Rose retweeted
Pumpkins:
Halloween is one night.
Tonight.
If you have to waste a food item (and I strongly suggest you don't), please put it out for that one night, then safely dispose of it.
Please DO NOT put it out for the wildlife.
Once you've handled it, cut it, left it out in the open, unrefrigerated, it will not be hygienic or safe for anyone to eat.
Pumpkins are a low-acid vegetable, so once they are cut and left at room temperature, pathogens will rapidly grow on the flesh, producing mould spores.
Our precious wildlife do not have any magical properties that protect them against food poisoning.
Additionally, this time of year there are baby hedgehogs around, born too late to find natural food, desperate to eat anything to stop the pain of starvation.
Pumpkin has a laxative affect so it would be particularly cruel to leave it out for starving wildlife to eat in desperation, causing them to lose precious fluids that may make the difference between life and death.
So no matter what you read elsewhere, please DO NOT put your discarded decoration out for the birds or any other wildlife.
Please DO NOT compost them either, as a composting pumpkin can produce highly toxic tremorgenic mycotoxins, which will be deadly if the compost bin is not properly secured and is accessible to wildlife (or pets).
Many hedgehogs, seeking the warmth of a compost bin, die this way every year.
Once you've used the pumpkin as decoration it's waste, fit only for the bin.
Please help get this vital message spread far and wide, to save precious lives and prevent suffering.
“The festering carcass of American rot
Brilliant article from the UK👇👇👇👇👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏💯💯💯💯💯
I know that many Americans would like free healthcare but if anyone who doesn't support it would be willing to explain why I would love to find out
She asked an archbishop whether it was acceptable for a nun to lie if it meant saving Jewish children from the Nazis. His answer was just six words: “Let’s lie, my daughter, let’s lie.”
What followed was one of the most remarkable rescue efforts of World War II.
Eighty-three Jewish children would survive because one French nun refused to surrender them to the Nazis.
Her name was Sister Denise Bergon.
And in 1942, she was about to turn a peaceful convent school into a secret refuge.
At just thirty years old, Sister Denise served as Mother Superior of Notre-Dame de Massip in southwestern France.
Outside the convent walls, the country was living through terror.
Jewish families were being arrested.
Parents were separated from their children.
Trains carried thousands toward concentration and extermination camps.
Some children escaped into the countryside, hiding in forests and abandoned buildings, frightened, hungry, and alone.
Sister Denise could not ignore their suffering.
She had already sheltered several Jewish children, presenting them as ordinary Catholic students.
But she knew that protecting more children would require something dangerous.
Deception.
She would have to mislead the authorities, conceal identities, and maintain an elaborate cover story for as long as the war continued.
And as a nun, she struggled with one question.
Could lying ever be justified?
She secretly wrote to Archbishop Jules-Géraud Saliège of Toulouse, a religious leader who had openly condemned the persecution of Jewish people.
He had publicly reminded Christians that Jews were their brothers and sisters.
Sister Denise explained her situation and asked for guidance.
His response was unmistakable.
“Let’s lie, my daughter, let’s lie.”
Those words gave her the reassurance she needed.
Soon, resistance couriers and desperate relatives began bringing Jewish children to the convent.
Among them were twelve-year-old Annie Beck and a young girl named Hélène Bach.
Many arrived exhausted and traumatized.
Some had witnessed their parents being arrested.
Others had spent days hiding, uncertain whether they would ever see their families again.
Sister Denise welcomed them.
She gave them food, shelter, and a place to sleep.
But most importantly, she gave them a chance to survive.
Eventually, eighty-three Jewish children were hidden inside the convent.
Keeping so many children safe required extraordinary secrecy.
Sister Denise revealed the truth to only three trusted people.
The remaining eleven nuns were told that the children were refugees displaced by the war.
But there was an obvious problem.
The Jewish children were unfamiliar with Catholic religious customs.
They didn’t know the prayers.
Some didn’t understand how to make the sign of the cross.
And mistakes during religious services could raise dangerous suspicions.
So Sister Denise invented an explanation.
She claimed the children came from strict communist families who had rejected religion entirely.
Their unfamiliarity with Catholic traditions suddenly seemed understandable.
It was a simple deception.
But it helped protect dozens of lives.
Still, danger surrounded them.
Nazi officers and local police could arrive without warning.
