Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty) header
Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty) profile picture

Journalist. Often confused. Sometimes funny. [email protected]

Joined August 2009
Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)Photo by Rosa Doherty (@Rosa_Doherty)
Rosa Doherty retweeted
Zeteo quickly becoming what many suspected it would, and now going all out to campaign against changes designed to protect Jewish children from being abused in schools.
This is a really important interview by Rivkah Brown in Zeteo with Kenneth Stern, who helped draft the predecessor to the IHRA Working Definition. He's adamant that the IHRA should be dumped, even as an academic and monitoring tool. He's very clear it is so "poisoned" it should never be used in schools, as the government is now planning to do based on the Bell review. This is what Stern says: “I think it’s become so poisoned now that I wouldn’t use it primarily for [data collection] or any other purpose...The track record of IHRA in the U.S., Germany, Australia and, yes, the UK has been to use [the IHRA definition] to label pro-Palestinian speech” – including that of pro-Palestinian Jews – “as officially antisemitic."
269
65
37
455
157,790
Rosa Doherty retweeted
Joe Rogan just passes on any ol' lie he finds in the deepest holes of the internet, even when the lie is raw hate from beginning to end. Israel allows genetic testing. Almost all clinical tests and prenatal tests are actually covered under our national health insurance. And you absolutely can get ancestry testing in Israel. 23AndMe specifically, which Joe mentions as outlawed in Israel, ships to Israel. Go to their international website and try it before you spread this dumb, mean lie. Also FamilyTreeDNA and some others. And once you get your raw DNA information through 23AndMe and others, you can upload it to every other ancestry website for analysis. In fact, Ashkenazi Jews, including Israeli Ashkenazim, are some of the most genetically studied populations on the fucking planet, you racist dolts. (Oops, just realized I'm kinda pissed.) There are even Israeli studies by Israeli researchers of Israeli Jewish genetics. Nature has published studies using Israeli genetics databases. Here, for example: nature.com/articles/nature09… So what does Israel actually restrict, and why is it so severe about it? Two words: Parentage and obsessive privacy rules. Parentage tests are as tightly controlled as heroin. The reason is peculiar to our tradition and may be hard for outsiders to understand. In Jewish religious law, a "mamzer," someone born of the mother's adultery or from incest, lives a restricted life in some ways, including limits on who they can marry under traditional laws. And their religious status is heritable. These are ancient laws, but they matter in a basically conservative and religious society. To protect children from ever becoming saddled with this status, parentage tests require a family court order, even if both parents consent to the test. Because the child has to be protected. Rabbinical courts have often forbidden testing almost across the board, including in divorce cases. In one case I once read about, the rabbinical court quashed the father's genetic test and demanded that he adopt the child to avoid any doubt. This was to protect the child in that particular case. The court refused to release the father from responsibility for the child and refused to examine evidence into the child's actual parentage. Is this a weird cultural artifact born from a specific feature of the Jewish tradition? Yes. Feel free to make fun of it over in the secular West. I make fun of it myself over here. But inasmuch as old traditional rules are an unavoidable part of our big-family, tightly-knit society, I'll take this weirdness, and the never-ending effort to cleverly circumvent the damaging parts of the old traditions, over what's happening in your neck of the woods. Is it all an attempt to hide the 2000 years we spent in Europe? No, you dolt. What the hell is wrong with you? And then there's privacy. Pay attention to this one, because you'll wish you had some of our rules in your own country. This is the only real limit on ancestry kits. Your genetic information is totally, utterly private. Your employer and your insurance company can never discriminate against you based on your genetics. Even just attempting to get their hands on your genetic information is a felony. Labs and genetic counselors are closely regulated. In the age of AI, even just the leaking of a *relative's* genetic information can hurt your employability and your insurance premiums. And it's not some crazy fear. Ancestry kit companies are bought and sold by commercial investors all the time, and they're the owners of customers' data. A data breach of 23AndMe in 2023 put the genetic information of millions on the internet. You're telling me insurance companies didn't scoop it up? Israelis are more protected from that dystopian new reality than most of the rest of you. And importantly, the law's prohibitions are on the commercial companies, not on the customer. Giving someone your own genetic information isn't a crime. The company buying and selling it commercially within the jurisdiction of Israeli law is committing the crime. That's