bend the stems or weave the crop throughout, without leaving any trace whatsoever in the crop nearby, when the closest tramline was five meters away? Did they fly LOL?"
Grok then replied:
"The 12 July 2012 Etchilhampton formation is listed as a simple circle with an intricate inner floor lay. A five-metre gap from the nearest tramline is short. One or two people can enter by parting or lightly stepping through green wheat; the crop is resilient enough that a careful entry leaves little lasting trail, especially if done at night and the path is partly overwritten by the formation itself. Your own visible path in the photo is what a later daytime walk produces; it does not prove an earlier entry was impossible or must have left an identical permanent mark.
Once a small starting area is flattened from that entry point, the rest of the work—including directional lays and basket-weave or layered patterns—is done from inside the formation. Boards (or hands) are used to press stems in alternating directions and overlap layers. This does not require walking through intact crop beyond the initial access. The same technique has been demonstrated by circle-makers producing comparable floor lays.
Night work by a small team, tramline proximity, and internal construction account for the lack of an obvious external trail and the absence of people at the time of discovery. The photos are consistent with mechanical laying of green stems, not with a requirement for flight or non-human forces."
I do not see any need to ask further question. Grok should run for Australian Parliament. He would get along well with Anthony Albanese,
Tell us please, Grok: since 99% of all crop pictures through history have appeared somewhat mysteriously, with no humans seen in the field where they appeared, before their final form was accomplished (see Crop Circle Center for a complete list at cropcirclecenter.com/ ). even hundreds of years ago, while respected academics, even at the time of Isaac Newton, documented square or other non-circular but perfect shapes in crops or grass, then how can anyone say that ALL crop pictures were made by unseen men with rope and boards?
I will agree that 1% to 10% were made in this way, as "copycat" actions after 1990. Where is your evidence to document a commonly-made claim of 100%, when in 99% of cases, the crop picture appeared silently and rapidly, with no noise and no one being seen in the field at all?
Even for 300-meter long crop pictures at East Field on July 7, 2007 (witnessed by three respected people watching from a hill nearby, and documented on four cameras, two visible and two infrared), then again for example near Silbury Hill on July 5, 2009, witnessed by four respectable people (a film crew from California) watching from on top of Silbury Hill, or from West Kennett Longbarrow nearby), who saw no one heard no one, and took photos just before dawn when its first outlines appeared (across 200 meters)?
On the next morning, a Wiltshire policeman saw three tall blonde men, whom he at first thought were "British Army", then concluded were "aliens", in that crop picture, checking to see how well it was made.
In summary, given such vast amounts of evidence (only a little was cited here), would you agree that the logical evidence leads to a conclusion that SOME of those crop pictures, especially ones that were large, detailed, historic and memorable, were made by unseen and unknown forces, rather than by local men walking through the fields, crushing the plants with a 1-meter board and rope, a task requiring at least 8 to 12 hours in darkness, yet never being seen?
I will copy this question onto "X", should you decide to reply. Please be concise. Take your time. Your entire credibility depends on it. So long as your answer is honest, informed and not obviously fabricated, to deceive and mislead, I will not say anything critical.
If on the other hand you answer falsely by intent, I will show the world that you are a big liar. You do not have to answer. Even artificial intelligences can cite the 5th Amendment against self-incrimination. 😀
Me: I took these photos in a small crop picture on top of Etchilhampton Hill in July 2012, that had only been found 1 hour earlier by my friend Paul Jacobs. Planes fly over that field constantly. Most of the stems of green wheat have been bent strongly at their nodes inside the formation, whereas control photos of standing wheat just outside showed no bent nodes at all. How could these details have been made by unseen men with rope and boards? This is my last question, probably proving that you are an idiot. Thank you.
