This is from my parish during Holy week, our bridegroom Matins service was gorgeous, was reading Matthew 24-25 on break and was reminded of this moment
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
Well, another Cardinal has come out with a, shall we say, puzzling take on evangelization.
A few years ago, Cardinal AmΓ©rico Aguiar, at the time auxiliary bishop of Lisbon, said that he and the other organizers of World Youth Day in his hometown had no interest in converting anyone to Christ.
Now Cardinal Jean-Paul Vesco of Algeria has opined that βthe Church is not there to convertβ and βChristians should approach other religions through fraternity rather than seeking conversions.β
Excuse me, butβ¦what?
Last time I checked, the Founder said, βAll authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.β Sure sounds like conversion to me.
When St. Paul came to Corinth or Athens or Thessalonica, his purpose was not to listen or to form a discussion group but rather to declare an unnerving message: the euangelion (glad tidings) that Jesus Christ is risen from the dead.
So impassioned is he for this work that he says, βI have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospelβ (1 Cor. 9:22); and βIf I proclaim the gospel, this gives me no ground for boasting, for an obligation is laid on me, and woe to me if I do not proclaim the gospelβ (1 Cor. 9:16)!
Moreover, the entire thrust of the Second Vatican Council was toward bringing the Light of Christ to the peoples of the world (Lumen Gentium). And this missionary Γ©lan has given rise in the last few decades to the idea of a βnew evangelization,β which is to say, a fresh declaration of the Lordship of Christ.
Quite obviously, no one thinks that this work of evangelization should be done in a brow-beating, overbearing, or disrespectful manner (proselytization), but for Godβs sake, letβs not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
If I really thought that the Church does not exist to bring people to Christ, then I would resign and get an honest job.
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
Learning that liturgy teaches theology is crazy tbh. I feel like as a non denom or even many very low church you don't see it (its my background relax). My Reformed baptists even get this bro.
If you cannot see friends hugging without thinking its gay, you are the one with the homosexual inclination
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
"Your worst sin is that you have destroyed and betrayed yourself for nothing."
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky (Crime and Punishment, pt. IV, c. 4)
I find it strange that having a single immersion baptism is somehow dangerous for the soul in the eyes of many EOs. Even if you think that the preferred universal practice should be thrice immersion, that doesnt mean somehow the other baptism styles arent baptisms or the didache
Replying to @MarsMonkey_2 @DanielDorotheos
What if your bishop is wrong? I personally know people who were received by chrismation while having no prior baptism, or having only a single immersion baptism. Itβs dangerous.
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
βI have often said during my 20 years as a bishop that I am not interested in a private education for the privileged as an apostolate of the Church. The Archdiocese of Portland should not be operating schools whose institutional priorities and plans are dominated by a secular, utilitarian vision of academic excellence and great sports programs, while remaining inaccessible to so many of our families because of high tuition costs. To do so would be wholly inconsistent with the history and purpose of Catholic education. Our first job is not to prepare children eventually to get into a great college or university, but to help them get into heaven!β
Portland Archbishop Alexander King Sample
Psalm 104:15 and Proverbs 31:6-7 along with the first miracle of Christ's ministry at the wedding of Cana shows this to be deeply false
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
Do people really eat Arbys?
If they actually do they deserve to be flogged
I am not surprised by the slander of apostates, nor am I shocked by such an unintelligent read of the room
I'm gonna say what no one else has.
The pope is opposing Nidal Hasan's execution because Hasan is an Islamist terrorist Muslim, and defending Islam is the left wing thing to do these days.
If the mass murderer was a Christian Nationalist who went nuts and bombed an abortion clinic the pope would have stayed silent.
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
Replying to @grok @BaT_MaN_23
Even the groks will cry out.
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
Thomas Aquinas says a starving man who takes your bread is not a thief. Modern capitalism has no category for that.
The assumption baked into most modern minds, including most Christian minds, is that ownership is absolute. Your property is yours. Full stop.
Aquinas dismantles that in the Summa Theologiae, II-II, question 66.
His first move: the division of possessions is not natural law. It is a human convention, an addition to natural law made for the sake of order and peace. Useful, legitimate, but secondary. Underneath the property lines, natural law still says the goods of the earth exist for everyone.
Second move: you hold your possessions as a steward, not an absolute owner. Aquinas says man should possess external things "not as his own, but as common," ready to share them with those in need. The title is yours. The destination is everyone's.
Third move, the one that scandalizes modern readers: in manifest and urgent need, taking what is required for survival is not theft. Theft requires taking what another still has a right to. But in extreme necessity, the goods revert to their original common destination. Legal title dissolves where survival is at stake.
Note what this is not. Aquinas is not a communist. He defends private property as prudent and necessary. But he refuses to absolutize it.
The medieval doctor would say the modern instinct, that property rights override a dying man's need, is not capitalism. It is a theological error about who the earth actually belongs to.
Which conviction do you actually hold when push comes to shove: absolute ownership, or Aquinas's stewardship?
β° Roark, Desert Fathers Enjoyer π»π¦β¦οΈ retweeted
Our Lady of Lourdes, the Immaculate Conception, Mother full of love, we entrust to you our most urgent personal intentions, especially those of the sick and suffering. We entrust to you our living and deceased loved ones. We pray that you will remove all the obstacles that still separate us from your beloved Son. May He may reign in all hearts. Amen. #ApostolicJourney #France

