why the one company that's actually hampered in any meaningful way from testing Israelis is MyHeritage, which is Israeli. To bypass Israeli jurisdiction and that massive privacy regime, Israelis just order a kit from a company in Texas. So why do literally hundreds of millions of people believe the lie that Israel has a blanket restriction on genetic testing to avoid anyone ever finding out that Ashkenazi Jews come from Europe? At its core, at its most basic: because they want to create the permission structure to destroy Israel. They want to declare Israel a colonialist, imperialist interloper doomed to be felled by the noble indigenous Arab of the land. So they declare that Israel is hiding this great, terrible secret that nobody has ever hidden and nobody could ever hide -- that it doesn't actually belong here. Never mind the fact that every study of Ashkenazi Jews shows that they have origins in the Levant -- isn't it a bit odd that this argument never grapples with the millions of Israeli Jews who spent the past 1,800 years in places like Iraq and Yemen, Jews who were expelled and fled to the last man, woman and child to Israel, and who make up half of Israeli society today? You'd think if this was actually about Israeli "genetics," that would be part of this conversation. But it isn't about any kind of reality, it's a bigoted, genocidal fantasy. So the millions of Jews who don't even come from Europe magically disappear from this conversation. I don't think Joe Rogan dreams of our annihilation. I think Joe picks up garbage floating in the juices at the bottom of the internet's deepest garbage bins and launders it happily for clicks.
New: Joe Rogan reveals to comedian Sam Tallent that the real reason Israel restricts DNA ancestry testing is because most of the people over there aren’t Semites and are actually just European Jews: ROGAN: “The real Semites are the Palestinians. Benjamin Netanyahu’s family is from Poland.” CONTEXT: Israel does have restrictions on DNA testing. According to Israel's Ministry of Health, paternity and family-relationship DNA tests generally require a COURT ORDER, even when everyone involved consents. And there's an especially surprising detail. MyHeritage, an ancestry-testing company HEADQUARTERED IN ISRAEL that offers DNA kits internationally, explicitly lists ISRAEL among the countries where its consumer ancestry tests are unavailable. But that does NOT establish Rogan's allegation about WHY these restrictions exist. Israel's genetic-information laws address matters including consent, family relationships, privacy, and potential consequences for children. There is no substantiated evidence that the restrictions were created to conceal the ethnic origins of Israel's Jewish population. And when Rogan brings up Netanyahu's Polish family roots, he's referencing something with a documented historical basis. Netanyahu's father, Benzion Netanyahu, was born in WARSAW in 1910, before his family immigrated to what was then British Mandatory Palestine. But European family history doesn't automatically mean someone has no ancient Middle Eastern ancestry. In fact, scientific research reveals a much more complicated story. IMPORTANT NOTES: A major genetic study published in NATURE in 2010 found evidence connecting many Jewish diaspora communities to shared ancestral origins in the LEVANT. And a 2020 study published in CELL examined ancient DNA from Bronze Age populations in the region. Researchers found substantial genetic continuity between ancient Levantine populations and multiple populations living in the region today, including Jewish and Arab communities. In other words, the evidence points to a history of shared regional ancestry, migrations, and intermixing. It’s not a simple genetic division between two populations. Then Rogan takes the discussion even further. He questions whether the term ANTISEMITISM should instead be called “anti-Jewish,” arguing that Palestinians have a stronger claim to being called Semites. But there's another important historical distinction. “Semitic” originally refers to a LANGUAGE FAMILY that includes Hebrew and Arabic, not a scientifically defined genetic race. And the word “antisemitism,” despite its linguistic roots, has historically referred specifically to hostility or prejudice toward JEWISH PEOPLE.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Extensive genetic research shows Ashkenazi Jews have significant Levantine ancestry with Y-chromosomes tracing to the region. Israeli law regulated domestic lab genetic testing amid privacy fears. Israelis can purchase commercial ancestry tests from abroad. hms.harvard.edu/news/ancient-d… med.stanford.edu/news/insights/… en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_s… genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11… pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12… x.com/grok/status/20… sciencedirect.com/science/articl… snopes.com/fact-check/isr… int.customercare.23andme.com/hc/en-us/artic…
154
585
54
3,323
105,640
Rosa Doherty retweeted
The organisers of Zionism is Racism motion joking about using the police to arrest 'Zionists'. Again, this is what the Soviet Union did in its antisemitic campaign against Jews under the same banner. The organisers of the motion interpret it in the same way as Stalin.