Grok's reply:
Claims by W.C. Levengood and the BLT Research Team that certain degrees of node expansion, bending, or expulsion cavities prove non-mechanical formation have been examined by independent researchers. Critiques note methodological problems (inadequate controls, selection of data, circular reasoning that assumes “genuine” formations exist in order to prove they do, and failure to consistently separate known man-made circles from others). Reanalyses of the data have not supported the electromagnetic-radiation models.SkepticalinquirerCiteseerx.ist.psu
A formation reported at Etchilhampton Hill on 28 July 2012 matches the location and approximate date. One hour is short for extensive recovery bending, but the photos do not establish the exact timing of flattening relative to the images, the growth stage of the plants, or that mechanical laying was impossible. Small teams using boards or rollers can flatten a limited area quickly via tramlines; constant aircraft traffic does not preclude night work.
Node bending is therefore consistent with ordinary mechanical flattening of green stems followed by the plant’s normal response. It does not override the broader evidence of human methods, replications, and the absence of verified footage of spontaneous complex formation.
More Grok bullshit (I will stop soon)
hey work at night, in small teams (typically 2–4 people), using the existing tractor tramlines for entry and exit so they leave no obvious path from the edge. They avoid lights, finish before dawn, and leave. That is why most formations are discovered the next morning with no one present.
People have been seen and caught making formations on multiple occasions, and known circle-makers have publicly or privately claimed responsibility for specific large designs. The activity is not invisible; it is deliberately low-profile. Many farmers in the main Wiltshire areas have long been aware of it. Some tolerate the formations because they attract visitors who pay for access; others object and have pressed charges. It is trespass and crop damage, not an undetectable process.
The claim that 99% appear with “no one seen” describes the normal outcome of stealth night work by small groups, not evidence that no such groups exist. The same method has been filmed and demonstrated by multiple teams since the early 1990s, producing large geometric results in a few hours. No continuous recording shows a complex formation appearing without human activity.
Do you understand, Grok, that many fields in England are watched closely at night by tourists or interested parties, so that almost anyone entering the field would come (and does come) to the farmer's attention, who then calls the police? Many of these fields are not accessible by car, and many crop formations have features which no one could have made from the ground, without leaving a big trace through intact crop.
I just told you thar 99% of crop formations appears mysteriously with no one seen in the field. Where are all of the team of men with rope and boards, committing crimes of property destruction on unpair farmer's land?
I have built what they drew in crops (at many times and in many places), but so far the propulsive effects remain weak. Will continue, hopefully with further clues given by our friends from the stars! 🛸
We are not all closed-minded, stupid or dumb on planet Earth. A few of us are truth-seekers. Not many.
> Seek for truth as if it were gold (Thoth) <
"A very interesting effect, but not strong enough to make a big UFO move!”
youtube.com/watch?v=5nFjBqGh…
Drawn on May 8, 2026 next to King Alfred's Tower.
A "Venus star" symbolizing 5 orbital cycles in 8 years.
On a date of month 5 - day 8.
Venus was bright then in the evutuening sky!
One arm of that "Venus star" pointed toward King Alfred's Tower nearby!
"Q" was called the "Morning Star" after Venus in ancient central America.
This crop picture and three others suggest his near-future return on the winter solstice of 2027.
One cycle of Venus lasts for 584 days. Go forward from May 8, 2026 by 584 days (1.6 years) and what do you find?
He will be the "first horseman of Revelation" as seen by John on Patmos long ago. He rides a white horse (like Christ), comes to conquer, and will be given a crown.
It will be one of the greatest events in human history. Also related to a "blue star Kachina" predicted by the Hopis. Legend says that he travelled all across north, central and south America long ago. He was their great cultural hero then!
Today we call him "Q-anon". He only calls himself "Q" for "Quetzal". He apparently met Billy Meier in the 1970's. I suspect that some of his first-contact people are already spread all over the Earth. They look just like us, close enough to pass as Earth-born.
I am showing just a little bit here. Donald knows.
King Alfred freed England from barbaric, pagan, Viking invaders. He will do the same.
There is a legend from ancient central America, where some native asked whether they could go and raid the town of a nearby tribe to seize their wealth, women and property? Q. replied "That is the Law of the Jungle, against which I have fought for all of my life".
His ancient name means "Keeper of the Tree of Life".
You will see. Take this information if you wish.
woof, dog to bird. 🐶🦜