Whenever authorities came to inspect the convent, Sister Denise greeted them calmly.
She walked them through the classrooms and answered their questions.
Meanwhile, Jewish children hid in concealed cellars beneath the chapel floor.
A single cry or unexpected noise could have exposed everyone.
Discovery might have meant deportation for the children and severe punishment for those sheltering them.
But Sister Denise never abandoned her mission.
At night, when the convent became quiet, she carried out another important task.
Jewish parents had entrusted their children with money, jewelry, and identity documents.
These possessions represented their remaining connection to families that had been torn apart.
Sister Denise secretly buried the valuables in the convent garden.
She memorized the hiding places.
And she carefully preserved a private record of the children’s real identities.
She hoped that when the war ended, surviving relatives would come searching.
And she wanted to return everything entrusted to her care.
For twenty months, the dangerous operation continued.
Every inspection brought uncertainty.
Every unfamiliar visitor could have been an informer.
Every day required the children and their protectors to maintain the same carefully constructed story.
Then, finally, the war ended.
And the outcome was extraordinary.
All eighty-three Jewish children survived.
Not one had been lost.
But Sister Denise considered her responsibility unfinished.
When surviving relatives arrived, she reunited them with the children whenever possible.
She also returned the money, jewelry, and personal belongings she had buried.
Nothing had been taken.
Nothing had been spent.
For children whose parents had died, she helped arrange safe homes with relatives abroad.
Then, instead of seeking recognition, she returned to her quiet religious life.
She never wrote a memoir celebrating her bravery.
She remained at the convent for the rest of her life.
But the children never forgot her.
Decades passed.
Those frightened boys and girls grew into adults.
They married, raised families, and built lives that might never have existed without Sister Denise.
Some eventually returned to Capdenac, traveling from different parts of the world.
Now elderly, they gathered beneath a cedar tree planted in her honor.
They drank tea with the woman who had protected them.
And they brought their children and grandchildren to meet her.
Each reunion carried the same extraordinary meaning.
Sister Denise had not simply saved eighty-three children.
She had helped preserve entire generations.
She died in 2006 at the age of ninety-four.
But her legacy continued through every family she had helped survive.
Annie Beck, one of the children she sheltered, later expressed what so many survivors felt.
“She was like a mother to us. She saved our lives.”
Sister Denise had once questioned whether telling a lie could ever be the right thing to do.
In the darkest years of the war, she chose to deceive those who intended to harm innocent children.
She hid their identities.
Protected their belongings.
And guarded their lives.
Eighty-three children entered her convent seeking safety.
Eighty-three children survived.
And generations later, their families remain living reminders of a woman who chose compassion over fear.
You should see this
Rose retweeted
ITV undercover caught Reform
councillors saying:
• “If she was my daughter it would still be bath night on a Thursday… I’ll wash you properly this time”
• “If she’d given me a hug I’d have fucking fingered her”
• “Cut the cunt’s head off” ( Referring to King Charles while calling him a Muslim)
• “Drag them out of their homes, stick them on planes and fuck them off to Pakistan”
• “No more than 1% of the British population can be non-white”
• Black kids = “fucking animals”
• Used the slur “Paki” throughout
• “I’ll take them out… you’ve got to kill or you’re going to be killed… these fuckers have come to rape and pillage and fucking kill us”
• Train young men in “insurgency tactics” to go street-by-street, house-by-house
• “I didn’t realise curry was an exchange that you could then rape all our kids”
• Suggested burying pork chops to stop a mosque
• “They should all be shot against the wall”
Alan Feeney, Chris Whelan, Dean Miller, Raymond Dunning and Jamie Campbell should never get to work in the political field again.
Rose retweeted
Some of the most powerful witnesses to the Real Presence are Catholics who do not receive Holy Communion.
Bishop Erik Varden's reflections following the Vatican's Amoris Laetitia meeting deserve careful attention, particularly his recognition of Catholics in irregular marital situations who faithfully attend Mass, participate in parish life, but refrain from receiving Holy Communion.
He describes their fidelity as a genuine contribution to the Christian community, beautifully observing that “Sacramental exile sustained over time can prepare a joyful homecoming.”
Professor Jacob Phillips @Counteredlogos makes a particularly interesting observation here. In a city like London, such Catholics could attend Mass anonymously, receive Communion and nobody would be any the wiser. Yet many choose not to.