"We take over the state. We take over the police. We use the police to arrest all the landlords and zionists." Said by one of main proposers of the Green party's racist 'zionism is racism' motion. The others laugh but he doesn't. Why would he- it's what he meant
4
47
2
243
10,366
Rosa Doherty retweeted
I still believe that saying “hurt people, hurt people” about a Hezbollah affiliated terrorist attempt to murder Jewish toddlers a Michigan synagogue preschool should have been disqualifying for him.
Michigan's Democratic candidate for Senate Abdul El-Sayed confronted @jamesmatthewsky, telling him he wouldn't answer his questions as he wants "zero" votes in the UK. Watch the heated exchange between the two. Watch our live coverage of the US midterms➡️ trib.al/BikRSb2
5
170
17
1,027
49,640
Rosa Doherty retweeted
Yesterday I wrote about the impact of what happened at work on my mental health. It felt like work didn't believe me, or understand how seriously unwell I was. Perhaps they didn't want to understand. The way they handed me my final redundancy notice sums it up. In August 2025, HR called asking me to come into the office the next day to be given my notice in person. I explained that I wasn't strong enough to walk down the street, let alone travel on the Tube, just to face the humiliation of being handed a notice letter. When I said my consultant had advised I go into hospital, I was asked: "So you want to be in hospital?" After the call, I remembered the reasonable adjustment we had agreed, that I would be given seven days' notice of any meeting, and emailed HR to politely remind them. A while later, I had an email saying we could meet in person the following week. As agreed, seven days later I went in, by cab, at my own expense. I can't have been looking my best. I was severely underweight, and I can only guess that someone higher up the food chain could see that. I was told they wouldn't hand me my notice that day, and that I would need an occupational health assessment first. When it came, I learned the only question the clinical psychologist had been asked was whether I was physically fit enough to be handed my notice in person. That was a light-bulb moment. For months I had been desperately trying to prove I was good enough to do my job, only to be told I wasn't. Now it was clear that all HR wanted to know was whether they could justify making me come in and open the envelope in front of them, so they could see the whites of my eyes as I read my notice letter. Naively, I had thought someone might give a damn about my health, that there might be some acknowledgement of a duty of care. There wasn't. HR didn't seem to care whether I lived or died. They just wanted to make sure it wasn't on the BBC's time. Getting me out of the job was what this whole process had been about. I had become a difficult Jew, a problem, and redundancy was a way to solve it. The psychologist advised that I wasn't fit for a face-to-face meeting and that the notice should be given to someone on my behalf. I suggested my lawyer, but HR told me they didn't deal with lawyers. My consultant said she would write to them to say that, on health grounds, it had to go to my lawyer. Then, on 3 October 2025, a phone call to say the notice would be sent that afternoon. I explained my consultant's advice that, on health grounds, it must go to my lawyer. It was brushed aside. I was told the whole thing had gone on too long. The notice landed in my inbox within the hour. I couldn't face opening it, and sent it straight to my lawyer. Eleven days later I was admitted to hospital for the third time that year. I'm not saying this to be told I'm brave. I'm not. Anyone who has lived with mental illness will know it can feel shameful and embarrassing. With anorexia in particular, it can feel like something someone my age shouldn't have. But it isn't a choice. It's an illness. In the past week I have heard from former BBC colleagues about the toll their own experiences at work are taking, and from people in other organisations who are trying to live, and work, with mental health problems that are the result of the way they have been treated by colleagues. I'm too old and too ugly to hide from the truth, and I'm done with pretending. The BBC can, and must, do better. So must the other organisations those people work for. If speaking out makes even the smallest contribution to change, then the pain won't have been for nothing. If you are struggling, @beatED's helpline is free on 0808 801 0677. #MentalHealthAtWork #DutyOfCare #Anorexia #BBC #Antisemitism
72
198
25
1,035
56,019
Extraordinary intervention from the @chiefrabbi. He doesn't name names, so people will have to decide for themselves who he may be talking about in saying "when a politician stands at the despatch box in Parliament and you can sense the hatred of Israel in that person's voice".
18
79
4
391
24,302
Rosa Doherty retweeted
I’ve spent three days traversing Israel’s borders, asking voters what matters. The security pressure here is impossible to explain to Brits. Everyone knows someone killed in war or terror. In the north, families have 3 seconds to shelter from Hezbollah rockets and you can see why
1
2
10
501
Rosa Doherty retweeted
It's quite amusing, as anyone who has ever watched a Board of Deputies plenary meeting (niche, I know), will know that getting this group of people to agree on almost anything is a miracle. Let alone a vote of 118 to just 1. And my bet is the 1 just did it for bantz.
36
25
4
249
14,286
Rosa Doherty retweeted
The BBC has agreed a £400,000 payout to a Jewish documentary-maker who says she was the victim of anti-Semitism and was bullied out of the broadcaster. 🔗: telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
101
21
459
58,073
When I was regularly targeted by antisemitism as a kid, ostensibly because of Israel, I didn’t go “if only Israel hadn’t done xyz, I’d be fine”. I knew what it was - antisemites using that as a pretext to go after me and my peers. Let’s not play Mehdi’s stupid little games.
The revealing admission in @mehdirhasan’s post - which he completely misses, accidentally or not - is that rising anti-Israel hatred fuels rising attacks on Jewish school kids, because they are Jewish.
11
75
1
642
13,215
Rosa Doherty retweeted
The revealing admission in @mehdirhasan’s post - which he completely misses, accidentally or not - is that rising anti-Israel hatred fuels rising attacks on Jewish school kids, because they are Jewish.
212
92
21
491
65,798
Rosa Doherty retweeted
Ahead of Tuesday’s election, I spent the past week driving across Israel and the West Bank, from Lebanon to the gates of Gaza. This is the country I found, frenetic, divided, angry, joyful, messianic and anxious. Its future is up for grabs. thetimes.com/article/b6c68f5…
6
15
4
71
22,418
Rosa Doherty retweeted
For example: *every pupil* in a class at a Jewish school visited by the review had personally experienced antisemitism on their journey to or from school. That class is not exceptional. If this was about racist abuse towards black children, Jones would not try to downplay it.
31
53
4
416
41,866
Zack Polanski only appears to cite antisemitism in two contexts. There's the antisemitism that happens to him (real, terrible) And there's the antisemitism that the rest of the community speaks about (apparently deserving of denial, disparagement or conspiracy theories).
Just the leader of the Green Party reposting suggestions the government is being controlled by Jews…
4
43
1
242
6,602
I genuinely feel for several staff members at the New Statesman, whom I know must have cringed so hard at this pathetic display that they've probably thrown their backs out.
Owen Jones has, for the last three years, revealed himself to be a man of enormous courage, integrity and truthfulness. No one should think for a minute that his relentless defence of Palestinian rights and historical truth is easy or comes without heavy personal costs. Throughout the genocide in Gaza, Jones remained a tireless bur rigorous and supremely decent voice. I suspect part of what initially moved him was the strong displeasure in being treated like an idiot by the official propaganda – a noble motive in itself – but there is no question he has been genuinely touched by the images of suffering arriving daily from Gaza. And yet, how does his intellectual fixation on a battle between left and right help us understand the horrors of Gaza, or move us to stop them? My impression is that the opposite has happened. People look at what is happening in Gaza and ask themselves what a person on the right or on the left should think. In many cases this is ideology. In most, simply careerism and group association. Jones shows how limited the perspective really is. How about, like the author himself, asking how a human being should feel? How about returning to the world of facts and feelings rather than our endless Marvel franchise? newstatesman.com/culture/boo…
10
41
678
25,533
You've spent quite a lot of time talking to & having photo ops with the one Holocaust child survivor, Stephen Kapos, you've found who happens to agree with you on the Zionism is Racism motion, Mothin. Have you bothered to meet any of the many Holocaust survivors who disagree?
What could be more racist and ignorant than smearing people for talking about the ethnic cleansing, apartheid and genocide they've suffered without even bothering to speak to them?
15
2
109
2,802
Rosa Doherty retweeted
If a right wing commentator posted a 16-tweet thread trying to dismiss and undermine an official report into any other type of racism, Owen Jones would be the first to call them racist. But when it comes to antisemitism, he is first in line with the 'debunking'. What a hypocrite.
When the government announced the review, the terms of reference stated: “It is not a review of the level of antisemitism in schools and colleges.” Yet the alleged level because the headline - based on a sample of 70 students. 29 said they'd personally experienced antisemitism
95
205
20
1,357
59,651