Consider what this tells us. Their fidelity is not imposed by surveillance or fear of embarrassment, rather it springs from conscience, reverence for the Eucharist and a recognition that the sacraments possess an objective reality which cannot simply be subordinated to our personal circumstances.
Surely this raises a question about the whole synodal enterprise?
We hear a great deal about listening to those who experience the Church's teaching as burdensome, and rightly so. But how much attention is given to those who embrace that teaching despite the burden it places upon them? Are their sacrifices, their consciences and their "lived experience" being taken equally seriously?
There is a danger of treating every painful pastoral situation as a problem whose solution must involve relaxing sacramental discipline but the Christian life has never promised freedom from suffering. It promises that suffering, united to Christ, can become fruitful. Bishop Varden's great insight is that Christian accompaniment must be ordered towards conversion and holiness, not simply affirmation. Genuine mercy does not pretend that difficult truths cease to exist. It helps people live in the light of those truths, confident that God's grace is already at work.
Perhaps one of the most important voices in the debate over Holy Communion belongs to those who quietly, faithfully, choose not to receive it.
Rose retweeted
Arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD rises upon you
Isaiah 60:1
Walking in this knowledge, go and conquer your day. ❤️
Rose retweeted
"The community we're part of won't exist anymore"
The plans to destory Harmondsworth Village and it's medievial structures.
If you wouldn't mind, please repost this clip and/or the original (full length video) attached to help highlight not only this tragic case, but the many others that we've yet to hear about.
Harmondsworth's medieval barn, church, and the pubs, which are centuries old, would all dissappear in one fell swoop or over time. Even with alterations to the plan, any surviving buildings, like the community itself, would still die.
đź“˝ @ChelseaDan5
🎙 @VinnieSull1van
Filmed for @Britains___Pubs
The Fate of Harmondsworth Village (The proposed runway of Heathrow Airport)
In this special episode, we visit the historic village of Harmondsworth, which faces partial demolition, severe noise risks, and community displacement under the proposed third runway expansion of Heathrow Airport. It's not only its pubs that will suffer or disappear, but everything that makes it so magnificent.
Whilst in this quaint village, we speak to Ivor (the organist of St Mary's), Alan, and Justine (volunteer's at the nearby Medieval barn) to hear the inside story behind what's taken place. The pubs, homes, and various other features will either disappear or die a slow death from being left without a community.
Harmondsworth is a wonderful village with an extensive history dating from Anglo-Saxon England, through the Norman era, and every epoch since. We hear of how damaging and plans were (and have continued to be) and the effect it's had on those who live there.
The proposed plans by Heathrow and the potential fate of Harmondsworth and its surrounding areas set a very dark precedent indeed. The plans for this village mean listed buildings that are centuries old would be demolished without a second thought. A millennium of social history could be wiped out.
It's important that those who care for the sanctity of Britain and its past watch this video and share it with others. This video will end all doubts as to how much danger Britain's history and beauty face in modern times.
Thank you all for your viewership and support. 🤝
See this Instagram post by @dea_cantat instagram.com/reel/DeVFU3wCW…
Rose retweeted
Things are really hotting up at the Patriots Protest in Leeds today, anyone seen their estimate on numbers?
In 2026, the far right are trying to convince us that having MPs of foreign ancestry is some outrageous new phenomenon. Britain’s history tells a totally different story.
Our first non-white MP, James Townshend, who had Dutch and African ancestry, was elected in 1767 and went on to become Lord Mayor of London in 1772. Richard Beckford, of Jamaican ancestry, followed in 1780; John Stewart, of mixed ancestry, in 1832; David Ochterlony Dyce Sombre, of Indian and European ancestry, in 1841; and Dadabhai Naoroji, born in India, in 1892.
These examples are from hundreds of years ago. Britain went on to prosper and become one of the world’s leading economic powers.
Stop allowing hard-right extremists to whitewash British history and convince you that Britain and British democracy somehow thrived as a pure white nationalist society. It’s bullshit.
Britain has been a multicultural nation for centuries, and people from across the world have contributed enormously to its prosperity. Racism and white nationalism damage our country and our place in the world. They are the exact opposite of patriotism.





















